Re: [PATCH 10/10] mfd: cros_ec: ec_dev->cmd_xfer() returns number of bytes received from EC

2014-06-17 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Doug,

On 17 June 2014 21:54, Doug Anderson  wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16 June 2014 14:40, Doug Anderson  wrote:
>>> From: Bill Richardson 
>>>
>>> When communicating with the EC, the cmd_xfer() function should return the
>>> number of bytes it received from the EC, or negative on error.
>>
>> This is just for the I2C tunnel feature, right? If so, I think this
>> should be mentioned here. It seems to be affecting ec_i2c_xfer(), not
>> cmd_xfer().
>
> No, the tunnel feature is implemented just fine without this (and is
> already landed and working).  It looks like the (not yet upstreamed)
> ec_i2c_limited_xfer for spring returns this new value directly but I'm
> not convinced that's technicall correct.
>
> Bill can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is primarily
> interesting once we add in cros_ec_dev (the userspace API) which needs
> this info.  Until that happens this patch doesn't hurt and just
> returns some extra info.

Agreed.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 

Regards,
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 08/10] mfd: cros_ec: cleanup: Remove EC wrapper functions

2014-06-17 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Doug,

On 17 June 2014 21:27, Doug Anderson  wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c 
>>> b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>>> index 4083796..dc37b6b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>>> @@ -191,8 +191,18 @@ static void cros_ec_keyb_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>>>
>>>  static int cros_ec_keyb_get_state(struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev, uint8_t 
>>> *kb_state)
>>>  {
>>> -   return ckdev->ec->command_recv(ckdev->ec, EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
>>> - kb_state, ckdev->cols);
>>> +   int ret;
>>> +   struct cros_ec_command msg = {
>>> +   .version = 0,
>>> +   .command = EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
>>> +   .outdata = NULL,
>>> +   .outsize = 0,
>>> +   .indata = kb_state,
>>> +   .insize = ckdev->cols,
>>> +   };
>>> +
>>> +   ret = ckdev->ec->cmd_xfer(ckdev->ec, &msg);
>>
>> Do we need ret?
>
> No.  If you wish I will spin without it.  Let me know.
>
> Note that locally this code includes a comment between the above and the 
> return:
>   /* FIXME: This assumes msg.result == EC_RES_SUCCESS */

It's not important to me, and you've explained the other question.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 10/10] mfd: cros_ec: ec_dev->cmd_xfer() returns number of bytes received from EC

2014-06-17 Thread Doug Anderson
Simon,

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16 June 2014 14:40, Doug Anderson  wrote:
>> From: Bill Richardson 
>>
>> When communicating with the EC, the cmd_xfer() function should return the
>> number of bytes it received from the EC, or negative on error.
>
> This is just for the I2C tunnel feature, right? If so, I think this
> should be mentioned here. It seems to be affecting ec_i2c_xfer(), not
> cmd_xfer().

No, the tunnel feature is implemented just fine without this (and is
already landed and working).  It looks like the (not yet upstreamed)
ec_i2c_limited_xfer for spring returns this new value directly but I'm
not convinced that's technicall correct.

Bill can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is primarily
interesting once we add in cros_ec_dev (the userspace API) which needs
this info.  Until that happens this patch doesn't hurt and just
returns some extra info.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 08/10] mfd: cros_ec: cleanup: Remove EC wrapper functions

2014-06-17 Thread Doug Anderson
Simon,

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c 
>> b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>> index 4083796..dc37b6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>> @@ -191,8 +191,18 @@ static void cros_ec_keyb_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>>
>>  static int cros_ec_keyb_get_state(struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev, uint8_t 
>> *kb_state)
>>  {
>> -   return ckdev->ec->command_recv(ckdev->ec, EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
>> - kb_state, ckdev->cols);
>> +   int ret;
>> +   struct cros_ec_command msg = {
>> +   .version = 0,
>> +   .command = EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
>> +   .outdata = NULL,
>> +   .outsize = 0,
>> +   .indata = kb_state,
>> +   .insize = ckdev->cols,
>> +   };
>> +
>> +   ret = ckdev->ec->cmd_xfer(ckdev->ec, &msg);
>
> Do we need ret?

No.  If you wish I will spin without it.  Let me know.

Note that locally this code includes a comment between the above and the return:
  /* FIXME: This assumes msg.result == EC_RES_SUCCESS */

Given that this is not a new problem introduced in this code, that it
still hasn't been fixed locally in the ChromeOS tree, and that
generally FIXMEs don't seem to be left in the code upstream, I left it
out.

>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
>> index 2b0c598..60c0880 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
>> @@ -63,9 +63,10 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
>>   * @was_wake_device: true if this device was set to wake the system from
>>   * sleep at the last suspend
>>   * @event_notifier: interrupt event notifier for transport devices
>> - * @command_send: send a command
>> - * @command_recv: receive a response
>> - * @command_sendrecv: send a command and receive a response
>> + * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
>> + * Returns 0 if the communication succeeded, but that doesn't mean the 
>> EC
>> + * was happy with the command it got. Caller should check msg.result for
>> + * the EC's result code.
>>   *
>>   * @priv: Private data
>>   * @irq: Interrupt to use
>> @@ -83,7 +84,6 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
>>   * @parent: pointer to parent device (e.g. i2c or spi device)
>>   * @wake_enabled: true if this device can wake the system from sleep
>>   * @lock: one transaction at a time
>> - * @cmd_xfer: low-level channel to the EC
>>   */
>>  struct cros_ec_device {
>>
>> @@ -94,13 +94,8 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
>> bool was_wake_device;
>> struct class *cros_class;
>> struct blocking_notifier_head event_notifier;
>> -   int (*command_send)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
>> -   uint16_t cmd, void *out_buf, int out_len);
>> -   int (*command_recv)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
>> -   uint16_t cmd, void *in_buf, int in_len);
>> -   int (*command_sendrecv)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
>> -   uint16_t cmd, void *out_buf, int out_len,
>> -   void *in_buf, int in_len);
>> +   int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
>> +   struct cros_ec_command *msg);
>>
>> /* These are used to implement the platform-specific interface */
>> void *priv;
>> @@ -112,8 +107,6 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
>> struct device *parent;
>> bool wake_enabled;
>> struct mutex lock;
>> -   int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
>> -   struct cros_ec_command *msg);
>
> Seems odd - maybe this line move of cmd_xfer() should be in an earlier patch?

It got moved from "private" to public.  Bill reorganized all the
public stuff at the top and the private at the bottom.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 10/10] mfd: cros_ec: ec_dev->cmd_xfer() returns number of bytes received from EC

2014-06-17 Thread Simon Glass
Hi,

On 16 June 2014 14:40, Doug Anderson  wrote:
> From: Bill Richardson 
>
> When communicating with the EC, the cmd_xfer() function should return the
> number of bytes it received from the EC, or negative on error.

This is just for the I2C tunnel feature, right? If so, I think this
should be mentioned here. It seems to be affecting ec_i2c_xfer(), not
cmd_xfer().

>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson 
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c   | 2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c   | 2 +-
>  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 8 
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> index dd07818..05e033c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct 
> i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
> msg.insize = response_len;
>
> result = bus->ec->cmd_xfer(bus->ec, &msg);
> -   if (result)
> +   if (result < 0)
> goto exit;
>
> result = ec_i2c_parse_response(response, i2c_msgs, &num);
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> index 2276096..dc0ba29 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_i2c(struct cros_ec_device 
> *ec_dev,
> goto done;
> }
>
> -   ret = 0;
> +   ret = i2c_msg[1].buf[1];
>   done:
> kfree(in_buf);
> kfree(out_buf);
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> index 4d34f1c..beba1bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device 
> *ec_dev,
> goto exit;
> }
>
> -   ret = 0;
> +   ret = len;
>  exit:
> mutex_unlock(&ec_spi->lock);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> index 60c0880..7b65a75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ enum {
>   * @outdata: Outgoing data to EC
>   * @outsize: Outgoing length in bytes
>   * @indata: Where to put the incoming data from EC
> - * @insize: Incoming length in bytes (filled in by EC)
> + * @insize: Max number of bytes to accept from EC
>   * @result: EC's response to the command (separate from communication 
> failure)
>   */
>  struct cros_ec_command {
> @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
>   * sleep at the last suspend
>   * @event_notifier: interrupt event notifier for transport devices
>   * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
> - * Returns 0 if the communication succeeded, but that doesn't mean the EC
> - * was happy with the command it got. Caller should check msg.result for
> - * the EC's result code.
> + * Returns the number of bytes received if the communication succeeded, 
> but
> + * that doesn't mean the EC was happy with the command. The caller
> + * should check msg.result for the EC's result code.
>   *
>   * @priv: Private data
>   * @irq: Interrupt to use
> --
> 2.0.0.526.g5318336
>

Regards,
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 08/10] mfd: cros_ec: cleanup: Remove EC wrapper functions

2014-06-17 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Doug,

On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson  wrote:
> From: Bill Richardson 
>
> Remove the three wrapper functions that talk to the EC without passing all
> the desired arguments and just use the underlying communication function
> that passes everything in a struct intead.
>
> This is internal code refactoring only. Nothing should change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson 
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 15 +++
>  drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c   | 14 --
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c   | 32 
>  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 19 ++-
>  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> index 8e7a714..dd07818 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct 
> i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
> u8 *request = NULL;
> u8 *response = NULL;
> int result;
> +   struct cros_ec_command msg;
>
> request_len = ec_i2c_count_message(i2c_msgs, num);
> if (request_len < 0) {
> @@ -218,9 +219,15 @@ static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct 
> i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
> }
>
> ec_i2c_construct_message(request, i2c_msgs, num, bus_num);
> -   result = bus->ec->command_sendrecv(bus->ec, EC_CMD_I2C_PASSTHRU,
> -  request, request_len,
> -  response, response_len);
> +
> +   msg.version = 0;
> +   msg.command = EC_CMD_I2C_PASSTHRU;
> +   msg.outdata = request;
> +   msg.outsize = request_len;
> +   msg.indata = response;
> +   msg.insize = response_len;
> +
> +   result = bus->ec->cmd_xfer(bus->ec, &msg);
> if (result)
> goto exit;
>
> @@ -258,7 +265,7 @@ static int ec_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u32 remote_bus;
> int err;
>
> -   if (!ec->command_sendrecv) {
> +   if (!ec->cmd_xfer) {
> dev_err(dev, "Missing sendrecv\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c 
> b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> index 4083796..dc37b6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> @@ -191,8 +191,18 @@ static void cros_ec_keyb_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>
>  static int cros_ec_keyb_get_state(struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev, uint8_t 
> *kb_state)
>  {
> -   return ckdev->ec->command_recv(ckdev->ec, EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
> - kb_state, ckdev->cols);
> +   int ret;
> +   struct cros_ec_command msg = {
> +   .version = 0,
> +   .command = EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
> +   .outdata = NULL,
> +   .outsize = 0,
> +   .indata = kb_state,
> +   .insize = ckdev->cols,
> +   };
> +
> +   ret = ckdev->ec->cmd_xfer(ckdev->ec, &msg);

Do we need ret?

> +   return ret;
>  }
>
>  static int cros_ec_keyb_work(struct notifier_block *nb,
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> index d242714..6dd91e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> @@ -44,34 +44,6 @@ int cros_ec_prepare_tx(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_prepare_tx);
>
> -static int cros_ec_command_sendrecv(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> -   uint16_t cmd, void *out_buf, int out_len,
> -   void *in_buf, int in_len)
> -{
> -   struct cros_ec_command msg;
> -
> -   msg.version = cmd >> 8;
> -   msg.command = cmd & 0xff;
> -   msg.outdata = out_buf;
> -   msg.outsize = out_len;
> -   msg.indata = in_buf;
> -   msg.insize = in_len;
> -
> -   return ec_dev->cmd_xfer(ec_dev, &msg);
> -}
> -
> -static int cros_ec_command_recv(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> -   uint16_t cmd, void *buf, int buf_len)
> -{
> -   return cros_ec_command_sendrecv(ec_dev, cmd, NULL, 0, buf, buf_len);
> -}
> -
> -static int cros_ec_command_send(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> -   uint16_t cmd, void *buf, int buf_len)
> -{
> -   return cros_ec_command_sendrecv(ec_dev, cmd, buf, buf_len, NULL, 0);
> -}
> -
>  static irqreturn_t ec_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
>  {
> struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = data;
> @@ -104,10 +76,6 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
>
> BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&ec_dev->event_notifier);
>
> -   ec_dev->command_send = cros_ec_command_send;
> -   ec_dev->command_recv = cros_ec_command_recv;
> -   ec_dev->command_sendrecv = cros_ec_command_sendrecv;
> -
> if (ec_dev->din_size) {
> ec_dev->din = devm_kzalloc(

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: sun6-p2wi: fix call to snprintf

2014-06-17 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:23:48PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Fixes possible issue in case pdev name contains formatting characters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON 
> Reported-by: Kees Cook 

Applied to for-next, thanks!



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: I2C Slave monitor mode support

2014-06-17 Thread Wolfram Sang

> Few of the I2C interfaces are [operated] with slave monitor mode, when
> there is a requirement for
> a particular slave may need to wait some time to get the ADDR before
> sending an ACK.

Can you describe an existing scenario? Why can't the slave use clock
stretching?

> This feature is an optional and defined in few of the controllers, Can
> anyone tell me is this support is
> added already in kernel, if yes please point to the respective driver
> or code link.

None that I know of. The above questions should help me understand why
it is needed on master driver level at all.



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [PATCH 1/2] I2C: EMMA Mobile I2C master driver

2014-06-17 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 06:38:43PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:49:29PM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > Add a driver for the EMMA mobile I2C block.
> > 
> > The driver supports low and high-speed interrupt driven PIO transfers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Molton 
> 
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> > @@ -777,6 +777,16 @@ config I2C_RCAR
> >   This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> >   will be called i2c-rcar.
> >  
> > +config I2C_EM
> > +   tristate "EMMA Mobile series I2C adapter"
> > +   depends on I2C && HAVE_CLK
> > +   help
> > + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> > + I2C interface on the Renesas Electronics EM/EV family of processors.
> > +
> > + This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> > + will be called i2c-em
> > +
> 
> Please keep it sorted.

Ping. Still any interest in this one?



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature