Trouble with UDP/IP communications
I am trying to develop applications based upon UDP, but ran into a problem
doing UDP communications in the LAN on which I test my stuff, and I don't
have the vaguest idea where to start checking.
The perl Camel book has an example of communicating with UDP sockets. A
slightly modified script is attached to this E-mail message.
When I try the script in the LAN as follows:
$ ./udpecho.pl 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.0.26 \
> 192.168.0.31
I get the following output:
error sending to 192.168.0.1: Invalid argument
error sending to 192.168.0.2: Invalid argument
error sending to 192.168.0.31: Invalid argument
Reply from host geosedit: Host 3: 127.0.0.1
Reply from host geosedit: Host 4: localhost
Reply from host geosedit: Host 5: 192.168.0.26
Analysis:
192.168.0.1 - exists in the LAN
192.168.0.2 - does not exist
127.0.0.1 - my own host
localhost - my own host (of course!)
192.168.0.26 - my own host
192.168.0.31 - exists in the LAN
I don't understand why the UDP communication with 192.168.0.1 or
192.168.0.31 does not work as it should be. The UDP port 7 is enabled
(when it is blocked, I get a "Connection refused" error, rather than
"Invalid argument").
With TCP/IP (telnet, HTTP, etc.) I had absolutely no problems.
Environmental Details:
--
1. The LAN is 100-Base TX Ethernet, with hub model DH-1600
10/100Mbps Dual Speed Hub, manufactured by Planet Technology Corp.
2. The perl version being used is 5.005_03 built for i386-linux.
3. The Linux version being used by localhost is:
Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
Kernel 2.2.14-5.0 on an i586
4. The relevant line from /etc/inetd.conf is:
echodgram udp waitrootinternal
Any advice where should I look for the reasons for my UDP/IP problems?
Thanks,
--- Omer
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
-- File: udpecho.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# udpecho.pl script - speak to an UDP echo port.
#
# Was written by Omer Zak in order to test communication by UDP/IP.
use strict;
use Socket;
use Sys::Hostname;
my ($count, $hisiaddr, $hispaddr,
$host, $iaddr, $msg, $paddr, $port, $proto,
$rin, $rout, $response);
$iaddr = gethostbyname(hostname());
$proto = getprotobyname('udp');
$port = getservbyname('echo', 'udp');
$paddr = sockaddr_in(0, $iaddr); # 0 means let kernel pick
socket(SOCKET, PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, $proto) || die "socket: $!";
bind(SOCKET, $paddr) || die "bind: $!";
$| = 1;
$count = 0;
for $host (@ARGV) {
$count++;
$hisiaddr = inet_aton($host)|| die "unknown host";
$msg = "Host $count: $host";
$hispaddr = sockaddr_in($port, $hisiaddr);
defined(send(SOCKET, $msg, 0, $hispaddr))|| print "error sending to $host:
$!\n";
}
$rin = '';
vec($rin, fileno(SOCKET), 1) = 1;
# timeout after 10.0 seconds
while ($count && select($rout = $rin, undef, undef, 10.0)) {
($hispaddr = recv(SOCKET, $response, 65536, 0))|| print "reception error:
$!\n";
($port, $hisiaddr) = sockaddr_in($hispaddr);
$host = gethostbyaddr($hisiaddr, AF_INET);
print "Reply from host $host: $response\n";
$count--;
}
# End of udpecho.pl
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: install oracle on linux redhat 6.2
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Chen Naor wrote:
> Hello again,
> I did it already and eventually it is falling on the jre..
> Attached is the strace file and my bash_profile (user oracle).
> if you can find something useful it will be greatly appreciated.
Not an answer to the question, but I couldn't help noticing in the strace:
chmod("à/bin/jre", 0777)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
chmod("à/bin/linux/native_threads/jre", 0777) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
chmod 777 ???
The 'à' is probably some sort of uninitilized value (how smart of me...).
Perhaps it can be deifned in some command-ilne parameter, or in the .ini
file?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Redhat installation and networking
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eran Levy wrote: > > No No. Im sorry. From my experience, knowledge and testings, I have got this: > When I have installed NT loader after installing Linux, Linux showed up in > the menu and I only had to choose it from the menu and press ENTER. Im not > telling this because "I heard it from...". I tested this and thats what I > have got. > Again, Its not regarding to other windows versions 95/98. They overwrite > your MBR and LILO is gone after installing them so I cant recommend this. Why does everyone seem to always install LILO in the MBR? Personally I never do. I always install LILO in the "superblock of the root partition", eg. boot = /dev/hda2. If I understand correctly, there is a boot record for the entire disk (the MBR) and also a boot record for each partition. Install LILO in your linux root partition and then you can let windows/dos have the MBR the way it wants to.. all you have to do after you install windows (if you installed linux first) is go into fdisk and set your linux root partition boot flag (and remove it from any other partition). I've never had any problems with this method. Comments? -Cedar = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Redhat installation and networking
Cedar Cox wrote: >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eran Levy wrote: > >>No No. Im sorry. From my experience, knowledge and testings, I have got this: >>When I have installed NT loader after installing Linux, Linux showed up in >>the menu and I only had to choose it from the menu and press ENTER. Im not >>telling this because "I heard it from...". I tested this and thats what I >>have got. >>Again, Its not regarding to other windows versions 95/98. They overwrite >>your MBR and LILO is gone after installing them so I cant recommend this. >> What about when updating kernels? What do you need to update? I would also love to see the boot.ini that your computer created. Note that this only applies to installing Linux before NT. > >windows/dos have the MBR the way it wants to.. all you have to do after >you install windows (if you installed linux first) is go into fdisk and >set your linux root partition boot flag (and remove it from any other >partition). I've never had any problems with this method. Comments? > Actually, there are. If that's your approach, you'll find that you need to change active partition every time you want to switch Linux/windows. I, personally, do not feel comfertable with manually tweeking my partition table. I know that some multi-boots do that automatically (boot magic), and I'm still not sure how comfertable I am with that. The beuty of using the NT boot manager is that, on one hand, you don't need to install any program beyond those already installed on your system, and on the other hand, you don't need to touch your partition table every time you want a different boot. The only thing is how to update the boot manager every time you recompile. My favourite: Add to boot.ini C:\BOOTSECT.LIN="Linux" from linux (assuming C:\ is mounted as /mnt/C), do dd if=/dev/hda2 of=/mnt/C/BOOTSECT.LIN bs=512 count=1 and in lilo.conf, change root to read root=/mnt/C/BOOTSECT.LIN From there on - continue as usual. If you cannot write to your NT root from linux (NTFS), bootpart is the best way to go. Shachar = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Redhat installation and networking
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Cedar Cox wrote: > > >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eran Levy wrote: > > > >>No No. Im sorry. From my experience, knowledge and testings, I have got this: > >>When I have installed NT loader after installing Linux, Linux showed up in > >>the menu and I only had to choose it from the menu and press ENTER. Im not > >>telling this because "I heard it from...". I tested this and thats what I > >>have got. > >>Again, Its not regarding to other windows versions 95/98. They overwrite > >>your MBR and LILO is gone after installing them so I cant recommend this. > >> > What about when updating kernels? What do you need to update? I would > also love to see the boot.ini that your computer created. > > Note that this only applies to installing Linux before NT. boot.ini? Isn't this for the NT loader? The method I described uses LILO for the main loader. NT only has to know about itself and therefore you don't have to do anything in NT when you change kernels, etc.. I suppose if you wanted to you could install a different loader on each partition and put options for the other in each of them and switch back and forth between them during boot.. if you get really bored. Never tried it though :) > > > >windows/dos have the MBR the way it wants to.. all you have to do after > >you install windows (if you installed linux first) is go into fdisk and > >set your linux root partition boot flag (and remove it from any other > >partition). I've never had any problems with this method. Comments? > > > Actually, there are. If that's your approach, you'll find that you need > to change active partition every time you want to switch Linux/windows. nope. Just put the windows partition as an option in lilo... AFAIK windows 9x is happy even if it's c: is not the active partition. NT may be different but I don't know why... -Cedar = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Redhat installation and networking
At 12:54 26/06/01 +0300, you wrote: >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eran Levy wrote: > > > > No No. Im sorry. From my experience, knowledge and testings, I have got > this: > > When I have installed NT loader after installing Linux, Linux showed up in > > the menu and I only had to choose it from the menu and press ENTER. Im not > > telling this because "I heard it from...". I tested this and thats what I > > have got. > > Again, Its not regarding to other windows versions 95/98. They overwrite > > your MBR and LILO is gone after installing them so I cant recommend this. > >Why does everyone seem to always install LILO in the MBR? Personally I >never do. I always install LILO in the "superblock of the root >partition", eg. boot = /dev/hda2. If I understand correctly, there is a >boot record for the entire disk (the MBR) and also a boot record for each >partition. Install LILO in your linux root partition and then you can let >windows/dos have the MBR the way it wants to.. all you have to do after >you install windows (if you installed linux first) is go into fdisk and >set your linux root partition boot flag (and remove it from any other >partition). I've never had any problems with this method. Comments? This is good solution when you have something like NT loader or System Commander that you have installed them first and then installed Linux. When you do this its will not overwrite your MBR and this will let you still use your NT loader or System commander without any probs with one more choice there: "Linux" :) >-Cedar Regards, Eran Levy. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebSite: http://www15.brinkster.com/liloboot "This is Linux country. If you listen carefully, you can hear Windows reboot..." = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Redhat installation and networking
At 13:26 26/06/01 +0200, you wrote: >Cedar Cox wrote: > >>On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eran Levy wrote: >> >>>No No. Im sorry. From my experience, knowledge and testings, I have got >>>this: >>>When I have installed NT loader after installing Linux, Linux showed up >>>in the menu and I only had to choose it from the menu and press ENTER. >>>Im not telling this because "I heard it from...". I tested this and >>>thats what I have got. >>>Again, Its not regarding to other windows versions 95/98. They overwrite >>>your MBR and LILO is gone after installing them so I cant recommend this. >What about when updating kernels? What do you need to update? I would also >love to see the boot.ini that your computer created. Thats another problem. >Note that this only applies to installing Linux before NT. > sure. >>windows/dos have the MBR the way it wants to.. all you have to do after >>you install windows (if you installed linux first) is go into fdisk and >>set your linux root partition boot flag (and remove it from any other >>partition). I've never had any problems with this method. Comments? >Actually, there are. If that's your approach, you'll find that you need to >change active partition every time you want to switch Linux/windows. I, >personally, do not feel comfertable with manually tweeking my partition >table. I know that some multi-boots do that automatically (boot magic), >and I'm still not sure how comfertable I am with that. > >The beuty of using the NT boot manager is that, on one hand, you don't >need to install any program beyond those already installed on your system, >and on the other hand, you don't need to touch your partition table every >time you want a different boot. The only thing is how to update the boot >manager every time you recompile. My favourite: >Add to boot.ini >C:\BOOTSECT.LIN="Linux" > >from linux (assuming C:\ is mounted as /mnt/C), do >dd if=/dev/hda2 of=/mnt/C/BOOTSECT.LIN bs=512 count=1 > >and in lilo.conf, change root to read >root=/mnt/C/BOOTSECT.LIN > > From there on - continue as usual. > >If you cannot write to your NT root from linux (NTFS), bootpart is the >best way to go. > >Shachar > > Regards, Eran Levy. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebSite: http://www15.brinkster.com/liloboot "This is Linux country. If you listen carefully, you can hear Windows reboot..." = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS prohibits licensees using open source as development tools?
At the risk to be close to off-topic, here's a tidbit: In the SV.com's roundtable (check /.) Bruce Perens asks about the newest MS EULA, http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/eula_mit.htm (Linux is specifically mentioned there, so I *am* on topic :) While I can see that M$ can be worried about someone distributing a product that contains both M$ code and GPLed code (there seems to be a licensing conflict in this case indeed), they seem to tell developers, "You want to use our products - you are prohibited to use open source even as development tools, whether or not you include them in your product." Can anyone knowledgeable comment on this? I am not even familiar with the M$ product in question, Microsoft Mobile Internet Toolkit Beta 2. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] If it ain't broken, it hasn't got enough features yet. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Re: linux USB mouse
Hi to all, I have a problem whit a USB mouse on an ASUS S8 (laptop), The Linux wont talk to that device, I run Linux 7.1 RedHat. I`m not so familiar whit USB device. Thanks in advance, Gili Lapid _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS prohibits licensees using open source as development tools?
On 26 Jun 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > At the risk to be close to off-topic, here's a tidbit: > > In the SV.com's roundtable (check /.) Bruce Perens asks > about the newest MS EULA, > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/eula_mit.htm > > (Linux is specifically mentioned there, so I *am* on topic :) > > While I can see that M$ can be worried about someone distributing > a product that contains both M$ code and GPLed code (there seems to > be a licensing conflict in this case indeed), they seem to tell > developers, "You want to use our products - you are prohibited to > use open source even as development tools, whether or not you > include them in your product." Can anyone knowledgeable comment on > this? I am not even familiar with the M$ product in question, > > Microsoft Mobile Internet Toolkit Beta 2. Do we care about this? Does this have anything to do with linux? -- Matan Ziv-Av. [EMAIL PROTECTED] = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS prohibits licensees using open source as development tools?
I have read the EULA in question. The situation was blown up, due to Microsoft's own FUD tactics. They claim that GPL is more "infectious" than it really is. They claim that if you edit and compile code using GPLed tools, your code must, too, be GPLed. This is untrue. According to what I understand from the EULA, you are prohibited from using any tools, which would require Microsoft's code (and its derivatives) from being GPLed (or being licensed under another viral open source license). Since GPLed tools don't make such a requirement, they really are not prohibited according to EULA's terms. But nervous PHBs, who don't have the time to tell FUD apart from real facts, would play it safe and prohibit their employees from using GPLed tools, and thus play into Microsoft's hands. On 26 Jun 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > At the risk to be close to off-topic, here's a tidbit: > > In the SV.com's roundtable (check /.) Bruce Perens asks > about the newest MS EULA, > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/eula_mit.htm > > (Linux is specifically mentioned there, so I *am* on topic :) > > While I can see that M$ can be worried about someone distributing > a product that contains both M$ code and GPLed code (there seems to > be a licensing conflict in this case indeed), they seem to tell > developers, "You want to use our products - you are prohibited to > use open source even as development tools, whether or not you > include them in your product." Can anyone knowledgeable comment on > this? I am not even familiar with the M$ product in question, > > Microsoft Mobile Internet Toolkit Beta 2. --- Omer There is no IGLU cabal. Its former members were confused by the information overload due to the sophisticated FUD tactics employed by certain Masters of Informational and Commercial Rights Organizations for Software and Operations F.T. WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virus-scanners for mail servers
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Installation turned out to be not as easy as I thought, I had some additional problems beside amavis poor documentation one. When CPAN/perl install creates directories it uses the umask I use (700) so no one could use my installed modules, don't forget to check your umask before installing any global perl modules. > > Installation was fairly easy. The docmentation is resonable. I'll have to > try tinkering with it a bit so it will send in the warinng message to the > virus sender the name of the suspected virus, and some other small > details. The documentation is bad. I use the postfix content filtering. the daemon starts as root(?) postfix could not write to the socket. It was opened as 700 ( umask). I had to make it work as vscan user(more secure anyway). No scripts to start/close amavisd. > > empty headrs from infected messages, and then I noticed the log > messages, and created such a directory that is writable by the vscan user. > It's needed for more then just log, it's where the attachment are converted, unziped, unarjed etc.. Then the virus scanner kicks in and test the raw files. > > As I have mentioned in another post, I wanted to also check outgoing mail. > The problem is that PostFix has no simple way to add a scanning by an > external programs to all the messages in the queue. The content filter is simple. It would be nice If the docs would tell how the mail flows (postfix(port 25)-> amavisd ( unix socket) -> postfix(localhost port 10025) -> delivery local & remote) As long as you use smtp or postfix's sendmail script it will go into the scanner. > Downsides: > * complication (for instance: you now have to "master" processes) > * resource consumption (not much, but I have to mention it ;-) Content filter is much better. You can limit the pipe forking and reduce the resource to the level you want. > Unexpected advantage: > * It is now much easier to stop all mail delivery, while still accepting > new mail on smtp. Yap, I only need to kill amavisd, no mail is lost. > > > As for the virus scanner itself: > > amavis is a does everything, except scanning the files themselves for > virii. It needs a command-line scanner for that. > > Amavis lacks a bit interactive commands. For instance, when it discovers a > message that is suspected as infected, it puts it as a file in a certain > folder. It has it, it is not created by default, you need to create it /var/virusmails and chown to amavisd user > > > Another one that I will not use is McAfee's one. It may be fine, but the > EULA (at least for the evaluation copy) forbids the user to publish > reviews and benchmarks on the product without NAI's agreement. I'm not > going to write any review about this product, but for another reason. I use the above and I can't tell you anything else ;-) The only problem I had with it is amavisd related: amavisd examine the exit code to see if virus was found, for some reason this was set to 1 for NAI and not 13, I got the right number from the logs using EICAR.COM. I guess the 4.X scan engine is from the 3.X. I didn't run benchmarks, I used it because it's already paid for. Don't forget to test using EICAR.COM plain, gziped, arc, bzip2 etc Bye Gal = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Redhat installation and networking
At 09:27 26/06/01 +0300, you wrote: >Hi > >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jeremy Hoyland wrote: > > > Something no-one has said 'cause it's obvious ;-) When installing Linux, > > DO NOT SKIP the "create a boot diskette" stage! > >Actually, with a bootable installation CD, I rather skip the boot diskette >creation, and in case of such a problem, start an installation, and when >it has got far enough, chroot into the original system and run whatever I >need (usually: /sbin/lilo) > > > > > Something you should consider: If you plan to be compiling and > installing kernels > > pretty frequently you should make the effort to get LILO working. This is > > because the NTloader solution requires the following steps (IIRC): > > > > Copy bzImage to /boot partition, edit lilo.conf (perhaps) and run lilo > (must) > > > > peel off a copy of the boot partition lilo just created for you: > >dd if=/dev/hda5 of=/tmp/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1 > > copy this bootsect.lnx (somehow) to drive C:\, but save the original > one first! > > > > You need to do lilo/dd/cp EVERY TIME you SNEEZE at your kernel image, since > > lilo uses the actual physical location of the image on the disk > (remember - the > > kernel image is loaded before anything gets "mounted"). This is also > the cause of > > the 1024 cylinder limit, since early BIOSes couldn't address cylinders > beyond this > > (modern lilos AND BIOSes can get round this limitation). (that's > logical AND) > >If grub would be used - will it be better? > > > > > read the following mini-HOWTOs on http://www.linuxdoc.org/ > > LILO This is a new mini-howto and its not old. Its updated in 13 May 2001. Thats a really good HOWTO with good description. > > Linux+NT-loader Really OLD its from 1997 but its still relevance because the information there maybe changed a little but not in the whole document. > > Linux+WinNT This is an updated document. Updated in 13 May 2001. very good document. > > Linux+DOS+Win95+OS2 Very OLD document from 1997. This isnt relevance for this days. Its talking about OLD versions of OSes. >IIRC some of them are relatively old. Would anybody comment on their >relevance? >-- >Tzafrir Cohen >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir > > >= >To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with >the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command >echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Eran Levy. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebSite: http://www15.brinkster.com/liloboot "This is Linux country. If you listen carefully, you can hear Windows reboot..." = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian/ReiserFS
Hello, children. A modified (slightly) Debian installation CD has been made by yours falsely. It installs a sid system, with 2.4.5 and reiserfs. It asks no questions as it goes. It knows about hardware RAID. It's a 50MB bootable CD images. Anybody wants one? -- ---MAV Linguists Do It Cunningly Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux support for LG ether NIC
Hi list! Plonter sells LG's LNIC-1000/SX fibre gig card, for roughly 150$-200$ cheaper than 3com's 3C985 or Intel's PRO/gig adapter. http://www.lgnetwork.com/css/product/information/product_html/lnic-1000sx-1.html says these cards are supported by linux kernel 2.0.35 and up. I didn't find a word about this card in recent kernel sources, and I didn't find any downloadable drivers for these cards at all. I have a stomach hunch that in spite of 2.2.18 or 2.4.5 being technically higher than 2.0.35, it may not neccesarily support the new kernels. Anyone ran into these or has any working experience with LG NICs? TIA for the input! ---= Miki Shapiro =-- ---= Cell: (+972)-56-322433 = ---= ICQ: 3EE853 =--- ---= Windows Programmer in Rehab =--- - "If at first you don't succeed... .. Skydiving is probbably not for you." = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian/ReiserFS
On 27 Jun 2001 07:22:55 +0300, (null) wrote: > Hello, children. > > A modified (slightly) Debian installation CD has been made > by yours falsely. It installs a sid system, with 2.4.5 and > reiserfs. It asks no questions as it goes. It knows about > hardware RAID. It's a 50MB bootable CD images. > > Anybody wants one? Yes , please. Do you have it on an FTP / HTTP / TFTP / CIFS / NFS / NSA / TLA / ZMODEM publicly available site somewhere? ;-) Gilad. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian/ReiserFS
On 27 Jun 2001, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2001 07:22:55 +0300, (null) wrote:
> > Hello, children.
> >
> > A modified (slightly) Debian installation CD has been made
> > by yours falsely. It installs a sid system, with 2.4.5 and
> > reiserfs. It asks no questions as it goes. It knows about
> > hardware RAID. It's a 50MB bootable CD images.
> >
> > Anybody wants one?
>
>
> Yes , please.
> Do you have it on an FTP / HTTP / TFTP / CIFS / NFS / NSA / TLA / ZMODEM
> publicly available site somewhere? ;-)
>
> Gilad.
>
>
>
> =
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
It should be on the IGLU server.
- yba
EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.6452, http://www.tkos.co.il -
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian/ReiserFS
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:17:39AM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > > Yes , please. > Do you have it on an FTP / HTTP / TFTP / CIFS / NFS / NSA / TLA / ZMODEM > publicly available site somewhere? ;-) Not yet. My ADSL line will support 64k upstream. I can push it to my web site, but the line will be choked if the iso is even slightly more popular than Ayatollah Levinger's Hallucinatory Views On Rights and Equality (tm). I would be delighted to put it on the IGLU machine (per jba suggestion), but I would need an account. Failing that, I _will_ put it on my web site. -- ---MAV Linguists Do It Cunningly Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems with pppd
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Oded Arbel wrote: > > > compile the kernel module (IMO, simple), write a five line config file and > > run the daemon. Set up the routes and you're done. > > hmm.. would you be so kind as to send/post your configurtion files > (sensitive information removed, of course :-) ? As far as routes, mine are simple: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 10.0.2.10.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 cipcb0 192.168.2.0 10.0.2.1255.255.255.0 UG0 00 cipcb0 .. .and the file: --- # Surprise, this file allows comments (but only on a line by themselves) # This is probably the minimal set of options that has to be set # Without a "device" line, the device is picked dynamically # the peer's IP address ptpaddr 10.0.2.1 # our CIPE device's IP address ipaddr 10.0.1.1 # The static key. Keep this file secret! # The key is 128 bits in hexadecimal notation. key 764efa883dda1e11db47671c4a3bbd9e # my UDP address. Note: if you set port 0 here, the system will pick # one and tell it to you via the ip-up script. Same holds for IP 0.0.0.0. me 0.0.0.0:6789 # ...and the UDP address we connect to. Of course no wildcards here. peer192.114.47.57:6789 --- For the other machine, switch the ptpaddr and ipaddr addresses and change the peer address. Note: you can choose any port instead of 6789. I just remembered that there's another method besides the static key. I chose the static key method because it is simple. I agree that the DH key exchange stuff is a bit more difficult to set up.. Actually, I'm trying to get SMB/CIFS stuff to work but having difficulty. It may be that the ipaddr/ptpaddr should be something like 10.0.1.1 / 10.0.1.2 instead. I still haven't got the P-t-P network stuff straight in my head.. comments? -Cedar = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems with pppd
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Oded Arbel wrote: > > I was looking into CIPE in the last week, and the current plans are to > start using CIPE asap, unfortunatly - it's not even close to being as > trivial as pppd over ssh, and except for this anoying problem, the vpn > works great using the script I've written. Trivial? IMHO, I remember pppd+ssh sounding more complicated than cipe.. Besides that, I didn't like the idea of that little rouge utility running as root on my system (the tty tool, I forget the name). As for cipe, compile the kernel module (IMO, simple), write a five line config file and run the daemon. Set up the routes and you're done. > > and didn't even notice :) (BTW, anyone have any advice about my ADSL > > connection dropping?) > > > I've noticed this too myself - sometimes the ADSL connection just dies. > I have a sysV script (based on my VPN script) that takes good care of the > ADSL, and restarts it if it dies. I should probably try to package it , > like I did the last time (except that now it actually does what it's > supposed to do :-), but instead I'll just mail it to anyone who wants to > have a look. hmm.. I'm curious to see what you did. I'm sure mine is something of a hack job.. Here's something interesting: We have two servers that located under 10km of each other (near and in Mevesseret Zion). The ADSL connection often gets knocked off on both servers within 1 minute of each other.. but not always. Actually I think it's at the same time because I don't keep very close tabs on the system clocks. -Cedar = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
