Re: [ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup

2007-03-22 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:34AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22.
> 
> It looks like the UML change needs to be folded into the same changeset to
> avoid build breaks?

Yes, that would be great.

Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup

2007-03-22 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:06:40 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> These are post-2.6.21 material, except that if the new definition of
> ARRAY_SIZE goes to Linus, patch 1 in this series should go as well.

I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22.

It looks like the UML change needs to be folded into the same changeset to
avoid build breaks?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup

2007-03-22 Thread Jeff Dike
These are post-2.6.21 material, except that if the new definition of
ARRAY_SIZE goes to Linus, patch 1 in this series should go as well.

These patches are a response to the new ARRAY_SIZE.  UML had a
duplicate definition for the use of the userspace side of things,
which can't directly use kernel.h.  This header was included
everywhere, and had a random collection of stuff in it.

This series first gets UML building again by replacing the old
ARRAY_SIZE definition with one that expands to the same token
sequence.  Then user_util.h is dismantled, primarily into two, more
coherent headers, and deleted.  ARRAY_SIZE is reintroduced, but in a
header which is only included in userspace files, and in its old form,
so this version is lacking the extra typechecking.

The final patch in the series is unrelated to the rest - it adds
__init declarations to some functions which were lacking them.

Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/