Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker
> > and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers.
> 
> Whine bicker bitch moan complain ;)
> 
> I'll go over it in detail early next week

You know, one thing that seems to be a general truth is that people don't
report problems until you hold the gun to their head, and count down
from 10. Usually, they speak up at 2 or 1. It's probably due to seeing too
many Hollywood movies.

To prove this, I got a bugreport today. A bug that seems to have been
introduced in pre4, which was released 25th of April. One would expect
that bug to have been reported sooner, right? Hell no. Why report the
bug when you can fall back to pre3 and be happy?! :^)

Oh well. The backdraw with announcing a final is that it only works once
or twice, then the people who don't experience bugs and want the proper
final version get fed up.


/David
  _ _ 
 // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander  \\
//  Project MCA Linux hacker//  Dance across the winter sky // 
\>  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread Alan Cox

> too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker
> and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers.

Whine bicker bitch moan complain ;)

I'll go over it in detail early next week

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



[ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall

Haha! This is final 2.0.39, whether you like it or not! Noone screamed
too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker
and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers.
They won't disturb your kernel one bit. They might simplify backporting
of drivers, though.


2.0.39final

o   Fix the few vger.rutgers.edu(Daniel Roesen)
references that I missed
o   Added headerfiles for devfs (Richard Gooch)
to simplify backports of
drivers
o   Fix a bug involving syncronous  (Jari Ruusu)
writes and -ENOSPC that could
cause file-corruption


Rats! Someone _did_ come up with something terrible. The ide-stuff
wasn't compiling at all. So after putting a big brown paper-bag over my
head and poking two holes in it to be able to see, I sat down with a
fresh tree and tried to compile every damn option. The result is a
2.0.39pre8 which probably has as many warnings as before (oh, I removed
one, in xd.c) but _hopefully_ no non-compilable drivers. Notice,
however, that I only tried compiling the x86-stuff (due to lack of other
hardware.)


2.0.39pre8

o   Make ide.c compile  (Andries Brouwier)
o   Added new versions of PCI-2000  (Mark Ebersole)
o   Added new versions of PCI-2220i (Mark Ebersole)
o   Fixed a few typos in PCI-2000,  (me)
PCI-2220i, PSI-240i and related
files
o   Removed unused variable in xd.c (me)
o   Small Config.in-file cleanups   (me)
o   Renamed the initfunctions in(me)
pi2.c and pt.c, as their names
clashed with paride-names
(obviously, noone uses paride
 together with hamradio)
o   Remove two unnecessary files(me)
I introduced in one of the
other pre-patches
o   Changed all (?) references to   (me)
vger.rutgers.edu to
vger.kernel.org


This is the last 2.0.39 pre-patch, unless someone comes up
with something horrible. Still, I'm not impossible to convince,
should there be something one of you out the consider pressing.
Give this one a tough beating, ok? Test and enjoy!


2.0.39pre7

o   Fix a bug in af_unix that wrote to  (Michael Deutschmann)
a socket after freeing it
(aka the Win9x-related oops)
o   Fixed typo in Documentation (Martin Douda)


Doh! Another broken promise, I guess. As v2.0.39pre5 was broken wrt
IDE, I release this just to allow testing of the IDE-changes. The
earlier promised fixes to other problems will come in a later
release.


2.0.39pre6

o   Somewhat more complete fix for  (Wolfram Gloger)
the bug in Paride
o   Fix the annoying build-prohibiting  (Gael Queri)
bug in drivers/block/ide.c


While I promised this release to be the last one, at least one more
pre-patch will arrive after this one; I still have a few bugs to
investigate, among them a Win9x network-related oops and a blocksize
related fs problem. Test and scream if something bites you. Hopefully,
nothing does.


2.0.39pre5

o   IDE-patches (Andre Hedrick)
o   Move memory-offset for dynamic  (Michael Deutschsmann)
executables
o   Fixes to the Cyclades-driver(Ivan Passos)
o   Fix for a bug in ext2   (Stephen C. Tweedie)
o   Added marketing-names for 3Com  (Yann Dirson, me)
NICs in drivers/net/Config.in
o   Added fix to smbfs  (Rick Bressier)


Sorry to all of you for taking so long for getting this one out.
This one addresses some more things in v2.0.38 that I considered
relatively safe to change. There are several persons that have
reported the ability to resource-starve or crash the kernel by
various methods. However, most of these things would demand quite
significant changes to the memory-management to be addressed, and
I will not carry out any such. There is a reason that there are
a v2.2 kernel series and soon also a v2.4 kernel series. I hope you
all can understand this point of view.

Most of v2.0.39 seems to be ready for release. Now is
a perfectly good time to yell "Snarfel!" if you consider this
opinion of mine to be totally beyond the edges of sanity.

What I'm most curious about to know is whether the Large-disk fixes
works properly for everyone (of course, any problems with the other
fixes should be reported too...) The only thing I am considering to
adding now is Andre Hedrick's ide-patch.


2.0.39pre4

o   Large-disk fixes(Andries Brouwer)
o   Wavelan-driver cleanup & bugfixes   (Jean Tourrilhes)
o   Security-fixes  (Solar Designer)
o   Quota-fixes (Jan Kara)
o   Fixed GPF using IPsec Masquerade(Rudolf Lippan)
o   (s)size_t-patch for fs/proc/mem.c   (me)

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

  too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker
  and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers.
 
 Whine bicker bitch moan complain ;)
 
 I'll go over it in detail early next week

You know, one thing that seems to be a general truth is that people don't
report problems until you hold the gun to their head, and count down
from 10. Usually, they speak up at 2 or 1. It's probably due to seeing too
many Hollywood movies.

To prove this, I got a bugreport today. A bug that seems to have been
introduced in pre4, which was released 25th of April. One would expect
that bug to have been reported sooner, right? Hell no. Why report the
bug when you can fall back to pre3 and be happy?! :^)

Oh well. The backdraw with announcing a final is that it only works once
or twice, then the people who don't experience bugs and want the proper
final version get fed up.


/David
  _ _ 
 // David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Northern lights wander  \\
//  Project MCA Linux hacker//  Dance across the winter sky // 
\  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao//   Full colour fire   / 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/