Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-09 Thread Alan
> As an aside to this sort of problem, shouldn't we print some kind of 
> loud message in dmesg when we force a high-UDMA-capable device down to 
> UDMA33 due to a 40-wire cable detection? In the case where it truly is a 
> 40-wire cable the user may want to know that and replace the cable, if 
> it isn't it gives more of a hint of why the drive isn't running at full 
> speed..

Send patches. We also probably want to change speed straight from
UDMAlots to UDMA33 if the cable is CBL_UNK so that we can rapidly recover
in the cases where the controller says "I'm crap I don't really know" (eg
ATI and Nvidia without ACPI)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-08 Thread l . genoni

Well, the cable is OK, of course I checked.

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:


Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:36:58 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
linux-kernel 
Cc: Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata
     driver, NV CK804 ide controller.
Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 05:47:22 +0100
Resent-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Alan wrote:

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:19:36 +0100
Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop 
consequently), as you can see from:


Interesting.


Willing to test any patch.


Firstly can you see if its consistently the case that booting 2.6.20
gives UDMA33 and 2.6.19 UDMA100 over a few reboots. If it is please drop
the 2.6.19 drivers/ata/pamd_amd into 2.6.20 and try that.


As an aside to this sort of problem, shouldn't we print some kind of loud 
message in dmesg when we force a high-UDMA-capable device down to UDMA33 due 
to a 40-wire cable detection? In the case where it truly is a 40-wire cable 
the user may want to know that and replace the cable, if it isn't it gives 
more of a hint of why the drive isn't running at full speed..


--
Robert Hancock  Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-07 Thread Robert Hancock

Alan wrote:

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:19:36 +0100
Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop 
consequently), as you can see from:


Interesting.


Willing to test any patch.


Firstly can you see if its consistently the case that booting 2.6.20
gives UDMA33 and 2.6.19 UDMA100 over a few reboots. If it is please drop
the 2.6.19 drivers/ata/pamd_amd into 2.6.20 and try that.


As an aside to this sort of problem, shouldn't we print some kind of 
loud message in dmesg when we force a high-UDMA-capable device down to 
UDMA33 due to a 40-wire cable detection? In the case where it truly is a 
40-wire cable the user may want to know that and replace the cable, if 
it isn't it gives more of a hint of why the drive isn't running at full 
speed..


--
Robert Hancock  Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-07 Thread l . genoni
I did the test you asked and yes, it is consistently booting at DMA33 with 
2.6.20 and DMA100 with 2.6.19.3 (20 reboots, 10 2.6.20 and 10 2.6.19 in 
sparse order).
I am compiling a 2.6.20 kernel with older pata_amd.c driver and will let 
you know. seeing the diff I do exspect it to compile cleanly.


Luigi


On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Alan wrote:


Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:20:00 +
From: Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata
     driver, NV CK804 ide controller.
Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:17:42 +0100
Resent-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:19:36 +0100
Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop
consequently), as you can see from:


Interesting.


Willing to test any patch.


Firstly can you see if its consistently the case that booting 2.6.20
gives UDMA33 and 2.6.19 UDMA100 over a few reboots. If it is please drop
the 2.6.19 drivers/ata/pamd_amd into 2.6.20 and try that.

Thanks

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-07 Thread Alan
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:19:36 +0100
Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
> initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop 
> consequently), as you can see from:

Interesting.

> Willing to test any patch.

Firstly can you see if its consistently the case that booting 2.6.20
gives UDMA33 and 2.6.19 UDMA100 over a few reboots. If it is please drop
the 2.6.19 drivers/ata/pamd_amd into 2.6.20 and try that.

Thanks

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-07 Thread venom
I boot 2.6.20 also on a pentium4 with intel 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) IDE 
Controller and the same pata disk.
On this controller the disk runs in DMA100 as it should, so I'm prone to 
think it is a pata_amd.c driver trouble. Should try downgrading this 
driver from version 0.2.7 to version 0.2.4?


I looked at the diff, but I do not see why the new "static int 
amd_reinit_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)" , that has inside a clear 
a if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD), should have some impact on a 
nvidia controller.


suggestions?

regards

Luigi Genoni

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Luigi Genoni wrote:


Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:19:36 +0100
From: Luigi Genoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata
    driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop
consequently), as you can see from:

pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.7
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 irq 14
ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xF008 irq 15
scsi4 : pata_amd
ata5.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
ata5.00: ata5: dev 0 multi count 1
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi5 : pata_amd
ata6.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  SAMSUNG SP0822N  WA10 PQ: 0 ANSI:
5
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't
support DPO
or FUA
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't
support DPO
or FUA
 sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3
sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc


while with kernel 2.6.19.X it was initialized correctly in DMA100 mode:

pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.4
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 irq 14
ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xF008 irq 15
scsi4 : pata_amd
ata5.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
ata5.00: ata5: dev 0 multi count 1
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/100
scsi5 : pata_amd
ata6.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA SAMSUNG SP0822N  WA10 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
 sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3
sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc

I have other 2 sata disks on this system, and I have no problems with
them. I Wonder if this is due to some controller/disk problem triggered
just by 2.6.20 kernel (I saw there are a lot of changes into eh code),
while 2.6.19.X and previous sees everything OK.

Also forf the sata disks, in fact, I see this "doesn't support DPO or FUA"
warning, but I have to admit I do not know which features it is referred to.

This system is an Athlon64 X2 3800+ with an nvidia2 IDE controller

here is the lspci -v

00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev
a3)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 815a
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0
Capabilities: [44] HyperTransport: Slave or Primary Interface
Capabilities: [e0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping

00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0

00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: 66MHz, fast devsel, IRQ 10
I/O ports at e400 [size=32]
I/O ports at 4c00 [size=64]
I/O ports at 4c40 [size=64]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2)
(prog-if 10 [OHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 20
Memory at d4004000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3)
(prog-if 20 [EHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 22
Memory at d4005000 (32-bit, non-p

[BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-06 Thread Luigi Genoni
Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop 
consequently), as you can see from:

pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.7
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 irq 14
ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xF008 irq 15
scsi4 : pata_amd
ata5.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
ata5.00: ata5: dev 0 multi count 1
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi5 : pata_amd
ata6.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  SAMSUNG SP0822N  WA10 PQ: 0 ANSI:
5
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't
support DPO
or FUA
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't
support DPO
or FUA
  sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3
sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc


while with kernel 2.6.19.X it was initialized correctly in DMA100 mode:

pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.4
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 irq 14
ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xF008 irq 15
scsi4 : pata_amd
ata5.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
ata5.00: ata5: dev 0 multi count 1
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/100
scsi5 : pata_amd
ata6.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA SAMSUNG SP0822N  WA10 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
  sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3
sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc

I have other 2 sata disks on this system, and I have no problems with
them. I Wonder if this is due to some controller/disk problem triggered
just by 2.6.20 kernel (I saw there are a lot of changes into eh code),
while 2.6.19.X and previous sees everything OK.

Also forf the sata disks, in fact, I see this "doesn't support DPO or FUA" 
warning, but I have to admit I do not know which features it is referred to.

This system is an Athlon64 X2 3800+ with an nvidia2 IDE controller

here is the lspci -v

00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev
a3)
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 815a
 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0
 Capabilities: [44] HyperTransport: Slave or Primary Interface
 Capabilities: [e0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping

00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3)
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0

00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2)
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
 Flags: 66MHz, fast devsel, IRQ 10
 I/O ports at e400 [size=32]
 I/O ports at 4c00 [size=64]
 I/O ports at 4c40 [size=64]
 Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2)
(prog-if 10 [OHCI])
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 20
 Memory at d4004000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
 Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3)
(prog-if 20 [EHCI])
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 22
 Memory at d4005000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
 Capabilities: [44] Debug port
 Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2

00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio
Controller (rev a2)
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 8166
 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 23
 I/O ports at dc00 [size=256]
 I/O ports at e000 [size=256]
 Memory at d4003000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
 Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) (prog-if 8a
[Master SecP PriP])
 Subsystem: Unknown device f043:815a
 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0
 [virtual] Memory at 01f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled]
[size=8]
 [virtual] Memory at 03f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled]
[size=1]
 [virtual] Memory at 0170 (

[BUG?] ata disk running maximum at DMA33 with 2.6.20 and new pata driver, NV CK804 ide controller.

2007-02-06 Thread l . genoni

Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is 
initialized maximum  in DMA33 mode, as you can see from:


pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.7
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 irq 14
ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xF008 irq 15
scsi4 : pata_amd
ata5.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
ata5.00: ata5: dev 0 multi count 1
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi5 : pata_amd
ata6.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  SAMSUNG SP0822N  WA10 PQ: 0 ANSI: 
5

SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't 
support DPO

or FUA
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't 
support DPO

or FUA
 sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3
sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc


while with kernel 2.6.19.X it was initialized correctly in DMA100 mode:

pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.4
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 irq 14
ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xF008 irq 15
scsi4 : pata_amd
ata5.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
ata5.00: ata5: dev 0 multi count 1
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/100
scsi5 : pata_amd
ata6.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA SAMSUNG SP0822N  WA10 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sdc: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
 sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3
sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc

I have other 2 sata disks on this system, and I have no problems with 
them. I Wonder if this is due to some controller/disk problem triggered 
just by 2.6.20 kernel (I saw there are a lot of changes into eh code), 
while 2.6.19.X and previous sees everything OK.


This system is an Athlon64 X2 3800+ with an nvidia2 IDE controller

here is the lspci -v

00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev 
a3)

Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 815a
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0
Capabilities: [44] HyperTransport: Slave or Primary Interface
Capabilities: [e0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping

00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0

00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: 66MHz, fast devsel, IRQ 10
I/O ports at e400 [size=32]
I/O ports at 4c00 [size=64]
I/O ports at 4c40 [size=64]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) 
(prog-if 10 [OHCI])

Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 20
Memory at d4004000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3) 
(prog-if 20 [EHCI])

Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K8N4-E Mainboard
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 22
Memory at d4005000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
Capabilities: [44] Debug port
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2

00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio 
Controller (rev a2)

Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 8166
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 23
I/O ports at dc00 [size=256]
I/O ports at e000 [size=256]
Memory at d4003000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) (prog-if 8a 
[Master SecP PriP])

Subsystem: Unknown device f043:815a
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0
[virtual] Memory at 01f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] 
[size=8]
[virtual] Memory at 03f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] 
[size=1]
[virtual] Memory at 0170 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] 
[size=8]
[virtual] Memory at 0370 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] 
[size=1]

I/O ports at f000 [size=16]
Capabilities: [44] Power Managemen