Re: [PATCH] [v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe

2023-09-26 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:29 AM Stefan Schmidt
 wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On 26.09.23 10:02, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Dinghao,
> >
> > dinghao@zju.edu.cn wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:22:44 +0800:
> >
> >> If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
> >> it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
> >> error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
> >> where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
> >> this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
> >> clk_unregister().
> >>
> >> Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
> >> be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
> >> IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().
> >>
> >> Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")
> >
> > Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu 
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >>
> >> v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c 
> >> b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> >> index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> >> @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct 
> >> spi_device *spi)
> >>  }
> >>  ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
> >>  if (ret) {
> >> -clk_unregister(priv->clk);
> >>  dev_crit(
> >>  >dev,
> >>  "Failed to register external clock as clock 
> >> provider\n"
> >
> > I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.
> >
> >> @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct 
> >> spi_device *spi)
> >>   {
> >>  struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> >>
> >> -if (!priv->clk)
> >> +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
> >>  return
> >>
> >>  of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);
> >
> > Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?
>
> IIRC it would be me for wpan and Alex for wpan-next.

That's okay for me.

- Alex



Re: [PATCH] [v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe

2023-09-26 Thread dinghao . liu
> Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.

I will cc stable (sta...@vger.kernel.org) for the next version, thanks!
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c 
> > b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> > index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> > @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct 
> > spi_device *spi)
> > }
> > ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
> > if (ret) {
> > -   clk_unregister(priv->clk);
> > dev_crit(
> > >dev,
> > "Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"
> 
> I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.

I understand. In the next patch version, I will just return 
of_clk_add_provider(). 

> 
> > @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct 
> > spi_device *spi)
> >  {
> > struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> >  
> > -   if (!priv->clk)
> > +   if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
> > return
> >  
> > of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);
> 
> Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?
>
 
Is there any problem I need to handle in the next patch?

Regards,
Dinghao


Re: [PATCH] [v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe

2023-09-26 Thread Stefan Schmidt

Hello.

On 26.09.23 10:02, Miquel Raynal wrote:

Hi Dinghao,

dinghao@zju.edu.cn wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:22:44 +0800:


If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
clk_unregister().

Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().

Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")


Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.


Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu 
---

Changelog:

v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
---
  drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
@@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device 
*spi)
}
ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
if (ret) {
-   clk_unregister(priv->clk);
dev_crit(
>dev,
"Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"


I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.


@@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device 
*spi)
  {
struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
  
-	if (!priv->clk)

+   if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
return
  
  	of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);


Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?


IIRC it would be me for wpan and Alex for wpan-next.

regards
Stefan Schmidt


Re: [PATCH] [v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe

2023-09-26 Thread Miquel Raynal
Hi Dinghao,

dinghao@zju.edu.cn wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:22:44 +0800:

> If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
> it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
> error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
> where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
> this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
> clk_unregister().
> 
> Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
> be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().
> 
> Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")

Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.

> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu 
> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device 
> *spi)
>   }
>   ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
>   if (ret) {
> - clk_unregister(priv->clk);
>   dev_crit(
>   >dev,
>   "Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"

I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.

> @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct 
> spi_device *spi)
>  {
>   struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>  
> - if (!priv->clk)
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
>   return
>  
>   of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);

Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?

Thanks,
Miquèl


[PATCH] [v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe

2023-09-25 Thread Dinghao Liu
If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
clk_unregister().

Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().

Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu 
---

Changelog:

v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
---
 drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
@@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device 
*spi)
}
ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
if (ret) {
-   clk_unregister(priv->clk);
dev_crit(
>dev,
"Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"
@@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device 
*spi)
 {
struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
 
-   if (!priv->clk)
+   if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
return
 
of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);
-- 
2.17.1