Re: selftests: ftrace: WARNING: __list_del_entry_valid_or_report (lib/list_debug.c:62 (discriminator 1))
Hi Steven, On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 02:06, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:00:16 +0530 > Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > Following kernel crash noticed while running selftests: ftrace on arm64 > > Juno-r2 > > device running stable-rc linux-6.6.y kernel. > > > > This kernel crash is hard to reproduce. > > > > Can you test this patch. I have applied your patch on top of Linux stable-rc linux-6.6.y and tested selftests: ftrace: for 100 iterations on arm64 Juno-r2 device. Out of 100 test runs I see the following exception only once. I do not see crashes related to the previous report. Test log: # ok 8 trace_pipe and trace_marker ... [ 282.726999] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 282.731840] Internal error: BRK handler: f20003e8 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 282.738752] Modules linked in: ftrace_direct ftrace_direct_too hdlcd tda998x onboard_usb_hub drm_dma_helper cec crct10dif_ce drm_kms_helper fuse drm backlight dm_mod ip_tables x_tables [last unloaded: ftrace_direct] [ 282.758152] CPU: 0 PID: 987 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.6.2-rc1 #1 [ 282.764191] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT) [ 282.770138] pstate: a0c5 (NzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 282.777133] pc : ring_buffer_lock_reserve (kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3304 (discriminator 1) kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3819 (discriminator 1)) [ 282.782230] lr : trace_function (kernel/trace/trace.c:992 kernel/trace/trace.c:3078) [ 282.786360] sp : 80008428ba20 [ 282.789695] x29: 80008428ba20 x28: 00082bb367c0 x27: [ 282.796898] x26: 800080371d84 x25: x24: 00097ed1e4b0 [ 282.804100] x23: 000800018400 x22: x21: 0018 [ 282.811302] x20: 000800018400 x19: 000800041400 x18: [ 282.818504] x17: x16: x15: 800081d2ec58 [ 282.825706] x14: x13: 80008428beb0 x12: 0255 [ 282.832908] x11: 800083343078 x10: 80008428bbc0 x9 : 8000803e3110 [ 282.840110] x8 : 80008428ba98 x7 : x6 : 0009 [ 282.847311] x5 : 0081 x4 : fffb x3 : 0001 [ 282.854513] x2 : x1 : x0 : [ 282.861715] Call trace: [ 282.864179] ring_buffer_lock_reserve (kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3304 (discriminator 1) kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3819 (discriminator 1)) [ 282.868920] trace_function (kernel/trace/trace.c:992 kernel/trace/trace.c:3078) [ 282.872702] tracer_hardirqs_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:279 kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:397 kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:619 kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:616) [ 282.877009] trace_hardirqs_off.part.0 (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:78 (discriminator 1)) [ 282.881748] trace_hardirqs_off (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:94) [ 282.885791] obj_cgroup_charge (mm/memcontrol.c:3236 (discriminator 1) mm/memcontrol.c:3364 (discriminator 1)) [ 282.889918] kmem_cache_alloc (mm/slab.h:503 (discriminator 2) mm/slab.h:714 (discriminator 2) mm/slub.c:3460 (discriminator 2) mm/slub.c:3486 (discriminator 2) mm/slub.c:3493 (discriminator 2) mm/slub.c:3502 (discriminator 2)) [ 282.893873] __anon_vma_prepare (mm/rmap.c:197) [ 282.897999] __handle_mm_fault (mm/memory.c:4111 (discriminator 2) mm/memory.c:3670 (discriminator 2) mm/memory.c:4981 (discriminator 2) mm/memory.c:5122 (discriminator 2)) [ 282.902213] handle_mm_fault (mm/memory.c:5287) [ 282.906077] do_page_fault (arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:513 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:626) [ 282.909856] do_translation_fault (arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:714) [ 282.914068] do_mem_abort (arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:846 (discriminator 1)) [ 282.917591] el0_da (arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h:28 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:133 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:144 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:547) [ 282.920590] el0t_64_sync_handler (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:700) [ 282.924894] el0t_64_sync (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595) [ 282.928593] Code: 88037c22 35a3 17f8 94549eb9 (d4207d00) All code 0: 88037c22 stxr w3, w2, [x1] 4: 35a3 cbnz w3, 0xfff8 8: 17f8 b 0xffe8 c: 94549eb9 bl 0x1527af0 10:* d4207d00 brk #0x3e8 <-- trapping instruction Code starting with the faulting instruction === 0: d4207d00 brk #0x3e8 [ 282.934716] ---[ end trace ]--- [ 282.939358] note: rmmod[987] exited with irqs disabled [ 282.945441] note: rmmod[987] exited with preempt_count 2 [ 282.951337] [ cut here ] [ 282.955980] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/context_tracking.c:128 ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0 (kernel/context_tracking.c:128 (discriminator 1)) [ 282.965683] Modules linked in: ftrace_direct ftrace_direct_too hdlcd tda998x onboard_usb_hub drm_dma_helper cec crct10dif_ce dr
selftests: ftrace: WARNING: __list_del_entry_valid_or_report (lib/list_debug.c:62 (discriminator 1))
Following kernel crash noticed while running selftests: ftrace on arm64 Juno-r2 device running stable-rc linux-6.6.y kernel. This kernel crash is hard to reproduce. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing kselftest: Running tests in ftrace TAP version 13 1..1 # timeout set to 0 # selftests: ftrace: ftracetest-ktap # unlink: cannot unlink '/opt/kselftests/default-in-kernel/ftrace/logs/latest': No such file or directory # TAP version 13 # 1..130 # ok 1 Basic trace file check ... # ok 44 ftrace - test for function traceon/off triggers # ok 45 ftrace - test tracing error log support [ 617.613901] [ cut here ] [ 617.618870] list_del corruption. prev->next should be 000837184758, but was 000837184638. (prev=0008359f82e8) [ 617.629894] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13512 at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry_valid_or_report (lib/list_debug.c:62 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.639496] Modules linked in: onboard_usb_hub hdlcd tda998x crct10dif_ce drm_dma_helper cec drm_kms_helper fuse drm backlight dm_mod ip_tables x_tables [last unloaded: trace_printk] [ 617.655832] CPU: 1 PID: 13512 Comm: ls Not tainted 6.6.2-rc1 #1 [ 617.661765] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT) [ 617.667692] pstate: 6005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 617.674668] pc : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report (lib/list_debug.c:62 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.680339] lr : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report (lib/list_debug.c:62 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.686009] sp : 80008507b910 [ 617.689325] x29: 80008507b910 x28: 0003 x27: 0001 [ 617.696482] x26: 000834694788 x25: 000835a39c88 x24: [ 617.703637] x23: x22: 0008359f8248 x21: 000837184720 [ 617.710792] x20: 0008359f8248 x19: 000837184758 x18: 0010 [ 617.717948] x17: 20747562202c3835 x16: 3734383137333830 x15: 30302065 [ 617.725102] x14: 6220646c756f6873 x13: 2938653238663935 x12: 333830303066 [ 617.732257] x11: 663d766572702820 x10: 2e38333634383137 x9 : 800080145634 [ 617.739411] x8 : 80008507b638 x7 : 00017fe8 x6 : 00057fa8 [ 617.746566] x5 : 0fff x4 : 00097ed27d50 x3 : 8008fc5d3000 [ 617.753720] x2 : x1 : x0 : 0008010722c0 [ 617.760874] Call trace: [ 617.763320] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report (lib/list_debug.c:62 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.768643] __dentry_kill (include/linux/list.h:215 (discriminator 1) fs/dcache.c:550 (discriminator 1) fs/dcache.c:603 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.772311] dput (fs/dcache.c:896) [ 617.775281] create_dentry (fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:404) [ 617.779040] dcache_dir_open_wrapper (fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:536) [ 617.783580] do_dentry_open (fs/open.c:929) [ 617.787424] vfs_open (fs/open.c:1064) [ 617.790572] path_openat (fs/namei.c:3640 fs/namei.c:3797) [ 617.794153] do_filp_open (fs/namei.c:3824) [ 617.797733] do_sys_openat2 (fs/open.c:1422) [ 617.801490] __arm64_sys_openat (fs/open.c:1448) [ 617.805508] invoke_syscall (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:56) [ 617.809267] el0_svc_common.constprop.0 (include/linux/thread_info.h:127 (discriminator 2) arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:144 (discriminator 2)) [ 617.814069] do_el0_svc (arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:156) [ 617.817391] el0_svc (arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h:28 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:133 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:144 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:679) [ 617.820454] el0t_64_sync_handler (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:697) [ 617.824820] el0t_64_sync (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595) [ 617.828488] ---[ end trace ]--- [ 617.833214] [ cut here ] [ 617.837840] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 13523 at fs/dcache.c:365 dentry_free (fs/dcache.c:365 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.845173] Modules linked in: onboard_usb_hub hdlcd tda998x crct10dif_ce drm_dma_helper cec drm_kms_helper fuse drm backlight dm_mod ip_tables x_tables [last unloaded: trace_printk] [ 617.861503] CPU: 2 PID: 13523 Comm: rmdir Tainted: GW 6.6.2-rc1 #1 [ 617.869175] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT) [ 617.875102] pstate: 4005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 617.882077] pc : dentry_free (fs/dcache.c:365 (discriminator 1)) [ 617.885835] lr : __dentry_kill (fs/dcache.c:623) [ 617.889937] sp : 800085123a30 [ 617.893252] x29: 800085123a30 x28: 0008371845a8 x27: 0008371845a8 [ 617.900409] x26: 000837184600 x25: 000837184638 x24: 0008359f82a0 [ 617.907565] x23: 000835a39d28 x22: 0008359f8248 x21: 000837184720 [ 617.914719] x20: 0008359f8248 x19: 0008371846c8 x18: [ 617.921874] x17: 00040044 x16: 00500074b5503510 x15: [ 617.929029] x14: x13: 0030 x12: 0101010101010101 [
stable-rc: 5.15 - all builds failed - ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol
Hi Greg, I see the following build warning / errors everywhere on stable-rc 5.15 branch. ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol >>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c >>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(create_local_trace_kprobe) in archive >>> kernel/built-in.a >>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c >>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(__trace_kprobe_create) in archive >>> kernel/built-in.a make[1]: *** [Makefile:1227: vmlinux] Error 1 Links, - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2XXALLRIZaXJVcqhff4ZmGTeZoQ/ - Naresh
Re: stable-rc: 5.4 - all builds failed - ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 20:38, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I see the following build warning / errors everywhere on stable-rc 5.4 branch. I am sorry, It is on stable-rc 5.15. > > ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol > >>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c > >>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(create_local_trace_kprobe) in archive > >>> kernel/built-in.a > >>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c > >>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(__trace_kprobe_create) in archive > >>> kernel/built-in.a > make[1]: *** [Makefile:1227: vmlinux] Error 1 I see the following latest commit on stable-rc 5.15 branch tracing/kprobes: Return EADDRNOTAVAIL when func matches several symbols commit b022f0c7e404887a7c5229788fc99eff9f9a80d5 upstream. - Naresh > Links, > - > https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2XXALLRIZaXJVcqhff4ZmGTeZoQ/ > > - Naresh
stable-rc: 5.4 - all builds failed - ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol
Hi Greg, I see the following build warning / errors everywhere on stable-rc 5.4 branch. ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol >>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c >>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(create_local_trace_kprobe) in archive >>> kernel/built-in.a >>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c >>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(__trace_kprobe_create) in archive >>> kernel/built-in.a make[1]: *** [Makefile:1227: vmlinux] Error 1 Links, - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2XXALLRIZaXJVcqhff4ZmGTeZoQ/ - Naresh
Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Hold eventfs_mutex when calling callback functions
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 21:10, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> The callback function that is used to create inodes and dentries is not
> protected by anything and the data that is passed to it could become
> stale. After eventfs_remove_dir() is called by the tracing system, it is
> free to remove the events that are associated to that directory.
> Unfortunately, that means the callbacks must not be called after that.
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> eventfs_root_lookup() {
> eventfs_remove_dir() {
> mutex_lock(_mutex);
> ei->is_freed = set;
> mutex_unlock(_mutex);
> }
> kfree(event_call);
>
> for (...) {
> entry = >entries[i];
> r = entry->callback() {
> call = data; // call == event_call above
> if (call->flags ...)
>
> [ USE AFTER FREE BUG ]
>
> The safest way to protect this is to wrap the callback with:
>
> mutex_lock(_mutex);
> if (!ei->is_freed)
> r = entry->callback();
> else
> r = -1;
> mutex_unlock(_mutex);
>
> This will make sure that the callback will not be called after it is
> freed. But now it needs to be known that the callback is called while
> holding internal eventfs locks, and that it must not call back into the
> eventfs / tracefs system. There's no reason it should anyway, but document
> that as well.
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYu9GOEbD=rR5eMR-=HJ8H6rMsbzDC2ZY5=y50wpwae...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google)
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
> ---
> fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 22 ++--
> include/linux/tracefs.h | 43
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH v2] eventfs: Test for ei->is_freed when accessing ei->dentry
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 20:11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:37:08 +0530
> Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> >
> > I have tested the linux-trace.git trace/core and run selftests ftrace
> > the reported kernel panic [1] & [2] has been fixed but found
>
> Good to know. Can I add "Tested-by" from you for that bug fix?
Please add,
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
>
> > "general protection fault" at kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2439.
>
> Can you test with the below patch?
Applied this patch on top of linux-trace.git trace/core and test passed.
All the reported issues have been resolved.
>
> Also, can I ask what are you testing this on that makes it trigger so
> easily? As I'm not able to trigger these in my tests, even though they are
> indeed bugs.
I use following build artifacts and running selftests: ftrace: ftracetest-ktap
kernel:
url:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/naresh/builds/2XT84xYJIMmKApmqOOtKhnLdCyz/bzImage
modules:
url:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/naresh/builds/2XT84xYJIMmKApmqOOtKhnLdCyz/modules.tar.xz
compression: xz
nfsrootfs:
url: https://storage.tuxboot.com/debian/bookworm/amd64/rootfs.tar.xz
kselftest:
url:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/naresh/builds/2XT84xYJIMmKApmqOOtKhnLdCyz/kselftest.tar.xz
Steps to test:
==
1) Boot x86 machine with above bzImage, modules, rootfs and
copy kselftest.tar.xz from above url and unzip.
2) cd /opt/kselftests/default-in-kernel/ftrace
3) ./run_kselftest.sh -c ftrace
# selftests: ftrace: ftracetest-ktap
# unlink: cannot unlink
'/opt/kselftests/default-in-kernel/ftrace/logs/latest': No such file
or directory
# TAP version 13
# 1..129
# ok 1 Basic trace file check
...
# # Totals: pass:126 faii:0 xfail:1 xpass:0 skip:1 error:1
Test logs:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6985018#L4742
>
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> index 7ad7496bd597..7a0b54ddda24 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> @@ -609,7 +609,13 @@ static struct dentry *eventfs_root_lookup(struct inode
> *dir,
> entry = >entries[i];
> if (strcmp(name, entry->name) == 0) {
> void *cdata = data;
> - r = entry->callback(name, , , );
> + mutex_lock(_mutex);
> + /* If ei->is_freed, then the event itself may be too
> */
> + if (!ei->is_freed)
> + r = entry->callback(name, , ,
> );
> + else
> + r = -1;
> + mutex_unlock(_mutex);
> if (r <= 0)
> continue;
> ret = simple_lookup(dir, dentry, flags);
> @@ -743,7 +749,13 @@ static int dcache_dir_open_wrapper(struct inode *inode,
> struct file *file)
> void *cdata = data;
> entry = >entries[i];
> name = entry->name;
> - r = entry->callback(name, , , );
> + mutex_lock(_mutex);
> + /* If ei->is_freed, then the event itself may be too */
> + if (!ei->is_freed)
> + r = entry->callback(name, , , );
> + else
> + r = -1;
> + mutex_unlock(_mutex);
> if (r <= 0)
> continue;
> d = create_file_dentry(ei, i, parent, name, mode, cdata,
> fops, false);
Re: [PATCH v2] eventfs: Test for ei->is_freed when accessing ei->dentry
Hi Steven, > Are you sure it was applied correctly? Please ignore the build warnings / errors it was due to apply patch was not successful. > Perhaps check out the branch I > have and let me know if you get the same errors. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace.git trace/core I have tested the linux-trace.git trace/core and run selftests ftrace the reported kernel panic [1] & [2] has been fixed but found "general protection fault" at kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2439. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYt6pY+tMZEOg=soeywqoe19fgp3ur15sgowkdk+_x8...@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231028164650.4f5ea...@rorschach.local.home/ Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Test log: == kselftest: Running tests in ftrace TAP version 13 1..1 # timeout set to 0 # selftests: ftrace: ftracetest-ktap ... # ok 46 Test creation and deletion of trace instances while setting an event [ 332.783872] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6bcb: [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 332.794585] CPU: 1 PID: 5165 Comm: ls Not tainted 6.6.0-rc4 #1 [ 332.800429] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS 2.7 12/07/2021 [ 332.807820] RIP: 0010:event_callback (kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2439) [ 332.812353] Code: f6 48 c7 c6 09 78 6b a0 41 55 49 89 cd 41 54 49 89 d4 53 48 8b 02 48 89 fb 4c 8b 78 10 e8 10 8b 19 01 85 c0 0f 84 d2 00 00 00 <41> 8b 47 60 a8 08 0f 85 9c 00 00 00 49 8b 47 10 48 83 78 18 00 74 All code 0: f6 48 c7 c6 testb $0xc6,-0x39(%rax) 4: 09 78 6b or %edi,0x6b(%rax) 7: a0 41 55 49 89 cd 41 movabs 0x495441cd89495541,%al e: 54 49 10: 89 d4mov%edx,%esp 12: 53push %rbx 13: 48 8b 02 mov(%rdx),%rax 16: 48 89 fb mov%rdi,%rbx 19: 4c 8b 78 10 mov0x10(%rax),%r15 1d: e8 10 8b 19 01callq 0x1198b32 22: 85 c0test %eax,%eax 24: 0f 84 d2 00 00 00je 0xfc 2a:* 41 8b 47 60 mov0x60(%r15),%eax <-- trapping instruction 2e: a8 08test $0x8,%al 30: 0f 85 9c 00 00 00jne0xd2 36: 49 8b 47 10 mov0x10(%r15),%rax 3a: 48 83 78 18 00cmpq $0x0,0x18(%rax) 3f: 74.byte 0x74 Code starting with the faulting instruction === 0: 41 8b 47 60 mov0x60(%r15),%eax 4: a8 08test $0x8,%al 6: 0f 85 9c 00 00 00jne0xa8 c: 49 8b 47 10 mov0x10(%r15),%rax 10: 48 83 78 18 00cmpq $0x0,0x18(%rax) 15: 74.byte 0x74 [ 332.831089] RSP: 0018:ba5700967b50 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 332.836315] RAX: 0001 RBX: a06fb5d7 RCX: ba5700967bc8 [ 332.843439] RDX: 0069 RSI: a06b7809 RDI: a06fb5d7 [ 332.850563] RBP: ba5700967b78 R08: 8dbe12250134 R09: [ 332.857722] R10: 8dbe122500e0 R11: 8dbe0d8f8fc8 R12: ba5700967bd0 [ 332.864846] R13: ba5700967bc8 R14: ba5700967bc6 R15: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b [ 332.871971] FS: 7fc5a5062d00() GS:8dc167a8() knlGS: [ 332.880057] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 332.885801] CR2: 7f7f8dc50a1c CR3: 000113c84003 CR4: 003706e0 [ 332.892928] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 332.900058] DR3: DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 332.907183] Call Trace: [ 332.909658] [ 332.911760] ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:479) [ 332.915166] ? die_addr (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:421 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:460) [ 332.918486] ? exc_general_protection (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:697 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:642) [ 332.923191] ? asm_exc_general_protection (arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:564) [ 332.928073] ? event_callback (kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2439) [ 332.931996] dcache_dir_open_wrapper (fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:745) [ 332.936636] ? __pfx_dcache_dir_open_wrapper (fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:683) [ 332.941772] do_dentry_open (fs/open.c:929) [ 332.945646] vfs_open (fs/open.c:1064) [ 332.948800] path_openat (fs/namei.c:3639 fs/namei.c:3796) [ 332.952465] ? ___slab_alloc (mm/slub.c:810 mm/slub.c:3265) [ 332.956384] ? nfs_ctx_key_to_expire (fs/nfs/write.c:1281) [ 332.960917] ? trace_preempt_on (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:105) [ 332.964929] do_filp_open (fs/namei.c:3823) [ 332.968511] do_sys_openat2 (fs/open.c:1422) [ 332.972173] __x64_sys_openat (fs/open.c:1448) [ 332.976014] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) [ 332.979601] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:47 (discriminator 16) kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:42 (discriminator 16)) [ 332.984436] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode (kernel/entry/common.c:299) [ 332.989219] ?
Re: [PATCH v2] eventfs: Test for ei->is_freed when accessing ei->dentry
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 02:16, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> The eventfs_inode (ei) is protected by SRCU, but the ei->dentry is not. It
> is protected by the eventfs_mutex. Anytime the eventfs_mutex is released,
> and access to the ei->dentry needs to be done, it should first check if
> ei->is_freed is set under the eventfs_mutex. If it is, then the ei->dentry
> is invalid and must not be used. The ei->dentry must only be accessed
> under the eventfs_mutex and after checking if ei->is_freed is set.
>
> When the ei is being freed, it will (under the eventfs_mutex) set is_freed
> and at the same time move the dentry to a free list to be cleared after
> the eventfs_mutex is released. This means that any access to the
> ei->dentry must check first if ei->is_freed is set, because if it is, then
> the dentry is on its way to be freed.
>
> Also add comments to describe this better.
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYt6pY+tMZEOg=soeywqoe19fgp3ur15sgowkdk+_x8...@mail.gmail.com/
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuDP3hVQ3t7FfrBAjd_WFVSurMgCepTxunSJf=MTe=6...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Fixes: 5790b1fb3d672 ("eventfs: Remove eventfs_file and just use
> eventfs_inode")
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
> Reported-by: Beau Belgrave
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google)
Following build errors have been noticed.
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:348:1: error: return type defaults to 'int'
[-Werror=implicit-int]
348 | create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
| ^
In file included from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:5,
from include/uapi/linux/types.h:14,
from include/linux/types.h:6,
from include/linux/kasan-checks.h:5,
from include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
from ./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/rwonce.h:1,
from include/linux/compiler.h:251,
from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
from include/linux/bits.h:21,
from include/linux/bitops.h:6,
from include/linux/radix-tree.h:11,
from include/linux/idr.h:15,
from include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h:13,
from include/linux/fsnotify.h:15,
from fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:17:
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c: In function 'create_dir_dentry':
include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: error: returning 'void *' from a function
with return type 'int' makes integer from pointer without a cast
[-Werror=int-conversion]
8 | #define NULL ((void *)0)
| ^
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:357:24: note: in expansion of macro 'NULL'
357 | return NULL;
|^~~~
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:366:24: error: returning 'struct dentry *'
from a function with return type 'int' makes integer from pointer
without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
366 | return dentry;
|^~
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:394:24: error: returning 'struct dentry *'
from a function with return type 'int' makes integer from pointer
without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
394 | return dentry;
|^~
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:416:34: error: returning 'struct dentry *'
from a function with return type 'int' makes integer from pointer
without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
416 | return invalidate ? NULL : dentry;
|~~^~~~
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c: In function 'dcache_dir_open_wrapper':
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:609:49: error: passing argument 2 of
'create_dir_dentry' from incompatible pointer type
[-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
609 | d = create_dir_dentry(ei_child, parent, false);
| ^~
| |
| struct dentry *
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:348:68: note: expected 'struct eventfs_inode
*' but argument is of type 'struct dentry *'
348 | create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
| ~~^~
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:609:21: error: too few arguments to function
'create_dir_dentry'
609 | d = create_dir_dentry(ei_child, parent, false);
| ^
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:348:1: note: declared here
348 | create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
| ^
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c:625:19: error: assignment to 'struct dentry
*' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast
[-Werror
Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Test for ei->is_freed when accessing ei->dentry
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 02:07, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> The eventfs_inode (ei) is protected by SRCU, but the ei->dentry is not. It
> is protected by the eventfs_mutex. Anytime the eventfs_mutex is released,
> and access to the ei->dentry needs to be done, it should first check if
> ei->is_freed is set under the eventfs_mutex. If it is, then the ei->dentry
> is invalid and must not be used. The ei->dentry must only be accessed
> under the eventfs_mutex and after checking if ei->is_freed is set.
>
> When the ei is being freed, it will (under the eventfs_mutex) set is_freed
> and at the same time move the dentry to a free list to be cleared after
> the eventfs_mutex is released. This means that any access to the
> ei->dentry must check first if ei->is_freed is set, because if it is, then
> the dentry is on its way to be freed.
>
> Also add comments to describe this better.
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYt6pY+tMZEOg=soeywqoe19fgp3ur15sgowkdk+_x8...@mail.gmail.com/
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuDP3hVQ3t7FfrBAjd_WFVSurMgCepTxunSJf=MTe=6...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Fixes: 5790b1fb3d672 ("eventfs: Remove eventfs_file and just use
> eventfs_inode")
> Reported-by: Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
In the above line "Reported-by:" is twice.
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
> Reported-by: Beau Belgrave
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google)
I am running tests on this patch and will get back to you shortly.
- Naresh
Re: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in page_to_skb.isra.0+0x300/0x418
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 19:47, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:45 PM Naresh Kamboju > wrote: > > > > Following kernel BUG reported on qemu-arm64 running linux next 20210420 > > the config is enabled with KASAN. > > > > steps to reproduce: > > > > - Build the arm64 kernel with KASAN enabled. > > - boot it with below command and you will notice > > /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 -cpu host -machine virt,accel=kvm > > -nographic -net nic,model=virtio,macaddr=BA:DD:AD:CC:09:10 -net tap -m > > 1024 -monitor none -kernel kernel/Image.gz --append "console=ttyAMA0 > > root=/dev/vda rw" -hda > > rootfs/rpb-console-image-lkft-juno-20210414125244-133.rootfs.ext4 -m > > 4096 -smp 4 -nographic > > > > > > crash log: > > - > > > > This is the fifth report, have you tried the proposed fix ? > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210420094341.3259328-1-eric.duma...@gmail.com/ I have tested your patch now and the reported issue got fixed. Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju Tested log link, https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/244#L208 - Naresh
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in page_to_skb.isra.0+0x300/0x418
+0x88/0xb8 [ 23.905462] el0_sync+0x18c/0x1c0 [ 23.907123] Code: d2e3 79405681 aa1603e0 d346fc42 (b9401ac6) [ 23.910073] ---[ end trace fd09da2bec4267c7 ]--- [ 23.912299] Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 23.915576] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 23.917615] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 23.919303] CPU features: 0x00240002,20002004 [ 23.921405] Memory Limit: none [ 23.922914] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt ]--- Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Full test log: -- https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2555059#L646 https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20210420/testrun/4398870/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2555059/log metadata: git branch: master git repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next git describe: next-20210420 kernel-config: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1rQkHtEDo0W1xQ7zqLlKg72HPil/config -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/73] 5.4.114-rc1 review
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.114 release. > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.114-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing NOTE: The following kernel crash reported on arm64 hikey device running stable-rc 5.4.114-rc1 kernel and testing LTP thp04 test case. but not reproducible. please find more details in the below link, So this is not considered as real regression. thp04: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x400dc0(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null) Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 1540 ,cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 1540 https://lore.kernel.org/stable/ca+g9fytujdeqdge_3ddpaeclmamufwzem5empegtndlqgxt...@mail.gmail.com/T/#u ## Build * kernel: 5.4.114-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: c509b45704fd663fc59405e98d29d7f06eaae4b5 * git describe: v5.4.113-74-gc509b45704fd * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.113-74-gc509b45704fd ## No regressions (compared to v5.4.113-49-g56028094045b) ## No fixes (compared to v5.4.113-49-g56028094045b) ## Test result summary total: 64147, pass: 53600, fail: 638, skip: 9689, xfail: 220, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 191 total, 191 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release. > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.10.32-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: bcedd92af6e5899132429d20a9322b12afec2188 * git describe: v5.10.31-104-gbcedd92af6e5 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.31-104-gbcedd92af6e5 ## No regressions (compared to v5.10.31-56-g86a799ba8d60) ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.31-56-g86a799ba8d60) ## Test result summary total: 69955, pass: 58611, fail: 1787, skip: 9326, xfail: 231, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/122] 5.11.16-rc1 review
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.16 release. > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.16-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.11.16-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.11.y * git commit: f34f787f0e47983f4f18c818b2cf23f5e3bf576e * git describe: v5.11.15-123-gf34f787f0e47 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.15-123-gf34f787f0e47 ## No regressions (compared to v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f) ## No fixes (compared to v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f) ## Test result summary total: 76776, pass: 63385, fail: 2827, skip: 10320, xfail: 244, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed * x86: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
[next] aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
The arm64 allnoconfig build failed on linux -next tag 20210416 kernel/sched/fair.c:8428:13: warning: 'update_nohz_stats' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq) ^ aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected! aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected! aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.o: in function `task_fpsimd_load': fpsimd.c:(.text+0x144): undefined reference to `sve_load_state' aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.o: in function `fpsimd_save': fpsimd.c:(.text+0x1f8): undefined reference to `sve_get_vl' aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: fpsimd.c:(.text+0x230): undefined reference to `sve_save_state' make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1277: vmlinux] Error 1 make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors. make: *** [Makefile:222: __sub-make] Error 2 make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju steps to reproduce: # TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides # portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of # architectures, toolchains, kernel configurations, and make targets. # # TuxMake supports the concept of runtimes. # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/runtimes/, for that to work it requires # that you install podman or docker on your system. # # To install tuxmake on your system globally: # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake # # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation. tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allnoconfig metadata: - git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next git_describe: next-20210415 kconfig: allnoconfig target_arch: arm64 toolchain: gcc-8 -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/38] 4.4.267-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.267 release. > There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.267-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.4.267-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.4.y * git commit: d5830a9390f6eccae1c50d2f4a82473ded6ea346 * git describe: v4.4.266-39-gd5830a9390f6 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.266-39-gd5830a9390f6 ## No regressions (compared to v4.4.266-35-gafa6a544124b) ## No fixes (compared to v4.4.266-35-gafa6a544124b) ## Test result summary total: 44985, pass: 36787, fail: 370, skip: 7578, xfail: 250, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance ## Build * kernel: 4.4.267-rc1 * git: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git * git branch: 4.4.267-rc1-hikey-20210415-988 * git commit: f84c762ec9c5916bcd6a9bb420e560756fd14261 * git describe: 4.4.267-rc1-hikey-20210415-988 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.267-rc1-hikey-20210415-988 ## Regressions (compared to 4.4.267-rc1-hikey-20210412-985) No regressions found. ## Fixes (compared to 4.4.267-rc1-hikey-20210412-985) No fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 2480, pass: 1851, fail: 69, skip: 546, xfail: 14, ## Build Summary * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests *
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/47] 4.9.267-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.267 release. > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.267-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.9.267-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.9.y * git commit: 5183cf83a541a4684e52ca704658b93e63fdf243 * git describe: v4.9.266-48-g5183cf83a541 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.266-48-g5183cf83a541 ## No regressions (compared to v4.9.266-43-ga0c17d36dea3) ## No fixes (compared to v4.9.266-43-ga0c17d36dea3) ## Test result summary total: 54076, pass: 44392, fail: 544, skip: 8849, xfail: 291, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/68] 4.14.231-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.231 release. > There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.231-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.14.231-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.14.y * git commit: 520c87617485a8885f18d5cb9d70076199e37b43 * git describe: v4.14.230-69-g520c87617485 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.230-69-g520c87617485 ## No regressions (compared to v4.14.230-60-g9c0b97ea1e55) ## No fixes (compared to v4.14.230-60-g9c0b97ea1e55) ## Test result summary total: 57382, pass: 47701, fail: 583, skip: 8861, xfail: 237, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/13] 4.19.188-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.188 release. > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.188-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.19.188-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.19.y * git commit: 9f5de887b160253cf03d6ae91e72ba7dbd4a2317 * git describe: v4.19.187-14-g9f5de887b160 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.187-14-g9f5de887b160 ## No regressions (compared to v4.19.187) ## No fixes (compared to v4.19.187) ## Test result summary total: 71166, pass: 57695, fail: 1809, skip: 11392, xfail: 270, ## Build Summary * arm: 97 total, 96 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/18] 5.4.113-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.113 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.113-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.4.113-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: 0d80f6c61d6ba21b3cb64eae72b8485dd96b5a94 * git describe: v5.4.112-19-g0d80f6c61d6b * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.112-19-g0d80f6c61d6b ## No regressions (compared to v5.4.112) ## No fixes (compared to v5.4.112) ## Test result summary total: 71154, pass: 59298, fail: 1014, skip: 10587, xfail: 255, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 191 total, 191 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.10.31-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 * git describe: v5.10.30-26-g32f5704a0a4f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.30-26-g32f5704a0a4f ## No regressions (compared to v5.10.30) ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.30) ## Test result summary total: 72955, pass: 61311, fail: 1785, skip: 9589, xfail: 270, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mod[ * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 00/23] 5.11.15-rc1 review
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.15 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.15-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.11.15-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.11.y * git commit: 7825299a896f0cf519f259bb9d4ccab262d8c175 * git describe: v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f ## No regressions (compared to v5.11.14) ## No fixes (compared to v5.11.14) ## Test result summary total: 74984, pass: 63321, fail: 1427, skip: 9959, xfail: 277, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/66] 4.19.187-rc1 review
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.187 release. > There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.187-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.19.187-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.19.y * git commit: 85bc28045cdbb9576907965c761445aaece4f5ad * git describe: v4.19.186-67-g85bc28045cdb * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.186-67-g85bc28045cdb ## No regressions (compared to v4.19.185-19-g6aba908ea95f) ## No fixes (compared to v4.19.185-19-g6aba908ea95f) ## Test result summary total: 65010, pass: 52744, fail: 1575, skip: 10433, xfail: 258, ## Build Summary * arm: 97 total, 96 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 15 total, 13 passed, 2 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 2 total, 1 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/111] 5.4.112-rc1 review
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.112 release. > There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.112-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.4.112-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: f9b2de2cddd4601c5d2f2947fc5cebb7dbecd266 * git describe: v5.4.111-112-gf9b2de2cddd4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.111-112-gf9b2de2cddd4 ## No regressions (compared to v5.4.110-24-g9b00696cdc42) ## No fixes (compared to v5.4.110-24-g9b00696cdc42) ## Test result summary total: 66568, pass: 55229, fail: 884, skip: 10210, xfail: 245, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 190 total, 190 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 2 total, 1 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.10.30-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 8ac4b1deedaa507b5d0f46316e7f32004dd99cd1 * git describe: v5.10.29-189-g8ac4b1deedaa * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.29-189-g8ac4b1deedaa ## No regressions (compared to v5.10.28-42-g18f507c37f33) ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.28-42-g18f507c37f33) ## Test result summary total: 75890, pass: 63301, fail: 2174, skip: 10129, xfail: 286, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 2 total, 1 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/210] 5.11.14-rc1 review
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.14 release. > There are 210 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.14-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.11.14-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.11.y * git commit: 7ce240e32fd44eb0ababbd16236a00ca7b7d005e * git describe: v5.11.13-211-g7ce240e32fd4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.13-211-g7ce240e32fd4 ## No regressions (compared to v5.11.12-46-gab8c60637a48) ## No fixes (compared to v5.11.12-46-gab8c60637a48) ## Test result summary total: 74763, pass: 62936, fail: 1599, skip: 9939, xfail: 289, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/13] 4.9.266-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.266 release. > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.266-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.9.266-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.9.y * git commit: d263ac9a21bc26cb10dee0ee34109289ac518725 * git describe: v4.9.265-14-gd263ac9a21bc * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.265-14-gd263ac9a21bc ## No regressions (compared to v4.9.265) ## No fixes (compared to v4.9.265) ## Test result summary total: 56309, pass: 46531, fail: 617, skip: 8921, xfail: 240, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.266-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.266 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.266-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.4.266-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.4.y * git commit: 52dca0094c23c3f6c73da63a8861764f778940d5 * git describe: v4.4.265-21-g52dca0094c23 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.265-21-g52dca0094c23 ## No regressions (compared to v4.4.265) ## No fixes (compared to v4.4.265) ## Test result summary total: 45835, pass: 37184, fail: 486, skip: 7946, xfail: 219, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/14] 4.14.230-rc1 review
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 01:43, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:53:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.230 release. > > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 168 pass: 168 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 408 pass: 408 fail: 0 > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck > > Having said this, I did see a spurious crash, and I see an unusual warning. > I have seen the crash only once, but the warning happens with every boot. > These are likely not new but exposed because I added network interface > tests. This is all v4.14.y specific; I did not see it in other branches. > See below for the tracebacks. Maybe someone has seen it before. I do not notice these warnings. Please share the testing environment / device / setup / network interfaces and Kernel configs and steps to reproduce. - Naresh
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/14] 4.14.230-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.230 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.230-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.14.230-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.14.y * git commit: bbc0ac1df3446fb814abe1f0486c72f81bb95577 * git describe: v4.14.229-15-gbbc0ac1df344 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.229-15-gbbc0ac1df344 ## No regressions (compared to v4.14.229) ## No fixes (compared to v4.14.229) ## Test result summary total: 54655, pass: 45540, fail: 651, skip: 8277, xfail: 187, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/18] 4.19.186-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.186 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.186-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.19.186-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.19.y * git commit: 6aba908ea95f2196c499c922cfae662412d5040a * git describe: v4.19.185-19-g6aba908ea95f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.185-19-g6aba908ea95f ## No regressions (compared to v4.19.185) ## No fixes (compared to v4.19.185) ## Test result summary total: 67843, pass: 55043, fail: 1811, skip: 10773, xfail: 216, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/23] 5.4.111-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.111 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.111-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.4.111-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: 9b00696cdc423c6b92ee4d7cea65858137f8456f * git describe: v5.4.110-24-g9b00696cdc42 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.110-24-g9b00696cdc42 ## No regressions (compared to v5.4.110) ## No fixes (compared to v5.4.110) ## Test result summary total: 66085, pass: 54986, fail: 899, skip: 9988, xfail: 212, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 191 total, 190 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/41] 5.10.29-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.29 release. > There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.29-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.10.29-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 18f507c37f338c5d30f58839060d3af0d8504162 * git describe: v5.10.28-42-g18f507c37f33 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.28-42-g18f507c37f33 ## No regressions (compared to v5.10.28) ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.28) ## Test result summary total: 76017, pass: 63668, fail: 2017, skip: 10100, xfail: 232, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 00/45] 5.11.13-rc1 review
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.13 release. > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.13-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.11.13-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.11.y * git commit: ab8c60637a48fbff98e2c93fd1cba93172937f29 * git describe: v5.11.12-46-gab8c60637a48 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.12-46-gab8c60637a48 ## No regressions (compared to v5.11.12) ## No fixes (compared to v5.11.12) ## Test result summary total: 71163, pass: 59648, fail: 1495, skip: 9771, xfail: 249, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [EXTERNAL] [next] ERROR: modpost: "dns_query" [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 23:17, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 21:49, Shyam Prasad wrote: > > > > Hi Naresh, > > > > AFAIK, this has been fixed in an updated patch last evening. Can you please > > check if you're still seeing it? > > Please share the fix commit and subject here. > > FYI, ignore the below statement. our build system did not trigger today tag yet. > This build error is still on today's Linux next tag 20210409. - Naresh
Re: [EXTERNAL] [next] ERROR: modpost: "dns_query" [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 21:49, Shyam Prasad wrote: > > Hi Naresh, > > AFAIK, this has been fixed in an updated patch last evening. Can you please > check if you're still seeing it? Please share the fix commit and subject here. FYI, This build error is still on today's Linux next tag 20210409. - Naresh
Re: [next] drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:586:61: error: 'rq' undeclared (first use in this function)
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:02, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > > On 4/8/21 23:24, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > >> bio_offset(req->bio), > >> GDROM_DMA_STARTADDR_REG); > >> __raw_writel(block_cnt * GDROM_HARD_SECTOR, GDROM_DMA_LENGTH_REG); > >> __raw_writel(1, GDROM_DMA_DIRECTION_REG); > > Thanks for your patch. > > After applying this typo fix, the build pass now. > > > > - Naresh > > > > are you okay if I add your tested by tag to the official patch ? > > Or you want to send it as a reply to that patch ? Please create a patch and add my Reported-by / Tested-by tags. - Naresh
Re: [next] drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:586:61: error: 'rq' undeclared (first use in this function)
Hi Chaitanya, On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 11:01, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > > On 4/8/21 22:21, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Linux next tag 20210408 architecture sh builds failed due to these errors. > > > > # to reproduce this build locally: > > > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 > > O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=sh > > CROSS_COMPILE=sh4-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache sh4-linux-gnu-gcc' > > 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' > > > > > > In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/scatterlist.h:9, > > from /builds/linux/include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10, > > from /builds/linux/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:16: > > /builds/linux/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c: In function 'gdrom_readdisk_dma': > > /builds/linux/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:586:61: error: 'rq' undeclared > > (first use in this function) > > 586 | __raw_writel(page_to_phys(bio_page(req->bio)) + > > bio_offset(rq->bio), > > | ^~ > > > > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju > > > > Regressions found on sh: > > - build/gcc-9-dreamcast_defconfig > > - build/gcc-10-dreamcast_defconfig > > - build/gcc-8-dreamcast_defconfig > > > > -- > > Linaro LKFT > > https://lkft.linaro.org > > > > This can be fixed by following :- > > diff --git a/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c b/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c > index e7717d090868..742b4a0932e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c > +++ b/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c > @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static blk_status_t gdrom_readdisk_dma(struct > request *req) > read_command->cmd[1] = 0x20; > block = blk_rq_pos(req)/GD_TO_BLK + GD_SESSION_OFFSET; > block_cnt = blk_rq_sectors(req)/GD_TO_BLK; > - __raw_writel(page_to_phys(bio_page(req->bio)) + bio_offset(rq->bio), > + __raw_writel(page_to_phys(bio_page(req->bio)) + > bio_offset(req->bio), > GDROM_DMA_STARTADDR_REG); > __raw_writel(block_cnt * GDROM_HARD_SECTOR, GDROM_DMA_LENGTH_REG); > __raw_writel(1, GDROM_DMA_DIRECTION_REG); Thanks for your patch. After applying this typo fix, the build pass now. - Naresh
[next] drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:586:61: error: 'rq' undeclared (first use in this function)
Linux next tag 20210408 architecture sh builds failed due to these errors. # to reproduce this build locally: make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=sh CROSS_COMPILE=sh4-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache sh4-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/scatterlist.h:9, from /builds/linux/include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10, from /builds/linux/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:16: /builds/linux/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c: In function 'gdrom_readdisk_dma': /builds/linux/drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c:586:61: error: 'rq' undeclared (first use in this function) 586 | __raw_writel(page_to_phys(bio_page(req->bio)) + bio_offset(rq->bio), | ^~ Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Regressions found on sh: - build/gcc-9-dreamcast_defconfig - build/gcc-10-dreamcast_defconfig - build/gcc-8-dreamcast_defconfig -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
[next] ERROR: modpost: "dns_query" [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined
Large number of Linux next tag 20210408 builds failed due to these errors. make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- 'CC=sccache arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' ERROR: modpost: "dns_query" [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Regressions found on parisc: - build/gcc-9-defconfig - build/gcc-8-defconfig - build/gcc-10-defconfig Regressions found on sh: - build/gcc-9-dreamcast_defconfig - build/gcc-10-dreamcast_defconfig - build/gcc-8-dreamcast_defconfig Regressions found on arm: - build/clang-12-s3c2410_defconfig - build/gcc-8-s3c2410_defconfig - build/clang-10-nhk8815_defconfig - build/gcc-9-s3c2410_defconfig - build/gcc-10-nhk8815_defconfig - build/gcc-8-nhk8815_defconfig - build/gcc-10-s3c2410_defconfig - build/clang-12-nhk8815_defconfig - build/clang-11-s3c2410_defconfig - build/gcc-9-nhk8815_defconfig - build/clang-11-nhk8815_defconfig - build/clang-10-s3c2410_defconfig -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [next] [arm64] [gpio] BUG: key has not been registered! DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 15:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:33 AM Naresh Kamboju > wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 04:21, Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:38 AM Naresh Kamboju > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > While running kselftest recently added gpio gpio-sim.sh test case the > > > > following > > > > warning was triggered on Linux next tag 20210330 tag running on arm64 > > > > juno > > > > and hikey devices. > > > > > > > > GOOD: next-20210326 > > > > BAD: next-20210330 > > > > > > > > This is still happening today on Linux next tag 20210407. > > > > > > Can you add the following > > > > > > sysfs_attr_init(attrs[i]); > > > > > > to the end of the loop in gpio_sim_setup_sysfs()? > > > > Do you mean like this, > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > > index ea17289a869c..5fe67ccf45f7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > > @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip > > *chip) > > dev_attr->store = gpio_sim_sysfs_line_store; > > > > attrs[i] = _attr->attr; > > + sysfs_attr_init(attrs[i]); > > } > > > > chip->attr_group.name = "line-ctrl"; > > Precisely. As per your suggestions the above line added and build tested the reported issue is fixed now. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju > > > > If it fixes an issue I'll send a formal patch. > > > > I will build and test this and report here. OTOH, LKFT builds kernel and rootfs on host and runs tests on various target devices. While doing this process "make install" is not installing required test files like gpio-mockup-cdev and gpio-line-name. # ./gpio-mockup.sh: line 106: ./gpio-mockup-cdev: No such file or directory # ./gpio-sim.sh: line 100: ./gpio-line-name: No such file or directory Test run log: -- # selftests: gpio: gpio-mockup.sh # 1. Module load tests # 1.1. dynamic allocation of gpio # ./gpio-mockup.sh: line 106: ./gpio-mockup-cdev: No such file or directory # test failed: line value is 127 when 1 was expected # GPIO gpio-mockup test FAIL not ok 1 selftests: gpio: gpio-mockup.sh # exit=1 # selftests: gpio: gpio-sim.sh # 1. chip_name and dev_name attributes # 1.1. Chip name is communicated to user # 1.2. chip_name returns 'none' if the chip is still pending # 1.3. Device name is communicated to user # 1.4. dev_name returns 'none' if chip is still pending # 2. Creating simulated chips # 2.1. Default number of lines is 1 # 2.2. Number of lines can be specified # 2.3. Label can be set # 2.4. Label can be left empty # 2.5. Line names can be configured # ./gpio-sim.sh: line 100: ./gpio-line-name: No such file or directory # line name is incorrect # GPIO gpio-sim test FAIL not ok 2 selftests: gpio: gpio-sim.sh # exit=1 - Naresh
Re: [next] [arm64] [gpio] BUG: key has not been registered! DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 04:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:38 AM Naresh Kamboju > wrote: > > > > While running kselftest recently added gpio gpio-sim.sh test case the > > following > > warning was triggered on Linux next tag 20210330 tag running on arm64 juno > > and hikey devices. > > > > GOOD: next-20210326 > > BAD: next-20210330 > > > > This is still happening today on Linux next tag 20210407. > > Can you add the following > > sysfs_attr_init(attrs[i]); > > to the end of the loop in gpio_sim_setup_sysfs()? Do you mean like this, diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c index ea17289a869c..5fe67ccf45f7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip) dev_attr->store = gpio_sim_sysfs_line_store; attrs[i] = _attr->attr; + sysfs_attr_init(attrs[i]); } chip->attr_group.name = "line-ctrl"; > > If it fixes an issue I'll send a formal patch. I will build and test this and report here. - Naresh
[next] [arm64] [gpio] BUG: key has not been registered! DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON:
While running kselftest recently added gpio gpio-sim.sh test case the following warning was triggered on Linux next tag 20210330 tag running on arm64 juno and hikey devices. GOOD: next-20210326 BAD: next-20210330 This is still happening today on Linux next tag 20210407. # selftests: gpio: gpio-sim.sh # 1. chip_name and dev_name attributes # 1.1. Chip name is communicated to user [ 143.081193] BUG: key 000800eba398 has not been registered! [ 143.087326] [ cut here ] [ 143.091987] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) [ 143.092005] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1821 at /usr/src/kernel/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4688 lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.106223] Modules linked in: gpio_sim rfkill tda998x cec drm_kms_helper drm crct10dif_ce fuse [last unloaded: gpio_mockup] [ 143.117495] CPU: 1 PID: 1821 Comm: mv Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-next-20210330 #1 [ 143.124645] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT) [ 143.130572] pstate: 4005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) [ 143.136589] pc : lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.141302] lr : lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.146014] sp : 800013fb3560 [ 143.149330] x29: 800013fb3560 x28: ee4b [ 143.154655] x27: 11b4 x26: 1000 [ 143.159979] x25: 000800eba380 x24: [ 143.165303] x23: x22: [ 143.170626] x21: 80001382b000 x20: 000800eba398 [ 143.175949] x19: 000827ac32a8 x18: [ 143.181273] x17: x16: [ 143.186595] x15: 800012900a88 x14: 800093fb3167 [ 143.191918] x13: 800013fb3175 x12: a0ec [ 143.197241] x11: 05f5e0ff x10: 800013fb30c0 [ 143.202565] x9 : 800013fb3560 x8 : 4e5241575f534b43 [ 143.207888] x7 : 800012989ad8 x6 : 800013fb3180 [ 143.213211] x5 : 0001 x4 : 0001 [ 143.218534] x3 : 800012901000 x2 : [ 143.223856] x1 : b4b7acac5f71bc00 x0 : [ 143.229180] Call trace: [ 143.231625] lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.235989] __kernfs_create_file+0xa8/0x1d0 [ 143.240268] sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0xa8/0x1f8 [ 143.244718] internal_create_group+0x118/0x420 [ 143.249169] sysfs_create_group+0x2c/0x38 [ 143.253185] gpio_sim_probe+0x358/0x3c0 [gpio_sim] [ 143.257995] platform_probe+0x6c/0xd8 [ 143.261663] really_probe+0x16c/0x508 [ 143.265332] driver_probe_device+0x104/0x178 [ 143.269610] __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x130 [ 143.274062] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xd8 [ 143.277903] __device_attach+0xf0/0x178 [ 143.281745] device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30 [ 143.285935] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xa8 [ 143.289776] device_add+0x424/0x810 [ 143.293270] platform_device_add+0x12c/0x2c0 [ 143.297545] platform_device_register_full+0x124/0x150 [ 143.302692] gpio_sim_config_commit_item+0x160/0x1e0 [gpio_sim] [ 143.308628] configfs_rename+0x1dc/0x220 [ 143.312557] vfs_rename+0x394/0x960 [ 143.316051] do_renameat2+0x408/0x4c0 [ 143.319718] __arm64_sys_renameat+0x5c/0x70 [ 143.323908] el0_svc_common+0x7c/0x158 [ 143.327665] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x90 [ 143.330985] el0_svc+0x20/0x30 [ 143.334045] el0_sync_handler+0x8c/0xb0 [ 143.337886] el0_sync+0x13c/0x140 [ 143.341204] irq event stamp: 5607 [ 143.344520] hardirqs last enabled at (5607): [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x48/0x90 [ 143.353410] hardirqs last disabled at (5606): [] __schedule+0x364/0x950 [ 143.361605] softirqs last enabled at (5602): [] __do_softirq+0x510/0x63c [ 143.369971] softirqs last disabled at (5577): [] irq_exit+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 143.377992] ---[ end trace bc3c86ef609281aa ]--- # 1.2. chip_name returns 'none' if the chip is still pending Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju metadata: git branch: master git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git describe: next-20210330 kernel-config: http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/lkft/sumo/juno/lkft/linux-next/995/config https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20210407/testrun/4306292/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2485709/log Full test log link, https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20210330/testrun/4268728/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2463256/log git log --oneline next-20210326..next-20210330 -- tools/testing/selftests/gpio/ 9d940ab72645 selftests: gpio: add test cases for gpio-sim 8a4cb2823240 selftests: gpio: add a helper for reading GPIO line names ab1dbed6f4e8 selftests: gpio: provide a helper for reading chip info -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/28] 4.4.265-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.265 release. > There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.265-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.4.265-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-4.4.y * git commit: 5bb7d387c8f89b4d3ff46f3e0ee3f0f00d026bde * git describe: v4.4.264-29-g5bb7d387c8f8 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.264-29-g5bb7d387c8f8 ## No regressions (compared to v4.4.264-21-g8b29c729d1d8) ## Fixes (compared to v4.4.264-21-g8b29c729d1d8) No fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 44184, pass: 35929, fail: 472, skip: 7578, xfail: 205, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/35] 4.9.265-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.265 release. > There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.265-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.9.265-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-4.9.y * git commit: 570fbad9f4ca61dfb49359b9c2627a97e41e2b4b * git describe: v4.9.264-36-g570fbad9f4ca * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.264-36-g570fbad9f4ca ## No regressions (compared to v4.9.264-25-gea8146018e96) ## No fixes (compared to v4.9.264-25-gea8146018e96) ## Test result summary total: 58777, pass: 48253, fail: 593, skip: 9676, xfail: 255, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/52] 4.14.229-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.229 release. > There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.229-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.14.229-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-4.14.y * git commit: 9d1c6513551e6928da195e22c6b32ed0adf42593 * git describe: v4.14.228-53-g9d1c6513551e * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.228-53-g9d1c6513551e ## No regressions (compared to v4.14.228) ## No fixes (compared to v4.14.228) ## Test result summary total: 56301, pass: 46585, fail: 686, skip: 8844, xfail: 186, ## Build Summary * arm: 97 total, 97 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/56] 4.19.185-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.185 release. > There are 56 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.185-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.19.185-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-4.19.y * git commit: e80ef2122d5c0531670cb281f5beea2cb469aee1 * git describe: v4.19.184-57-ge80ef2122d5c * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.184-57-ge80ef2122d5c ## No regressions (compared to v4.19.184-40-gea7c9d15cb8d) ## No fixes (compared to v4.19.184-40-gea7c9d15cb8d) ## Test result summary total: 69440, pass: 56308, fail: 1824, skip: 11083, xfail: 225, ## Build Summary * arm: 97 total, 97 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/74] 5.4.110-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.110 release. > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.110-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.4.110-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: c6f7c5a01d5a9e0d0cfb721249d5378de5f00310 * git describe: v5.4.109-75-gc6f7c5a01d5a * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.109-75-gc6f7c5a01d5a ## No regressions (compared to v5.4.109) ## No fixes (compared to v5.4.109) ## Test result summary total: 71104, pass: 59473, fail: 795, skip: 10620, xfail: 216, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 191 total, 190 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/126] 5.10.28-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.28 release. > There are 126 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.28-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.10.28-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 17879c574df0acdfddd69065b191a3c1b1f00d48 * git describe: v5.10.27-127-g17879c574df0 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.27-127-g17879c574df0 ## No regressions (compared to v5.10.27-82-g948d7f2d279f) ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.27-82-g948d7f2d279f) ## Test result summary total: 75519, pass: 63466, fail: 1846, skip: 9956, xfail: 251, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed * s390: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/152] 5.11.12-rc1 review
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.12 release. > There are 152 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:50:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.12-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.11.12-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.11.y * git commit: 74f1df3016246d321c3f58de40c0d64f5d5861a1 * git describe: v5.11.11-153-g74f1df301624 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.11-153-g74f1df301624 ## No regressions (compared to v5.11.11-105-g79c43dab0491) ## No fixes (compared to v5.11.11-105-g79c43dab0491) ## Test result summary total: 76190, pass: 64219, fail: 1734, skip: 9997, xfail: 240, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 42 total, 38 passed, 4 failed * s390: 27 total, 24 passed, 3 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 35 total, 34 passed, 1 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
BUG: key ffff000800eba398 has not been registered!
While running kselftest recently added gpio gpio-sim.sh test case the following warning was triggered on Linux next tag 20210330 tag running on arm64 juno and hikey devices. GOOD: next-20210326 BAD: next-20210330 # selftests: gpio: gpio-sim.sh # 1. chip_name and dev_name attributes # 1.1. Chip name is communicated to user [ 143.081193] BUG: key 000800eba398 has not been registered! [ 143.087326] [ cut here ] [ 143.091987] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) [ 143.092005] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1821 at /usr/src/kernel/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4688 lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.106223] Modules linked in: gpio_sim rfkill tda998x cec drm_kms_helper drm crct10dif_ce fuse [last unloaded: gpio_mockup] [ 143.117495] CPU: 1 PID: 1821 Comm: mv Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-next-20210330 #1 [ 143.124645] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT) [ 143.130572] pstate: 4005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) [ 143.136589] pc : lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.141302] lr : lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.146014] sp : 800013fb3560 [ 143.149330] x29: 800013fb3560 x28: ee4b [ 143.154655] x27: 11b4 x26: 1000 [ 143.159979] x25: 000800eba380 x24: [ 143.165303] x23: x22: [ 143.170626] x21: 80001382b000 x20: 000800eba398 [ 143.175949] x19: 000827ac32a8 x18: [ 143.181273] x17: x16: [ 143.186595] x15: 800012900a88 x14: 800093fb3167 [ 143.191918] x13: 800013fb3175 x12: a0ec [ 143.197241] x11: 05f5e0ff x10: 800013fb30c0 [ 143.202565] x9 : 800013fb3560 x8 : 4e5241575f534b43 [ 143.207888] x7 : 800012989ad8 x6 : 800013fb3180 [ 143.213211] x5 : 0001 x4 : 0001 [ 143.218534] x3 : 800012901000 x2 : [ 143.223856] x1 : b4b7acac5f71bc00 x0 : [ 143.229180] Call trace: [ 143.231625] lockdep_init_map_type+0xf0/0x298 [ 143.235989] __kernfs_create_file+0xa8/0x1d0 [ 143.240268] sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0xa8/0x1f8 [ 143.244718] internal_create_group+0x118/0x420 [ 143.249169] sysfs_create_group+0x2c/0x38 [ 143.253185] gpio_sim_probe+0x358/0x3c0 [gpio_sim] [ 143.257995] platform_probe+0x6c/0xd8 [ 143.261663] really_probe+0x16c/0x508 [ 143.265332] driver_probe_device+0x104/0x178 [ 143.269610] __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x130 [ 143.274062] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xd8 [ 143.277903] __device_attach+0xf0/0x178 [ 143.281745] device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30 [ 143.285935] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xa8 [ 143.289776] device_add+0x424/0x810 [ 143.293270] platform_device_add+0x12c/0x2c0 [ 143.297545] platform_device_register_full+0x124/0x150 [ 143.302692] gpio_sim_config_commit_item+0x160/0x1e0 [gpio_sim] [ 143.308628] configfs_rename+0x1dc/0x220 [ 143.312557] vfs_rename+0x394/0x960 [ 143.316051] do_renameat2+0x408/0x4c0 [ 143.319718] __arm64_sys_renameat+0x5c/0x70 [ 143.323908] el0_svc_common+0x7c/0x158 [ 143.327665] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x90 [ 143.330985] el0_svc+0x20/0x30 [ 143.334045] el0_sync_handler+0x8c/0xb0 [ 143.337886] el0_sync+0x13c/0x140 [ 143.341204] irq event stamp: 5607 [ 143.344520] hardirqs last enabled at (5607): [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x48/0x90 [ 143.353410] hardirqs last disabled at (5606): [] __schedule+0x364/0x950 [ 143.361605] softirqs last enabled at (5602): [] __do_softirq+0x510/0x63c [ 143.369971] softirqs last disabled at (5577): [] irq_exit+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 143.377992] ---[ end trace bc3c86ef609281aa ]--- # 1.2. chip_name returns 'none' if the chip is still pending Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju metadata: git branch: master git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git describe: next-20210330 kernel-config: http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/lkft/sumo/juno/lkft/linux-next/995/config Full test log link, https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20210330/testrun/4268728/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2463256/log git log --oneline next-20210326..next-20210330 -- tools/testing/selftests/gpio/ 9d940ab72645 selftests: gpio: add test cases for gpio-sim 8a4cb2823240 selftests: gpio: add a helper for reading GPIO line names ab1dbed6f4e8 selftests: gpio: provide a helper for reading chip info -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry
Small correction, As per available test data the good tag is next-20210326. GOOD: next-20210326 BAD: next-20210330 On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 22:19, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > While running kselftest gpio on x86_64 and i386 the following warnings were > noticed and the device did not recover. > GOOD: next-20210326 > BAD: next-20210330 > > steps to reproduce: > --- > # Boot linux next tag 20210330 on x86_64 machine > # cd /opt/kselftests/default-in-kernel/ > # ./gpio-mockup.sh --> which is doing modprobe gpio-mockup > > Test log: > > # selftests: gpio: gpio-mockup.sh > # 1. Module load tests > # 1.1. dynamic allocation of gpio > # ./gpio-mockup.sh: line 106: ./gpio-mockup-cdev: No such file or directory > # test failed: line value is 127 when 1 was[ 46.136044] > [ cut here ] > [ 46.141916] remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory > 'irq/3', leaking at least 'ttyS1' > expected > # GPI[ 46.150471] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 603 at > /usr/src/kernel/fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x1a8/0x1c0 > [ 46.161566] Modules linked in: gpio_mockup(-) x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse > [ 46.168195] CPU: 2 PID: 603 Comm: modprobe Not tainted > 5.12.0-rc5-next-20210330 #1 > [ 46.175793] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS > 2.2 05/23/2018 > [ 46.183217] RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x1a8/0x1c0 > O gpio-mockup te[ 46.188128] Code: 40 bc 24 a8 48 c7 c7 98 4a 6a a8 > 48 0f 45 c2 49 8b 94 24 b0 00 00 00 4c 8b 80 d8 00 00 00 48 8b 92 d8 > 00 00 00 e8 38 36 cb ff <0f> 0b e9 5b ff ff ff e8 0c f4 c5 00 66 90 66 > 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 > [ 46.208252] RSP: 0018:9da080293c58 EFLAGS: 00010286 > [ 46.213511] RAX: RBX: 93e8403bcbb8 RCX: > > [ 46.220650] RDX: 0001 RSI: 93e9afb177f0 RDI: > 93e9afb177f0 > [ 46.227820] RBP: 9da080293c88 R08: 0001 R09: > 0001 > [ 46.235018] R10: 9da080293a80 R11: 9da080293a08 R12: > 93e8403bcb00 > [ 46.242165] R13: 93e840263100 R14: 0001 R15: > > st FAIL > [ 46.249303] FS: 7f7dc2501740() GS:93e9afb0() > knlGS: > [ 46.258164] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 > [ 46.263977] CR2: 7f7dc1de67f0 CR3: 00014f292003 CR4: > 003706e0 > [ 46.271124] DR0: DR1: DR2: > > [ 46.278292] DR3: DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: > 0400 > [ 46.285459] Call Trace: > [ 46.287926] unregister_irq_proc+0xf8/0x110 > [ 46.292128] free_desc+0x2e/0x70 > [ 46.295393] irq_free_descs+0x54/0x80 > [ 46.299102] irq_domain_free_irqs+0x11b/0x150 > [ 46.303507] irq_dispose_mapping+0x77/0x120 > [ 46.307711] gpio_mockup_dispose_mappings+0x4c/0x60 [gpio_mockup] > [ 46.313817] devm_action_release+0x15/0x20 > [ 46.317933] release_nodes+0x11e/0x220 > [ 46.321707] devres_release_all+0x3c/0x50 > [ 46.325733] device_release_driver_internal+0x10e/0x1d0 > [ 46.331016] driver_detach+0x4d/0xa0 > [ 46.334609] bus_remove_driver+0x5f/0xe0 > [ 46.338553] driver_unregister+0x2f/0x50 > [ 46.342495] platform_driver_unregister+0x12/0x20 > [ 46.347218] gpio_mockup_exit+0x1f/0x5cc [gpio_mockup] > [ 46.352374] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15b/0x260 > [ 46.357082] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x50 > [ 46.360676] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > [ 46.365748] RIP: 0033:0x7f7dc1e0f997 > [ 46.369342] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 01 a5 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 b0 00 00 > 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d1 a4 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 > 01 48 > [ 46.388108] RSP: 002b:7ffe35506e78 EFLAGS: 0206 ORIG_RAX: > 00b0 > [ 46.395708] RAX: ffda RBX: 0134ebd0 RCX: > 7f7dc1e0f997 > [ 46.402883] RDX: RSI: 0800 RDI: > 0134ec38 > [ 46.410031] RBP: R08: 7ffe35505e41 R09: > > [ 46.417183] R10: 08da R11: 0206 R12: > 0134ec38 > [ 46.424331] R13: 0001 R14: 0134ec38 R15: > 7ffe35508238 > [ 46.431507] irq event stamp: 6645 > [ 46.434845] hardirqs last enabled at (6655): [] > console_unlock+0x34e/0x550 > [ 46.443380] hardirqs last disabled at (6664): [] > console_unlock+0x3b9/0x550 > [ 46.451915] softirqs last enabled at (6564): [] > __do_softirq+0x30e/0x421 > [ 46.460333] softirqs last disabled at (6559): [] > irq_exit_rcu+0xb3/0xc0 > [ 46.468548] ---[ end trace 89d01
WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry
While running kselftest gpio on x86_64 and i386 the following warnings were noticed and the device did not recover. GOOD: next-20210329 BAD: next-20210330 steps to reproduce: --- # Boot linux next tag 20210330 on x86_64 machine # cd /opt/kselftests/default-in-kernel/ # ./gpio-mockup.sh --> which is doing modprobe gpio-mockup Test log: # selftests: gpio: gpio-mockup.sh # 1. Module load tests # 1.1. dynamic allocation of gpio # ./gpio-mockup.sh: line 106: ./gpio-mockup-cdev: No such file or directory # test failed: line value is 127 when 1 was[ 46.136044] [ cut here ] [ 46.141916] remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'irq/3', leaking at least 'ttyS1' expected # GPI[ 46.150471] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 603 at /usr/src/kernel/fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x1a8/0x1c0 [ 46.161566] Modules linked in: gpio_mockup(-) x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse [ 46.168195] CPU: 2 PID: 603 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-next-20210330 #1 [ 46.175793] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS 2.2 05/23/2018 [ 46.183217] RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x1a8/0x1c0 O gpio-mockup te[ 46.188128] Code: 40 bc 24 a8 48 c7 c7 98 4a 6a a8 48 0f 45 c2 49 8b 94 24 b0 00 00 00 4c 8b 80 d8 00 00 00 48 8b 92 d8 00 00 00 e8 38 36 cb ff <0f> 0b e9 5b ff ff ff e8 0c f4 c5 00 66 90 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 [ 46.208252] RSP: 0018:9da080293c58 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 46.213511] RAX: RBX: 93e8403bcbb8 RCX: [ 46.220650] RDX: 0001 RSI: 93e9afb177f0 RDI: 93e9afb177f0 [ 46.227820] RBP: 9da080293c88 R08: 0001 R09: 0001 [ 46.235018] R10: 9da080293a80 R11: 9da080293a08 R12: 93e8403bcb00 [ 46.242165] R13: 93e840263100 R14: 0001 R15: st FAIL [ 46.249303] FS: 7f7dc2501740() GS:93e9afb0() knlGS: [ 46.258164] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 46.263977] CR2: 7f7dc1de67f0 CR3: 00014f292003 CR4: 003706e0 [ 46.271124] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 46.278292] DR3: DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 46.285459] Call Trace: [ 46.287926] unregister_irq_proc+0xf8/0x110 [ 46.292128] free_desc+0x2e/0x70 [ 46.295393] irq_free_descs+0x54/0x80 [ 46.299102] irq_domain_free_irqs+0x11b/0x150 [ 46.303507] irq_dispose_mapping+0x77/0x120 [ 46.307711] gpio_mockup_dispose_mappings+0x4c/0x60 [gpio_mockup] [ 46.313817] devm_action_release+0x15/0x20 [ 46.317933] release_nodes+0x11e/0x220 [ 46.321707] devres_release_all+0x3c/0x50 [ 46.325733] device_release_driver_internal+0x10e/0x1d0 [ 46.331016] driver_detach+0x4d/0xa0 [ 46.334609] bus_remove_driver+0x5f/0xe0 [ 46.338553] driver_unregister+0x2f/0x50 [ 46.342495] platform_driver_unregister+0x12/0x20 [ 46.347218] gpio_mockup_exit+0x1f/0x5cc [gpio_mockup] [ 46.352374] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15b/0x260 [ 46.357082] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x50 [ 46.360676] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 46.365748] RIP: 0033:0x7f7dc1e0f997 [ 46.369342] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 01 a5 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d1 a4 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 46.388108] RSP: 002b:7ffe35506e78 EFLAGS: 0206 ORIG_RAX: 00b0 [ 46.395708] RAX: ffda RBX: 0134ebd0 RCX: 7f7dc1e0f997 [ 46.402883] RDX: RSI: 0800 RDI: 0134ec38 [ 46.410031] RBP: R08: 7ffe35505e41 R09: [ 46.417183] R10: 08da R11: 0206 R12: 0134ec38 [ 46.424331] R13: 0001 R14: 0134ec38 R15: 7ffe35508238 [ 46.431507] irq event stamp: 6645 [ 46.434845] hardirqs last enabled at (6655): [] console_unlock+0x34e/0x550 [ 46.443380] hardirqs last disabled at (6664): [] console_unlock+0x3b9/0x550 [ 46.451915] softirqs last enabled at (6564): [] __do_softirq+0x30e/0x421 [ 46.460333] softirqs last disabled at (6559): [] irq_exit_rcu+0xb3/0xc0 [ 46.468548] ---[ end trace 89d0119dab1b1498 ]--- [ 46.477938] remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'irq/4', leaking at least 'ttyS0' [ 46.486512] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 603 at /usr/src/kernel/fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x1a8/0x1c0 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju metadata: git branch: master git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git describe: next-20210330 kernel-config: http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/lkft/sumo/intel-corei7-64/lkft/linux-next/995/config Full test log: https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2463479#L1481 https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20210330/testrun/4268028/suite/linux-log-pa
Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/33] 4.4.264-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.264 release. > There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.264-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.4.264-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 5fccbcb46b8844500db24690cef618c294ac0ca5 git describe: v4.4.263-34-g5fccbcb46b88 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.263-34-g5fccbcb46b88 No regressions (compared to build v4.4.263) No fixes (compared to build v4.4.263) Ran 34815 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-sync * fwts * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * ssuite Summary kernel: 4.4.264-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git branch: 4.4.264-rc1-hikey-20210329-975 git commit: 094469e4d2aa566c4760fef99d768edd36eeac85 git describe: 4.4.264-rc1-hikey-20210329-975 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.264-rc1-hikey-20210329-975 No regressions (compared to build 4.4.264-rc1-hikey-20210327-972) No fixes (compared to build 4.4.264-rc1-hikey-20210327-972) Ran 810 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - hi6220-hikey - arm64 Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests *
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/53] 4.9.264-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.264 release. > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.264-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.9.264-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: 3c2295cc6be320f7598a3ae9da3abc98230bd931 git describe: v4.9.263-54-g3c2295cc6be3 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.263-54-g3c2295cc6be3 No regressions (compared to build v4.9.263) No fixes (compared to build v4.9.263) Ran 49047 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sysctl * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-sync * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/59] 4.14.228-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.228 release. > There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.228-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.14.228-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.14.y git commit: 4cee23773c6e6701bbedeed75e7d4dd2fe5bb8c0 git describe: v4.14.227-60-g4cee23773c6e Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.227-60-g4cee23773c6e No regressions (compared to build v4.14.227) No fixes (compared to build v4.14.227) Ran 50616 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * fwts * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-mm-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * v4l2-compliance * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * kselftest-kexec * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/72] 4.19.184-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.184 release. > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.184-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.19.184-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.19.y git commit: bbd08292bae4049381e5537588ba9f581456c4d5 git describe: v4.19.183-73-gbbd08292bae4 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.183-73-gbbd08292bae4 No regressions (compared to build v4.19.183) No fixes (compared to build v4.19.183) Ran 57059 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-tc-testing * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/111] 5.4.109-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.109 release. > There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.109-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.4.109-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.4.y git commit: 7b78fa4bf15f02997c4dba22fe2bf2ca8aa9906f git describe: v5.4.108-112-g7b78fa4bf15f Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.108-112-g7b78fa4bf15f No regressions (compared to build v5.4.108) No fixes (compared to build v5.4.108) Ran 59776 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-tc-testing * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * rcutorture * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/219] 5.10.27-rc2 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.27 release. > There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:13:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.27-rc2.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.27-rc2 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 8c8bcec351223764ccc3ab7551540172989b5194 git describe: v5.10.26-220-g8c8bcec35122 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.26-220-g8c8bcec35122 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.26) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.26) Ran 65388 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-lib * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/252] 5.11.11-rc2 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 15:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release. > There are 252 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:13:07 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.11-rc2.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.11.11-rc2 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.11.y git commit: f288f3edc68844bc15b54723fe2c7a50c24f5da6 git describe: v5.11.10-253-gf288f3edc688 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.10-253-gf288f3edc688 No regressions (compared to build v5.11.9-3-g7ab86fca27ce) No fixes (compared to build v5.11.9-3-g7ab86fca27ce) Ran 66219 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-tc-testing * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * fwts * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * kvm-unit-tests * v4l2-compliance * rcutorture * kunit * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 225/254] arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range()
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> From: Anshuman Khandual
>
> [ Upstream commit 03aaf83fba6e5af08b5dd174c72edee9b7d9ed9b ]
>
> This overrides arch_get_mappable_range() on arm64 platform which will be
> used with recently added generic framework. It drops
> inside_linear_region() and subsequent check in arch_add_memory() which are
> no longer required. It also adds a VM_BUG_ON() check that would ensure
> that mhp_range_allowed() has already been called.
>
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1612149902-7867-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khand...@arm.com
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas
> Cc: Will Deacon
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
> Cc: Mark Rutland
> Cc: Heiko Carstens
> Cc: Jason Wang
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> Cc: Michal Hocko
> Cc: Oscar Salvador
> Cc: Pankaj Gupta
> Cc: Pankaj Gupta
> Cc: teawater
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik
> Cc: Wei Yang
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 15 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 6f0648777d34..92b3be127796 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1443,16 +1443,19 @@ static void __remove_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir,
> unsigned long start, u64 size)
> free_empty_tables(start, end, PAGE_OFFSET, PAGE_END);
> }
>
> -static bool inside_linear_region(u64 start, u64 size)
> +struct range arch_get_mappable_range(void)
> {
> + struct range mhp_range;
> +
> /*
> * Linear mapping region is the range [PAGE_OFFSET..(PAGE_END - 1)]
> * accommodating both its ends but excluding PAGE_END. Max physical
> * range which can be mapped inside this linear mapping range, must
> * also be derived from its end points.
> */
> - return start >= __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual)) &&
> - (start + size - 1) <= __pa(PAGE_END - 1);
> + mhp_range.start = __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual));
> + mhp_range.end = __pa(PAGE_END - 1);
> + return mhp_range;
> }
>
> int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> @@ -1460,11 +1463,7 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> {
> int ret, flags = 0;
>
> - if (!inside_linear_region(start, size)) {
> - pr_err("[%llx %llx] is outside linear mapping region\n",
> start, start + size);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> + VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
> if (rodata_full || debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
The stable rc 5.10 and 5.11 builds failed for arm64 architecture
due to below warnings / errors,
> Anshuman Khandual
> arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range()
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'arch_add_memory':
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:13: error: implicit declaration of function
'mhp_range_allowed'; did you mean 'cpu_map_prog_allowed'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
^
include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro
'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e
^
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:2: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_BUG_ON'
VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
^
Build link,
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.11/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/41/consoleText
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.10/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=dragonboard-410c,label=docker-buster-lkft/120/consoleFull
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/221] 5.10.27-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.27 release. > There are 221 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.27-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h The stable rc 5.10 and 5.11 builds failed for arm64 architecture due to below warnings / errors, > Anshuman Khandual > arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range() arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'arch_add_memory': arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'mhp_range_allowed'; did you mean 'cpu_map_prog_allowed'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); ^ include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID' #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e ^ arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:2: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_BUG_ON' VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); ^ Build link, https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.11/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/41/consoleText https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.10/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=dragonboard-410c,label=docker-buster-lkft/120/consoleFull -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org ReplyReply to allForward
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/254] 5.11.11-rc1 review
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release. > There are 254 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.11-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h The stable rc 5.10 and 5.11 builds failed for arm64 architecture due to below warnings / errors, > Anshuman Khandual > arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range() arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'arch_add_memory': arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'mhp_range_allowed'; did you mean 'cpu_map_prog_allowed'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); ^ include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID' #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e ^ arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:2: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_BUG_ON' VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); ^ Build link, https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.11/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/41/consoleText https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.10/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=dragonboard-410c,label=docker-buster-lkft/120/consoleFull -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/150] 5.10.26-rc3 review
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release. > There are 150 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:33:54 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.26-rc3.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.26-rc3 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: f6bd595b6fdae1933a752242cfb77a1a0bc3117d git describe: v5.10.25-151-gf6bd595b6fda Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-151-gf6bd595b6fda No regressions (compared to build v5.10.25) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.25) Ran 65251 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lkdtm * libhugetlbfs * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * fwts * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/156] 5.10.26-rc2 review
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 14:19, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 20:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release. > > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:18:19 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.26-rc2.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > While runnning Kselftest net mptcp_join.sh tests the following warnings and > kernel panic triggered on arm64, x86 and i386. > - arm64 juno-r2 > - arm64 hikey > - x86 > - i386 > > easy to reproduce: > Please find more details in this email. > > Warning: > > [ 1040.114695] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. > [ 1040.119857] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 31925 at > /usr/src/kernel/lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd7/0x100 > [ 1040.129769] Modules linked in: act_mirred cls_u32 sch_netem sch_etf > ip6table_nat xt_nat iptable_nat nf_nat ip6table_filter xt_conntrack > nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 sch_fq > iptable_filter xt_mark ip_tables cls_bpf sch_ingress algif_hash > x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse [last unloaded: test_blackhole_dev] > [ 1040.159030] CPU: 3 PID: 31925 Comm: mptcp_connect Tainted: G > W K 5.10.26-rc2 #1 > [ 1040.167459] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS > 2.2 05/23/2018 > [ 1040.174851] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd7/0x100 > > And > > Kernel Panic: > - > [ 1069.557485] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0010 > [ 1069.564446] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > [ 1069.569583] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page > [ 1069.574714] PGD 0 P4D 0 > [ 1069.577246] Oops: [#1] SMP PTI > [ 1069.580730] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Tainted: GW > K 5.10.26-rc2 #1 > [ 1069.588719] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS > 2.2 05/23/2018 > [ 1069.596106] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3f/0x290 > ... > [ 1069.961697] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt > [ 1069.968083] Kernel Offset: 0x1860 from 0x8100 > (relocation range: 0x8000-0xbfff) > > steps to reproduce: > -- > - cd /opt/kselftests/mainline/net/mptcp > - ./mptcp_join.sh || true > The reported warning and kernel crash is bisected and found this commit is cause. > Florian Westphal > mptcp: put subflow sock on connect error We have reverted this patch and re-tested and confirmed that after reverting the reported issue got disappeared. > > Summary > > > kernel: 5.10.26-rc2 > git repo: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > git branch: linux-5.10.y > git commit: deabac90f919203307e6eee2606366bdb19bbe93 > git describe: v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919 > Test details: > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919 > Test config: > http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/lkft/sumo/juno/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.10/113/config > > > # selftests: net/mptcp: mptcp_join.sh > [ 1032.910970] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth1: link becomes ready > [ 1032.946716] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth2: link becomes ready > [ 1033.003858] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth3: link becomes ready > [ 1033.072944] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth4: link becomes ready > # Created /tmp/tmp.YJ5EeX04Tc (size 1 KB) containing data sent by client > # Created /tmp/tmp.TzVm9gRu34 (size 1 KB) containing data sent by server > [ 1033.918127] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns2eth1: link becomes ready > # 01 no JOIN syn[ ok ] - synack[ ok ] - ack[ ok ] > [ 1035.374798] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth1: link becomes ready > [ 1035.440014] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth2: link becomes ready > [ 1035.493485] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth3: link becomes ready > [ 1035.548411] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ns1eth4: link becomes ready > [
Re: [PATCH 5.10 104/157] mptcp: put subflow sock on connect error
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> From: Florian Westphal
>
> [ Upstream commit f07157792c633b528de5fc1dbe2e4ea54f8e09d4 ]
>
> mptcp_add_pending_subflow() performs a sock_hold() on the subflow,
> then adds the subflow to the join list.
>
> Without a sock_put the subflow sk won't be freed in case connect() fails.
>
> unreferenced object 0x88810c03b100 (size 3000):
> [..]
> sk_prot_alloc.isra.0+0x2f/0x110
> sk_alloc+0x5d/0xc20
> inet6_create+0x2b7/0xd30
> __sock_create+0x17f/0x410
> mptcp_subflow_create_socket+0xff/0x9c0
> __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1da/0xaf0
> mptcp_pm_nl_work+0x6e0/0x1120
> mptcp_worker+0x508/0x9a0
>
> Fixes: 5b950ff4331ddda ("mptcp: link MPC subflow into msk only after accept")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal
> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
I have reported the following warnings and kernel crash on 5.10.26-rc2 [1]
The bisect reported that issue pointing out to this commit.
commit 460916534896e6d4f80a37152e0948db33376873
mptcp: put subflow sock on connect error
This problem is specific to 5.10.26-rc2.
Warning:
[ 1040.114695] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
[ 1040.119857] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 31925 at
/usr/src/kernel/lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd7/0x100
[ 1040.129769] Modules linked in: act_mirred cls_u32 sch_netem sch_etf
ip6table_nat xt_nat iptable_nat nf_nat ip6table_filter xt_conntrack
nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 sch_fq
iptable_filter xt_mark ip_tables cls_bpf sch_ingress algif_hash
x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse [last unloaded: test_blackhole_dev]
[ 1040.159030] CPU: 3 PID: 31925 Comm: mptcp_connect Tainted: G
W K 5.10.26-rc2 #1
[ 1040.167459] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
2.2 05/23/2018
[ 1040.174851] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd7/0x100
And
Kernel Panic:
-
[ 1069.557485] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0010
[ 1069.564446] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 1069.569583] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page
[ 1069.574714] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 1069.577246] Oops: [#1] SMP PTI
[ 1069.580730] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Tainted: GW
K 5.10.26-rc2 #1
[ 1069.588719] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
2.2 05/23/2018
[ 1069.596106] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3f/0x290
...
[ 1069.961697] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
[ 1069.968083] Kernel Offset: 0x1860 from 0x8100
(relocation range: 0x8000-0xbfff)
steps to reproduce:
--
- cd /opt/kselftests/mainline/net/mptcp
- ./mptcp_join.sh || true
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
crash test link:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2436164
Revert this commit and test job:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2437401#L1207
> ---
> net/mptcp/subflow.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> index 16adba172fb9..591546d0953f 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,7 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, const
> struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
> spin_lock_bh(>join_list_lock);
> list_add_tail(>node, >join_list);
> spin_unlock_bh(>join_list_lock);
> + sock_put(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow));
>
> return err;
>
url:
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20210323182123.3ce89...@yaviniv.e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de/T/#m7994b86b52391a746e7d5be214885a5a1b2f9713
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/14] 4.4.263-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.263 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.263-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.4.263-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 769f344ebed2d7d9adc324015195b8c3fda886da git describe: v4.4.262-15-g769f344ebed2 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.262-15-g769f344ebed2 No regressions (compared to build v4.4.262) No fixes (compared to build v4.4.262) Ran 36066 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * libhugetlbfs * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-vm * fwts Summary kernel: 4.4.263-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git branch: 4.4.263-rc1-hikey-20210322-970 git commit: cdbe5973893696eb29efb23b75953efd2f7edf4d git describe: 4.4.263-rc1-hikey-20210322-970 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.263-rc1-hikey-20210322-970 No regressions (compared to 4.4.263-rc1-hikey-20210319-968) No fixes (compared to 4.4.263-rc1-hikey-20210319-968) Ran 1863 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - hi6220-hikey - arm64 Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests *
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/25] 4.9.263-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.263 release. > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.263-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.9.263-rc1 git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: ee852ebcc01fee023a18f1ed0e34afc29b3f11d0 git describe: v4.9.262-26-gee852ebcc01f Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.262-26-gee852ebcc01f No regressions (compared to v4.9.262) No fixes (compared to v4.9.262) Ran 49031 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - powerpc - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-fs-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * fwts * rcutorture * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/43] 4.14.227-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.227 release. > There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.227-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.14.227-rc1 git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.14.y git commit: dbfdb55a0970570a02a8d7bb6abc2e4db71218c8 git describe: v4.14.226-44-gdbfdb55a0970 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.226-44-gdbfdb55a0970 No regressions (compared to v4.14.226-8-g085047cda613) No fixes (compared to v4.14.226-8-g085047cda613) Ran 48680 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - powerpc - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-fs-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * fwts * rcutorture * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/43] 4.19.183-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.183 release. > There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.183-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.19.183-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.19.y git commit: 155590e98805144ae9800805ca98d3edcd2228de git describe: v4.19.182-44-g155590e98805 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.182-44-g155590e98805 No regressions (compared to build v4.19.182) No fixes (compared to build v4.19.182) Ran 55402 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - powerpc - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-fs-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * fwts * rcutorture * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.108-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.108 release. > There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.108-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.4.108-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.4.y git commit: 5094cb203da71ac5da8f1715dec97fe69fbfb326 git describe: v5.4.107-61-g5094cb203da7 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.107-61-g5094cb203da7 No regressions (compared to build v5.4.107) No fixes (compared to build v5.4.107) Ran 60075 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-tc-testing * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/156] 5.10.26-rc2 review
_held+0x25/0x60 [ 1069.716837] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2f/0x50 [ 1069.721112] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x48/0x350 [ 1069.725208] ? tcp_v4_inbound_md5_hash+0x60/0x1e0 [ 1069.729906] tcp_v4_rcv+0xb59/0xd70 [ 1069.733390] ? lock_acquire+0x1d4/0x3a0 [ 1069.737229] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x3c/0x270 [ 1069.741754] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x92/0x130 [ 1069.746286] ip_local_deliver+0x1a1/0x200 [ 1069.750289] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x25/0x60 [ 1069.754468] ip_rcv_finish+0x8a/0xc0 [ 1069.758046] ip_rcv+0x142/0x200 [ 1069.761183] ? lock_acquire+0x1d4/0x3a0 [ 1069.765014] ? kfree+0x3e4/0x720 [ 1069.768248] ? process_backlog+0x73/0x250 [ 1069.772261] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x86/0xa0 [ 1069.777138] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60 [ 1069.781228] process_backlog+0xe2/0x250 [ 1069.785061] net_rx_action+0x144/0x460 [ 1069.788812] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x42a [ 1069.792382] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x2b/0x1f0 [ 1069.796561] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x70/0x1f0 [ 1069.800746] run_ksoftirqd+0x2b/0x60 [ 1069.804326] smpboot_thread_fn+0x149/0x1f0 [ 1069.808423] ? sort_range+0x30/0x30 [ 1069.811908] kthread+0x142/0x160 [ 1069.815132] ? kthread_insert_work_sanity_check+0x60/0x60 [ 1069.820524] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 1069.824104] Modules linked in: act_mirred cls_u32 sch_netem sch_etf ip6table_nat xt_nat iptable_nat nf_nat ip6table_filter xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 sch_fq iptable_filter xt_mark ip_tables cls_bpf sch_ingress algif_hash x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse [last unloaded: test_blackhole_dev] [ 1069.853359] CR2: 0010 [ 1069.856671] ---[ end trace 8a7765e77d8e79ea ]--- [ 1069.861290] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3f/0x290 [ 1069.866940] Code: 54 4c 8d 75 98 53 49 89 fd 48 83 ec 78 0f b7 5f 10 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 45 d0 31 c0 48 8b 87 48 04 00 00 4c 89 f7 <44> 8b 78 10 31 c0 f3 48 ab 89 d8 83 e0 f7 66 83 f8 02 0f 85 4a 01 [ 1069.885676] RSP: 0018:a57ec00e7a20 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 1069.890893] RAX: RBX: 0002 RCX: 0007 [ 1069.898018] RDX: 9995c813 RSI: 90cffe966b00 RDI: a57ec00e7a58 [ 1069.905141] RBP: a57ec00e7ac0 R08: R09: [ 1069.912264] R10: R11: 90cfffa66500 R12: 90cffe966b00 [ 1069.919389] R13: 90d007a04380 R14: a57ec00e7a58 R15: 90d007a04380 [ 1069.926514] FS: () GS:90d12fa8() knlGS: [ 1069.934589] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 1069.940328] CR2: 0010 CR3: 0001ed026002 CR4: 003706e0 [ 1069.947449] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 1069.954575] DR3: DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 1069.961697] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 1069.968083] Kernel Offset: 0x1860 from 0x8100 (relocation range: 0x8000-0xbfff) [ 1069.978859] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]--- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919/testrun/4220685/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2434782/log https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919/testrun/4221759/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-warning-2434838/log https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919/testrun/4221747/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2434809/log LAVA jobs link, https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2436164 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/120] 5.11.9-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.9 release. > There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.11.9-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.11.y git commit: 3f03c425f75c4a6828beda5de7774ce0b75d55f2 git describe: v5.11.8-121-g3f03c425f75c Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.8-121-g3f03c425f75c No regressions (compared to build v5.11.8) No fixes (compared to build v5.11.8) Ran 65573 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-lkdtm * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * fwts * rcutorture * kunit * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/157] 5.10.26-rc1 review
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release. > There are 157 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:19:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.26-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h mipc tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds failed on stable-rc 5.10 branch make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=mips CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache mips-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x6a88): Section mismatch in reference from the function reserve_exception_space() to the function .meminit.text:memblock_reserve() The function reserve_exception_space() references the function __meminit memblock_reserve(). This is often because reserve_exception_space lacks a __meminit annotation or the annotation of memblock_reserve is wrong. FATAL: modpost: Section mismatches detected. Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them. make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.modpost:59: vmlinux.symvers] Error 1 Here is the list of build failed, - gcc-8-allnoconfig - gcc-8-tinyconfig - gcc-9-allnoconfig - gcc-9-tinyconfig - gcc-10-allnoconfig - gcc-10-tinyconfig - clang-10-tinyconfig - clang-10-allnoconfig - clang-11-allnoconfig - clang-11-tinyconfig - clang-12-tinyconfig - clang-12-allnoconfig Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju link: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/1117167411#L142 steps to reproduce: --- # TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides # portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of # architectures, toolchains, kernel configurations, and make targets. # # TuxMake supports the concept of runtimes. # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/runtimes/, for that to work it requires # that you install podman or docker on your system. # # To install tuxmake on your system globally: # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake # # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation. tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch mips --toolchain gcc-10 --kconfig tinyconfig -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 103/157] MIPS: kernel: Reserve exception base early to prevent corruption
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Bogendoerfer
>
> [ Upstream commit bd67b711bfaa02cf19e88aa2d9edae5c1c1d2739 ]
>
> BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
> After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
> with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
> built-in FDT being corrupted.
>
> Before the cited commit, early allocations would be in the [kernel_end,
> RAM_END] range, but after commit they would be within [RAM_START +
> PAGE_SIZE, RAM_END].
>
> The custom exception base handler that is installed by
> bmips_ebase_setup() done for BMIPS5000 CPUs ends-up trampling on the
> memory region allocated by unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() thus
> corrupting the FDT used by the kernel.
>
> To fix this, we need to perform an early reservation of the custom
> exception space. Additional we reserve the first 4k (1k for R3k) for
> either normal exception vector space (legacy CPUs) or special vectors
> like cache exceptions.
>
> Huge thanks to Serge for analysing and proposing a solution to this
> issue.
>
> Fixes: 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations with
> kernel_end")
> Reported-by: Kamal Dasu
> Debugged-by: Serge Semin
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli
> Reviewed-by: Serge Semin
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h| 3 +++
> arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c | 6 ++
> arch/mips/kernel/cpu-r3k-probe.c | 3 +++
> arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 10 +-
mipc tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds failed on stable-rc 5.10 branch
make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8
O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=mips
CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache mips-linux-gnu-gcc'
'HOSTCC=sccache gcc'
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x6a88): Section mismatch in
reference from the function reserve_exception_space() to the function
.meminit.text:memblock_reserve()
The function reserve_exception_space() references
the function __meminit memblock_reserve().
This is often because reserve_exception_space lacks a __meminit
annotation or the annotation of memblock_reserve is wrong.
FATAL: modpost: Section mismatches detected.
Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them.
make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.modpost:59:
vmlinux.symvers] Error 1
Here is the list of build failed,
- gcc-8-allnoconfig
- gcc-8-tinyconfig
- gcc-9-allnoconfig
- gcc-9-tinyconfig
- gcc-10-allnoconfig
- gcc-10-tinyconfig
- clang-10-tinyconfig
- clang-10-allnoconfig
- clang-11-allnoconfig
- clang-11-tinyconfig
- clang-12-tinyconfig
- clang-12-allnoconfig
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
link:
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/1117167411#L142
steps to reproduce:
---
# TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides
# portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of
# architectures, toolchains, kernel configurations, and make targets.
#
# TuxMake supports the concept of runtimes.
# See https://docs.tuxmake.org/runtimes/, for that to work it requires
# that you install podman or docker on your system.
#
# To install tuxmake on your system globally:
# sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake
#
# See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation.
tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch mips --toolchain gcc-10
--kconfig tinyconfig
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/18] 5.4.107-rc1 review
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.107 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.107-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.4.107-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.4.y git commit: 8a800acdf26f05d289c05e416591b6b18917b044 git describe: v5.4.106-19-g8a800acdf26f Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.106-19-g8a800acdf26f No regressions (compared to build v5.4.106) No fixes (compared to build v5.4.106) Ran 62773 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * kselftest-lkdtm * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * v4l2-compliance * kvm-unit-tests * fwts * rcutorture * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/8] 4.19.182-rc1 review
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.182 release. > There are 8 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.182-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.19.182-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.19.y git commit: 7281e11121f6fb47ea1e757b7781c5c15e3781fe git describe: v4.19.181-9-g7281e11121f6 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.181-9-g7281e11121f6 No regressions (compared to build v4.19.181) No fixes (compared to build v4.19.181) Ran 58666 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - powerpc - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-bpf * libhugetlbfs * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.25-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: b05da84e91a81ee89c814d51c18cc6f5b077256a git describe: v5.10.24-14-gb05da84e91a8 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.24-14-gb05da84e91a8 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.24) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.24) Ran 57572 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest- * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kunit * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-vm * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-x86 * rcutorture * timesync-off -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 00/31] 5.11.8-rc1 review
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.8 release. > There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.8-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.11.8-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.11.y git commit: 48a0708a31ceced042f5acd1d6a225a2fb66ebf3 git describe: v5.11.7-32-g48a0708a31ce Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.7-32-g48a0708a31ce No regressions (compared to build v5.11.7) No fixes (compared to build v5.11.7) Ran 66943 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * libhugetlbfs * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-bpf * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest- * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarri[ * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * kunit * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * perf * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
arm64: compiler_types.h:320:38: error: call to __compiletime_assert_417
[This email landed to Spam for some reason, sending it again with modified subject] While building arm64 kernel modules the following kernel warnings / errors noticed on linux next 20210318 tag the gcc version is 7.3.0. Build PASS with gcc-8, gcc-9 and gcc-10. In file included from :0:0: In function 'resiliency_test', inlined from 'test_slub_init' at lib/test_slub.c:120:2: include/linux/compiler_types.h:320:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_417' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 | KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) ^ include/linux/compiler_types.h:301:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' prefix ## suffix();\ ^~ include/linux/compiler_types.h:320:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) ^~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) ^~ include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) ^~~~ lib/test_slub.c:101:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' BUILD_BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 | KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10); ^~~~ make[2]: *** [ scripts/Makefile.build:273: lib/test_slub.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [ Makefile:1980: lib] Error 2 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/984/consoleFull https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/984/consoleFull -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
sparc: clang: error: unknown argument: '-mno-fpu'
Linux mainline master build breaks for sparc defconfig. There are multiple errors / warnings with clang-12 and clang-11 and 10. - sparc (defconfig) with clang-12, clang-11 and clang-10 - sparc (tinyconfig) with clang-12, clang-11 and clang-10 - sparc (allnoconfig) with clang-12, clang-11 and clang-10 make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=sparc CROSS_COMPILE=sparc64-linux-gnu- 'HOSTCC=sccache clang' 'CC=sccache clang' clang: error: unknown argument: '-mno-fpu' clang: error: unknown argument: '-fcall-used-g5' clang: error: unknown argument: '-fcall-used-g7' make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:116: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 1 clang: error: unknown argument: '-mno-fpu' clang: error: unknown argument: '-fcall-used-g5' clang: error: unknown argument: '-fcall-used-g7' make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:271: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju build link, https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/torvalds/linux-mainline/-/jobs/1110841374#L81 steps to reproduce: -- # TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides # portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of # architectures, toolchains, kernel configurations, and make targets. # # TuxMake supports the concept of runtimes. # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/runtimes/, for that to work it requires # that you install podman or docker on your system. # # To install tuxmake on your system globally: # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake # # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation. tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch sparc --toolchain clang-12 --kconfig defconfig -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Clang: powerpc: kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c:264:6: error: stack frame size of 2480 bytes in function 'kvmhv_enter_nested_guest'
Linux mainline master build breaks for powerpc defconfig. There are multiple errors / warnings with clang-12 and clang-11 and 10. - powerpc (defconfig) with clang-12 - powerpc (defconfig) with clang-11 - powerpc (defconfig) with clang-10 The following build errors / warnings triggered with clang-12. make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp LLVM=1 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- 'HOSTCC=sccache clang' 'CC=sccache clang' /builds/linux/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c:264:6: error: stack frame size of 2480 bytes in function 'kvmhv_enter_nested_guest' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=] long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) ^ 1 error generated. make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:271: arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.o] Error 1 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju The following build errors / warnings triggered with clang-10 and clang-11. - powerpc (defconfig) with clang-11 - powerpc (defconfig) with clang-10 make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp LLVM=1 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- 'HOSTCC=sccache clang' 'CC=sccache clang' /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/sigtramp.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/sigtramp.o /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.o /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/datapage.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/datapage.o /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/cacheflush.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/cacheflush.o /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/note.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/note.o /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/getcpu.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/getcpu.o /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vgettimeofday.o: compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian /usr/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vgettimeofday.o clang: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault (core dumped) clang: error: linker command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/Makefile:51: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 254 make[2]: Target 'include/generated/vdso32-offsets.h' not remade because of errors. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju build link, https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/torvalds/linux-mainline/-/jobs/1110841371#L59 -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
next: arm64: compiler_types.h:320:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_417' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 | KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10
While building arm64 kernel modules the following kernel warnings / errors noticed on linux next 20210318 tag the gcc version is 7.3.0. I will check latest gcc version builds and keep you updated. In file included from :0:0: In function 'resiliency_test', inlined from 'test_slub_init' at lib/test_slub.c:120:2: include/linux/compiler_types.h:320:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_417' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 | KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) ^ include/linux/compiler_types.h:301:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' prefix ## suffix();\ ^~ include/linux/compiler_types.h:320:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) ^~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) ^~ include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) ^~~~ lib/test_slub.c:101:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' BUILD_BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 | KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10); ^~~~ make[2]: *** [ scripts/Makefile.build:273: lib/test_slub.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [ Makefile:1980: lib] Error 2 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/984/consoleFull https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/984/consoleFull - Naresh
s390: kernel/entry.o: in function `sys_call_table_emu': (.rodata+0x1bc0): undefined reference to `__s390_'
Linux next 20210317 tag building s390 architecture failed. - s390 (defconfig) with gcc-8 - Failed - s390 (defconfig) with gcc-9 - Failed - s390 (defconfig) with gcc-10 - Failed make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=s390 CROSS_COMPILE=s390x-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache s390x-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' s390x-linux-gnu-ld: arch/s390/kernel/entry.o: in function `sys_call_table_emu': (.rodata+0x1bc0): undefined reference to `__s390_' make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1212: vmlinux] Error 1 Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju steps to reproduce: # TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides # portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of # architectures, toolchains, kernel configurations, and make targets. # # TuxMake supports the concept of runtimes. # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/runtimes/, for that to work it requires # that you install podman or docker on your system. # # To install tuxmake on your system globally: # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake # # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation. tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-9 --kconfig defconfig -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: BUG: KFENCE: memory corruption in usb_get_device_descriptor
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 15:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:28:40PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > While booting Linux mainline master 5.12.0-rc2 and 5.12.0-rc3 on arm64 > > Hikey device the following KFENCE bug was found. > > > > Recently, we have enabled CONFIG_KFENCE=y and started seeing this crash. > > kernel BUG log: > > What USB traffic are you having here? This is getting triggered while booting the device. We are not running any traffic. > > And has this ever not triggered? No. It was not triggered before. Since CONFIG_KFENCE=y is added to our builds recently we are able to reproduce always on recent builds. Steps to reproduce: 1) Build arm64 kernel Image with this given config. - tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-9 --kconfig defconfig --kconfig-add https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1pfztfszUNcDwOAyMrw2wPMKNfc/config 2) Boot arm64 hikey hi6220 device 3) While booting the device you will get to see this kernel BUG: [ 18.243075] BUG: KFENCE: memory corruption in usb_get_device_descriptor+0x80/0xb0 [ 18.813861] BUG: KFENCE: memory corruption in __usbnet_read_cmd.isra.0+0xd0/0x1a0 link: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v5.12-rc2-487-gf296bfd5cd04/testrun/4155170/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2388200/log - Naresh
BUG: KFENCE: memory corruption in usb_get_device_descriptor
While booting Linux mainline master 5.12.0-rc2 and 5.12.0-rc3 on arm64 Hikey device the following KFENCE bug was found. Recently, we have enabled CONFIG_KFENCE=y and started seeing this crash. kernel BUG log: [ 18.243075] BUG: KFENCE: memory corruption in usb_get_device_descriptor+0x80/0xb0 [ 18.243075] [ 18.253016] Corrupted memory at 0xbb4567e7 [ ! ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ] (in kfence-#118): [ 18.263817] usb_get_device_descriptor+0x80/0xb0 [ 18.268978] hub_port_init+0x3e8/0xb70 [ 18.273189] hub_event+0x578/0x1628 [ 18.277109] process_one_work+0x1c8/0x488 [ 18.281593] worker_thread+0x54/0x428 [ 18.285692] kthread+0x120/0x158 [ 18.289320] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 [ 18.293330] [ 18.295018] kfence-#118 [0xb55b54e8-0x1fc57965, size=18, cache=kmalloc-128] allocated by task 204: [ 18.306534] usb_get_device_descriptor+0x40/0xb0 [ 18.311693] hub_port_init+0x3e8/0xb70 [ 18.315900] hub_event+0x578/0x1628 [ 18.319819] process_one_work+0x1c8/0x488 [ 18.324301] worker_thread+0x54/0x428 [ 18.328397] kthread+0x120/0x158 [ 18.332024] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 root@hikey:~# [ 18.33603. /lava-2388200/environment 3] [ 18.338544] CPU: 7 PID: 204 Comm: kworker/7:2 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc2 #2 [ 18.345902] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT) [ 18.351715] Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [ 18.356428] == . /lava[ 18.805771] == [ 18.813861] BUG: KFENCE: memory corruption in __usbnet_read_cmd.isra.0+0xd0/0x1a0 [ 18.813861] [ 18.823804] Corrupted memory at 0x7cedde53 [ ! ! ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . ] (in kfence-#121): [ 18.834603] __usbnet_read_cmd.isra.0+0xd0/0x1a0 [ 18.839765] usbnet_read_cmd+0x70/0xa8 [ 18.843965] asix_read_cmd+0x60/0xa0 [ 18.847981] ax88772a_hw_reset+0x148/0x468 [ 18.852570] ax88772_bind+0x1c8/0x310 [ 18.856683] usbnet_probe+0x29c/0x7d8 [ 18.860788] usb_probe_interface+0xe0/0x2c0 -[ 18.865236] really_probe+0xf0/0x4d8 [ 18.869016] driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x168 [ 18.873430] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120 [ 18.878116] bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd8 [ 18.882165] __device_attach+0xfc/0x180 [ 18.886214] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 [ 18.890627] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0 [ 18.894676] device_add+0x3a8/0x7e8 [ 18.898357] usb_set_configuration+0x488/0x8e8 [ 18.903044] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x58/0x98 [ 18.907823] usb_probe_device+0x44/0x108 [ 18.911964] really_probe+0xf0/0x4d8 2[ 18.924600] driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x168 [ 18.937379] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120 [ 18.950406] bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd8 [ 18.960383] __device_attach+0xfc/0x180 [ 18.969078] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 3[ 18.977855] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0 [ 18.986226] device_add+0x3a8/0x7e8 [ 18.994190] usb_new_device+0x1e0/0x590 [ 19.002475] hub_event+0x5ec/0x1628 [ 19.010352] process_one_work+0x1c8/0x488 [ 19.018792] worker_thread+0x54/0x428 [ 19.026921] kthread+0x120/0x158 [ 19.034614] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 8[ 19.042712] [ 19.048623] kfence-#121 [0x8a763b3c-0x8a763b3c, size=1, cache=kmalloc-128] allocated by task 204: [ 19.063612] __usbnet_read_cmd.isra.0+0x60/0x1a0 [ 19.072924] usbnet_read_cmd+0x70/0xa8 [ 19.081325] asix_read_cmd+0x60/0xa0 [ 19.089503] ax88772a_hw_reset+0x148/0x468 8[ 19.098163] ax88772_bind+0x1c8/0x310 [ 19.106312] usbnet_probe+0x29c/0x7d8 [ 19.114407] usb_probe_interface+0xe0/0x2c0 [ 19.122950] really_probe+0xf0/0x4d8 [ 19.130811] driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x168 [ 19.139273] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120 [ 19.148025] bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd8 [ 19.156148] __device_attach+0xfc/0x180 2[ 19.164287] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 [ 19.172782] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0 [ 19.180948] device_add+0x3a8/0x7e8 [ 19.188758] usb_set_configuration+0x488/0x8e8 [ 19.197455] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x58/0x98 [ 19.206120] usb_probe_device+0x44/0x108 [ 19.214175] really_probe+0xf0/0x4d8 0[ 19.221885] driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x168 [ 19.230202] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120 [ 19.238794] bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd8 [ 19.246780] __device_attach+0xfc/0x180 [ 19.254790] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 [ 19.263145] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0 [ 19.27] device_add+0x3a8/0x7e8 0[ 19.278682] usb_new_device+0x1e0/0x590 [ 19.286583] hub_event+0x5ec/0x1628 [ 19.294055] process_one_work+0x1c8/0x488 [ 19.302102] worker_thread+0x54/0x428 [ 19.309743] kthread+0x120/0x158 [ 19.316894] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 [ 19.324306] [ 19.329495] CPU: 7 PID: 204 Comm: kworker/7:2 Tainted: GB 5.12.0-rc2 #2 /[ 19.341360] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT) [ 19.350439] Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju metadata: git branch: master git repo: https
Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/75] 4.4.262-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:23, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.262 release. > There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:51:52 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.262-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.4.262-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 712d2b53fc1193899b028c57bb0fe069936e958e git describe: v4.4.261-76-g712d2b53fc11 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.261-76-g712d2b53fc11 No regressions (compared to build v4.4.261) No fixes (compared to build v4.4.261) Ran 30821 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-sync * kvm-unit-tests * v4l2-compliance * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * fwts * ssuite Summary kernel: 4.4.262-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git branch: 4.4.262-rc1-hikey-20210315-965 git commit: 0571025494b76ef8d857a1bbf7937b881e18ba1e git describe: 4.4.262-rc1-hikey-20210315-965 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.262-rc1-hikey-20210315-965 No regressions (compared to build 4.4.262-rc1-hikey-20210315-962) No fixes (compared to build 4.4.262-rc1-hikey-20210315-962) Ran 1966 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - hi6220-hikey - arm64 Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests *
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/78] 4.9.262-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:23, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.262 release. > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:51:58 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.262-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.9.262-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: ed0b71399e2dfd89140732fd60d9435b266598c4 git describe: v4.9.261-79-ged0b71399e2d Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.261-79-ged0b71399e2d No regressions (compared to build v4.9.261) No fixes (compared to build v4.9.261) Ran 39751 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-sync * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/95] 4.14.226-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:29, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.226 release. > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:57:24 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.226-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.14.226-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.14.y git commit: 57cc62fb2d2b8e81c02cb9197e303c7782dee4cd git describe: v4.14.225-96-g57cc62fb2d2b Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.225-96-g57cc62fb2d2b No regressions (compared to build v4.14.225) No fixes (compared to build v4.14.225) Ran 41401 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-sched-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * kselftest-vm * fwts * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/120] 4.19.181-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:29, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.181 release. > There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:57:02 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.181-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.19.181-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.19.y git commit: a636947af93f0a20fdba2c08ae38b7825ebf9c56 git describe: v4.19.180-121-ga636947af93f Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.180-121-ga636947af93f No regressions (compared to build v4.19.180) No fixes (compared to build v4.19.180) Ran 49481 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-tc-testing * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-sched-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest- * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * igt-gpu-tools * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/168] 5.4.106-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:35, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release. > There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:26 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.106-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.4.106-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.4.y git commit: 26ba2df2641dff3b9583fc4d1fbdc668bd346f00 git describe: v5.4.105-169-g26ba2df2641d Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.105-169-g26ba2df2641d No regressions (compared to build v5.4.105) No fixes (compared to build v5.4.105) Ran 50881 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-tc-testing * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-cap_bounds-test[ * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * rcutorture * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:27, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.24-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: c6b3724e56923191dc567ceb626ba15daa49313c git describe: v5.10.23-291-gc6b3724e5692 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.23-291-gc6b3724e5692 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.23) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.23) Ran 58761 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-lkdtm * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * fwts * kselftest- * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-cpufreq * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * rcutorture * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/306] 5.11.7-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:27, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.7 release. > There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:54:26 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.7-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.11.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.11.7-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.11.y git commit: f109baa2424b2523fbb975de996fedc7a53ef531 git describe: v5.11.6-307-gf109baa2424b Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.6-307-gf109baa2424b No regressions (compared to build v5.11.6) No fixes (compared to build v5.11.6) Ran 55999 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * libhugetlbfs * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * kunit * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/7] 4.4.261-rc1 review
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:57, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.261 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:23:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.261-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.4.261-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 9de32cd2fc5194157c9c116eec56a219048dc511 git describe: v4.4.260-8-g9de32cd2fc51 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.260-8-g9de32cd2fc51 No regressions (compared to build v4.4.260) No fixes (compared to build v4.4.260) Ran 26428 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * libhugetlbfs * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-vm * fwts Summary kernel: 4.4.261-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git branch: 4.4.261-rc1-hikey-20210310-953 git commit: bf1bdacd039d70403f1ce3196f223cae689ca15f git describe: 4.4.261-rc1-hikey-20210310-953 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.261-rc1-hikey-20210310-953 No regressions (compared to build 4.4.261-rc1-hikey-20210308-951) No fixes (compared to build 4.4.261-rc1-hikey-20210308-951) Ran 1965 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - hi6220-hikey - arm64 Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests *
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/11] 4.9.261-rc1 review
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:56, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.261 release. > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:23:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.261-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.9.261-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: 8bf14e5a6c5c131e93c7c423725d758b0a6f531a git describe: v4.9.260-12-g8bf14e5a6c5c Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.260-12-g8bf14e5a6c5c No regressions (compared to build v4.9.260) No fixes (compared to build v4.9.260) Ran 41377 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * fwts * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fs-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-sync * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/20] 4.14.225-rc1 review
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:56, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.225 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:23:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.225-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.14.225-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.14.y git commit: 878d7bf8fdf6e16616c200ff20d091126f795542 git describe: v4.14.224-21-g878d7bf8fdf6 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.224-21-g878d7bf8fdf6 No regressions (compared to build v4.14.224) No fixes (compared to build v4.14.224) Ran 42230 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-64k_page_size - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.180-rc1 review
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:56, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.180 release. > There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:23:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.180-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 4.19.180-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.19.y git commit: fffeea4063954b09866c112dad21a991ba52a914 git describe: v4.19.179-40-gfffeea406395 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.179-40-gfffeea406395 No regressions (compared to build v4.19.179) No fixes (compared to build v4.19.179) Ran 50816 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - s390 - sparc - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-math-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/24] 5.4.105-rc1 review
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:55, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.105 release. > There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:23:09 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.105-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.4.105-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.4.y git commit: 62f8f08c9d2fbc6c5692d90f64dd70e3a8edd986 git describe: v5.4.104-25-g62f8f08c9d2f Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.104-25-g62f8f08c9d2f No regressions (compared to build v5.4.104) No fixes (compared to build v5.4.104) Ran 53992 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * fwts * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * network-basic-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 23:59, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release. > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:28:23 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.23-rc2.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.23-rc2 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 93276f11b3afe08c3f213a3648483b1a8789673b git describe: v5.10.22-48-g93276f11b3af Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.22-48-g93276f11b3af No regressions (compared to build v5.10.22) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.22) Ran 56156 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-ptrace * libhugetlbfs * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * rcutorture * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
