Unidentified Intel wifi network card
I'm looking for assistance with a wifi device I can't find a driver for, the Intel Wireless 3945. I"m getting this: :0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation: Unknown device 4222 (rev 02) on a new Dell Latitude D820. Anyone know if there will be an open source driver for this any time soon, or if there is one now? I'm using the latest vendor supplied kernel, so my apologies if this has already been done and I'm late to the party. I wasn't able to find much, other than 'use the NDIS wrapper' which I really don't want to do. Thanks for any assistance, at all, Scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Unidentified Intel wifi network card
I'm looking for assistance with a wifi device I can't find a driver for, the Intel Wireless 3945. Im getting this: :0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation: Unknown device 4222 (rev 02) on a new Dell Latitude D820. Anyone know if there will be an open source driver for this any time soon, or if there is one now? I'm using the latest vendor supplied kernel, so my apologies if this has already been done and I'm late to the party. I wasn't able to find much, other than 'use the NDIS wrapper' which I really don't want to do. Thanks for any assistance, at all, Scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
> > On 2005-02-14, at 19:17, Matthew Jacob wrote: > He is simply plain dishonest about his intentions. And since he is > driving a > company it's not difficult to deduce what his intentions really are: > Making money. > That's plain and simple what all companies are all about. > Now you can start to guess how he wants to accomplish this. Excuse me, does this tinfoil hat belong to you? You seem to have droped it, getting off that short bus over there... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
On 2005-02-14, at 19:17, Matthew Jacob wrote: He is simply plain dishonest about his intentions. And since he is driving a company it's not difficult to deduce what his intentions really are: Making money. That's plain and simple what all companies are all about. Now you can start to guess how he wants to accomplish this. Excuse me, does this tinfoil hat belong to you? You seem to have droped it, getting off that short bus over there... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
Ditto. One with 320, one with 256 and one with 192. All dual booting Win98 or Win2k and Mandrake 8.0 with 2.4.3. Scott - Original Message - From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ronald Bultje" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 2:29 PM Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) > > I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in > > my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me > > Can I suggest you change your memory vendor and/or get an antistatic wrist > strap ? > > > that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128 > > MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems? > > Multiple boxes, all solid with 256Mb > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
Ditto. One with 320, one with 256 and one with 192. All dual booting Win98 or Win2k and Mandrake 8.0 with 2.4.3. Scott - Original Message - From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ronald Bultje [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 2:29 PM Subject: Re: 128 MB RAM stability problems (again) I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me Can I suggest you change your memory vendor and/or get an antistatic wrist strap ? that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128 MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems? Multiple boxes, all solid with 256Mb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Gee Andre, I guess people who use hotmail don't have an opinion you'd care to read? - Original Message - From: +ADw-postmaster+AEA-mail.hotmail.com+AD4- To: +ADw-thatlinuxguy+AEA-hotmail.com+AD4- Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) +AD4- This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. +AD4- +AD4- Delivery to the following recipients failed. +AD4- +AD4-andre+AEA-linux-ide.org +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- ATT00063.dat Dear Mr. Lyons, I think it's very exciting to see someone from promise talking to the community. I think the most important thing to remember is that even if the company does not release source, people will reverse engineer the cards anyway - possibly not giving the best support to the hardware that could be given with GPL'd source. How does that make the product look? If I can buy a controller that is very well documented (like my Adaptec 2940) and will serve my needs, and has source, I (personally) will pick that card over a closed source product where I cannot update the binary only driver provided by the manufacturer. While I recognize that sometimes it's hard to get "suits" to understand this, I encourage you to try. :-) Along these lines, I'm wondering what your interest, and Promise's policy is about Interviews? I'm curious to get your companies views on Linux, and also yours - I run a small (VERY loose, VERY non-serious) website called http://www.geekizoid.com/ and while we mostly cover troll related net humor, we also are trying to branch out and do more serious stuff. The Interview (if you would agree to it) would be "Slashdot style" - we'd let the readership know you were willing to answer questions, and we'd then forward them to you - you would then answer the ones you wanted, and those answers, verbatim with no editing, would appear with the questions as asked. William Scott Lockwood III Geekizoid Webmaster - Original Message - From: "Craig Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Andre Hedrick'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:52 PM Subject: RE: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux > Hi, > > Andre and I did indeed have a nice conversation on the phone. Thank you > again for taking the time to talk with me and offering your assistance. As I > stated on the phone, we are making a large commitment of resources to > supporting Linux by releasing drivers and utilities for our products, > including the FastTrak. I know we have plans to release source for our Ultra > and SuperTrak series cards, but at this point I'm not sure that the way we > are going to be supporting FastTrak is what you would like to see. As I > said, while I cannot guarantee anything that I don't have the authority to > deliver, I will pass on your requests. I will try to be an advocate for > Promise in the Linux community, and an advocate for the Linux community to > Promise. If the company has concerns, I will let you know what they are, and > then maybe you can tell us if we are off-base with those concerns or not. > > I would invite anybody to contact me if you have any suggestions, any > requests, whatever. As I told Andre, I won't promise something I can't > personally deliver, but I will do whatever I can to help out. I'm also > trying to get a technical point of contact so that you don't have to deal > with a marketing weenie who doesn't understand half of what you're saying > ;). > > Regards, > > Craig > > > -Original Message- > From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:43 PM > To: Craig Lyons > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux > > > > Greetings Craig, > > I would like to publicly thank you for coming to the table of GNU/GPL with > an open perspective. After 90 minutes on the phone, of which 45 minutes > were me pointing out issues promblems and complaints w/ 20 minutes on ways > to work on solutions in the near and distant future and the listening to > your concerns and questions between my moments of interruption. > > The next conversion will not have the burst-in moments because it will be > in person or my cell battery will be fully charged. > > Since you have stated "I will not make promise, I can not keep" this is a > good thing and it will go a fair way to clean up messes from the past on > both sides. > > I look forward to Promise working with Linux in meaningful and productive > ways. > > Please reply and correct anything that is mistated by me or verify the > correctness. This will show an action of good-faith before all those > watching here. > > Respectfully, > > Andre Hedrick > Linux ATA Development > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
Re: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux
Dear Mr. Lyons, I think it's very exciting to see someone from promise talking to the community. I think the most important thing to remember is that even if the company does not release source, people will reverse engineer the cards anyway - possibly not giving the best support to the hardware that could be given with GPL'd source. How does that make the product look? If I can buy a controller that is very well documented (like my Adaptec 2940) and will serve my needs, and has source, I (personally) will pick that card over a closed source product where I cannot update the binary only driver provided by the manufacturer. While I recognize that sometimes it's hard to get "suits" to understand this, I encourage you to try. :-) Along these lines, I'm wondering what your interest, and Promise's policy is about Interviews? I'm curious to get your companies views on Linux, and also yours - I run a small (VERY loose, VERY non-serious) website called http://www.geekizoid.com/ and while we mostly cover troll related net humor, we also are trying to branch out and do more serious stuff. The Interview (if you would agree to it) would be "Slashdot style" - we'd let the readership know you were willing to answer questions, and we'd then forward them to you - you would then answer the ones you wanted, and those answers, verbatim with no editing, would appear with the questions as asked. William Scott Lockwood III Geekizoid Webmaster - Original Message - From: "Craig Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Andre Hedrick'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:52 PM Subject: RE: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux > Hi, > > Andre and I did indeed have a nice conversation on the phone. Thank you > again for taking the time to talk with me and offering your assistance. As I > stated on the phone, we are making a large commitment of resources to > supporting Linux by releasing drivers and utilities for our products, > including the FastTrak. I know we have plans to release source for our Ultra > and SuperTrak series cards, but at this point I'm not sure that the way we > are going to be supporting FastTrak is what you would like to see. As I > said, while I cannot guarantee anything that I don't have the authority to > deliver, I will pass on your requests. I will try to be an advocate for > Promise in the Linux community, and an advocate for the Linux community to > Promise. If the company has concerns, I will let you know what they are, and > then maybe you can tell us if we are off-base with those concerns or not. > > I would invite anybody to contact me if you have any suggestions, any > requests, whatever. As I told Andre, I won't promise something I can't > personally deliver, but I will do whatever I can to help out. I'm also > trying to get a technical point of contact so that you don't have to deal > with a marketing weenie who doesn't understand half of what you're saying > ;). > > Regards, > > Craig > > > -Original Message- > From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:43 PM > To: Craig Lyons > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux > > > > Greetings Craig, > > I would like to publicly thank you for coming to the table of GNU/GPL with > an open perspective. After 90 minutes on the phone, of which 45 minutes > were me pointing out issues promblems and complaints w/ 20 minutes on ways > to work on solutions in the near and distant future and the listening to > your concerns and questions between my moments of interruption. > > The next conversion will not have the burst-in moments because it will be > in person or my cell battery will be fully charged. > > Since you have stated "I will not make promise, I can not keep" this is a > good thing and it will go a fair way to clean up messes from the past on > both sides. > > I look forward to Promise working with Linux in meaningful and productive > ways. > > Please reply and correct anything that is mistated by me or verify the > correctness. This will show an action of good-faith before all those > watching here. > > Respectfully, > > Andre Hedrick > Linux ATA Development > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux
Dear Mr. Lyons, I think it's very exciting to see someone from promise talking to the community. I think the most important thing to remember is that even if the company does not release source, people will reverse engineer the cards anyway - possibly not giving the best support to the hardware that could be given with GPL'd source. How does that make the product look? If I can buy a controller that is very well documented (like my Adaptec 2940) and will serve my needs, and has source, I (personally) will pick that card over a closed source product where I cannot update the binary only driver provided by the manufacturer. While I recognize that sometimes it's hard to get suits to understand this, I encourage you to try. :-) Along these lines, I'm wondering what your interest, and Promise's policy is about Interviews? I'm curious to get your companies views on Linux, and also yours - I run a small (VERY loose, VERY non-serious) website called http://www.geekizoid.com/ and while we mostly cover troll related net humor, we also are trying to branch out and do more serious stuff. The Interview (if you would agree to it) would be Slashdot style - we'd let the readership know you were willing to answer questions, and we'd then forward them to you - you would then answer the ones you wanted, and those answers, verbatim with no editing, would appear with the questions as asked. William Scott Lockwood III Geekizoid Webmaster - Original Message - From: Craig Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Andre Hedrick' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:52 PM Subject: RE: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux Hi, Andre and I did indeed have a nice conversation on the phone. Thank you again for taking the time to talk with me and offering your assistance. As I stated on the phone, we are making a large commitment of resources to supporting Linux by releasing drivers and utilities for our products, including the FastTrak. I know we have plans to release source for our Ultra and SuperTrak series cards, but at this point I'm not sure that the way we are going to be supporting FastTrak is what you would like to see. As I said, while I cannot guarantee anything that I don't have the authority to deliver, I will pass on your requests. I will try to be an advocate for Promise in the Linux community, and an advocate for the Linux community to Promise. If the company has concerns, I will let you know what they are, and then maybe you can tell us if we are off-base with those concerns or not. I would invite anybody to contact me if you have any suggestions, any requests, whatever. As I told Andre, I won't promise something I can't personally deliver, but I will do whatever I can to help out. I'm also trying to get a technical point of contact so that you don't have to deal with a marketing weenie who doesn't understand half of what you're saying ;). Regards, Craig -Original Message- From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:43 PM To: Craig Lyons Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux Greetings Craig, I would like to publicly thank you for coming to the table of GNU/GPL with an open perspective. After 90 minutes on the phone, of which 45 minutes were me pointing out issues promblems and complaints w/ 20 minutes on ways to work on solutions in the near and distant future and the listening to your concerns and questions between my moments of interruption. The next conversion will not have the burst-in moments because it will be in person or my cell battery will be fully charged. Since you have stated I will not make promise, I can not keep this is a good thing and it will go a fair way to clean up messes from the past on both sides. I look forward to Promise working with Linux in meaningful and productive ways. Please reply and correct anything that is mistated by me or verify the correctness. This will show an action of good-faith before all those watching here. Respectfully, Andre Hedrick Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Gee Andre, I guess people who use hotmail don't have an opinion you'd care to read? - Original Message - From: +ADw-postmaster+AEA-mail.hotmail.com+AD4- To: +ADw-thatlinuxguy+AEA-hotmail.com+AD4- Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) +AD4- This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. +AD4- +AD4- Delivery to the following recipients failed. +AD4- +AD4-andre+AEA-linux-ide.org +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- ATT00063.dat Dear Mr. Lyons, I think it's very exciting to see someone from promise talking to the community. I think the most important thing to remember is that even if the company does not release source, people will reverse engineer the cards anyway - possibly not giving the best support to the hardware that could be given with GPL'd source. How does that make the product look? If I can buy a controller that is very well documented (like my Adaptec 2940) and will serve my needs, and has source, I (personally) will pick that card over a closed source product where I cannot update the binary only driver provided by the manufacturer. While I recognize that sometimes it's hard to get suits to understand this, I encourage you to try. :-) Along these lines, I'm wondering what your interest, and Promise's policy is about Interviews? I'm curious to get your companies views on Linux, and also yours - I run a small (VERY loose, VERY non-serious) website called http://www.geekizoid.com/ and while we mostly cover troll related net humor, we also are trying to branch out and do more serious stuff. The Interview (if you would agree to it) would be Slashdot style - we'd let the readership know you were willing to answer questions, and we'd then forward them to you - you would then answer the ones you wanted, and those answers, verbatim with no editing, would appear with the questions as asked. William Scott Lockwood III Geekizoid Webmaster - Original Message - From: Craig Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Andre Hedrick' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:52 PM Subject: RE: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux Hi, Andre and I did indeed have a nice conversation on the phone. Thank you again for taking the time to talk with me and offering your assistance. As I stated on the phone, we are making a large commitment of resources to supporting Linux by releasing drivers and utilities for our products, including the FastTrak. I know we have plans to release source for our Ultra and SuperTrak series cards, but at this point I'm not sure that the way we are going to be supporting FastTrak is what you would like to see. As I said, while I cannot guarantee anything that I don't have the authority to deliver, I will pass on your requests. I will try to be an advocate for Promise in the Linux community, and an advocate for the Linux community to Promise. If the company has concerns, I will let you know what they are, and then maybe you can tell us if we are off-base with those concerns or not. I would invite anybody to contact me if you have any suggestions, any requests, whatever. As I told Andre, I won't promise something I can't personally deliver, but I will do whatever I can to help out. I'm also trying to get a technical point of contact so that you don't have to deal with a marketing weenie who doesn't understand half of what you're saying ;). Regards, Craig -Original Message- From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:43 PM To: Craig Lyons Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Eye2Eye a hope for Promise to Join Linux Greetings Craig, I would like to publicly thank you for coming to the table of GNU/GPL with an open perspective. After 90 minutes on the phone, of which 45 minutes were me pointing out issues promblems and complaints w/ 20 minutes on ways to work on solutions in the near and distant future and the listening to your concerns and questions between my moments of interruption. The next conversion will not have the burst-in moments because it will be in person or my cell battery will be fully charged. Since you have stated I will not make promise, I can not keep this is a good thing and it will go a fair way to clean up messes from the past on both sides. I look forward to Promise working with Linux in meaningful and productive ways. Please reply and correct anything that is mistated by me or verify the correctness. This will show an action of good-faith before all those watching here. Respectfully, Andre Hedrick Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Sound problems with Asus K7V board using the via82cxxx drivers (2.4.3-pre 3/4)
I have the same problem with my K7VZA board. I replaced the onboard sound with a real card for now. - Original Message - From: "jens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:02 PM Subject: Sound problems with Asus K7V board using the via82cxxx drivers (2.4.3-pre 3/4) > Hi there, I am not sure if this is a kernel problem or an operator > problem but for some reason or other my sound is no longer working. > More specifically when I run gmix it reports no mixers being found. I > verified that the via82cxxx driver is compiled in (it worked before) > and everything seems cosher. If anyone has a clue what would cause my > lack of sound, I would be grateful. > > Jens > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Sound problems with Asus K7V board using the via82cxxx drivers (2.4.3-pre 3/4)
I have the same problem with my K7VZA board. I replaced the onboard sound with a real card for now. - Original Message - From: "jens" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:02 PM Subject: Sound problems with Asus K7V board using the via82cxxx drivers (2.4.3-pre 3/4) Hi there, I am not sure if this is a kernel problem or an operator problem but for some reason or other my sound is no longer working. More specifically when I run gmix it reports no mixers being found. I verified that the via82cxxx driver is compiled in (it worked before) and everything seems cosher. If anyone has a clue what would cause my lack of sound, I would be grateful. Jens - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: setting up pppd dial-in on linux
Jeff, I am also VERY interested in this, particularly on getting modems to work with Linux at all. I'm not reading the list right now, but I'd appreciate any feedback you can throw my way on this. Esp. if you DO get it setup and working. It sure would be nice to see Linux FINALLY support more modems out there. Hell, my Internal USR ISA modem is not even supported, but FreeBSD had had support for it for a long time now. :-( Please let me know what you find out, and I'm VERY interested in your RPM - hope there will be a straight tarball for us Slackware Dinosaurs too. :-) Scott - Original Message - From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:36 AM Subject: setting up pppd dial-in on linux > > > Anyone out there a whiz at setting up a pppd dialin server? I am > trying to put together an RPM for pppd dialin configurations > that will support default Windows NT and Linux dial in clients > without requiring the poor user to learn bash scripting, chat > scripting, mgetty and inittab configuration, etc. The steps > in setting this up are about as easy as going on a U.N. relief > mission to equatorial Africa, and most customers who are > "mere mortals" would give up about an hour into it. > > I am seeing massive problems with pppd dial-in and IP/IPX > routing with problems that range from constant Oops, to > the bug infested pppd daemon failing valid MD5 chap > authentication. The HOW-TO's and man pages provide > wonderful commentary on all the things about pppd > that don't work, but it's not too helpful on getting > it to work reliably. An NT dial-in server takes about > 5 minutes to configure on W2K. Linux takes about 2 days, and > won't stay up reliably. > > Who out there is an expert on Linux pppd that would like > to help put together some easy configs for standard > dial-in scenarios? > > Thanks > > Jeff > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
