[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Denote the cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
The cpuidle tracepoints are called within a rcu_idle_exit() section, and must be denoted with the _rcuidle() version of the tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c index 87b98bf9..2dbd378 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c @@ -301,11 +301,11 @@ static void omap3_pm_idle(void) if (omap_irq_pending()) return; - trace_cpu_idle(1, smp_processor_id()); + trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id()); omap_sram_idle(); - trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id()); + trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id()); } #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND -- 2.5.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Denote the cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
* Jisheng Zhang [150923 20:26]: > Dear Tony, > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:08:15 -0700 > Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Kevin Hilman [150923 11:03]: > > > Jisheng Zhang writes: > > > > > > > The cpuidle tracepoints are called within a rcu_idle_exit() section, and > > > > must be denoted with the _rcuidle() version of the tracepoint. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > > > > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman > > > > Hmm is this needed as a fix for the -rc cycle or can this wait > > for v4.4? > > IMHO, this is a fix. But it can wait for v4.4 merge window. Applying into omap-for-v4.4/fixes thanks. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Denote the cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
Jisheng Zhang writes: > The cpuidle tracepoints are called within a rcu_idle_exit() section, and > must be denoted with the _rcuidle() version of the tracepoint. > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang Acked-by: Kevin Hilman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Denote the cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
* Kevin Hilman [150923 11:03]: > Jisheng Zhang writes: > > > The cpuidle tracepoints are called within a rcu_idle_exit() section, and > > must be denoted with the _rcuidle() version of the tracepoint. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman Hmm is this needed as a fix for the -rc cycle or can this wait for v4.4? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Denote the cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
Dear Tony, On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:08:15 -0700 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Kevin Hilman [150923 11:03]: > > Jisheng Zhang writes: > > > > > The cpuidle tracepoints are called within a rcu_idle_exit() section, and > > > must be denoted with the _rcuidle() version of the tracepoint. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman > > Hmm is this needed as a fix for the -rc cycle or can this wait > for v4.4? IMHO, this is a fix. But it can wait for v4.4 merge window. Thanks, Jisheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/