Re: [Linux-ntfs] Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: ANN: NTFS new release available (1.1.15)
Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Does anyone know what NTFS version the NT 3.1 / 3.51 volumes had? If I > know I can make sure we don't mount such beasts considering we know > the driver would fail on them... - I am aware of only one person stil > using NT 3.51 and he doesn't believe in the NTFS Linux driver any > more, so I guess we can just say we support NT 4.0 and above only. NT 3.51 uses exactly the same version of NTFS as NT 4.0 does. Yuri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Linux-ntfs] Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: ANN: NTFS new release available (1.1.15)
Martin von Loewis wrote: >That would not work: NT would split individual runs across extends >(i.e. split them in the middle). Did I misunderstand, or do you have a >solution for that as well. > Are you sure that it's true? My NTFS resizer interprets parts of runlist stored in different FILE records independently and I never experienced any problems with that. Yuri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
