Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
Hi, I just tried to create a group with ordered=false in pacemaker 1.0.4, but this fails. Regards Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb: On 2009-07-10T12:53:53, Gawith gaw...@gmx.de wrote: Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the same node as the ips. As far as I know, setting ordered=false is not supported any more for groups. Andrew? I'm pretty sure it still is supported. Of course you can also use a resource set to the same effect, but disabling ordering on groups should also do it. Regards, Lars ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
Am Montag, 13. Juli 2009 10:05:13 schrieb Steinhauer Juergen: Hi, I just tried to create a group with ordered=false in pacemaker 1.0.4, but this fails. Regards Why does it fail? Any eror message? Nothing in the logs? group id=group meta_attributes id=group-meta_attributes nvpair id=group-meta_attributes-ordered name=ordered value=false/ /meta_attributes primitive class=ocf id=res1 provider=pacemaker type=Dummy /primitive primitive class=ocf id=res2 provider=pacemaker type=Dummy /primitive /group works for me. -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff MultiNET Services GmbH Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 mail: mi...@multinet.de web: www.multinet.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens --- PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B Skype: misch42 ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
Hi, it was my fault. I didn't set ordered as meta-attribute. Nevertheless, the wanted behaviour is still not achieved. I created a colocation like this: resource_set id=app_colocation-resource_set score=INFINITY sequential=true resource_ref id=app_ips/ resource_ref id=app/ /resource_set I would expect, that app_ips, the unordered group, will start in parallel. After that, the app is started. But I see, that the IPs start in parallel and during that also the app is started. Where#s my fault? Regards. Michael Schwartzkopff schrieb: Am Montag, 13. Juli 2009 10:05:13 schrieb Steinhauer Juergen: Hi, I just tried to create a group with ordered=false in pacemaker 1.0.4, but this fails. Regards Why does it fail? Any eror message? Nothing in the logs? group id=group meta_attributes id=group-meta_attributes nvpair id=group-meta_attributes-ordered name=ordered value=false/ /meta_attributes primitive class=ocf id=res1 provider=pacemaker type=Dummy /primitive primitive class=ocf id=res2 provider=pacemaker type=Dummy /primitive /group works for me. ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Gawithgaw...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dominik, Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the same node as the ips. As far as I know, setting ordered=false is not supported any more for groups. Andrew? Thats my recollection/intention ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Steinhauer Juergengaw...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, it was my fault. I didn't set ordered as meta-attribute. Nevertheless, the wanted behaviour is still not achieved. I created a colocation like this: resource_set id=app_colocation-resource_set score=INFINITY sequential=true resource_ref id=app_ips/ resource_ref id=app/ /resource_set I would expect, that app_ips, the unordered group, will start in parallel. After that, the app is started. But I see, that the IPs start in parallel and during that also the app is started. Where#s my fault? no idea, you'll need to create a hb_report archive for us to look at ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
Hi Dominik, Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the same node as the ips. As far as I know, setting ordered=false is not supported any more for groups. Andrew? Cheers ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
Steinhauer Juergen wrote: Hi guys! In my cluster setup, I have 6 IP addresses which should be started in parallel for speed purpose, and two apps, depending on the six addresses. What would be the best way to configure this? Putting all IPs in a group will start them one after another. Bad. Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the same node as the ips. Regards Dominik A colocation with a set including the IPs (sequential=false) and the two apps will not migrate the apps (and the remaining IPs), if one IP should fail... I'm happy about every proposal. Regards ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Resource set question
On 2009-07-10T12:53:53, Gawith gaw...@gmx.de wrote: Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the same node as the ips. As far as I know, setting ordered=false is not supported any more for groups. Andrew? I'm pretty sure it still is supported. Of course you can also use a resource set to the same effect, but disabling ordering on groups should also do it. Regards, Lars -- SuSE Labs, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. -- Oscar Wilde ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
