Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Saturday January 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > > Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code.. > > > > Probably this 'break' in the wrong place... > > > > Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to > > where it should be. > > Now it worked :) Thanks. I'll try to get those fixes into 2.6.20... NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Saturday January 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code.. Probably this 'break' in the wrong place... Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to where it should be. Now it worked :) Thanks. I'll try to get those fixes into 2.6.20... NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code..
>
> Probably this 'break' in the wrong place...
>
> Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to
> where it should be.
Now it worked :)
Thanks,
Wu
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100
> +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-13 06:40:12.0 +1100
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr
> .pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM,
> .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS,
> .pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions,
> - .pg_name= "nfsd",
> + .pg_name= "nfsacl",
> .pg_class = "nfsd",
> .pg_stats = _acl_svcstats,
> .pg_authenticate= _set_client,
> @@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha
> switch(change) {
> case NFSD_SET:
> nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers];
> - break;
> #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
> if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
> - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
> + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
> #endif
> + break;
> case NFSD_CLEAR:
> nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL;
> #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
> if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
> - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL;
> + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL;
> #endif
> break;
> case NFSD_TEST:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Friday January 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel
> > with the patch applied?
> > Because at the very least it should have changed the message to
>
> Oh, sorry. I recompiled & installed kernel and it output this new message:
>
> [ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl)
>
Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code..
Probably this 'break' in the wrong place...
Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to
where it should be.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
### Diffstat output
./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
--- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100
+++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-13 06:40:12.0 +1100
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr
.pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM,
.pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS,
.pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions,
- .pg_name= "nfsd",
+ .pg_name= "nfsacl",
.pg_class = "nfsd",
.pg_stats = _acl_svcstats,
.pg_authenticate= _set_client,
@@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha
switch(change) {
case NFSD_SET:
nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers];
- break;
#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
- nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
+ nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
#endif
+ break;
case NFSD_CLEAR:
nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL;
#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
- nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL;
+ nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL;
#endif
break;
case NFSD_TEST:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Friday January 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel
with the patch applied?
Because at the very least it should have changed the message to
Oh, sorry. I recompiled installed kernel and it output this new message:
[ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl)
Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code..
Probably this 'break' in the wrong place...
Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to
where it should be.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
--- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100
+++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-13 06:40:12.0 +1100
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr
.pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM,
.pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS,
.pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions,
- .pg_name= nfsd,
+ .pg_name= nfsacl,
.pg_class = nfsd,
.pg_stats = nfsd_acl_svcstats,
.pg_authenticate= svc_set_client,
@@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha
switch(change) {
case NFSD_SET:
nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers];
- break;
#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
- nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
+ nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
#endif
+ break;
case NFSD_CLEAR:
nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL;
#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
- nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL;
+ nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL;
#endif
break;
case NFSD_TEST:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code..
Probably this 'break' in the wrong place...
Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to
where it should be.
Now it worked :)
Thanks,
Wu
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
--- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100
+++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-13 06:40:12.0 +1100
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr
.pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM,
.pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS,
.pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions,
- .pg_name= nfsd,
+ .pg_name= nfsacl,
.pg_class = nfsd,
.pg_stats = nfsd_acl_svcstats,
.pg_authenticate= svc_set_client,
@@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha
switch(change) {
case NFSD_SET:
nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers];
- break;
#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
- nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
+ nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers];
#endif
+ break;
case NFSD_CLEAR:
nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL;
#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL)
if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS)
- nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL;
+ nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL;
#endif
break;
case NFSD_TEST:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:04:15AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday January 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Neil, > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > > > > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > > > > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. > > > > # mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel > with the patch applied? > Because at the very least it should have changed the message to Oh, sorry. I recompiled & installed kernel and it output this new message: [ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) Regards, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Thursday January 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Neil, > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. > > # mount localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel with the patch applied? Because at the very least it should have changed the message to > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
Neil, On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. # mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) # pss nfs USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5488 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5489 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5490 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5491 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5492 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5493 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5494 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5495 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] # pss rpc USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5486 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S< 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5487 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S< 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5499 0.0 0.0 7944 668 ?Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5567 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ?Ss 22:16 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5578 0.0 0.0 23180 652 ?Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd Thanks, Wu > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ### Diffstat output > ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100 > +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-11 14:57:03.0 +1100 > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr > .pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, > .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, > .pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions, > - .pg_name= "nfsd", > + .pg_name= "nfsacl", > .pg_class = "nfsd", > .pg_stats = _acl_svcstats, > .pg_authenticate= _set_client, > @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha > break; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > #endif > case NFSD_CLEAR: > nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; > #endif > break; > case NFSD_TEST: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
Neil, On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks. That helps a lot. This patch should help too. Please let me know. # mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) # pss nfs USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5488 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5489 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5490 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5491 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5492 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5493 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5494 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5495 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S22:16 0:00 [nfsd] # pss rpc USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5486 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5487 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5499 0.0 0.0 7944 668 ?Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5567 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ?Ss 22:16 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5578 0.0 0.0 23180 652 ?Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd Thanks, Wu Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### Diffstat output ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100 +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c2007-01-11 14:57:03.0 +1100 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr .pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, .pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions, - .pg_name= nfsd, + .pg_name= nfsacl, .pg_class = nfsd, .pg_stats = nfsd_acl_svcstats, .pg_authenticate= svc_set_client, @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha break; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; #endif case NFSD_CLEAR: nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; #endif break; case NFSD_TEST: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Thursday January 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neil, On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks. That helps a lot. This patch should help too. Please let me know. # mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel with the patch applied? Because at the very least it should have changed the message to [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:04:15AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Thursday January 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neil, On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks. That helps a lot. This patch should help too. Please let me know. # mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel with the patch applied? Because at the very least it should have changed the message to Oh, sorry. I recompiled installed kernel and it output this new message: [ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) Regards, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks. That helps a lot. This patch should help too. Please let me know. NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ### Diffstat output ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100 +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:57:03.0 +1100 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr .pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, .pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions, - .pg_name= "nfsd", + .pg_name= "nfsacl", .pg_class = "nfsd", .pg_stats = _acl_svcstats, .pg_authenticate= _set_client, @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha break; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; #endif case NFSD_CLEAR: nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; #endif break; case NFSD_TEST: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
Fengguang Wu gmail.com> writes: > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. I get the same log messages here with 2.6.19. I also noticed the following messages when starting rpc.nfsd: nfsd[1287]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success) nfsd[1287]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success) These messages appeared with kernel 2.6.19 too. I however don't know if this could be related to the other messages. I use nfs-utils 1.0.10 on Debian Etch. Arnaud Giersch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning.
> > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> >
> > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt
> > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3)
> > # mount | grep suse
> > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1)
> >
> > Any clues about it?
>
> Weird.
>
> Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information.
>
> NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./net/sunrpc/svc.c |3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c
> --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c2007-01-10 16:58:14.0 +1100
> +++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c2007-01-10 16:59:55.0 +1100
> @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog:
>
> err_bad_vers:
> #ifdef RPC_PARANOIA
> - printk("svc: unknown version (%d)\n", vers);
> + printk("svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n",
> +vers, prog, progp->pg_name);
> #endif
> serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++;
> svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH);
root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt
[ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd)
I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all
have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good.
Thanks,
Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Friday January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Any clues about it? Weird. Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information. NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### Diffstat output ./net/sunrpc/svc.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c2007-01-10 16:58:14.0 +1100 +++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c2007-01-10 16:59:55.0 +1100 @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog: err_bad_vers: #ifdef RPC_PARANOIA - printk(svc: unknown version (%d)\n, vers); + printk(svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n, +vers, prog, progp-pg_name); #endif serv-sv_stats-rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH); root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
Fengguang Wu fengguang.wu at gmail.com writes: root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. I get the same log messages here with 2.6.19. I also noticed the following messages when starting rpc.nfsd: nfsd[1287]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success) nfsd[1287]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success) These messages appeared with kernel 2.6.19 too. I however don't know if this could be related to the other messages. I use nfs-utils 1.0.10 on Debian Etch. Arnaud Giersch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks. That helps a lot. This patch should help too. Please let me know. NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### Diffstat output ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.0 +1100 +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:57:03.0 +1100 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr .pg_prog= NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, .pg_vers= nfsd_acl_versions, - .pg_name= nfsd, + .pg_name= nfsacl, .pg_class = nfsd, .pg_stats = nfsd_acl_svcstats, .pg_authenticate= svc_set_client, @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha break; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; #endif case NFSD_CLEAR: nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; #endif break; case NFSD_TEST: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Friday January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning.
> I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
>
> # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt
> [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3)
> # mount | grep suse
> localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1)
>
> Any clues about it?
Weird.
Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information.
NeilBrown
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
### Diffstat output
./net/sunrpc/svc.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:58:14.0 +1100
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:59:55.0 +1100
@@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog:
err_bad_vers:
#ifdef RPC_PARANOIA
- printk("svc: unknown version (%d)\n", vers);
+ printk("svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n",
+ vers, prog, progp->pg_name);
#endif
serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++;
svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Friday January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Any clues about it? Weird. Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information. NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### Diffstat output ./net/sunrpc/svc.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:58:14.0 +1100 +++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:59:55.0 +1100 @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog: err_bad_vers: #ifdef RPC_PARANOIA - printk(svc: unknown version (%d)\n, vers); + printk(svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n, + vers, prog, progp-pg_name); #endif serv-sv_stats-rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:25:39PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > > # mount | grep suse > > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) > > Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The > former will only support NFSv2. I'm running kernel nfs servers: USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5451 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5452 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5453 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5454 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5455 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5456 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5457 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5458 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5449 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S< 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5450 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S< 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5462 0.0 0.0 7940 672 ?Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5527 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ?Ss 19:30 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5538 0.0 0.0 23168 764 ?Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd My system is Debian etch. And I just found that CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is irrelevant, the message remains even if it is disabled. I'll check more kernel versions. Thanks, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Neil, > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > # mount | grep suse > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The former will only support NFSv2. Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The former will only support NFSv2. Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:25:39PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The former will only support NFSv2. I'm running kernel nfs servers: USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5451 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5452 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5453 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5454 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5455 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5456 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5457 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5458 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5449 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5450 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5462 0.0 0.0 7940 672 ?Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5527 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ?Ss 19:30 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5538 0.0 0.0 23168 764 ?Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd My system is Debian etch. And I just found that CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is irrelevant, the message remains even if it is disabled. I'll check more kernel versions. Thanks, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
"svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Any clues about it? Short .config: # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 # Thu Jan 4 15:55:02 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y .. # # Network File Systems # CONFIG_NFS_FS=m CONFIG_NFS_V3=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y # CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO=y CONFIG_NFSD=m CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y CONFIG_LOCKD=m CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y CONFIG_EXPORTFS=m CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y CONFIG_SUNRPC=m CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3=m CONFIG_SMB_FS=m # CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT is not set CONFIG_CIFS=m CONFIG_CIFS_STATS=y # CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR=y CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX=y # CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set # CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set # CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set # CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set CONFIG_9P_FS=m .. Thanks, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
svc: unknown version (3) when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y
Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Any clues about it? Short .config: # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 # Thu Jan 4 15:55:02 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y .. # # Network File Systems # CONFIG_NFS_FS=m CONFIG_NFS_V3=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y # CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO=y CONFIG_NFSD=m CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y CONFIG_LOCKD=m CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y CONFIG_EXPORTFS=m CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y CONFIG_SUNRPC=m CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3=m CONFIG_SMB_FS=m # CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT is not set CONFIG_CIFS=m CONFIG_CIFS_STATS=y # CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR=y CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX=y # CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set # CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set # CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set # CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set CONFIG_9P_FS=m .. Thanks, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
