Re: [PATCH][next] platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int

2021-01-13 Thread Hans de Goede 
Hi,

On 1/11/21 3:46 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King 
> 
> The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit
> arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument. In the case where
> func is 32 or more this can lead to an oveflow.  Avoid this by shifting
> using the BIT_ULL macro instead.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: fc00bc8ac1da ("platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 

Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans 
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans

> ---
>  drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c 
> b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
> index 8cd67a669c86..ef9c1f8e8336 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int san_acpi_notify_event(struct device *dev, u64 
> func,
>   union acpi_object *obj;
>   int status = 0;
>  
> - if (!acpi_check_dsm(san, _DSM_UUID, SAN_DSM_REVISION, 1 << func))
> + if (!acpi_check_dsm(san, _DSM_UUID, SAN_DSM_REVISION, 
> BIT_ULL(func)))
>   return 0;
>  
>   dev_dbg(dev, "notify event %#04llx\n", func);
>

Re: [PATCH][next] platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int

2021-01-11 Thread Maximilian Luz 

On 1/11/21 3:46 PM, Colin King wrote:

From: Colin Ian King 

The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit
arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument. In the case where
func is 32 or more this can lead to an oveflow.  Avoid this by shifting
using the BIT_ULL macro instead.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: fc00bc8ac1da ("platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
---
  drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c 
b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
index 8cd67a669c86..ef9c1f8e8336 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int san_acpi_notify_event(struct device *dev, u64 
func,
union acpi_object *obj;
int status = 0;
  
-	if (!acpi_check_dsm(san, _DSM_UUID, SAN_DSM_REVISION, 1 << func))

+   if (!acpi_check_dsm(san, _DSM_UUID, SAN_DSM_REVISION, 
BIT_ULL(func)))
return 0;
  
  	dev_dbg(dev, "notify event %#04llx\n", func);




Thanks, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz 

Regards,
Max

[PATCH][next] platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int

2021-01-11 Thread Colin King 
From: Colin Ian King 

The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit
arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument. In the case where
func is 32 or more this can lead to an oveflow.  Avoid this by shifting
using the BIT_ULL macro instead.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: fc00bc8ac1da ("platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
---
 drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c 
b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
index 8cd67a669c86..ef9c1f8e8336 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int san_acpi_notify_event(struct device *dev, u64 
func,
union acpi_object *obj;
int status = 0;
 
-   if (!acpi_check_dsm(san, _DSM_UUID, SAN_DSM_REVISION, 1 << func))
+   if (!acpi_check_dsm(san, _DSM_UUID, SAN_DSM_REVISION, 
BIT_ULL(func)))
return 0;
 
dev_dbg(dev, "notify event %#04llx\n", func);
-- 
2.29.2