Re: [Linux-HA] ocf:pacemaker:ping: dampen

2011-04-29 Thread Dominik Klein 
> correcto

wow.
again! :)
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] ocf:pacemaker:ping: dampen

2011-04-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Dominik Klein  wrote:
> It waits $dampen before changes are pushed to the cib. So that
> eventually occuring icmp hickups do not produce an unintended failover.
>
> At least that's my understanding.

correcto
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] ocf:pacemaker:ping: dampen

2011-04-29 Thread Dominik Klein 
It waits $dampen before changes are pushed to the cib. So that
eventually occuring icmp hickups do not produce an unintended failover.

At least that's my understanding.

Regards
Dominik

On 04/29/2011 09:22 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think the description for "dampen" in OCF:pacemaker:ping 
> (pacemaker-1.1.5-5.5.5 of SLES11 SP1) is too terse:
> 
> 
> 
> The time to wait (dampening) further changes occur
> 
> Dampening interval
> 
> 
> 
> What does that do?
> 
> Regards,
> Ulrich
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

[Linux-HA] ocf:pacemaker:ping: dampen

2011-04-29 Thread Ulrich Windl 
Hi,

I think the description for "dampen" in OCF:pacemaker:ping 
(pacemaker-1.1.5-5.5.5 of SLES11 SP1) is too terse:



The time to wait (dampening) further changes occur

Dampening interval



What does that do?

Regards,
Ulrich


___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems