Re: [PATCH 12/13] ide: move drive-using_dma check to callers of -dma_host_on method
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov [EMAIL PROTECTED] MBR, Sergei Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c === --- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ide_dma_off); void ide_dma_host_on(ide_drive_t *drive) { - if (drive-using_dma) { + if (1) { Why so? ide_hwif_t *hwif= HWIF(drive); u8 unit = (drive-select.b.unit 0x01); u8 dma_stat = hwif-INB(hwif-dma_status); WBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 12/13] ide: move drive-using_dma check to callers of -dma_host_on method
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov [EMAIL PROTECTED] MBR, Sergei Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c === --- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ide_dma_off); void ide_dma_host_on(ide_drive_t *drive) { - if (drive-using_dma) { + if (1) { Why so? Just not to move the code around (because it vanishes in patch #13/13). ide_hwif_t *hwif= HWIF(drive); u8 unit = (drive-select.b.unit 0x01); u8 dma_stat = hwif-INB(hwif-dma_status); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html