Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Add checking buffer head stat before clear
Hi Andrew, 在 2021/2/6 7:45, Andrew Morton 写道: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:14:50 +0800 Shaokun Zhang > wrote: > >> From: Yang Guo >> >> clear_buffer_new() is used to clear buffer new stat. When PAGE_SIZE >> is 64K, most buffer heads in the list are not needed to clear. >> clear_buffer_new() has an enpensive atomic modification operation, >> Let's add checking buffer head before clear it as __block_write_begin_int >> does which is good for performance. > > Did this produce any measurable improvement? It has been tested on Huwei Kunpeng 920 which is ARM64 platform and test commond is below: numactl --cpunodebind=0 --membind=0 fio -name=randwrite -numjobs=16 -filename=/mnt/test1 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -direct=0 -iodepth=64 -sync=0 -norandommap -group_reporting -runtime=60 -time_based -bs=4k -size=5G The test result before patch: WRITE: bw=930MiB/s (976MB/s), 930MiB/s-930MiB/s (976MB/s-976MB/s), io=54.5GiB (58.5GB), run=60001-60001msec The test result after patch: WRITE: bw=958MiB/s (1005MB/s), 958MiB/s-958MiB/s (1005MB/s-1005MB/s), io=56.1GiB (60.3GB), run=60001-60001msec > > Perhaps we should give clear_buffer_x() the same optimization as > set_buffer_x()? > Good catch, but we check it more about it, if we do it the same as set_buffer_x(), many more codes will be fixed, such as ext4_wait_block_bitmap it has done sanity check using buffer_new and clear_buffer_new will check it again. Thanks, Shaokun > > static __always_inline void set_buffer_##name(struct buffer_head *bh) \ > { \ > if (!test_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state))\ > set_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state); \ > } \ > static __always_inline void clear_buffer_##name(struct buffer_head *bh) > \ > { \ > clear_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state);\ > } \ > > > . >
Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Add checking buffer head stat before clear
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:14:50 +0800 Shaokun Zhang wrote: > From: Yang Guo > > clear_buffer_new() is used to clear buffer new stat. When PAGE_SIZE > is 64K, most buffer heads in the list are not needed to clear. > clear_buffer_new() has an enpensive atomic modification operation, > Let's add checking buffer head before clear it as __block_write_begin_int > does which is good for performance. Did this produce any measurable improvement? Perhaps we should give clear_buffer_x() the same optimization as set_buffer_x()? static __always_inline void set_buffer_##name(struct buffer_head *bh) \ { \ if (!test_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state))\ set_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state); \ } \ static __always_inline void clear_buffer_##name(struct buffer_head *bh) \ { \ clear_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state);\ } \
[PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Add checking buffer head stat before clear
From: Yang Guo clear_buffer_new() is used to clear buffer new stat. When PAGE_SIZE is 64K, most buffer heads in the list are not needed to clear. clear_buffer_new() has an enpensive atomic modification operation, Let's add checking buffer head before clear it as __block_write_begin_int does which is good for performance. Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Nick Piggin Signed-off-by: Yang Guo Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang --- fs/buffer.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index 32647d2011df..f1c3a5b27a90 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -2083,7 +2083,8 @@ static int __block_commit_write(struct inode *inode, struct page *page, set_buffer_uptodate(bh); mark_buffer_dirty(bh); } - clear_buffer_new(bh); + if (buffer_new(bh)) + clear_buffer_new(bh); block_start = block_end; bh = bh->b_this_page; -- 2.7.4