Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Leonard Crestez]

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 01:07 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Leonard Crestez
>  wrote:
> > 
> > From: Octavian Purdila 
> > 
> > This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to
> > 528Mhz
> > would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
> > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam 

This is a gentle reminder that this patch has been posted 3 weeks ago
but has not yet been applied.

--
Regards,
Leonard

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Leonard Crestez]

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 01:07 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Leonard Crestez
>  wrote:
> > 
> > From: Octavian Purdila 
> > 
> > This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to
> > 528Mhz
> > would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
> > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam 

This is a gentle reminder that this patch has been posted 3 weeks ago
but has not yet been applied.

--
Regards,
Leonard

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Fabio Estevam]

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Leonard Crestez
 wrote:
> From: Octavian Purdila 
>
> This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
> would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam 

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Fabio Estevam]

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Leonard Crestez
 wrote:
> From: Octavian Purdila 
>
> This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
> would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam 

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Viresh Kumar]

On 30-05-17, 18:57, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> From: Octavian Purdila 
> 
> This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
> would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 6 --
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> index 9c13f09..b6edd3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy 
> *policy, unsigned int index)
>*  - Reprogram pll1_sys_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk back to it
>*  - Disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk
>*/
> - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
>   /*
>* When changing pll1_sw_clk's parent to pll1_sys_clk,
>* CPU may run at higher than 528MHz, this will lead to
> @@ -215,7 +216,8 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   goto put_clk;
>   }
>  
> - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
>   pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
>   secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
>   if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) {

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Viresh Kumar]

On 30-05-17, 18:57, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> From: Octavian Purdila 
> 
> This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
> would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 6 --
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> index 9c13f09..b6edd3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy 
> *policy, unsigned int index)
>*  - Reprogram pll1_sys_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk back to it
>*  - Disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk
>*/
> - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
>   /*
>* When changing pll1_sw_clk's parent to pll1_sys_clk,
>* CPU may run at higher than 528MHz, this will lead to
> @@ -215,7 +216,8 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   goto put_clk;
>   }
>  
> - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
>   pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
>   secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
>   if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) {

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 

-- 
viresh

[PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Leonard Crestez]

From: Octavian Purdila 

This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.

Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
---
 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 6 --
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 9c13f09..b6edd3c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, 
unsigned int index)
 *  - Reprogram pll1_sys_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk back to it
 *  - Disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk
 */
-   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
+   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
+   of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
/*
 * When changing pll1_sw_clk's parent to pll1_sys_clk,
 * CPU may run at higher than 528MHz, this will lead to
@@ -215,7 +216,8 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto put_clk;
}
 
-   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
+   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
+   of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) {
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul

[Leonard Crestez]

From: Octavian Purdila 

This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.

Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila 
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez 
---
 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 6 --
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 9c13f09..b6edd3c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, 
unsigned int index)
 *  - Reprogram pll1_sys_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk back to it
 *  - Disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk
 */
-   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
+   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
+   of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
/*
 * When changing pll1_sw_clk's parent to pll1_sys_clk,
 * CPU may run at higher than 528MHz, this will lead to
@@ -215,7 +216,8 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto put_clk;
}
 
-   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
+   if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
+   of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) {
-- 
2.7.4