Re: Jinxed VAIO wreckage - current state of affairs
Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:59:49 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmm, how's 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 doing on the Vaio? People would have heard if it was busted ;) Have seen occasional hangs in e100 resume-from-RAM, and occasional all-black-and-dead symptoms after resume-from-RAM, but it seems to work at least 90% of the time. You doing than I am on my S580p. if AHCI is loaded, damn thing will not turn off. Goofy part is, another Sony S80p at work does NOT have this probelm - same bios, same drive firmware. Suspend to disk mostly works - sometimes when you return, the screen is kinda wonky. Suspend to ram - going in appears to work, coming out it's dead. thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Postgrey experiment at VGER
Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote: On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote: I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails. My prediction for next 200 days is that most spammers get the clue, but it gives us perhaps 3 months of less leaked junk. IMHO this is only an step in an "arms race". What you will do in three months, remove this check because it will prove useless since the spammers will also retry ? If yes, why install it in the first place ? spammers are already re-trying; but they give up after 10 minutes. As the delay time increases, the chances of getting on a blacklist increase, which makes it easier to identify a machine as a spamming bot. I normally let my greyfilters run at 30 minutes deny, and 72hrs of lease time on a IP/To/From tuplet. This setting seams to be pretty effective in dropping spam; at one point, upto 10k spam vs. a couple hundred ham messages. thomsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Processes stuck on D state on Dual Opteron
Nick Piggin wrote:
It is a bit subtle: get_request may only drop the lock and return NULL
(after retaking the lock), if we fail on a memory allocation. If we
just fail due to unavailable queue slots, then the lock is never
dropped. And the mem allocation can't fail because it is a mempool
alloc with GFP_NOIO.
I'm jumping in here, because we have seen this problem on a X86-64 system,
with 4gb of ram, and SLES9 (2.6.5-7.141)
You can drive the node into this state:
Mem-info:
Node 1 DMA per-cpu: empty
Node 1 Normal per-cpu:
cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
cpu 1 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
Node 1 HighMem per-cpu: empty
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
cpu 1 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
Node 0 Normal per-cpu:
cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
cpu 1 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
Node 0 HighMem per-cpu: empty
Free pages: 10360kB (0kB HighMem)
Active:485853 inactive:421820 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:2590
slab:10816 mapped:903444 pagetables:2097
Node 1 DMA free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1664 1664
Node 1 Normal free:2464kB min:2468kB low:4936kB high:7404kB active:918440kB
inactive:710360kB present:1703936kB
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
Node 1 HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB
present:0kB
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA free:4928kB min:20kB low:40kB high:60kB active:0kB inactive:0kB
present:16384kB
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2031 2031
Node 0 Normal free:2968kB min:3016kB low:6032kB high:9048kB active:1024968kB
inactive:976924kB present:2080764kB
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
Node 0 HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB
present:0kB
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
Node 1 DMA: empty
Node 1 Normal: 46*4kB 19*8kB 9*16kB 4*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2464kB
Node 1 HighMem: empty
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 4*8kB 1*16kB 2*32kB 3*64kB 4*128kB 2*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB
1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 4928kB
Node 0 Normal: 0*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 3*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2968kB
Node 0 HighMem: empty
Swap cache: add 1009224, delete 106245, find 179674/181478, race 0+2
Free swap: 4739812kB
950271 pages of RAM
17513 reserved pages
2788 pages shared
902980 pages swap cached
with processes doing this:
SysRq : Show State
sibling
task PC pid father child younger older
init D 0100e810 0 1 0 2 (NOTLB)
01007ff81be8 0006
010002c1d6e0
Call Trace:{try_to_free_pages+283}
{schedule_timeout+173}
{process_timeout+0}
{io_schedule_timeout+82}
{blk_congestion_wait+141}
{autoremove_wake_function+0}
{autoremove_wake_function+0}
{__alloc_pages+776}
{read_swap_cache_async+63}
{swapin_readahead+97}
{do_swap_page+142}
{handle_mm_fault+337}
{do_page_fault+411} {sys_select+1097}
{sys_select+1311} {error_exit+0}
mg.C.2D 0100e810 0 1971 1955 1972 (NOTLB)
0100e236bc68 0006
0001 0100816ed360
Call Trace:{try_to_free_pages+283}
{schedule_timeout+173}
{process_timeout+0}
{io_schedule_timeout+82}
{blk_congestion_wait+141}
{autoremove_wake_function+0}
{autoremove_wake_function+0}
{__alloc_pages+776}
{do_wp_page+285} {handle_mm_fault+373}
{do_page_fault+411} {error_exit+0}
mg.C.2S 01007b0a06a0 0 1972 1971 1974 (NOTLB)
0100bc1c1ca0 0006 0010 00010246
0004c7c0 0100816ec280 00768780 010081f23390
00018780 0100816ed360
Call Trace:{__alloc_pages+852}
{__down_interruptible+216}
{default_wake_function+0}
{recalc_task_prio+940}
{__down_failed_interruptible+53}
{:mosal:.text.lock.mosal_sync+5}
{:mod_vipkl:VIPKL_EQ_poll+607}
{:mod_vipkl:VIPKL_EQ_poll_stat+529}
{:mod_vipkl:VIPKL_ioctl+5144}
{:mod_vipkl:vipkl_wrap_kernel_ioctl+417}
{filp_close+126} {sys_ioctl+612}
{system_call+124}
mg.C.2S 01007b0a18c0 0 1974 19711972 (NOTLB)
0100a3955ca0 0006 0001e7d422e8 01002c9ca550
0005f138 0100816ec280 00768780 010081f23390
00018780 0100816ed360
Call Trace:{__alloc_pages+852}
{__down_interruptible+216}
{default_wake_function+0}
{recalc_task_prio+940}
Re: Looking for ifenslave.c
PALFFY Daniel wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Thomas Davis wrote: > > > Guus, there isn't a really official version of it.. > > > > At http://pdsf.nersc.gov/linux/ifenslave.c is the last version I > > produced, that works with bonding in v2.2 and v2.4 kernels. > > > Guus Sliepen wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > The Ethernet bonding module is useless without ifenslave.c. I'm making a Debian > > > package for it, and I have tried to find the "offical" distribution of this > > > small program. I could not find an authorative source, instead a lot of copies > > > and patched versions are scattered around the Internet (I maintain a patched > > > version myself too). > > > > > > I would like to combine all the useful extra features and patches into this > > > Debian package, so if you know of a patched version or maintain one yourself, > > > please send it to me. > > The only bonding driver and ifenslave that worked for me was the patched > version from http://sourceforge.net/projects/bonding . It runs fine over a > quad starfire card, with vlans over it (ben's patch). You might consider > packaging the ifenslave from that patch, and packaging the bonding driver > as a kernel patch... > Yea, and that ifenslave won't work with redhat's network setup files, which has been in place for years. Notice I'm not on that page? I considered it a forked version. It also does things I talked to becker about, that is not nice to the system (MII polling as often it does is bad.) When I created the first 2.2 bonding patch, I didn't want to have to rewrite redhat's already in place ifenslave support (from the 2.0.xx kernel patch). The ifenslave listed on that page is broken in that regard. The original ifenslave bonded a device to a master that was already up and running; the master device was used also a xmit device (so it routed packets, and sometimes transmitted them). So, if the master device died, the slave(s) died with it. Not good. Redhat config files assumed the master was up and running, and you can add a slave to it without any problems. The slave device also picks up it's mac address from the master device. The version I created, the master device does nothing but route packets to slaves. This has a simple problem - no known mac hardware address. (ie, it's 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0) That's bad. To set a hardware mac address, you need to down, change the hw mac, and re-up the device. But, redhat's scripts already assume the master is up and running, and downing the master to setup the mac hw means all IP routing information is lost. So I added the BOND_SETHWADDR, which allows ifenslave to add a mac address to the bond master without killing any IP routing information. But that's not totally correct either, since adding a mac hw address can screw up the arp tables (it appears not to, but that's just plain lucky). So, in summary, bonding is hack, I strongly dis-agree with what is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/bonding, but my hands are currently tied on doing much about it (I could, but I could suffer from consequences) -- +-- Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "80 nodes and chugging Captain!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Looking for ifenslave.c
Guus, there isn't a really official version of it.. At http://pdsf.nersc.gov/linux/ifenslave.c is the last version I produced, that works with bonding in v2.2 and v2.4 kernels. Please note; I'm currently bound up in DOE/LBNL contract issues, that prevent any work on any GPL code on DOE/LBNL time. Folks, don't flame us - we know it, we are working on it. (The problem actually dates back to the 50's, when the labs where created!) Once this contract issue is cleared up, I've been given the 'Ok' to work on it again. Which means, since I don't have anything at home to work on bonding with, I can't officially support it. Sorry. thomas Guus Sliepen wrote: > > Hello, > > The Ethernet bonding module is useless without ifenslave.c. I'm making a Debian > package for it, and I have tried to find the "offical" distribution of this > small program. I could not find an authorative source, instead a lot of copies > and patched versions are scattered around the Internet (I maintain a patched > version myself too). > > I would like to combine all the useful extra features and patches into this > Debian package, so if you know of a patched version or maintain one yourself, > please send it to me. > > Thanks, > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, > Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- +-- Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "80 nodes and chugging Captain!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Questions about Enterprise Storage with Linux
Tom Sightler wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm seeking information in regards to a large Linux implementation we are > planning. We have been evaluating many storage options and I've come up > with some questions that I have been unable to answer as far as Linux > capabilities in regards to storage. > > We are looking at storage systems that provide approximately 1TB of capacity > for now and can scale to 10+TB in the future. We will almost certainly use > a storage system that provides both fiber channel connectivity as well as > NFS connectivity. > > The questions that have been asked are as follows (assume 2.4.x kernels): > > 1. What is the largest block device that linux currently supports? i.e. > Can I create a single 1TB volume on my storage device and expect linux to > see it and be able to format it? > Yes. [root@pdsfdv10 data]# df . Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/rza31046274600 889731608 146074448 86% /export/data > 2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about > large files over NFS? > No. [root@pdsflx002 pdsfdv10]# df . Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on pdsfdv10.nersc.gov:/export/data 1046274600 889731608 146074448 86% /auto/pdsfdv10 (same filesystem, via NFS) files > 2gb need LFS support in ia32 environments. > 3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We currently use > reirserfs on our internal system, but they generally have filesystems in the > 18-30GB ranges and we're talking about potentially 10-20x that. Should we > look at JFS/XFS or others? > ext2 works fine, you just have to wait about 3 hrs to FSCK a crashed filesystem; ext3 also works fine. Get a 2.2.18, apply the ext3 fs patches, bang, your done. reiserfs won't work via NFS, without kernel patches. -- +-- Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "80 nodes and chugging Captain!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
hard lockup using 2.4.1ac-1, usb, uhci
Hey, just found this one out. I've got a sony vaio 505tx, running linux-2.4.1-ac1, and I've got all the good stuff turned. With APM turned, and using USB uhci-alt driver (all as modules), if you put the laptop to sleep with any (and I mean *any*) usb devices plugged in, it will hard lock upon resume. Only way out is to power cycle the poor thing.. I'm going to update to a newer version of the kernel, and see if the other uhci driver suffers from this fate.. -- +------ Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Interface statistics for Bonding bug in 2.4
The answer is in the source; in v2.4, stats are only collected on sent packets; in v2.2, stats are not collected at all; they are simply summed from the interfaces stats. It's not a bug; it's simply a design decision. Chris Chabot wrote: > > I recently upgraded my main server to a 2.4 kernel (2.4.1pre9). This > machine uses 2 3Com 3C905B networkcards, bonded together (using the > bonding module). > > When doing a 'ifconfig' the bond0 device shows 0 RX packets, and a valid > # of TX packets. However looking at eth0 / eth1 (the 2 network cards) > they have the just about the same amount of RX packets, so recieving > does apear to be balanced over the two interfaces. > > When running this machine on 2.2.16 the interface it does show the > interface statistics accuratly. I also tested this on a clean 2.4.0 > kernel, and it had the same bug. > > The ifconfig output (note the 0 packets in bond0's RX) > > bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:B8:33:0F > inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:3655 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:B8:33:0F > inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:1992 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:1828 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > Interrupt:11 Base address:0x9800 > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:B8:33:0F > inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:1878 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:1827 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > Interrupt:10 Base address:0x9400 > > Please CC me in any replies since im not subscribed to the kernel list. > > -- Chris -- +-- Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Bonding...
Rainer Clasen wrote: > > Ciscos MAC based distribution limits each TCP connection to 100 Mbps. > What's even worse, is Cisco can also *clog* channels with traffic, if your MAC addresses aren't balanced. (ie, one line can have all the traffic, while the other is idle.. -- +------ Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre21
Matti Aarnio wrote: > Beowulf systems have "bonding" in use for parallel Ethernet > links in between two machines, however THAT is not EtherChannel > compatible thing! > Maybe we should adopt's sun naming then, and call it 'Trunking'. This is the same driver that Beowulf uses, and it is Etherchannel compatible. The only part of Etherchannel we don't support is the XOR channel selection (yuck!) and the automatic configuration of the links (it's a MII thing, that's undocumented.) Leave it as Ethernet Bonding. -- +------ Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted
Daniel Phillips wrote: > > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > I am having Andrew McCullough review these patents to determine if there > > are any infringement issues that may affect us. Whomever is concerned > > her, if it would not be too much trouble, please forward what > > documentation and patent no.'s to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and copy me at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will forward them to Malinkrodt & > > Malinkrodt in Salt Lake City. I'll pay them to do a patent infringment > > analysis, and post their analysis to interested/affected parties. > > >http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='5819292'.WKU.&OS=PN/5819292&RS=PN/5819292 > > >http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='5963962'.WKU.&OS=PN/5963962&RS=PN/5963962 > > >http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=/netahtml/search-adv.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&p=1&S1=6038570&OS=6038570&RS=6038570 > > I suppose you will need a formal description of my algorithm. > You probably also want to add http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US06049528__ for the bonding driver.. Since it's already in the kernel, and prior work can be demonstrated also. -- +-- Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH-2.2] Bonding Driver Enhancements + Security fix
willy tarreau wrote: > > > rename bond_xmit to bond_xmit_roundrobin, so > > bond_xmit_xor can be implemented, and used if > > desired. bond_xmit_xor is what cisco > > etherchannel/sun trunking really uses, not round > > robin. > > how does their xor method work ? do you know about an > RFC stating about this, that I could read ? I'm > really interested in this since I must propose a > completely redondant switch/server solution for a big > project here. The more I will know about their trunk, > the best I may be able to do :-) See this: http://docs.sun.com:80/ab2/coll.539.1/UGTRUNKING/@Ab2PageView/1311?Ab2Lang=C&Ab2Enc=iso-8859-1 for information on the 4 possible trunking transmittors. -- ----+-- Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted
Ion Badulescu wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > It is important that all technology used in GPL software be free of > > patent restrictions. > > Indeed. > > For another fine example of GPL technology covered by a parent, check out: > > http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US06049528__ > > This a patent filed by Sun in June 1997 and awarded in April 2000 which > covers very well the ethernet bonding device in Linux 2.2.x. > > I wonder if the equalizer device present in Linux kernels since before > 1996 could count as prior art. IANAL, of course. > Or, even better, the fact that Ethernet bonding has been available as a Linux patch since about 1995.. I'm sure Donald Becker could produce prior art on that one! -- --------+-- Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH-2.2] Bonding Driver Enhancements + Security fix
Willy TARREAU wrote:
>
> Hello Thomas !
>
> I've slightly enhanced the bonding code :
> - MII link checking with automatic slave enabling/disabling :
> Now the bond interface monitors all its MII-compliant slaves
> and disables the ones which have a dead link, and enables those
> which have a good one. The link check time defaults to 1 second
> but I've seen no overhead even at 30 ms.
>
> - slave release is now possible with a running bond
> - SMP-safe enslave/release/check/stats/xmit
> - fix a security bug which allowed anybody to enslave any active interface,
> thus making a local denial of service.
> - fix a potential infinite loop in bond_xmit() if no slave is useable.
>
> It now works very well for me, and the removal of a link becomes
> completely transparent now. On monday, I'll trunk it to an alteon switch.
>
> I've stressed the enslave/release code during "ping -f" and links up/down,
> but triggered absolutely no problem. I think it's stable enough to include it
> in 2.2.18 (Alan CC'ed for this). I'd like Constantine to test it on his servers
> because it should do exactly what he needed, and send us his feedback.
>
Ok, I have several things, since work is being done on this..
rename bond_xmit to bond_xmit_roundrobin, so bond_xmit_xor can be
implemented, and used if desired. bond_xmit_xor is what cisco
etherchannel/sun trunking really uses, not round robin.
Remove the variable counters from the xmit loop.. Make it more like:
(from the 2.4 bonding driver)
start = slave = bond
do {
if (slave == bond)
continue;
if (blah..blah)
do xmit()
return 0;
}
} while ((slave=slave->next) != start_at);
kfree(skb);
return 0;
This simplifies the transmit path; and bonding is cpu intensive already!
I'd also like to get the help included.. see attached patch for that!
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
diff -ruN linux-2.2.17-RAID/Documentation/Configure.help
linux/Documentation/Configure.help
--- linux-2.2.17-RAID/Documentation/Configure.help Tue Sep 19 17:18:27 2000
+++ linux/Documentation/Configure.help Mon Oct 2 13:32:41 2000
@@ -4901,6 +4901,28 @@
time, you need to compile this driver as a module. Instead of
'dummy', the devices will then be called 'dummy0', 'dummy1' etc.
+Bonding driver support
+CONFIG_BONDING
+ Say 'Y' or 'M' if you wish to be able to 'bond' multiple Ethernet
+ Channels together. This is called 'Etherchannel' by Cisco,
+ 'Trunking' by Sun, and 'Bonding' in Linux.
+
+ If you have two ethernet connections to some other computer, you can
+ make them behave like one double speed connection using this driver.
+ Naturally, this has to be supported at the other end as well, either
+ with a similar Bonding Linux driver, a Cisco 5500 switch or a
+ SunTrunking SunSoft driver.
+
+ This is similar to the EQL driver, but it merges Ethernet segments
+ instead of serial lines.
+
+ For more information, please see Documentation/networking/bonding.txt.
+
+ If you want to compile this as a module ( = code which can be
+ inserted in and removed from the running kernel whenever you want),
+ say M here and read Documentation/modules.txt. The module will be
+ called bonding.o.
+
SLIP (serial line) support
CONFIG_SLIP
Say Y if you intend to use SLIP or CSLIP (compressed SLIP) to
Re: Bonding Driver Questions
Constantine Gavrilov wrote: > > 1) How can I check for the link status from the user space? > 2) Could enslaved interface be released without bringing the master > interface down? If yes, how? Could we have ifunslave? > Link status is not used at all in v2.2 (and would mean a rewrite of drivers to get it) Link status is used in v2.4. Not all drivers support link status. In fact, I don't know of any that do - but it's possible now to do it. Simply taking down the interface should be enough to remove it from enslavement. -- +------ Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
scsi change, two tape drives, kernel oops in st..
Ok, I've got an ADIC scsi tape library, that is using the scsi Changer code from http://www.strusel007.de/linux/changer.html (v0.15) with linux 2.2.17. When you do: mt -f /dev/nst0 offline mover ex d0 s12 mt -f /dev/nst1 offline mover ex d1 s13 you get the attached kernel oops. I've included the ksymoops output, along with the dmesg results (which includes the SCSI tape library information) You will continue to get oops from the second tape drive from now on. Any ideas on what's wrong? I'll be looking at the st code, hoping that's it trivial to fix.. -- +------ Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
