Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:58:48 +0500
Bilal Wasim wrote:
> Hi CK,
>
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:43:44 +0800
> Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
>
> > Hi, Bilal:
> >
> > Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一
> > 下午7:53寫道：
> > >
> > > Hi CK,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:12:55 +0800
> > > Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Bilal:
> > > >
> > > > Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一
> > > > 上午3:25寫道：
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi CK,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
> > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, Bilal:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm,
> > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > > >
> > > > > Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't
> > > > > work. The HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the
> > > > > system keeps on operating normally.
> > > >
> > > > Could you print this information, so I could find out the
> > > > solution for both small hbp and elm.
> > > >
> > > > vm->hfront_porch, vm->hback_porch, dsi_tmp_buf_bpp,
> > > > data_phy_cycles_byte, and the final horizontal_frontporch_byte,
> > > > horizontal_backporch_byte.
> > >
> > > Here are the values I got,
> > >
> > > [2.506400] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
> > > [2.506402] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
> > > [2.506404] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
> > > [2.506406] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 180
> > > [2.506408] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 110
> > > [2.506409] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 455
> > >
> > > Please let me know if I can help debug this in any other way.
> > >
> >
> > How about this patch [1] ?
> >
> > [1]
> > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2536217/2
> >
>
> This patch works, though it doesn't apply cleanly on 5.9-rc3 (had to
> manually patch the mtk_dsi.c file).
>
Just to clarify: I tested with 5.10-rc3, not 5.9-rc3. Apologies for the
typo.
Thanks,
Bilal
> Here are the various variable values, if you're interested.
>
> [2.453292] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
> [2.453293] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
> [2.453295] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
> [2.453296] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 192
> [2.453298] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 107
> [2.453299] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 436
>
> Thanks,
> Bilal
>
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bilal
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Chun-Kuang.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日
> > > > > > 週日上午8:14寫道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: CK Hu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > > > > > > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of
> > > > > > > panel with small hfp or hbp")
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > > > > > > ++ 1 file changed, 18
> > > > > > > insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > > > > > > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > > > > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@
> > > > > > > static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > > u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32
> > > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte; u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > > > > > > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > > > > > > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > > > > > > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > > > > > > + u32 delta;
> > > > > > > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> > > > > > > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void
> > > > > > > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > > data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > > > > > > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > > > > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > > > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > > dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > > vm->hback_porch);
Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
Hi CK,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:43:44 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Bilal:
>
> Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一
> 下午7:53寫道：
> >
> > Hi CK,
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:12:55 +0800
> > Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Bilal:
> > >
> > > Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一
> > > 上午3:25寫道：
> > > >
> > > > Hi CK,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
> > > > Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Bilal:
> > > > >
> > > > > Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > >
> > > > Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't
> > > > work. The HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the
> > > > system keeps on operating normally.
> > >
> > > Could you print this information, so I could find out the
> > > solution for both small hbp and elm.
> > >
> > > vm->hfront_porch, vm->hback_porch, dsi_tmp_buf_bpp,
> > > data_phy_cycles_byte, and the final horizontal_frontporch_byte,
> > > horizontal_backporch_byte.
> >
> > Here are the values I got,
> >
> > [2.506400] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
> > [2.506402] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
> > [2.506404] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
> > [2.506406] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 180
> > [2.506408] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 110
> > [2.506409] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 455
> >
> > Please let me know if I can help debug this in any other way.
> >
>
> How about this patch [1] ?
>
> [1]
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2536217/2
This patch works, though it doesn't apply cleanly on 5.9-rc3 (had to
manually patch the mtk_dsi.c file).
Here are the various variable values, if you're interested.
[2.453292] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
[2.453293] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
[2.453295] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
[2.453296] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 192
[2.453298] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 107
[2.453299] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 436
Thanks,
Bilal
>
> > Thanks,
> > Bilal
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Chun-Kuang.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日 週日
> > > > > 上午8:14寫道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: CK Hu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > > > > > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of
> > > > > > panel with small hfp or hbp")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > > > > > ++ 1 file changed, 18
> > > > > > insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > > > > > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > > > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@
> > > > > > static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32
> > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte; u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > > > > > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > > > > > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > > > > > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > > > > > + u32 delta;
> > > > > > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> > > > > > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void
> > > > > > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > > > > > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > > > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > vm->hback_porch); -
> > > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > > > > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > > > > - } else {
> > > > > > -
Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
Hi, Bilal:
Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一 下午7:53寫道：
>
> Hi CK,
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:12:55 +0800
> Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
>
> > Hi, Bilal:
> >
> > Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一
> > 上午3:25寫道：
> > >
> > > Hi CK,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
> > > Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Bilal:
> > > >
> > > > Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Chun-Kuang Hu
> > >
> > > Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't work.
> > > The HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the system keeps
> > > on operating normally.
> >
> > Could you print this information, so I could find out the solution for
> > both small hbp and elm.
> >
> > vm->hfront_porch, vm->hback_porch, dsi_tmp_buf_bpp,
> > data_phy_cycles_byte, and the final horizontal_frontporch_byte,
> > horizontal_backporch_byte.
>
> Here are the values I got,
>
> [2.506400] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
> [2.506402] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
> [2.506404] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
> [2.506406] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 180
> [2.506408] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 110
> [2.506409] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 455
>
> Please let me know if I can help debug this in any other way.
>
How about this patch [1] ?
[1]
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2536217/2
> Thanks,
> Bilal
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chun-Kuang.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日 週日
> > > > 上午8:14寫道：
> > > > >
> > > > > From: CK Hu
> > > > >
> > > > > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > > > > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel
> > > > > with small hfp or hbp")
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > > > > ++ 1 file changed, 18
> > > > > insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > > > > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static
> > > > > void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) u32
> > > > > horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > > > u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > > > > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > > > > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > > > > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > > > > + u32 delta;
> > > > > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
> > > > >
> > > > > struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> > > > > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void
> > > > > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) data_phy_cycles
> > > > > = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > > > > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > - vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes +
> > > > > 18) *
> > > > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > vm->hback_porch); -
> > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes +
> > > > > 18) *
> > > > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > > > - } else {
> > > > > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > > > > under 60Hz\n");
> > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > -
> > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ?
> > > > > 18 : 12; +
> > > > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > > + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte
> > > > > + horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > > > + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes +
> > > > > delta; +
> > > > > + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> > > > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte -=
> > > > > data_phy_cycles_byte * +
> > > > >
Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
Hi CK,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:12:55 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Bilal:
>
> Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一
> 上午3:25寫道：
> >
> > Hi CK,
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
> > Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Bilal:
> > >
> > > Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Chun-Kuang Hu
> >
> > Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't work.
> > The HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the system keeps
> > on operating normally.
>
> Could you print this information, so I could find out the solution for
> both small hbp and elm.
>
> vm->hfront_porch, vm->hback_porch, dsi_tmp_buf_bpp,
> data_phy_cycles_byte, and the final horizontal_frontporch_byte,
> horizontal_backporch_byte.
Here are the values I got,
[2.506400] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
[2.506402] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
[2.506404] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
[2.506406] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 180
[2.506408] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 110
[2.506409] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 455
Please let me know if I can help debug this in any other way.
Thanks,
Bilal
>
> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日 週日
> > > 上午8:14寫道：
> > > >
> > > > From: CK Hu
> > > >
> > > > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > > > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > > > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel
> > > > with small hfp or hbp")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > > > ++ 1 file changed, 18
> > > > insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > > > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static
> > > > void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) u32
> > > > horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > > u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > > > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > > > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > > > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > > > + u32 delta;
> > > > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
> > > >
> > > > struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> > > > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void
> > > > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) data_phy_cycles
> > > > = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > > > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > > >
> > > > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > - vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes +
> > > > 18) *
> > > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > vm->hback_porch); -
> > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes +
> > > > 18) *
> > > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > > > under 60Hz\n");
> > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > -
> > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > - }
> > > > + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ?
> > > > 18 : 12; +
> > > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte
> > > > + horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > > + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes +
> > > > delta; +
> > > > + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> > > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte -=
> > > > data_phy_cycles_byte * +
> > > > horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> > > > +
> > > > horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> > > > + horizontal_backporch_byte -=
> > > > data_phy_cycles_byte * +
> > > > horizontal_backporch_byte /
> > > > +
> > > > horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> >
Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
Hi, Bilal:
Bilal Wasim 於 2020年11月16日 週一 上午3:25寫道：
>
> Hi CK,
>
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
> Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
>
> > Hi, Bilal:
> >
> > Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chun-Kuang Hu
>
> Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't work. The
> HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the system keeps on
> operating normally.
Could you print this information, so I could find out the solution for
both small hbp and elm.
vm->hfront_porch, vm->hback_porch, dsi_tmp_buf_bpp,
data_phy_cycles_byte, and the final horizontal_frontporch_byte,
horizontal_backporch_byte.
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
>
> >
> > Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日 週日
> > 上午8:14寫道：
> > >
> > > From: CK Hu
> > >
> > > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel
> > > with small hfp or hbp")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > > ++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 35
> > > deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static
> > > void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) u32
> > > horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > > + u32 delta;
> > > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
> > >
> > > struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> > > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> > > mtk_dsi *dsi) data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > >
> > > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18)
> > > *
> > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > vm->hback_porch); -
> > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18)
> > > *
> > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > - } else {
> > > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > > under 60Hz\n");
> > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > vm->hfront_porch *
> > > -
> > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > - }
> > > + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> > > 12; +
> > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> > > horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> > > +
> > > + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> > > +
> > > horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> > > +
> > > horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> > > + horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> > > +
> > > horizontal_backporch_byte /
> > > +
> > > horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12)
> > > *
> > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12)
> > > *
> > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > - } else {
> > > -
Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
Hi CK,
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Bilal:
>
> Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang Hu
Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't work. The
HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the system keeps on
operating normally.
>
> Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日 週日
> 上午8:14寫道：
> >
> > From: CK Hu
> >
> > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> >
> > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel
> > with small hfp or hbp")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > ++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 35
> > deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static
> > void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) u32
> > horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > + u32 delta;
> > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
> >
> > struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> > mtk_dsi *dsi) data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> >
> > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18)
> > *
> > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > vm->hback_porch); -
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18)
> > *
> > - vm->hback_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > vm->hback_porch);
> > - } else {
> > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > under 60Hz\n");
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > vm->hfront_porch *
> > -
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > - }
> > + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> > 12; +
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> > horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> > +
> > + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> > +
> > horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> > +
> > horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> > + horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> > +
> > horizontal_backporch_byte /
> > +
> > horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12)
> > *
> > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > vm->hback_porch);
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12)
> > *
> > - vm->hback_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > vm->hback_porch);
> > - } else {
> > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > under 60Hz\n");
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > vm->hfront_porch *
> > -
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > - }
> > + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> > 60Hz\n"); }
> >
> > writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Thanks,
Bilal
Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
Hi, Bilal:
Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
Regards,
Chun-Kuang Hu
Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年11月15日 週日 上午8:14寫道：
>
> From: CK Hu
>
> Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
>
> Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with small
> hfp or hbp")
>
> Signed-off-by: CK Hu
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 ++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
> u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
> u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> + u32 delta;
> struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
>
> struct videomode *vm = >vm;
> @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
> data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
>
> - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> -dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 : 12;
> +
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> horizontal_backporch_byte;
> + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> +
> + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> + horizontal_front_back_byte;
> +
> + horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +horizontal_backporch_byte /
> +horizontal_front_back_byte;
> } else {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = horizontal_backporch_byte
> -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> -dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> }
>
> writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
[PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself
From: CK Hu
Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with small hfp
or hbp")
Signed-off-by: CK Hu
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
+ u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
+ u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
+ u32 delta;
struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = >phy_timing;
struct videomode *vm = >vm;
@@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
- if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
- if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
- data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
- horizontal_frontporch_byte =
- vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
- vm->hfront_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
-
- horizontal_backporch_byte =
- horizontal_backporch_byte -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
- vm->hback_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- } else {
- DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
- horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
-dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
- }
+ delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 : 12;
+
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+ horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
horizontal_backporch_byte;
+ data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
+
+ if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte /
+ horizontal_front_back_byte;
+
+ horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
+horizontal_backporch_byte /
+horizontal_front_back_byte;
} else {
- if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
- data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
- horizontal_frontporch_byte =
- vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
- vm->hfront_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- horizontal_backporch_byte = horizontal_backporch_byte -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
- vm->hback_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- } else {
- DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
- horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
-dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
- }
+ DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
}
writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
--
2.17.1
