Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > >There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings > and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly. > > Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 > Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed > Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed > dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions > compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, > alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Thanks for testing both of these, sorry for the mess with -rc2. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly. Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Test systems Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2 (cross-compile testing) Cross-compile tests results alpha defconfig Passed arm defconfig Passed arm64 defconfig Not applicable blackfin defconfig Passed c6x defconfig Not applicable mipsdefconfig Passed mipsel defconfig Passed powerpc wii_defconfig Passed sh defconfig Passed sparc defconfig Passed tiletilegx_defconfig Passed -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah...@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > > > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. > > > > mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': > > slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > > mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': > > slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > > mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': > > slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > > > More tomorrow. > > Should now be fixed, if not, please let me know. > Yes, much better: total: 98 pass: 71 skipped: 16 fail: 11 This matches the results from the previous release. qemu tests also pass. Details are at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders, as usual. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 01:15 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Khalid Aziz wrote... Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the patch and send another one for the next round. FYI, after patching mm/swap.c accordingly, all the 3.0 and 3.4 configurations I use do build. Some boot tests will follow, I'll follow up only if I see unusual behaviour. Christoph Thanks for testing, Christoph. I will create a v2 of this patch with this change for the next round of stable kernels. -- Khalid -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
Khalid Aziz wrote... > Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo > the patch and send another one for the next round. FYI, after patching mm/swap.c accordingly, all the 3.0 and 3.4 configurations I use do build. Some boot tests will follow, I'll follow up only if I see unusual behaviour. Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. > > mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': > slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': > slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': > slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > More tomorrow. Should now be fixed, if not, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:04:25PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz > and the diffstat can be found below. Due to build problems in -rc1, I've dropped one patch and now have posted a -rc2 patch: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc2.gz thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:12:47AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > > > > Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post. > > > > Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well. > > > > Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the > patch and send another one for the next round. Now removed from 3.0 and I'll drop it from 3.4 as well, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:35:35AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > On 10/03/2013 06:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: > >Guenter Roeck wrote... > > > >>On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > > > >>Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. > >> > >>mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': > >>slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > >>mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': > >>slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > >>mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': > >>slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > >>make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > > >This is obviously due to > > > >| [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP > > > >and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. > > > >Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h > >while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like > >in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting > >kernel shows no anomalies here. > > > >However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an > >important point? > > Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with > CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many > multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from > linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I > had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see > those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after > including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h > instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c > would be the right thing to do. > For my part, what I do is to compile lots of standard configurations. I don't look into details. If you are interested, go to http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders, click on any of the many failed builds for 3.0 or 3.4, then click on "stdio" on the build page. You'll see the build log, which also lists the names of the failed configurations. An easy start might be x86_64:allnoconfig or i386:allnoconfig, both of which fail. Thanks, Guenter > -- > Khalid > > > > > Christoph > > > >--- a/mm/swap.c > >+++ b/mm/swap.c > >@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > >+#include > > > > #include "internal.h" > > > >@@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); > > > >-int PageHuge(struct page *page); > >- > > /* > > * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally > > * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post. Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well. Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the patch and send another one for the next round. Thanks, Khalid -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 08:41 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Khalid Aziz wrote... Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c would be the right thing to do. Yes, one of my configurations has CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, also CONFIG_NUMA=y, and the kernel built. Could not test it, though. There still might be other configuration settings that caused the error messages you've seen. Manually picking both PageHuge definitions from linux/hugetlb.h should be a safe alternative then, but that's ugly. Christoph Including linux/hugetlb.h is the right thing to do here. I cleaned up my build directories and started from scratch again. I tested with the old config where I had seen errors and I did not see errors again. I must have had something messed up in my old build directories. Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post. Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well. Thanks, Khalid -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
Khalid Aziz wrote... > Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with > CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many > multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from > linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I > had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see > those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after > including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h > instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c > would be the right thing to do. Yes, one of my configurations has CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, also CONFIG_NUMA=y, and the kernel built. Could not test it, though. There still might be other configuration settings that caused the error messages you've seen. Manually picking both PageHuge definitions from linux/hugetlb.h should be a safe alternative then, but that's ugly. Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 06:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Guenter Roeck wrote... On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c would be the right thing to do. -- Khalid Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "internal.h" @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 05:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Guenter Roeck wrote... On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Thanks a lot for tracking this down. Final build result is total: 98 pass: 15 skipped: 16 fail: 67 for 3.0, which is obviously less than perfect. All qemu tests failed as well, or rather the qemu images failed to build. Guenter Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "internal.h" @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
Guenter Roeck wrote... > On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. > > mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': > slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': > slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': > slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "internal.h" @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
Guenter Roeck wrote... On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include linux/backing-dev.h #include linux/memcontrol.h #include linux/gfp.h +#include linux/hugetlb.h #include internal.h @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 05:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Guenter Roeck wrote... On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Thanks a lot for tracking this down. Final build result is total: 98 pass: 15 skipped: 16 fail: 67 for 3.0, which is obviously less than perfect. All qemu tests failed as well, or rather the qemu images failed to build. Guenter Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include linux/backing-dev.h #include linux/memcontrol.h #include linux/gfp.h +#include linux/hugetlb.h #include internal.h @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 06:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Guenter Roeck wrote... On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c would be the right thing to do. -- Khalid Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include linux/backing-dev.h #include linux/memcontrol.h #include linux/gfp.h +#include linux/hugetlb.h #include internal.h @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
Khalid Aziz wrote... Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c would be the right thing to do. Yes, one of my configurations has CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, also CONFIG_NUMA=y, and the kernel built. Could not test it, though. There still might be other configuration settings that caused the error messages you've seen. Manually picking both PageHuge definitions from linux/hugetlb.h should be a safe alternative then, but that's ugly. Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 08:41 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Khalid Aziz wrote... Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c would be the right thing to do. Yes, one of my configurations has CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, also CONFIG_NUMA=y, and the kernel built. Could not test it, though. There still might be other configuration settings that caused the error messages you've seen. Manually picking both PageHuge definitions from linux/hugetlb.h should be a safe alternative then, but that's ugly. Christoph Including linux/hugetlb.h is the right thing to do here. I cleaned up my build directories and started from scratch again. I tested with the old config where I had seen errors and I did not see errors again. I must have had something messed up in my old build directories. Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post. Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well. Thanks, Khalid -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post. Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well. Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the patch and send another one for the next round. Thanks, Khalid -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:35:35AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 10/03/2013 06:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Guenter Roeck wrote... On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This is obviously due to | [ 11/13] mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP and happens if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set. Looking closer, upstream commit 7cb2ef56 included linux/hugetlb.h while the backport for 3.0 just defines PageHuge. Reverting that like in the patch below causes the build to complete, and the resulting kernel shows no anomalies here. However did that backport, why was it done that way? Or did I miss an important point? Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I had something else screwed up in my build since you did not see those errors. Did you compile with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE set after including linux/hugetlb.h? If you did, including linux/hugetlb.h instead of importing just the definition of PageHuge in mm/swap.c would be the right thing to do. For my part, what I do is to compile lots of standard configurations. I don't look into details. If you are interested, go to http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders, click on any of the many failed builds for 3.0 or 3.4, then click on stdio on the build page. You'll see the build log, which also lists the names of the failed configurations. An easy start might be x86_64:allnoconfig or i386:allnoconfig, both of which fail. Thanks, Guenter -- Khalid Christoph --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include linux/backing-dev.h #include linux/memcontrol.h #include linux/gfp.h +#include linux/hugetlb.h #include internal.h @@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs); -int PageHuge(struct page *page); - /* * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:12:47AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post. Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well. Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the patch and send another one for the next round. Now removed from 3.0 and I'll drop it from 3.4 as well, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:04:25PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. Due to build problems in -rc1, I've dropped one patch and now have posted a -rc2 patch: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc2.gz thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 More tomorrow. Should now be fixed, if not, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
Khalid Aziz wrote... Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the patch and send another one for the next round. FYI, after patching mm/swap.c accordingly, all the 3.0 and 3.4 configurations I use do build. Some boot tests will follow, I'll follow up only if I see unusual behaviour. Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/03/2013 01:15 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: Khalid Aziz wrote... Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the patch and send another one for the next round. FYI, after patching mm/swap.c accordingly, all the 3.0 and 3.4 configurations I use do build. Some boot tests will follow, I'll follow up only if I see unusual behaviour. Christoph Thanks for testing, Christoph. I will create a v2 of this patch with this change for the next round of stable kernels. -- Khalid -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 More tomorrow. Should now be fixed, if not, please let me know. Yes, much better: total: 98 pass: 71 skipped: 16 fail: 11 This matches the results from the previous release. qemu tests also pass. Details are at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders, as usual. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly. Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Test systems Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2 (cross-compile testing) Cross-compile tests results alpha defconfig Passed arm defconfig Passed arm64 defconfig Not applicable blackfin defconfig Passed c6x defconfig Not applicable mipsdefconfig Passed mipsel defconfig Passed powerpc wii_defconfig Passed sh defconfig Passed sparc defconfig Passed tiletilegx_defconfig Passed -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah...@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly. Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Thanks for testing both of these, sorry for the mess with -rc2. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 More tomorrow. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h - Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: Greg Kroah-Hartman Linux 3.0.99-rc1 Eric Dumazet splice: fix racy pipe->buffers uses Henrik Rydberg hwmon: (applesmc) Silence uninitialized warnings Khalid Aziz mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP Henrik Rydberg hwmon: (applesmc) Check key count before proceeding Jani Nikula drm/i915/dp: increase i2c-over-aux retry interval on AUX DEFER Mikulas Patocka dm-snapshot: fix performance degradation due to small hash size Mikulas Patocka dm snapshot: workaround for a false positive lockdep warning Kurt Garloff usb/core/devio.c: Don't reject control message to endpoint with wrong direction bit Florian Wolter xhci: Fix race between ep halt and URB cancellation Mathias Nyman xhci: Fix oops happening after address device timeout Malcolm Priestley staging: vt6656: [BUG] main_usb.c oops on device_close move flag earlier. Josh Boyer x86, efi: Don't map Boot Services on i386 Masoud Sharbiani x86/reboot: Add quirk to make Dell C6100 use reboot=pci automatically - Diffstat: Makefile | 4 +-- arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c | 16 ++ arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 11 --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 +++- drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 19 ++-- drivers/md/dm-snap-persistent.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-snap.c | 5 ++- drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 3 +- drivers/usb/core/devio.c | 16 ++ drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 14 +++-- fs/splice.c | 35 - include/linux/splice.h| 8 ++--- kernel/relay.c| 5 +-- kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 ++-- mm/swap.c | 65 --- net/core/skbuff.c | 3 +- 16 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h - Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org Linux 3.0.99-rc1 Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com splice: fix racy pipe-buffers uses Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se hwmon: (applesmc) Silence uninitialized warnings Khalid Aziz khalid.a...@oracle.com mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se hwmon: (applesmc) Check key count before proceeding Jani Nikula jani.nik...@intel.com drm/i915/dp: increase i2c-over-aux retry interval on AUX DEFER Mikulas Patocka mpato...@redhat.com dm-snapshot: fix performance degradation due to small hash size Mikulas Patocka mpato...@redhat.com dm snapshot: workaround for a false positive lockdep warning Kurt Garloff k...@garloff.de usb/core/devio.c: Don't reject control message to endpoint with wrong direction bit Florian Wolter woll...@web.de xhci: Fix race between ep halt and URB cancellation Mathias Nyman mathias.ny...@linux.intel.com xhci: Fix oops happening after address device timeout Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com staging: vt6656: [BUG] main_usb.c oops on device_close move flag earlier. Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com x86, efi: Don't map Boot Services on i386 Masoud Sharbiani msharbi...@twitter.com x86/reboot: Add quirk to make Dell C6100 use reboot=pci automatically - Diffstat: Makefile | 4 +-- arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c | 16 ++ arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 11 --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 +++- drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 19 ++-- drivers/md/dm-snap-persistent.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-snap.c | 5 ++- drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 3 +- drivers/usb/core/devio.c | 16 ++ drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 14 +++-- fs/splice.c | 35 - include/linux/splice.h| 8 ++--- kernel/relay.c| 5 +-- kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 ++-- mm/swap.c | 65 --- net/core/skbuff.c | 3 +- 16 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds. mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page': slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge' mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail': slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 More tomorrow. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
