Re: [PATCH] ib_umem: fix type mismatch
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 10:10 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I had slightly different fix in my submission queue, which I think is > better because it leaves length to be size_t. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20190908080726.30017-1-l...@kernel.org/T/#u Ok, I'm dropping my patch from my local test tree in favor of that one then. Arnd
Re: [PATCH] ib_umem: fix type mismatch
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On some 32-bit architectures, size_t is defined as 'int' rather > than 'long', causing a harmless warning: > > drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c:220:7: error: comparison of distinct > pointer types ('typeof (umem_odp->umem.address) *' (aka 'unsigned long *') > and 'typeof (umem_odp->umem.length) *' (aka 'unsigned int *')) > [-Werror,-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types] > if (check_add_overflow(umem_odp->umem.address, > ^~ > include/linux/overflow.h:59:15: note: expanded from macro 'check_add_overflow' > (void) (&__a == &__b); \ > ^ > > As size_t is always the same length as unsigned long in all supported > architectures, change the structure definition to use the unsigned long > type for both. > > Fixes: 204e3e5630c5 ("RDMA/odp: Check for overflow when computing the > umem_odp end") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > include/rdma/ib_umem.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Hi Arnd, I had slightly different fix in my submission queue, which I think is better because it leaves length to be size_t. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20190908080726.30017-1-l...@kernel.org/T/#u Thanks
[PATCH] ib_umem: fix type mismatch
On some 32-bit architectures, size_t is defined as 'int' rather than 'long', causing a harmless warning: drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c:220:7: error: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (umem_odp->umem.address) *' (aka 'unsigned long *') and 'typeof (umem_odp->umem.length) *' (aka 'unsigned int *')) [-Werror,-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types] if (check_add_overflow(umem_odp->umem.address, ^~ include/linux/overflow.h:59:15: note: expanded from macro 'check_add_overflow' (void) (&__a == &__b); \ ^ As size_t is always the same length as unsigned long in all supported architectures, change the structure definition to use the unsigned long type for both. Fixes: 204e3e5630c5 ("RDMA/odp: Check for overflow when computing the umem_odp end") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- include/rdma/ib_umem.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_umem.h b/include/rdma/ib_umem.h index a91b2af64ec4..5dffe05402ef 100644 --- a/include/rdma/ib_umem.h +++ b/include/rdma/ib_umem.h @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct ib_umem_odp; struct ib_umem { struct ib_device *ibdev; struct mm_struct *owning_mm; - size_t length; + unsigned long length; unsigned long address; u32 writable : 1; u32 is_odp : 1; -- 2.20.0