3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: William Dauchy <wdau...@gmail.com> commit 96dcadc2fdd111dca90d559f189a30c65394451a upstream. Adding rate limit on `Lock reclaim failed` messages since it could fill up system logs Signed-off-by: William Dauchy <wdau...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: add the 'NFS:' prefix at the same time] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> --- --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c @@ -1261,8 +1261,9 @@ restart: spin_lock(&state->state_lock); list_for_each_entry(lock, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) { if (!(lock->ls_flags & NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED)) - printk("%s: Lock reclaim failed!\n", - __func__); + pr_warn_ratelimited("NFS: " + "%s: Lock reclaim " + "failed!\n", __func__); } spin_unlock(&state->state_lock); nfs4_put_open_state(state); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/