Re: [PATCH] pata_marvell: Add another PCI identifier

[Jeff Garzik]

Alan Cox wrote:

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]

diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude 
linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c 
linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c  2007-08-22 
17:23:00.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.23rc3-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c  2007-08-22 
17:46:28.0 +0100
@@ -190,7 +190,8 @@
 
 static const struct pci_device_id marvell_pci_tbl[] = {

{ PCI_DEVICE(0x11AB, 0x6101), },
-   { PCI_DEVICE(0x11AB, 0x6145), },
+   { PCI_DEVICE(0x11AB, 0x6121), },
+   { PCI_DEVICE(0x11AB, 0x6123), },
{ } /* terminate list */


same question as with other poster:  where does 0x6145 go, and why?

Is this for -mm only?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] pata_marvell: Add another PCI identifier

[Robin H. Johnson]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:27:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
  static const struct pci_device_id marvell_pci_tbl[] = {
   { PCI_DEVICE(0x11AB, 0x6101), },
 - { PCI_DEVICE(0x11AB, 0x6145), },
Why is this ID being removed?

Not that I have that model (I have 0x6101), it just looks weird given
the patch description to Add another PCI identifier and I thought I
should check.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpCSdxd6X2ur.pgp
Description: PGP signature