Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Correct the nr_strict_isolated check for CMA
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:39:27AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block() > had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction: > Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1". > It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check > still fails and I missed that this fix was not picked up before RC1. This > same problem has been identified in 3.7-RC1 by Tony Prisk and should be > addressed by the following patch. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > Tested-by: Tony Prisk Acked-by: Minchan Kim -- Kind Regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Correct the nr_strict_isolated check for CMA
On 10/16/2012 04:39 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block() had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction: Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1". It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check still fails and I missed that this fix was not picked up before RC1. This same problem has been identified in 3.7-RC1 by Tony Prisk and should be addressed by the following patch. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Tested-by: Tony Prisk Acked-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] mm: compaction: Correct the nr_strict_isolated check for CMA
Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block() had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction: Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1". It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check still fails and I missed that this fix was not picked up before RC1. This same problem has been identified in 3.7-RC1 by Tony Prisk and should be addressed by the following patch. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Tested-by: Tony Prisk --- mm/compaction.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c index 2c4ce17..9eef558 100644 --- a/mm/compaction.c +++ b/mm/compaction.c @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, * pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is * returned and CMA will fail. */ - if (strict && nr_strict_required != total_isolated) + if (strict && nr_strict_required > total_isolated) total_isolated = 0; if (locked) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
