Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: User direct recurrence for device hierarchy walks

2013-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 12:22:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki 
> 
> Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is
> renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device
> object's children directly and call themselves recursively for
> each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace().  This
> simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of
> callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not
> really necessary for these two routines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is on top of the linux-pm/bleeding-edge branch that contains the series
> I posted previously: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci=138470560909690=4

The subject should be "ACPI / scan: Use direct recurrence for device hierarchy
walks", sorry for the typo.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH] ACPI / scan: User direct recurrence for device hierarchy walks

2013-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki 

Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is
renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device
object's children directly and call themselves recursively for
each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace().  This
simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of
callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not
really necessary for these two routines.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
---

Hi,

This is on top of the linux-pm/bleeding-edge branch that contains the series
I posted previously: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci=138470560909690=4

Thanks,
Rafael

---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |  120 +++-
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1909,54 +1909,40 @@ static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(stru
return ret;
 }
 
-static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attach(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
- void *not_used, void **ret_not_used)
+static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-   struct acpi_device *device;
-   unsigned long long sta;
+   struct acpi_device *child;
int ret;
 
-   /*
-* Ignore errors ignored by acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid terminating
-* namespace walks prematurely.
-*/
-   if (acpi_bus_type_and_status(handle, , ))
-   return AE_OK;
-
-   if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, ))
-   return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
-
-   acpi_set_device_status(device, sta);
+   acpi_bus_get_status(device);
/* Skip devices that are not present. */
-   if (!acpi_device_is_present(device))
-   goto err;
-
+   if (!acpi_device_is_present(device)) {
+   device->flags.visited = false;
+   return;
+   }
if (device->handler)
-   return AE_OK;
+   goto ok;
 
if (!device->flags.initialized) {
acpi_bus_update_power(device, NULL);
device->flags.initialized = true;
}
+   device->flags.visited = false;
ret = acpi_scan_attach_handler(device);
if (ret < 0)
-   goto err;
+   return;
 
device->flags.match_driver = true;
-   if (ret > 0)
-   goto ok;
-
-   ret = device_attach(>dev);
-   if (ret < 0)
-   goto err;
-
- ok:
+   if (!ret) {
+   ret = device_attach(>dev);
+   if (ret < 0)
+   return;
+   }
device->flags.visited = true;
-   return AE_OK;
 
- err:
-   device->flags.visited = false;
-   return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
+ ok:
+   list_for_each_entry(child, >children, node)
+   acpi_bus_attach(child);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1976,64 +1962,48 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
 int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle)
 {
void *device = NULL;
-   int error = 0;
 
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, )))
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, );
 
-   if (!device)
-   error = -ENODEV;
-   else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
-   acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
-   acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-
-   return error;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
-
-static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_detach(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
- void *not_used, void **ret_not_used)
-{
-   struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
-
-   if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, )) {
-   struct acpi_scan_handler *dev_handler = device->handler;
-
-   if (dev_handler) {
-   if (dev_handler->detach)
-   dev_handler->detach(device);
-
-   device->handler = NULL;
-   } else {
-   device_release_driver(>dev);
-   }
-   /*
-* Most likely, the device is going away, so put it into D3cold
-* before that.
-*/
-   acpi_device_set_power(device, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
-   device->flags.initialized = false;
-   device->flags.visited = false;
+   if (device) {
+   acpi_bus_attach(device);
+   return 0;
}
-   return AE_OK;
+   return -ENODEV;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
 
 /**
- * acpi_bus_trim - Remove ACPI device node and all of its descendants
- * @start: Root of the ACPI device nodes subtree to remove.
+ * acpi_bus_trim - Detach scan 

[PATCH] ACPI / scan: User direct recurrence for device hierarchy walks

2013-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com

Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is
renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device
object's children directly and call themselves recursively for
each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace().  This
simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of
callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not
really necessary for these two routines.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
---

Hi,

This is on top of the linux-pm/bleeding-edge branch that contains the series
I posted previously: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pcim=138470560909690w=4

Thanks,
Rafael

---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |  120 +++-
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1909,54 +1909,40 @@ static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(stru
return ret;
 }
 
-static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attach(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
- void *not_used, void **ret_not_used)
+static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-   struct acpi_device *device;
-   unsigned long long sta;
+   struct acpi_device *child;
int ret;
 
-   /*
-* Ignore errors ignored by acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid terminating
-* namespace walks prematurely.
-*/
-   if (acpi_bus_type_and_status(handle, ret, sta))
-   return AE_OK;
-
-   if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, device))
-   return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
-
-   acpi_set_device_status(device, sta);
+   acpi_bus_get_status(device);
/* Skip devices that are not present. */
-   if (!acpi_device_is_present(device))
-   goto err;
-
+   if (!acpi_device_is_present(device)) {
+   device-flags.visited = false;
+   return;
+   }
if (device-handler)
-   return AE_OK;
+   goto ok;
 
if (!device-flags.initialized) {
acpi_bus_update_power(device, NULL);
device-flags.initialized = true;
}
+   device-flags.visited = false;
ret = acpi_scan_attach_handler(device);
if (ret  0)
-   goto err;
+   return;
 
device-flags.match_driver = true;
-   if (ret  0)
-   goto ok;
-
-   ret = device_attach(device-dev);
-   if (ret  0)
-   goto err;
-
- ok:
+   if (!ret) {
+   ret = device_attach(device-dev);
+   if (ret  0)
+   return;
+   }
device-flags.visited = true;
-   return AE_OK;
 
- err:
-   device-flags.visited = false;
-   return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
+ ok:
+   list_for_each_entry(child, device-children, node)
+   acpi_bus_attach(child);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1976,64 +1962,48 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
 int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle)
 {
void *device = NULL;
-   int error = 0;
 
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, device)))
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, device);
 
-   if (!device)
-   error = -ENODEV;
-   else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
-   acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
-   acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-
-   return error;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
-
-static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_detach(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
- void *not_used, void **ret_not_used)
-{
-   struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
-
-   if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, device)) {
-   struct acpi_scan_handler *dev_handler = device-handler;
-
-   if (dev_handler) {
-   if (dev_handler-detach)
-   dev_handler-detach(device);
-
-   device-handler = NULL;
-   } else {
-   device_release_driver(device-dev);
-   }
-   /*
-* Most likely, the device is going away, so put it into D3cold
-* before that.
-*/
-   acpi_device_set_power(device, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
-   device-flags.initialized = false;
-   device-flags.visited = false;
+   if (device) {
+   acpi_bus_attach(device);
+   return 0;
}
-   return AE_OK;
+   return -ENODEV;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
 
 /**
- * acpi_bus_trim - Remove ACPI device node and all of its descendants
- * 

Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: User direct recurrence for device hierarchy walks

2013-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 12:22:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
 
 Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is
 renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device
 object's children directly and call themselves recursively for
 each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace().  This
 simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of
 callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not
 really necessary for these two routines.
 
 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
 ---
 
 Hi,
 
 This is on top of the linux-pm/bleeding-edge branch that contains the series
 I posted previously: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pcim=138470560909690w=4

The subject should be ACPI / scan: Use direct recurrence for device hierarchy
walks, sorry for the typo.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/