Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-06-18 Thread S. P. Prasanna

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:43:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
> CONFIG_KPROBES=n.
> 
Adrian,

Please implement it as Andrew suggested, when this was patch was posted
eariler. Refer this discussion thread below.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/27/576

NACK

Thanks
Prasanna

> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---
> 
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 27 Apr 2007
> - 27 Mar 2007
> 
>  include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old  2007-03-26 
> 15:28:27.0 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h  2007-03-26 
> 15:32:23.0 +0200
> @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
>  extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>  extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>  extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
> -extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
>  extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
>  extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
> @@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
>  {
>  }
>  #endif   /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> +
> +void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
>  #endif   /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

-- 
Prasanna S.P.
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 91-80-41776329
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-06-18 Thread S. P. Prasanna

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:43:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
 CONFIG_KPROBES=n.
 
Adrian,

Please implement it as Andrew suggested, when this was patch was posted
eariler. Refer this discussion thread below.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/27/576

NACK

Thanks
Prasanna

 Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 
 This patch has been sent on:
 - 27 Apr 2007
 - 27 Mar 2007
 
  include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 --- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old  2007-03-26 
 15:28:27.0 +0200
 +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h  2007-03-26 
 15:32:23.0 +0200
 @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
  extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
  extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
  extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
 -extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
  extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
  extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
  extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
 @@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
  {
  }
  #endif   /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
 +
 +void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +
  #endif   /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

-- 
Prasanna S.P.
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 91-80-41776329
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-06-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
CONFIG_KPROBES=n.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

This patch has been sent on:
- 27 Apr 2007
- 27 Mar 2007

 include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old2007-03-26 
15:28:27.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h2007-03-26 
15:32:23.0 +0200
@@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
 extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
-extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
 extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
 extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
@@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
 {
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
+
+void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-06-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
CONFIG_KPROBES=n.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---

This patch has been sent on:
- 27 Apr 2007
- 27 Mar 2007

 include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old2007-03-26 
15:28:27.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h2007-03-26 
15:32:23.0 +0200
@@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
 extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
-extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
 extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
 extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
@@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
 {
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
+
+void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:32:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:40:57 +0530
> Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
> > > CONFIG_KPROBES=n.
> > 
> > Is kprobes.h the correct place to allow for this change? Perhaps, with
> > Christoph's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=117432009501114=2
> > consolidating the die_notifier code, this could be moved to
> > include/linux/kdebug.h instead?
> > 
> 
> Yes, I think something is definitely wrong here.  If the code is presently
> calling show_registers() with no prototype in scope, it should be emitting
> warnings?

No, it's not a caller but the function itself that is present wiith 
CONFIG_KPROBES=n, giving me warnings with -Wmissing-prototypes.

> Also, yes, kprobes.h is an inappropriate place for this declaration.  It
> should be in include/asm-foo/, I guess.

Currently, we have partially both...

And include/linux/ sounds like a better place it the prototype should be 
the same on all architectures.

> But if we do that, there's an excellent chance of a compile explosion,
> because we also have implementations of show_registers() in
> drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c, drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c,
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c, drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c and who knows
> where else.
> 
> So what I'd suggest is that we rename show_registers() to something saner,
> then put the declaration into some arch header file then include that
> header in kprobes.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:32:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:40:57 +0530
 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
   Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
   CONFIG_KPROBES=n.
  
  Is kprobes.h the correct place to allow for this change? Perhaps, with
  Christoph's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=117432009501114w=2
  consolidating the die_notifier code, this could be moved to
  include/linux/kdebug.h instead?
  
 
 Yes, I think something is definitely wrong here.  If the code is presently
 calling show_registers() with no prototype in scope, it should be emitting
 warnings?

No, it's not a caller but the function itself that is present wiith 
CONFIG_KPROBES=n, giving me warnings with -Wmissing-prototypes.

 Also, yes, kprobes.h is an inappropriate place for this declaration.  It
 should be in include/asm-foo/, I guess.

Currently, we have partially both...

And include/linux/ sounds like a better place it the prototype should be 
the same on all architectures.

 But if we do that, there's an excellent chance of a compile explosion,
 because we also have implementations of show_registers() in
 drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c, drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c,
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c, drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c and who knows
 where else.
 
 So what I'd suggest is that we rename show_registers() to something saner,
 then put the declaration into some arch header file then include that
 header in kprobes.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   Only a promise, Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:40:57 +0530
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
> > CONFIG_KPROBES=n.
> 
> Is kprobes.h the correct place to allow for this change? Perhaps, with
> Christoph's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=117432009501114=2
> consolidating the die_notifier code, this could be moved to
> include/linux/kdebug.h instead?
> 

Yes, I think something is definitely wrong here.  If the code is presently
calling show_registers() with no prototype in scope, it should be emitting
warnings?

Also, yes, kprobes.h is an inappropriate place for this declaration.  It
should be in include/asm-foo/, I guess.

But if we do that, there's an excellent chance of a compile explosion,
because we also have implementations of show_registers() in
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c, drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c,
drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c, drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c and who knows
where else.

So what I'd suggest is that we rename show_registers() to something saner,
then put the declaration into some arch header file then include that
header in kprobes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:40:57 +0530
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
  Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
  CONFIG_KPROBES=n.
 
 Is kprobes.h the correct place to allow for this change? Perhaps, with
 Christoph's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=117432009501114w=2
 consolidating the die_notifier code, this could be moved to
 include/linux/kdebug.h instead?
 

Yes, I think something is definitely wrong here.  If the code is presently
calling show_registers() with no prototype in scope, it should be emitting
warnings?

Also, yes, kprobes.h is an inappropriate place for this declaration.  It
should be in include/asm-foo/, I guess.

But if we do that, there's an excellent chance of a compile explosion,
because we also have implementations of show_registers() in
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c, drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c,
drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c, drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c and who knows
where else.

So what I'd suggest is that we rename show_registers() to something saner,
then put the declaration into some arch header file then include that
header in kprobes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-26 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
> CONFIG_KPROBES=n.

Is kprobes.h the correct place to allow for this change? Perhaps, with
Christoph's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=117432009501114=2
consolidating the die_notifier code, this could be moved to
include/linux/kdebug.h instead?

Ananth

> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---
> 
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 27 Mar 2007
> 
>  include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old  2007-03-26 
> 15:28:27.0 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h  2007-03-26 
> 15:32:23.0 +0200
> @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
>  extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>  extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>  extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
> -extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
>  extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
>  extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
> @@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
>  {
>  }
>  #endif   /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> +
> +void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
>  #endif   /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
CONFIG_KPROBES=n.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

This patch has been sent on:
- 27 Mar 2007

 include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old2007-03-26 
15:28:27.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h2007-03-26 
15:32:23.0 +0200
@@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
 extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
-extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
 extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
 extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
@@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
 {
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
+
+void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
CONFIG_KPROBES=n.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---

This patch has been sent on:
- 27 Mar 2007

 include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old2007-03-26 
15:28:27.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h2007-03-26 
15:32:23.0 +0200
@@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
 extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
-extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
 extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
 extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
@@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
 {
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
+
+void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2.6 patch] include/linux/kprobes.h: always offer show_registers() prototype

2007-04-26 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 Allow gcc to perform show_registers() type checking also with 
 CONFIG_KPROBES=n.

Is kprobes.h the correct place to allow for this change? Perhaps, with
Christoph's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=117432009501114w=2
consolidating the die_notifier code, this could be moved to
include/linux/kdebug.h instead?

Ananth

 
 Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 
 This patch has been sent on:
 - 27 Mar 2007
 
  include/linux/kprobes.h |4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 --- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h.old  2007-03-26 
 15:28:27.0 +0200
 +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h  2007-03-26 
 15:32:23.0 +0200
 @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
  extern void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
  extern void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
  extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
 -extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
  extern kprobe_opcode_t *get_insn_slot(void);
  extern void free_insn_slot(kprobe_opcode_t *slot, int dirty);
  extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
 @@ -241,4 +240,7 @@
  {
  }
  #endif   /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
 +
 +void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +
  #endif   /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/