Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[David Miller]

From: Vegard Nossum 
Date: Thu,  7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200

> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
> see it fixed anyway.
> 
> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/666

As stated, I'm not applying this, and rather I am fixing this as
below:


[PATCH] decnet: Do not build routes to devices without decnet private data.

In particular, make sure we check for decnet private presence
for loopback devices.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
---
 net/decnet/dn_route.c | 9 -
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index 607a14f..b1dc096 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -1034,10 +1034,13 @@ source_ok:
if (!fld.daddr) {
fld.daddr = fld.saddr;
 
-   err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
if (dev_out)
dev_put(dev_out);
+   err = -EINVAL;
dev_out = init_net.loopback_dev;
+   if (!dev_out->dn_ptr)
+   goto out;
+   err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
dev_hold(dev_out);
if (!fld.daddr) {
fld.daddr =
@@ -1110,6 +1113,8 @@ source_ok:
if (dev_out == NULL)
goto out;
dn_db = rcu_dereference_raw(dev_out->dn_ptr);
+   if (!dn_db)
+   goto e_inval;
/* Possible improvement - check all devices for local addr */
if (dn_dev_islocal(dev_out, fld.daddr)) {
dev_put(dev_out);
@@ -1151,6 +1156,8 @@ select_source:
dev_put(dev_out);
dev_out = init_net.loopback_dev;
dev_hold(dev_out);
+   if (!dev_out->dn_ptr)
+   goto e_inval;
fld.flowidn_oif = dev_out->ifindex;
if (res.fi)
dn_fib_info_put(res.fi);
-- 
2.1.0

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[David Miller]

From: Vegard Nossum 
Date: Thu,  7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200

> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
> see it fixed anyway.
> 
> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/666

As stated, I'm not applying this, and rather I am fixing this as
below:


[PATCH] decnet: Do not build routes to devices without decnet private data.

In particular, make sure we check for decnet private presence
for loopback devices.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
---
 net/decnet/dn_route.c | 9 -
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index 607a14f..b1dc096 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -1034,10 +1034,13 @@ source_ok:
if (!fld.daddr) {
fld.daddr = fld.saddr;
 
-   err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
if (dev_out)
dev_put(dev_out);
+   err = -EINVAL;
dev_out = init_net.loopback_dev;
+   if (!dev_out->dn_ptr)
+   goto out;
+   err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
dev_hold(dev_out);
if (!fld.daddr) {
fld.daddr =
@@ -1110,6 +1113,8 @@ source_ok:
if (dev_out == NULL)
goto out;
dn_db = rcu_dereference_raw(dev_out->dn_ptr);
+   if (!dn_db)
+   goto e_inval;
/* Possible improvement - check all devices for local addr */
if (dn_dev_islocal(dev_out, fld.daddr)) {
dev_put(dev_out);
@@ -1151,6 +1156,8 @@ select_source:
dev_put(dev_out);
dev_out = init_net.loopback_dev;
dev_hold(dev_out);
+   if (!dev_out->dn_ptr)
+   goto e_inval;
fld.flowidn_oif = dev_out->ifindex;
if (res.fi)
dn_fib_info_put(res.fi);
-- 
2.1.0

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[David Miller]

From: One Thousand Gnomes 
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:01:20 +0100

> On Thu,  7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200
> Vegard Nossum  wrote:
> 
>> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
>> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
>> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
>> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
>> see it fixed anyway.
>> 
>> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
>> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
> 
> How about consigning it to staging at this point ?

Staging is a one way facility in my opinion.

I saw we just fix the NULL dereference.

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[David Miller]

From: One Thousand Gnomes 
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:01:20 +0100

> On Thu,  7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200
> Vegard Nossum  wrote:
> 
>> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
>> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
>> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
>> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
>> see it fixed anyway.
>> 
>> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
>> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
> 
> How about consigning it to staging at this point ?

Staging is a one way facility in my opinion.

I saw we just fix the NULL dereference.

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[One Thousand Gnomes]

On Thu,  7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200
Vegard Nossum  wrote:

> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
> see it fixed anyway.
> 
> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.

How about consigning it to staging at this point ?

Alan

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[One Thousand Gnomes]

On Thu,  7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200
Vegard Nossum  wrote:

> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
> see it fixed anyway.
> 
> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.

How about consigning it to staging at this point ?

Alan

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[James Cameron]

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:22:43AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
> see it fixed anyway.
> 
> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/666
> Cc: Eric Dumazet 
> Cc: Sasha Levin 
> Cc: David Miller 

Reviewed-by: James Cameron 

(An old DECnet application programmer from way back, ah what fun!)

> ---
>  net/decnet/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/decnet/Kconfig b/net/decnet/Kconfig
> index f3393e1..b040172 100644
> --- a/net/decnet/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/decnet/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #
>  config DECNET
>   tristate "DECnet Support"
> + depends on BROKEN
>   ---help---
> The DECnet networking protocol was used in many products made by
> Digital (now Compaq).  It provides reliable stream and sequenced

fwiw, then Compaq merged into HP.

> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/

Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[James Cameron]

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:22:43AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
> see it fixed anyway.
> 
> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/666
> Cc: Eric Dumazet 
> Cc: Sasha Levin 
> Cc: David Miller 

Reviewed-by: James Cameron 

(An old DECnet application programmer from way back, ah what fun!)

> ---
>  net/decnet/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/decnet/Kconfig b/net/decnet/Kconfig
> index f3393e1..b040172 100644
> --- a/net/decnet/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/decnet/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #
>  config DECNET
>   tristate "DECnet Support"
> + depends on BROKEN
>   ---help---
> The DECnet networking protocol was used in many products made by
> Digital (now Compaq).  It provides reliable stream and sequenced

fwiw, then Compaq merged into HP.

> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/

[PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[Vegard Nossum]

There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
see it fixed anyway.

To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/666
Cc: Eric Dumazet 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: David Miller 
---
 net/decnet/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/decnet/Kconfig b/net/decnet/Kconfig
index f3393e1..b040172 100644
--- a/net/decnet/Kconfig
+++ b/net/decnet/Kconfig
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #
 config DECNET
tristate "DECnet Support"
+   depends on BROKEN
---help---
  The DECnet networking protocol was used in many products made by
  Digital (now Compaq).  It provides reliable stream and sequenced
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken

[Vegard Nossum]

There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
see it fixed anyway.

To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/666
Cc: Eric Dumazet 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: David Miller 
---
 net/decnet/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/decnet/Kconfig b/net/decnet/Kconfig
index f3393e1..b040172 100644
--- a/net/decnet/Kconfig
+++ b/net/decnet/Kconfig
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #
 config DECNET
tristate "DECnet Support"
+   depends on BROKEN
---help---
  The DECnet networking protocol was used in many products made by
  Digital (now Compaq).  It provides reliable stream and sequenced
-- 
1.9.1