cross-platform bare metal remote restore system?

2010-03-10 Thread Ira Abramov
Howdie people!

Got a client that needs a test environment where the disk on one
specific server (maybe more in the future?) are wiped clean once in a
while (so the performance tests always start at the same state). They
want the same machine to be at alternate times installed with one of
several images, Windows and Linux. Naturally I prefer to skip
proprietary solutions and go to open.

One of the requiremnets is that the data is only wiped on one of the two
disks in the machine, or preferably just a single partition (the OS).

Stored images can go to the other disk, or a remote server. Naturally I
prefer a remote server because then I'll be able to use it for other
one-shot installs as well (such as virtual machines, or just future
bare-metals)

On the short list are:
* OpenQRM (an overkill, and I think avoiding full wipe is not easy)
* G4L (I know nothing about it)
* Partimage/PING (donno it, and it seems unmaintained)
* Clonezilla (seems like the best candidate ATM)
* FOG (aka freeghost - seems pretty good as well)

So... before I sink my teeth in, I'd love any recommendations or
warnings that will save me time. If you have interesting horror stories
that go with the warnings, that's even better :-)

Thanks,
Ira.

-- 
Dumb as they come
Ira Abramov
http://ira.abramov.org/email/

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: cross-platform bare metal remote restore system?

2010-03-10 Thread Elazar Leibovich
When my parent's windows machine occasionally became too slow (as
most undermaintained windows machine does). I tried to ease the situation
like so:
I divided the windows into a minimal C:\ partition which contained the
windows directory, a d:\ which contained the rest of the data (program
files, documents and settings, etc), a hidden parition /dev/hda3 which
contained copy of the c:\ partition, and finally a small linux partition.
I hacked up a script that would once every X boots up the linux partition
that would recover the c:\ partition from the hidden partition.
That way, every once in a while the users would "feel" as if their windows
was reinstalled (a known cure for many windows diseases.

This didn't work out eventually, since some windows program assumed Program
Files is on C:\, without checking the registry, and behaved strangely.

I used partimage for this job, and was generally content. I don't recall a
single data corruption. Of course this is highly inaccurate estimation, so
use with caution.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ira Abramov  wrote:

> Howdie people!
>
> Got a client that needs a test environment where the disk on one
> specific server (maybe more in the future?) are wiped clean once in a
> while (so the performance tests always start at the same state). They
> want the same machine to be at alternate times installed with one of
> several images, Windows and Linux. Naturally I prefer to skip
> proprietary solutions and go to open.
>
> One of the requiremnets is that the data is only wiped on one of the two
> disks in the machine, or preferably just a single partition (the OS).
>
> Stored images can go to the other disk, or a remote server. Naturally I
> prefer a remote server because then I'll be able to use it for other
> one-shot installs as well (such as virtual machines, or just future
> bare-metals)
>
> On the short list are:
> * OpenQRM (an overkill, and I think avoiding full wipe is not easy)
> * G4L (I know nothing about it)
> * Partimage/PING (donno it, and it seems unmaintained)
> * Clonezilla (seems like the best candidate ATM)
> * FOG (aka freeghost - seems pretty good as well)
>
> So... before I sink my teeth in, I'd love any recommendations or
> warnings that will save me time. If you have interesting horror stories
> that go with the warnings, that's even better :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ira.
>
> --
> Dumb as they come
> Ira Abramov
> http://ira.abramov.org/email/
>
> ___
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: cross-platform bare metal remote restore system?

2010-03-10 Thread Amos Shapira
On 11 March 2010 00:11, Ira Abramov  wrote:
> On the short list are:
> * OpenQRM (an overkill, and I think avoiding full wipe is not easy)
> * G4L (I know nothing about it)
> * Partimage/PING (donno it, and it seems unmaintained)
> * Clonezilla (seems like the best candidate ATM)
> * FOG (aka freeghost - seems pretty good as well)

I haven't tried all the options in the list but as far as my experience goes:
1. G4L wasn't very useable back when we tried it
2. Clonezilla rocks

We use Clonezilla to backup legacy windows servers for rainy days.

--Amos

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: cross-platform bare metal remote restore system?

2010-04-07 Thread Arie Skliarouk
Probably too late, but will write my opinion anyway:

I would set up netboot environment that each server is configured to boot
from automatically (falling back to harddisk boot). The DHCP configuration
is defined to include netboot configuration for servers that are scheduled
for reinstallation.

Netboot system will automatically reinstall the server using specified
image, notify DHCP on success and reboot.

--
Arie



On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:41, Amos Shapira  wrote:

> On 11 March 2010 00:11, Ira Abramov 
> wrote:
> > On the short list are:
> > * OpenQRM (an overkill, and I think avoiding full wipe is not easy)
> > * G4L (I know nothing about it)
> > * Partimage/PING (donno it, and it seems unmaintained)
> > * Clonezilla (seems like the best candidate ATM)
> > * FOG (aka freeghost - seems pretty good as well)
>
> I haven't tried all the options in the list but as far as my experience
> goes:
> 1. G4L wasn't very useable back when we tried it
> 2. Clonezilla rocks
>
> We use Clonezilla to backup legacy windows servers for rainy days.
>
> --Amos
>
> ___
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: cross-platform bare metal remote restore system?

2010-04-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2010/4/7 Arie Skliarouk 

> Probably too late, but will write my opinion anyway:
>
> I would set up netboot environment that each server is configured to boot
> from automatically (falling back to harddisk boot). The DHCP configuration
> is defined to include netboot configuration for servers that are scheduled
> for reinstallation.
>
> Netboot system will automatically reinstall the server using specified
> image, notify DHCP on success and reboot.
>

What was the question, again?


>
> --
> Arie
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:41, Amos Shapira wrote:
>
>> On 11 March 2010 00:11, Ira Abramov 
>> wrote:
>> > On the short list are:
>> > * OpenQRM (an overkill, and I think avoiding full wipe is not easy)
>> > * G4L (I know nothing about it)
>> > * Partimage/PING (donno it, and it seems unmaintained)
>> > * Clonezilla (seems like the best candidate ATM)
>> > * FOG (aka freeghost - seems pretty good as well)
>>
>> I haven't tried all the options in the list but as far as my experience
>> goes:
>> 1. G4L wasn't very useable back when we tried it
>> 2. Clonezilla rocks
>>
>> We use Clonezilla to backup legacy windows servers for rainy days.
>>
>> --Amos
>>
>> ___
>> Linux-il mailing list
>> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>
>
>
> ___
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il