[2.6 patch] mm/slab.c: start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit
start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit (which also matches what it's
callers are).
__devinit didn't cause problems, it simply wasted a few bytes of memory
for the common CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n case.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch has been sent on:
- 28 Apr 2007
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c.old 2007-04-28 14:26:44.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c 2007-04-28 14:26:54.0 +0200
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@
* the CPUs getting into lockstep and contending for the global cache chain
* lock.
*/
-static void __devinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
{
struct delayed_work *reap_work = _cpu(reap_work, cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[2.6 patch] mm/slab.c: start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit
start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit (which also matches what it's
callers are).
__devinit didn't cause problems, it simply wasted a few bytes of memory
for the common CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n case.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch has been sent on:
- 28 Apr 2007
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c.old 2007-04-28 14:26:44.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c 2007-04-28 14:26:54.0 +0200
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@
* the CPUs getting into lockstep and contending for the global cache chain
* lock.
*/
-static void __devinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
{
struct delayed_work *reap_work = per_cpu(reap_work, cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[2.6 patch] mm/slab.c: start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit
start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit (which also matches what it's
callers are).
__devinit didn't cause problems, it simply wasted a few bytes of memory
for the common CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n case.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c.old 2007-04-28 14:26:44.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c 2007-04-28 14:26:54.0 +0200
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@
* the CPUs getting into lockstep and contending for the global cache chain
* lock.
*/
-static void __devinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
{
struct delayed_work *reap_work = _cpu(reap_work, cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[2.6 patch] mm/slab.c: start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit
start_cpu_timer() should be __cpuinit (which also matches what it's
callers are).
__devinit didn't cause problems, it simply wasted a few bytes of memory
for the common CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n case.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c.old 2007-04-28 14:26:44.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/mm/slab.c 2007-04-28 14:26:54.0 +0200
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@
* the CPUs getting into lockstep and contending for the global cache chain
* lock.
*/
-static void __devinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
{
struct delayed_work *reap_work = per_cpu(reap_work, cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
