Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in >/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o > > try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ... > > Jeff > [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > --- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001 > +++ /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c Mon Apr 23 21:12:27 2001 > @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ > int max_hardblocksize = 0, hardblocksize; > > for (le = 0; le < lv->lv_allocated_le; le++) { > - hardblocksize = > get_hardblocksize(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev); > + hardblocksize = > get_hardsect_size(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev); ^ > if (hardblocksize == 0) > hardblocksize = 512; ^ Those above two code lines can be killed, since get_hardsect_size is returning the default sector size of Linux (namely 512 bytes) in case the driver didn't have a chance to set hardsect_size[] array in time for usage (Which shouldn't happen anyway). > if (hardblocksize > max_hardblocksize) > @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ > if (lv->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) { > for (e = 0; e < lv->lv_remap_end; e++) { > hardblocksize = > - get_hardblocksize( > + get_hardsect_size( > > lv->lv_block_exception[e].rdev_new); > if (hardblocksize == 0) > hardblocksize = 512; > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in >/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ... Jeff [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] --- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001 +++ /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c Mon Apr 23 21:12:27 2001 @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ int max_hardblocksize = 0, hardblocksize; for (le = 0; le < lv->lv_allocated_le; le++) { - hardblocksize = get_hardblocksize(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev); + hardblocksize = get_hardsect_size(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev); if (hardblocksize == 0) hardblocksize = 512; if (hardblocksize > max_hardblocksize) @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ if (lv->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) { for (e = 0; e < lv->lv_remap_end; e++) { hardblocksize = - get_hardblocksize( + get_hardsect_size( lv->lv_block_exception[e].rdev_new); if (hardblocksize == 0) hardblocksize = 512; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: > > > > oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in >/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o > > depmod: get_hardblocksize > > > > ideas? > > s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size And don't forget to have a look whatever the get_hardblocksize == 0 check or similar can't be killed alltogether as well - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
Jens Axboe wrote: On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Hi, building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o depmod: get_hardblocksize ideas? s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size And don't forget to have a look whatever the get_hardblocksize == 0 check or similar can't be killed alltogether as well - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ... Jeff [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] --- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001 +++ /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c Mon Apr 23 21:12:27 2001 @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ int max_hardblocksize = 0, hardblocksize; for (le = 0; le lv-lv_allocated_le; le++) { - hardblocksize = get_hardblocksize(lv-lv_current_pe[le].dev); + hardblocksize = get_hardsect_size(lv-lv_current_pe[le].dev); if (hardblocksize == 0) hardblocksize = 512; if (hardblocksize max_hardblocksize) @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ if (lv-lv_access LV_SNAPSHOT) { for (e = 0; e lv-lv_remap_end; e++) { hardblocksize = - get_hardblocksize( + get_hardsect_size( lv-lv_block_exception[e].rdev_new); if (hardblocksize == 0) hardblocksize = 512; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
Jeff Chua wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ... Jeff [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] --- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001 +++ /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c Mon Apr 23 21:12:27 2001 @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ int max_hardblocksize = 0, hardblocksize; for (le = 0; le lv-lv_allocated_le; le++) { - hardblocksize = get_hardblocksize(lv-lv_current_pe[le].dev); + hardblocksize = get_hardsect_size(lv-lv_current_pe[le].dev); ^ if (hardblocksize == 0) hardblocksize = 512; ^ Those above two code lines can be killed, since get_hardsect_size is returning the default sector size of Linux (namely 512 bytes) in case the driver didn't have a chance to set hardsect_size[] array in time for usage (Which shouldn't happen anyway). if (hardblocksize max_hardblocksize) @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ if (lv-lv_access LV_SNAPSHOT) { for (e = 0; e lv-lv_remap_end; e++) { hardblocksize = - get_hardblocksize( + get_hardsect_size( lv-lv_block_exception[e].rdev_new); if (hardblocksize == 0) hardblocksize = 512; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
> building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: > > oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o > depmod: get_hardblocksize > > ideas? get_hardblock_size has been removed. Take a look at the fs parts of the ac10->11 diff and you'll see the trivial fixup you need to add - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Hi, > > building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: > > oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o > depmod: get_hardblocksize > > ideas? s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
Hi, building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o depmod: get_hardblocksize ideas? Ed Tomlinson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
Hi, building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o depmod: get_hardblocksize ideas? Ed Tomlinson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Hi, building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o depmod: get_hardblocksize ideas? s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o depmod: get_hardblocksize ideas? get_hardblock_size has been removed. Take a look at the fs parts of the ac10-11 diff and you'll see the trivial fixup you need to add - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/