Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: MOV CR/DR emulation should ignore mod
Il 25/05/2014 22:05, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
MOV CR/DR instructions ignore the mod field (in the ModR/M byte). As the SDM
states: "The 2 bits in the mod field are ignored". Accordingly, the second
operand of these instructions is always a general purpose register.
The current emulator implementation does not do so. If the mod bits do not
equal 3, it expects the second operand to be in memory.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 2fa7ab0..e4e833d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
#define Fastop ((u64)1 << 44) /* Use opcode::u.fastop */
#define NoWrite ((u64)1 << 45) /* No writeback */
#define SrcWrite((u64)1 << 46) /* Write back src operand */
+#define NoMod ((u64)1 << 47) /* Mod field is ignored */
#define DstXacc (DstAccLo | SrcAccHi | SrcWrite)
@@ -1077,7 +1078,7 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
ctxt->modrm_rm |= (ctxt->modrm & 0x07);
ctxt->modrm_seg = VCPU_SREG_DS;
- if (ctxt->modrm_mod == 3) {
+ if (ctxt->modrm_mod == 3 || (ctxt->d & NoMod)) {
op->type = OP_REG;
op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
op->addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, ctxt->modrm_rm,
@@ -3877,10 +3878,12 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
D(ImplicitOps | ModRM), N, N, N, N, N, N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM),
/* 0x20 - 0x2F */
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, cr_read, check_cr_read),
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, dr_read, check_dr_read),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_cr_write, cr_write,
check_cr_write),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_dr_write, dr_write,
check_dr_write),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, cr_read, check_cr_read),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, dr_read, check_dr_read),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_cr_write, cr_write,
+ check_cr_write),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_dr_write, dr_write,
+ check_dr_write),
N, N, N, N,
GP(ModRM | DstReg | SrcMem | Mov | Sse, _0f_28_0f_29),
GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, _0f_28_0f_29),
This is easy to test in kvm-unit-tests. Please provide a patch for that
as well. :)
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: MOV CR/DR emulation should ignore mod
Il 25/05/2014 22:05, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
MOV CR/DR instructions ignore the mod field (in the ModR/M byte). As the SDM
states: The 2 bits in the mod field are ignored. Accordingly, the second
operand of these instructions is always a general purpose register.
The current emulator implementation does not do so. If the mod bits do not
equal 3, it expects the second operand to be in memory.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit na...@cs.technion.ac.il
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 2fa7ab0..e4e833d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
#define Fastop ((u64)1 44) /* Use opcode::u.fastop */
#define NoWrite ((u64)1 45) /* No writeback */
#define SrcWrite((u64)1 46) /* Write back src operand */
+#define NoMod ((u64)1 47) /* Mod field is ignored */
#define DstXacc (DstAccLo | SrcAccHi | SrcWrite)
@@ -1077,7 +1078,7 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
ctxt-modrm_rm |= (ctxt-modrm 0x07);
ctxt-modrm_seg = VCPU_SREG_DS;
- if (ctxt-modrm_mod == 3) {
+ if (ctxt-modrm_mod == 3 || (ctxt-d NoMod)) {
op-type = OP_REG;
op-bytes = (ctxt-d ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt-op_bytes;
op-addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, ctxt-modrm_rm,
@@ -3877,10 +3878,12 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
D(ImplicitOps | ModRM), N, N, N, N, N, N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM),
/* 0x20 - 0x2F */
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, cr_read, check_cr_read),
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, dr_read, check_dr_read),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_cr_write, cr_write,
check_cr_write),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_dr_write, dr_write,
check_dr_write),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, cr_read, check_cr_read),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, dr_read, check_dr_read),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_cr_write, cr_write,
+ check_cr_write),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_dr_write, dr_write,
+ check_dr_write),
N, N, N, N,
GP(ModRM | DstReg | SrcMem | Mov | Sse, pfx_0f_28_0f_29),
GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, pfx_0f_28_0f_29),
This is easy to test in kvm-unit-tests. Please provide a patch for that
as well. :)
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] KVM: x86: MOV CR/DR emulation should ignore mod
MOV CR/DR instructions ignore the mod field (in the ModR/M byte). As the SDM
states: "The 2 bits in the mod field are ignored". Accordingly, the second
operand of these instructions is always a general purpose register.
The current emulator implementation does not do so. If the mod bits do not
equal 3, it expects the second operand to be in memory.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 2fa7ab0..e4e833d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
#define Fastop ((u64)1 << 44) /* Use opcode::u.fastop */
#define NoWrite ((u64)1 << 45) /* No writeback */
#define SrcWrite((u64)1 << 46) /* Write back src operand */
+#define NoMod ((u64)1 << 47) /* Mod field is ignored */
#define DstXacc (DstAccLo | SrcAccHi | SrcWrite)
@@ -1077,7 +1078,7 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
ctxt->modrm_rm |= (ctxt->modrm & 0x07);
ctxt->modrm_seg = VCPU_SREG_DS;
- if (ctxt->modrm_mod == 3) {
+ if (ctxt->modrm_mod == 3 || (ctxt->d & NoMod)) {
op->type = OP_REG;
op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
op->addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, ctxt->modrm_rm,
@@ -3877,10 +3878,12 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
D(ImplicitOps | ModRM), N, N, N, N, N, N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM),
/* 0x20 - 0x2F */
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, cr_read, check_cr_read),
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, dr_read, check_dr_read),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_cr_write, cr_write,
check_cr_write),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_dr_write, dr_write,
check_dr_write),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, cr_read, check_cr_read),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, dr_read, check_dr_read),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_cr_write, cr_write,
+ check_cr_write),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_dr_write, dr_write,
+ check_dr_write),
N, N, N, N,
GP(ModRM | DstReg | SrcMem | Mov | Sse, _0f_28_0f_29),
GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, _0f_28_0f_29),
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] KVM: x86: MOV CR/DR emulation should ignore mod
MOV CR/DR instructions ignore the mod field (in the ModR/M byte). As the SDM
states: The 2 bits in the mod field are ignored. Accordingly, the second
operand of these instructions is always a general purpose register.
The current emulator implementation does not do so. If the mod bits do not
equal 3, it expects the second operand to be in memory.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit na...@cs.technion.ac.il
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 2fa7ab0..e4e833d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
#define Fastop ((u64)1 44) /* Use opcode::u.fastop */
#define NoWrite ((u64)1 45) /* No writeback */
#define SrcWrite((u64)1 46) /* Write back src operand */
+#define NoMod ((u64)1 47) /* Mod field is ignored */
#define DstXacc (DstAccLo | SrcAccHi | SrcWrite)
@@ -1077,7 +1078,7 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
ctxt-modrm_rm |= (ctxt-modrm 0x07);
ctxt-modrm_seg = VCPU_SREG_DS;
- if (ctxt-modrm_mod == 3) {
+ if (ctxt-modrm_mod == 3 || (ctxt-d NoMod)) {
op-type = OP_REG;
op-bytes = (ctxt-d ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt-op_bytes;
op-addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, ctxt-modrm_rm,
@@ -3877,10 +3878,12 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
D(ImplicitOps | ModRM), N, N, N, N, N, N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM),
/* 0x20 - 0x2F */
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, cr_read, check_cr_read),
- DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264, dr_read, check_dr_read),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_cr_write, cr_write,
check_cr_write),
- IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264, em_dr_write, dr_write,
check_dr_write),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, cr_read, check_cr_read),
+ DIP(ModRM | DstMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, dr_read, check_dr_read),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_cr_write, cr_write,
+ check_cr_write),
+ IIP(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv | Op3264 | NoMod, em_dr_write, dr_write,
+ check_dr_write),
N, N, N, N,
GP(ModRM | DstReg | SrcMem | Mov | Sse, pfx_0f_28_0f_29),
GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, pfx_0f_28_0f_29),
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
