Re: [PATCH] 2.6.11 does not handle IRQ #0 on IXP4xx ARM platforms
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Juan M. de la Torre wrote: > > The original get_irqnr_and_bse macro leave Z flag set when the IRQ > being handled is #0, but the correct behaviour is to clear the flag > when there is at least one IRQ to handle. > > PS: Please CC me in the reply because i'm not subscribed to the list Best talk to the linux-arm-kernel list, which can be found on http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ There is also an linux-arm patch tracking system there where you can submit fixes like that for the Linux/ARM community to check. -- Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] 2.6.11 does not handle IRQ #0 on IXP4xx ARM platforms
The original get_irqnr_and_bse macro leave Z flag set when the IRQ being handled is #0, but the correct behaviour is to clear the flag when there is at least one IRQ to handle. PS: Please CC me in the reply because i'm not subscribed to the list -- /jm --- linux-2.6.11/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/entry-macro.S 2005-03-12 19:53:03.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.11-new/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/entry-macro.S 2005-03-12 19:54:18.0 +0100 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ beq 1001f clz \irqnr, \irqstat mov \base, #31 - subs\irqnr, \base, \irqnr + sub \irqnr, \base, \irqnr 1001: /*
