Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 14:33:41 Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:15:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
> > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
> > warns:
> > 
> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
> > 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
> > unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
> >dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> > 
> > This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
> > string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
> > the resource structure directly. I'm also swapping out the arguments
> > to match the text in the format string.
> > 
> 
> I agree the format change but not swapping out the arguments. Why do you have
> the feeling they are not matching the text?
> 
> Few lines before you have:
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
> atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
> 
> Each bank has its own irq line this is what I want to print with hwirq.
> Of course it assumes that interrupts are declared in the right order.

Sorry, my mistake. You are completely right and I don't know how I concluded
it was wrong. It's possible I got confused by the 'hwirq' string and thought
it could not refer to the resource, which is a virtual irq number rather than
a hwirq.

Anyway, I'll submit a new version with this fixup folded in:

@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
irq_set_handler_data(res->start, atmel_pioctrl);
-   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %pr: hwirq=%u\n", res, i);
+   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: irq=%pr\n", i, res);
}
 
atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 14:33:41 Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:15:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
> > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
> > warns:
> > 
> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
> > 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
> > unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
> >dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> > 
> > This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
> > string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
> > the resource structure directly. I'm also swapping out the arguments
> > to match the text in the format string.
> > 
> 
> I agree the format change but not swapping out the arguments. Why do you have
> the feeling they are not matching the text?
> 
> Few lines before you have:
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
> atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
> 
> Each bank has its own irq line this is what I want to print with hwirq.
> Of course it assumes that interrupts are declared in the right order.

Sorry, my mistake. You are completely right and I don't know how I concluded
it was wrong. It's possible I got confused by the 'hwirq' string and thought
it could not refer to the resource, which is a virtual irq number rather than
a hwirq.

Anyway, I'll submit a new version with this fixup folded in:

@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
irq_set_handler_data(res->start, atmel_pioctrl);
-   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %pr: hwirq=%u\n", res, i);
+   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: irq=%pr\n", i, res);
}
 
atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-17 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:15:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
> so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
> warns:
> 
> pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
> pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
> 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
> unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
>dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> 
> This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
> string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
> the resource structure directly. I'm also swapping out the arguments
> to match the text in the format string.
> 

I agree the format change but not swapping out the arguments. Why do you have
the feeling they are not matching the text?

Few lines before you have:
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;

Each bank has its own irq line this is what I want to print with hwirq.
Of course it assumes that interrupts are declared in the right order.

Regards

Ludovic

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> index 33edd07d9149..23217e990eaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
>   irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
>   irq_set_handler_data(res->start, atmel_pioctrl);
> - dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "bank %pr: hwirq=%u\n", res, i);
>   }
>  
>   atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-17 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:15:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
> so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
> warns:
> 
> pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
> pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
> 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
> unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
>dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> 
> This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
> string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
> the resource structure directly. I'm also swapping out the arguments
> to match the text in the format string.
> 

I agree the format change but not swapping out the arguments. Why do you have
the feeling they are not matching the text?

Few lines before you have:
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;

Each bank has its own irq line this is what I want to print with hwirq.
Of course it assumes that interrupts are declared in the right order.

Regards

Ludovic

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> index 33edd07d9149..23217e990eaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
>   irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
>   irq_set_handler_data(res->start, atmel_pioctrl);
> - dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "bank %pr: hwirq=%u\n", res, i);
>   }
>  
>   atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
warns:

pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);

This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
the resource structure directly. I'm also swapping out the arguments
to match the text in the format string.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
index 33edd07d9149..23217e990eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
irq_set_handler_data(res->start, atmel_pioctrl);
-   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
+   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %pr: hwirq=%u\n", res, i);
}
 
atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
warns:

pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);

This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
the resource structure directly. I'm also swapping out the arguments
to match the text in the format string.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
index 33edd07d9149..23217e990eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start;
irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
irq_set_handler_data(res->start, atmel_pioctrl);
-   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
+   dev_dbg(dev, "bank %pr: hwirq=%u\n", res, i);
}
 
atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/