system wait on SATA 7200 10k rpm drive
Hi, We have a couple of boxes here which just receive tons of e-mail and do some file processing on it before moving it off for other servers to process. The boxes have two AMD Athlon X2 3200 64 bit processors on them, with 1Gb RAM and a SATA drive which identifies as Seagate ST3400620AS (product page at http://tinyurl.com/26c8wg). The disk controller identifies on lspci as: 00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller (rev 80) The load average on these machines is way too high - one of them almost doesn't receive connections (it's a fall-back machine), both of them don't use the swap and still their load average is 13 and above (could peak at up to 90 for a few seconds/minutes), could be averaging above 20 most of the time on the busier machine. The strange thing I found about it (I look at the less busy box) is the output of vmstat: # vmstat 5 procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system-- cpu r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy id wa 2 13100 10448 232800 33134400 208 1180 4384 8 23 4 66 0 13100 9116 232812 33133200 246 465 384 357 0 1 0 99 0 13100 9496 232816 33132800 262 451 388 370 0 1 0 99 I'm looking at the "wa" column and I don't see why is it so high. "top" doesn't show any excessive amount of processes (not even insane amount of SMTP connections). Googling around about tuning SATA drives keeps coming back with answers to the tune of "SATA gets tuned automatically by the system already - there is nothing you can do about it as is possible/required with PATA/hdparm". Still, running "hdparm -tT /dev/sda" returns what seems to be reasonable cached reads but as far as I understand much slower buffered reads than I should expect: # hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3220 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1608.69 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads:2 MB in 3.16 seconds = 648.12 kB/sec I can't take the system down to single-user for testing, though, so I'm not sure how meaningful are these numbers. The system run Fedora Core 5 and kernel 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 and Sendmail 8.12 (at least until I get around to install Debian 4.0 and maybe convert the configuration to Postfix). Any hints on what can I do to improve the performance? Thanks, --Amos = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system wait on SATA 7200 10k rpm drive
Hi, output of vmstat: # vmstat 5 procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system-- cpu r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy id wa 2 13100 10448 232800 33134400 208 1180 4384 8 23 4 66 0 13100 9116 232812 33133200 246 465 384 357 0 1 0 99 What are these 13 processes? What do they do? Post output of "netstat -anp". Googling around about tuning SATA drives keeps coming back with What makes you think that SATA is the bottleneck? but as far as I understand much slower buffered reads than I should expect: Timing buffered disk reads:2 MB in 3.16 seconds = 648.12 kB/sec I can't take the system down to single-user for testing, though, so I'm not sure how meaningful are these numbers. On busy machine they are meaningless. -- Arieh
Re: system wait on SATA 7200 10k rpm drive
Are you sure the SATA disks are configured as SATA in the BIOS (enhanced/AHCI), and not emulated to PATA, then mapped using libata (which makes them /dev/sd* ? Dan On 4/17/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, We have a couple of boxes here which just receive tons of e-mail and do some file processing on it before moving it off for other servers to process. The boxes have two AMD Athlon X2 3200 64 bit processors on them, with 1Gb RAM and a SATA drive which identifies as Seagate ST3400620AS (product page at http://tinyurl.com/26c8wg). The disk controller identifies on lspci as: 00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller (rev 80) The load average on these machines is way too high - one of them almost doesn't receive connections (it's a fall-back machine), both of them don't use the swap and still their load average is 13 and above (could peak at up to 90 for a few seconds/minutes), could be averaging above 20 most of the time on the busier machine. The strange thing I found about it (I look at the less busy box) is the output of vmstat: # vmstat 5 procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system-- cpu r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy id wa 2 13100 10448 232800 33134400 208 1180 4384 8 23 4 66 0 13100 9116 232812 33133200 246 465 384 357 0 1 0 99 0 13100 9496 232816 33132800 262 451 388 370 0 1 0 99 I'm looking at the "wa" column and I don't see why is it so high. "top" doesn't show any excessive amount of processes (not even insane amount of SMTP connections). Googling around about tuning SATA drives keeps coming back with answers to the tune of "SATA gets tuned automatically by the system already - there is nothing you can do about it as is possible/required with PATA/hdparm". Still, running "hdparm -tT /dev/sda" returns what seems to be reasonable cached reads but as far as I understand much slower buffered reads than I should expect: # hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3220 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1608.69 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads:2 MB in 3.16 seconds = 648.12 kB/sec I can't take the system down to single-user for testing, though, so I'm not sure how meaningful are these numbers. The system run Fedora Core 5 and kernel 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 and Sendmail 8.12 (at least until I get around to install Debian 4.0 and maybe convert the configuration to Postfix). Any hints on what can I do to improve the performance? Thanks, --Amos = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system wait on SATA 7200 10k rpm drive
On 17/04/07, Dan Bar Dov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are you sure the SATA disks are configured as SATA in the BIOS (enhanced/AHCI), and not emulated to PATA, then mapped using libata (which makes them /dev/sd* ? No I'm not sure. Is there a way to infer this from within Linux or must I access the BIOS screen? Here is a clip from the latest boot: Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: SCSI subsystem initialized Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0f.0[B] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: PCI: Via IRQ fixup for :00:0f.0, from 10 to 0 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: sata_via :00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 0 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC000 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xA800 irq 16 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB400 ctl 0xB002 bmdma 0xA808 irq 16 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113) Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ata1: dev 0 ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 234441648 sectors: LBA48 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: scsi0 : sata_via Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0) Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: scsi1 : sata_via Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: Vendor: ATA Model: ST3120811AS Rev: 3.AA Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: SCSI device sda: 234441648 512-byte hdwr sectors (120034 MB) Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: sda: Write Protect is off Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back Apr 12 09:16:53 submit3 kernel: SCSI device sda: 234441648 512-byte hdwr sectors (120034 MB) Apr 12 09:16:54 submit3 kernel: sda: Write Protect is off Apr 12 09:16:54 submit3 kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back Apr 12 09:16:54 submit3 kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 Apr 12 09:16:54 submit3 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda Also - how well is the native SATA support in the latest kernels? As far as I followed the kernel changes libsata/libpata/lib?ata was integrated in the mainstream not long ago. Thanks, --Amos
Virtualization hardware - was (Re: Recommendation for software/hardware for virtualization)
Specifically regarding available hardware. What hardware (CPU - INTEL/AMD) today comes with virtualization features and is most compatible to vmware/xen/etc...? Can someone recommend a good spec for that? How is xen compared to vmware (ESX?) performance wise and utilizing special hardware features? What about graphics, i recall they had problems utilizing performance in the past for windows, is it solved? 10x. -- Regards, Tzahi. -- Tzahi Fadida Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[JOB OFFER] C++ programmer
Hello. For an application porting project, Swiftouch is looking for a programmer possessing the following qualifications: 1. Good knowledge of C++/STL/ACE, 3 or more years experience 2. Good knowledge of application programming under Linux 3. Acquaintance with Solaris application programming 4. Self-starter, independent 5. Good inter-personal relations For additional details - please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call Marc at 0544-676764. Swiftouch is an equal opportunity employer. -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Swiftouch, LTD +972-544-676764 = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Investment house
I'm sick and tired of the my bank (discount) support for firefox. I'm looking for an Israeli investment house with a decent internet portal that works well with firefox/linux. If you have good experience with one, please let me know, Thanks, Dan = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtualization hardware - was (Re: Recommendation for software/hardware for virtualization)
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:33:31 Jacob Broido wrote: > Hi, > > CPU's: I assume you're refering to VT-x(Intel) and Pacifica(AMD) cpu > extentions. Well, you can find a list of CPU models supporting these > extentions here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/IntelVT and AMD: Athlon > 64 F* , All current Opterons > > Having said that, using hardware aided vm extentions does not neceserly > boost one's performance (in many cases it worsens it), what it does allow > though, is running unmodified Guest OS's under a hypervisor(i.e windows > under xen). > > As for xen VS vmware(ESX) , there are many mixed benchmarks(vmware > prohibits publishing benchmark results of its products) around the compared > perfomance of these two, so I wont go directly into that. Having said that > Vmware seems to be a more mature and polished product. Keep in mind that > ESX is not a freeware and quite expensive , moreover it must have SAN or > iSCSI as its storage. > > All in all, regarding specs it really depends on the type of load you're > planning to do. But one thing is for sure, you can never have too much RAM > and double importance goes for VM's. Is it worth using xen/vmware esx for a development workstation? Are the VT extentions are in effect when using the host/guests version of vmware (i.e. not esx). Is it fair to say that intel VT features are supported and more stable in xen and vmware products? 10x. > On 4/17/07, Tzahi Fadida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Specifically regarding available hardware. > > What hardware (CPU - INTEL/AMD) today comes with virtualization features > > and > > is most compatible to vmware/xen/etc...? > > Can someone recommend a good spec for that? > > How is xen compared to vmware (ESX?) performance wise and utilizing > > special > > hardware features? What about graphics, i recall they had problems > > utilizing > > performance in the past for windows, is it solved? > > 10x. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Tzahi. > > -- > > Tzahi Fadida > > Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info > > WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at > > http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html > > > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Tzahi. -- Tzahi Fadida Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtualization hardware - was (Re: Recommendation for software/hardware for virtualization)
Hi, CPU's: I assume you're refering to VT-x(Intel) and Pacifica(AMD) cpu extentions. Well, you can find a list of CPU models supporting these extentions here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/IntelVT and AMD: Athlon 64 F* , All current Opterons Having said that, using hardware aided vm extentions does not neceserly boost one's performance (in many cases it worsens it), what it does allow though, is running unmodified Guest OS's under a hypervisor(i.e windows under xen). As for xen VS vmware(ESX) , there are many mixed benchmarks(vmware prohibits publishing benchmark results of its products) around the compared perfomance of these two, so I wont go directly into that. Having said that Vmware seems to be a more mature and polished product. Keep in mind that ESX is not a freeware and quite expensive , moreover it must have SAN or iSCSI as its storage. All in all, regarding specs it really depends on the type of load you're planning to do. But one thing is for sure, you can never have too much RAM and double importance goes for VM's. On 4/17/07, Tzahi Fadida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Specifically regarding available hardware. What hardware (CPU - INTEL/AMD) today comes with virtualization features and is most compatible to vmware/xen/etc...? Can someone recommend a good spec for that? How is xen compared to vmware (ESX?) performance wise and utilizing special hardware features? What about graphics, i recall they had problems utilizing performance in the past for windows, is it solved? 10x. -- Regards, Tzahi. -- Tzahi Fadida Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Not gonna be king of the world if you're slave to the grind - Skid Row
Re: Investment house
I thought Bank Discount fixed their support for Firefox.. didn't they? Thanks, Hetz On 4/17/07, Dan Bar Dov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm sick and tired of the my bank (discount) support for firefox. I'm looking for an Israeli investment house with a decent internet portal that works well with firefox/linux. If you have good experience with one, please let me know, Thanks, Dan = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Skepticism is the lazy person's default position. Visit my blog (hebrew) for things that (sometimes) matter: http://wp.dad-answers.com = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Investment house
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 17:45, Dan Bar Dov wrote: > I'm sick and tired of the my bank (discount) support for firefox. > I'm looking for an Israeli investment house with a decent internet > portal that works well with firefox/linux. Do you insist on it being an Israeli investment house? There are a few excellent foreign investment houses that will give you much better rates and unlike the Israeli fellows, they'll be glad to take your money regardless of your browser. > > If you have good experience with one, please let me know, > > Thanks, > Dan > - Aviram = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Investment house
We use FIBI and the web interface supports firefox very nicely. I believe other people have reported the same experience on the list in the past. David Suna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dan Bar Dov wrote: I'm sick and tired of the my bank (discount) support for firefox. I'm looking for an Israeli investment house with a decent internet portal that works well with firefox/linux. If you have good experience with one, please let me know, Thanks, Dan = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Investment house
On 4/17/07, Dan Bar Dov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm sick and tired of the my bank (discount) support for firefox. I'm looking for an Israeli investment house with a decent internet portal that works well with firefox/linux. None. All investment houses (Harel, Migdal, Gaon, Telniri) use the tradenet system for TASE, which is a IE only system, and a lousy one at that. I have pointed that out to at least two of them, but they failed to see the significance of the issue. If you have good experience with one, please let me know, Thanks, Dan = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gil Freund, Systems Analyst --- Sysnet consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sysnet.co.il voice: +972-54-2035888, Fax: +972-8-9356026 = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slightly OT: Business Cards Print
Hi all!
I'd like to print some Business Cards for myself. They will be in English
exclusively, and will contain my name, my "occupation" ("Software Developer,
Essayist and Writer"), and my contact details along with my EvilPHish icon.
I'd like a print for them that:
1. Will accept input in an open-content format that's well supported under
Linux. (OpenOffice.org, TIFF, BMP, etc.)
2. In Tel-Aviv or vicinity
3. Good service and good results.
Any recommendations will be welcomed.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
-
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage:http://www.shlomifish.org/
If it's not in my E-mail it doesn't happen. And if my E-mail is saying
one thing, and everything else says something else - E-mail will conquer.
-- An Israeli Linuxer
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Business Cards Print
Hi,
El mar, 17-04-2007 a las 23:33 +0300, Shlomi Fish escribió:
> I'd like to print some Business Cards for myself. They will be in English
> exclusively, and will contain my name, my "occupation" ("Software Developer,
> Essayist and Writer"), and my contact details along with my EvilPHish icon.
You can try Fotographyx. They took 140 nis for a thousand( it is the
minimal qty.) three color card.
> I'd like a print for them that:
>
> 1. Will accept input in an open-content format that's well supported under
> Linux. (OpenOffice.org, TIFF, BMP, etc.)
Well, I installed OOo at their PCs because they did not have how to open
my odp file( it was the only one sentence that justify why I´m
responding to the whole list;). They have all the Adobe stuff that
support TIFF, BMP, etc. as well, and maybe don´t know that they can use
Neooffice at their Macs.
> 2. In Tel-Aviv or vicinity
Allenby 24 2nd floor 03- 6203290
> 3. Good service and good results.
They were well- disposed and my order was ready on time.
Cheers,
--
Julian Daich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: system wait on SATA 7200 10k rpm drive
On 17/04/07, Arieh Skliarouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, output of vmstat: > > # vmstat 5 > procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system-- > cpu > r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy > id wa > 2 13100 10448 232800 33134400 208 1180 4384 8 23 > 4 66 > 0 13100 9116 232812 33133200 246 465 384 357 0 1 > 0 99 > What are these 13 processes? What do they do? Would the following answer your question? # ps -el | awk '$2 == "D"' 1 D 0 362 1 0 75 0 - 0 sync_b ?00:26:36 kjournald 5 D 0 20628 16431 0 78 0 - 9131 sync_p ?00:00:15 sendmail 5 D 0 15740 16431 0 78 0 - 9100 sync_p ?00:00:13 sendmail 5 D 0 16708 16431 0 78 0 - 9022 sync_p ?00:00:12 sendmail 5 D 0 11266 16431 0 78 0 - 8960 sync_b ?00:00:10 sendmail 5 D 0 2743 16431 0 78 0 - 8929 sync_p ?00:00:10 sendmail 5 D 0 25771 16431 0 78 0 - 8897 sync_p ?00:00:08 sendmail 5 D 0 22686 16431 0 78 0 - 8866 sync_p ?00:00:07 sendmail 5 D 0 21738 16431 0 78 0 - 8835 sync_p ?00:00:06 sendmail 5 D 0 13724 16431 0 78 0 - 8819 sync_p ?00:00:04 sendmail 5 D 0 18681 16431 0 78 0 - 8804 sync_p ?00:00:03 sendmail 5 D 0 22333 16431 0 78 0 - 8693 sync_p ?00:00:02 sendmail 5 D 0 25768 16431 0 78 0 - 8693 sync_p ?00:00:01 sendmail 5 D 0 29143 16431 0 78 0 - 8654 sync_p ?00:00:00 sendmail Another ps shows that these are queue runners: # ps -efww | fgrep sendmail root 16431 1 0 Apr16 ?00:00:39 sendmail: rejecting connections on daemon MTA: load average: 14 smmsp16439 1 0 Apr16 ?00:00:00 sendmail: Queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]:00:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue root 7096 16431 0 05:02 ?00:00:17 sendmail: ./l3F3Olul011285 mx2.optonline.net.: client DATA status root 14773 16431 0 06:02 ?00:00:16 sendmail: ./l3F3Olit011285 mail.bar-plate.com.: user open root 2191 16431 0 07:02 ?00:00:16 sendmail: ./l3EFZqba004458 from queue root 20628 16431 0 08:02 ?00:00:15 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 15740 16431 0 09:02 ?00:00:13 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 16708 16431 0 10:02 ?00:00:12 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 11266 16431 0 11:02 ?00:00:10 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 2743 16431 0 12:02 ?00:00:10 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 25771 16431 0 13:02 ?00:00:08 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 22686 16431 0 14:02 ?00:00:07 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 21738 16431 0 15:02 ?00:00:06 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 13724 16431 0 16:02 ?00:00:04 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 18681 16431 0 17:02 ?00:00:03 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 22333 16431 0 18:02 ?00:00:02 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 25768 16431 0 19:02 ?00:00:01 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue root 29143 16431 0 20:02 ?00:00:00 sendmail: running queue: /var/spool/mqueue Post output of "netstat -anp". Here: # netstat -anp Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:50309 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1515/rpc.statd tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1496/portmap tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:5 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1738/hpiod tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:50002 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1743/python tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:21 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1991/pure-ftpd (SER tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 14487/cupsd tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:5 127.0.0.1:60608 ESTABLISHED 1738/hpiod tcp0 0 10.10.1.3:47399 10.10.1.26:4596 TIME_WAIT - tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:60608 127.0.0.1:5 ESTABLISHED 1743/python tcp0 0 10.10.1.3:2110.10.1.26:4595 TIME_WAIT - tcp0 0 :::21 :::* LISTEN 1991/pure-ftpd (SER tcp0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 1808/sshd tcp0 0 :::10.10.1.3:59584 :::167.206.4.79:25 ESTABLISHED 7096/l3F3Olul011285 tcp0 1 :::10.10.1.3:53305 :::204.251.15.190:25 SYN_SENT2191/l3EGZqMF000468 tcp 102 0 :::10.10.1.3:60804 :::64.118.85.28:25 CLOSE_WAIT 7096/l3F3Olul011285 tcp0576 :::10.10.1.3:22 :::192.168.0.81:56611 ESTABLISHED 30826/0
