Re: [META] proposal to set up digestifier for linux-kernel
I received a note from Michael T. Babcock noting that there already is a digest operated by yahoogroups.com (formerly egroups.com): > I read the Linux kernel list as a digest from egroups.com. > Do a quick search for 'linux kernel' and you'll find it. If you don't care for the advertising that comes with it, I've been informed there's a site that hopes to make a Mailman server publically available to carry linux-kernel as a digest also. They have to be prepared for 3000 digest users, since that's what vger.rutgers.edu used to carry. Watch the list for a public announcement. Romain Kang Disclaimer: I speak for myself alone, [EMAIL PROTECTED]except when indicated otherwise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
eepro100 - Linux vs. FreeBSD
Dumb question: I've been following the freebsd-hackers list for a while, and in that domain, the Intel NICs are the preferred interfaces because they perform well and are very stable. One approach to the endless eepro100 headaches would be to port the FreeBSD if_fxp driver to Linux. After all, drivers have been ported between these OSs before; e.g., the aic7xxx SCSI adapter. However, I see no evidence that this has been attempted. Can someone tell me what I'm obviously missing? Romain Kang Disclaimer: I speak for myself alone, [EMAIL PROTECTED]except when indicated otherwise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
eepro100 - Linux vs. FreeBSD
Dumb question: I've been following the freebsd-hackers list for a while, and in that domain, the Intel NICs are the preferred interfaces because they perform well and are very stable. One approach to the endless eepro100 headaches would be to port the FreeBSD if_fxp driver to Linux. After all, drivers have been ported between these OSs before; e.g., the aic7xxx SCSI adapter. However, I see no evidence that this has been attempted. Can someone tell me what I'm obviously missing? Romain Kang Disclaimer: I speak for myself alone, [EMAIL PROTECTED]except when indicated otherwise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[META] proposal to set up digestifier for linux-kernel
After a hiatus from linux-kernel, I find that the lack of a digest on the new server is a nuisance. I'm thinking of setting up a Majordomo digestifier, with the caveat that non-plaintext messages may have some displaced bits. Would there be an interest in this? Romain Kang Disclaimer: I speak for myself alone, [EMAIL PROTECTED]except when indicated otherwise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[META] proposal to set up digestifier for linux-kernel
After a hiatus from linux-kernel, I find that the lack of a digest on the new server is a nuisance. I'm thinking of setting up a Majordomo digestifier, with the caveat that non-plaintext messages may have some displaced bits. Would there be an interest in this? Romain Kang Disclaimer: I speak for myself alone, [EMAIL PROTECTED]except when indicated otherwise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
