Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pwm-fan) Fix suspend/resume behavior

2014-11-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:42:55PM +0100, Kamil Debski wrote:
> The state of a PWM output is not clearly defined after resume. Some PWM
> drivers do not restore the duty cycle upon resume, thus it is necessary to
> manually restore the correct value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski 

Applied.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH] hwmon: (pwm-fan) Fix suspend/resume behavior

2014-11-03 Thread Kamil Debski
The state of a PWM output is not clearly defined after resume. Some PWM
drivers do not restore the duty cycle upon resume, thus it is necessary to
manually restore the correct value.

Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski 
---
 drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c |   13 ++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
index 823c877..1991d903 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
@@ -161,10 +161,17 @@ static int pwm_fan_suspend(struct device *dev)
 static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+   unsigned long duty;
+   int ret;
 
-   if (ctx->pwm_value)
-   return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
-   return 0;
+   if (ctx->pwm_value == 0)
+   return 0;
+
+   duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
+   ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
+   return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH] hwmon: (pwm-fan) Fix suspend/resume behavior

2014-11-03 Thread Kamil Debski
The state of a PWM output is not clearly defined after resume. Some PWM
drivers do not restore the duty cycle upon resume, thus it is necessary to
manually restore the correct value.

Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski k.deb...@samsung.com
---
 drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c |   13 ++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
index 823c877..1991d903 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
@@ -161,10 +161,17 @@ static int pwm_fan_suspend(struct device *dev)
 static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+   unsigned long duty;
+   int ret;
 
-   if (ctx-pwm_value)
-   return pwm_enable(ctx-pwm);
-   return 0;
+   if (ctx-pwm_value == 0)
+   return 0;
+
+   duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx-pwm_value * (ctx-pwm-period - 1), MAX_PWM);
+   ret = pwm_config(ctx-pwm, duty, ctx-pwm-period);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
+   return pwm_enable(ctx-pwm);
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pwm-fan) Fix suspend/resume behavior

2014-11-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:42:55PM +0100, Kamil Debski wrote:
 The state of a PWM output is not clearly defined after resume. Some PWM
 drivers do not restore the duty cycle upon resume, thus it is necessary to
 manually restore the correct value.
 
 Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski k.deb...@samsung.com

Applied.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/