Possible README patch

2001-05-05 Thread Duncan Gauld

Hi

Information in the README file says that when patching, the -p0 option is 
used with patch (eg tar xvzf .tar.gz | patch -p0). However I have 
never got this to work as I always get something like "can't find file to 
patch at line 5". However, replacing -p0 with -p1 seems to work perfectly.
Maybe the penguin doesn't like me, but still, whenever I've downloaded 
patches I had to say -p1, not -p0...

anyone else have to do this? If so, here's a wee patch for it.. (bear with 
me, it's my first one :)

Duncan Gauld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- README   Sat May  5 09:51:36 2001
+++ README  Sat May  5 09:52:24 2001
@@ -66,10 +66,10 @@
install by patching, get all the newer patch files, enter the
directory in which you unpacked the kernel source and execute:
 
-   gzip -cd patchXX.gz | patch -p0
+   gzip -cd patchXX.gz | patch -p1
 
or
-   bzip2 -dc patchXX.bz2 | patch -p0
+   bzip2 -dc patchXX.bz2 | patch -p1
 
(repeat xx for all versions bigger than the version of your current
source tree, _in_order_) and you should be ok.  You may want to remove
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: question regarding cpu selection

2001-04-29 Thread Duncan Gauld

On Sunday 29 April 2001  3:36 pm, Ville Herva wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 02:56:08PM -0400, you [William Park] claimed:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 07:07:51PM -0400, Duncan Gauld wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > This seems a silly question but - I have an intel celeron 800mhz CPU
> > > and thus it is of the Coppermine breed. But under cpu selection when
> > > configuring the kernel, should I select PIII or PII/Celeron? Just
> > > wondering, since Coppermine is basically a newish PIII with 128K less
> > > cache...
> >
> > Try both, and see if your machine throws up.
>
> 800Mhz Celeron is actually a CeleronII, and it does SSE just like PIII (the
> only difference being cache). Therefore PIII option should work.
>
> Perhaps this should be fixed in the config menu (or is it already? Which
> kernel are you compiling?)

compiling kernel 2.4.4 on mandrake 8.
Just checked - no mention of Celeron II in there-
   Pentium Pro/Pentium II/Celeron
is the only line mentioning the celeron; maybe the PIII line could be changed 
to something like "Pentium III/Celeron II"?
I would supply a patch, but I don't know how to write such a thing :)

---
Duncan Gauld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freelin.org (linux on cd, free)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



question regarding cpu selection

2001-04-29 Thread Duncan Gauld

Hi,
This seems a silly question but - I have an intel celeron 800mhz CPU and thus 
it is of the Coppermine breed. But under cpu selection when configuring the 
kernel, should I select PIII or PII/Celeron? Just wondering, since Coppermine 
is basically a newish PIII with 128K less cache...

TIA
--
Duncan Gauld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freelin.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: booting the 2.4.1 linux kernel... tada,nada

2001-02-09 Thread Duncan Gauld

hi,

a couple of things to check here.
a) when compiling the kernel, did you remember to select the proper CPU in
the kernel config?
b) if you are using (for example) an ATI Rage 128 you need to go into
character devices and say Y to DRI X and ATI Rage 128.
(I found that the latter idea fixed the same problem on my machine.)

I'm a newbie, 12, so hope this helps!

Duncan

Lyndsey Simon wrote:

> [1.] Once I get the loading the kernel message from Lilo I hard crash
without any error
> messages.
> [2.] I had no trouble making the bzImage and have installed it made it and
installed it
> three different times from scratch, once using debian's make-kpkg tool,
but still I get
> the same outcome - a hard crash with no error messages. I get the Loading
> Linux.2.4.1... ok,now booting the kernel and then BANG, I go dead
with no error
> message of any kind.





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/