RE: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks

2017-05-02 Thread Lofstedt, Marta


> -Original Message-
> From: keesc...@google.com [mailto:keesc...@google.com] On Behalf Of
> Kees Cook
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:22 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta 
> Cc: Chris Wilson ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Anton Vorontsov ; Colin Cross ;
> Luck, Tony ; Namhyung Kim 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
> 
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Lofstedt, Marta 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> >> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:53 AM
> >> To: Kees Cook 
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Anton Vorontsov
> ;
> >> Colin Cross ; Luck, Tony ;
> >> Lofstedt, Marta ; Namhyung Kim
> >> 
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode
> >> locks
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and
> >> > unlink (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves
> >> > possible future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right
> order.
> >>
> >> I have merged your for-next/pstore branch (which included this patch,
> >> so I hope I chose correctly ;) into our CI. That should exercise it
> >> on the machines that we originally found the lockdep splat.
> 
> That's the branch, yes, thanks!
> 
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Chris
> >>
> >
> > Chris, I tested this on drm-tip after you merged for-next/pstore.
> > EFI_VARS_PSTORE is enabled.
> > I deliberately cause kernel panic and reboot, but unfortunately that kernel
> doesn't reboot properly. On display I see a bunch of:
> > "Cleaning orphaned inode ...", but then kernel boot  is stuck.
> > I run this on a BDW NUCi5, which I have been using successfully with
> pstore-efi for weeks.
> > Fortunately I had some other pstore enabled kernels, so if I clean out
> /sys/fs/pstore/* with one of them I can boot above kernel again.
> 
> Hrmm... if you isolate this down to a different pstore issue, please let me
> know. I haven't seen filesystem corruption in my tests yet. :P
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
> -Kees


Hi Kees,

I can't reproduce above issue with your:
"
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git 
tags/pstore-v4.12-rc1

for you to fetch changes up to 3a7d2fd16c57a1ef47dc2891171514231c9c7c6e:

  pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks (2017-04-27 20:35:34 
-0700)"


BR,
Marta
 

> 
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security


Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks

2017-04-28 Thread Kees Cook
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Lofstedt, Marta
 wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:53 AM
>> To: Kees Cook 
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Anton Vorontsov ;
>> Colin Cross ; Luck, Tony ;
>> Lofstedt, Marta ; Namhyung Kim
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
>> > (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
>> > future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
>>
>> I have merged your for-next/pstore branch (which included this patch, so I
>> hope I chose correctly ;) into our CI. That should exercise it on the 
>> machines
>> that we originally found the lockdep splat.

That's the branch, yes, thanks!

>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Chris
>>
>
> Chris, I tested this on drm-tip after you merged for-next/pstore.
> EFI_VARS_PSTORE is enabled.
> I deliberately cause kernel panic and reboot, but unfortunately that kernel 
> doesn't reboot properly. On display I see a bunch of:
> "Cleaning orphaned inode ...", but then kernel boot  is stuck.
> I run this on a BDW NUCi5, which I have been using successfully with 
> pstore-efi for weeks.
> Fortunately I had some other pstore enabled kernels, so if I clean out 
> /sys/fs/pstore/* with one of them I can boot above kernel again.

Hrmm... if you isolate this down to a different pstore issue, please
let me know. I haven't seen filesystem corruption in my tests yet. :P

Thanks for testing!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security


RE: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks

2017-04-28 Thread Lofstedt, Marta


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:53 AM
> To: Kees Cook 
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Anton Vorontsov ;
> Colin Cross ; Luck, Tony ;
> Lofstedt, Marta ; Namhyung Kim
> 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
> 
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> > (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> > future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
> 
> I have merged your for-next/pstore branch (which included this patch, so I
> hope I chose correctly ;) into our CI. That should exercise it on the machines
> that we originally found the lockdep splat.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Chris
> 

Chris, I tested this on drm-tip after you merged for-next/pstore. 
EFI_VARS_PSTORE is enabled. 
I deliberately cause kernel panic and reboot, but unfortunately that kernel 
doesn't reboot properly. On display I see a bunch of:
"Cleaning orphaned inode ...", but then kernel boot  is stuck. 
I run this on a BDW NUCi5, which I have been using successfully with pstore-efi 
for weeks. 
Fortunately I had some other pstore enabled kernels, so if I clean out 
/sys/fs/pstore/* with one of them I can boot above kernel again.

BR,
Marta

> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks

2017-04-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.

I have merged your for-next/pstore branch (which included this patch,
so I hope I chose correctly ;) into our CI. That should exercise it on
the machines that we originally found the lockdep splat.

Thanks,
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks

2017-04-27 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi,

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Kees Cook  wrote:
> Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
>
> The lockdep warning could be triggered by unlinking a file in the
> pstore filesystem:
>
>   -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){++}:
>  lock_acquire+0xc9/0x220
>  down_write+0x3f/0x70
>  pstore_mkfile+0x1f4/0x460
>  pstore_get_records+0x17a/0x320
>  pstore_fill_super+0xa4/0xc0
>  mount_single+0x89/0xb0
>  pstore_mount+0x13/0x20
>  mount_fs+0xf/0x90
>  vfs_kern_mount+0x66/0x170
>  do_mount+0x190/0xd50
>  SyS_mount+0x90/0xd0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1
>
>   -> #0 (&psinfo->read_mutex){+.+.+.}:
>  __lock_acquire+0x1ac0/0x1bb0
>  lock_acquire+0xc9/0x220
>  __mutex_lock+0x6e/0x990
>  mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
>  pstore_unlink+0x3f/0xa0
>  vfs_unlink+0xb5/0x190
>  do_unlinkat+0x24c/0x2a0
>  SyS_unlinkat+0x16/0x30
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1
>
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0CPU1
> 
>lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14);
> lock(&psinfo->read_mutex);
> lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14);
>lock(&psinfo->read_mutex);
>
> Reported-by: Marta Lofstedt 
> Reported-by: Chris Wilson 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 

Looks good to me!

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim 

Thanks,
Namhyung


> ---
>  fs/pstore/inode.c| 37 +++--
>  fs/pstore/internal.h |  5 -
>  fs/pstore/platform.c | 10 +-
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/inode.c b/fs/pstore/inode.c
> index 06504b69575b..792a4e5f9226 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/inode.c
> @@ -311,9 +311,8 @@ bool pstore_is_mounted(void)
>   * Load it up with "size" bytes of data from "buf".
>   * Set the mtime & ctime to the date that this record was originally stored.
>   */
> -int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
> +int pstore_mkfile(struct dentry *root, struct pstore_record *record)
>  {
> -   struct dentry   *root = pstore_sb->s_root;
> struct dentry   *dentry;
> struct inode*inode;
> int rc = 0;
> @@ -322,6 +321,8 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
> unsigned long   flags;
> size_t  size = record->size + record->ecc_notice_size;
>
> +   WARN_ON(!inode_is_locked(d_inode(root)));
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&allpstore_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry(pos, &allpstore, list) {
> if (pos->record->type == record->type &&
> @@ -336,7 +337,7 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
> return rc;
>
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> -   inode = pstore_get_inode(pstore_sb);
> +   inode = pstore_get_inode(root->d_sb);
> if (!inode)
> goto fail;
> inode->i_mode = S_IFREG | 0444;
> @@ -394,11 +395,9 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
> break;
> }
>
> -   inode_lock(d_inode(root));
> -
> dentry = d_alloc_name(root, name);
> if (!dentry)
> -   goto fail_lockedalloc;
> +   goto fail_private;
>
> inode->i_size = private->total_size = size;
>
> @@ -413,12 +412,9 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
> list_add(&private->list, &allpstore);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&allpstore_lock, flags);
>
> -   inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
> -
> return 0;
>
> -fail_lockedalloc:
> -   inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
> +fail_private:
> free_pstore_private(private);
>  fail_alloc:
> iput(inode);
> @@ -427,6 +423,27 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
> return rc;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Read all the records from the persistent store. Create
> + * files in our filesystem.  Don't warn about -EEXIST errors
> + * when we are re-scanning the backing store looking to add new
> + * error records.
> + */
> +void pstore_get_records(int quiet)
> +{
> +   struct pstore_info *psi = psinfo;
> +   struct dentry *root;
> +
> +   if (!psi || !pstore_sb)
> +   return;
> +
> +   root = pstore_sb->s_root;
> +
> +   inode_lock(d_inode(root));
> +   pstore_get_backend_records(psi, root, quiet);
> +   inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
> +}
> +
>  static int pstore_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  {
> struct inode *inode;
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/internal.h b/fs/pstore/internal.h
> index af1df5a36d86..c416e653dc4f 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/pstore/inter

[PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks

2017-04-27 Thread Kees Cook
Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
(which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.

The lockdep warning could be triggered by unlinking a file in the
pstore filesystem:

  -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){++}:
 lock_acquire+0xc9/0x220
 down_write+0x3f/0x70
 pstore_mkfile+0x1f4/0x460
 pstore_get_records+0x17a/0x320
 pstore_fill_super+0xa4/0xc0
 mount_single+0x89/0xb0
 pstore_mount+0x13/0x20
 mount_fs+0xf/0x90
 vfs_kern_mount+0x66/0x170
 do_mount+0x190/0xd50
 SyS_mount+0x90/0xd0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1

  -> #0 (&psinfo->read_mutex){+.+.+.}:
 __lock_acquire+0x1ac0/0x1bb0
 lock_acquire+0xc9/0x220
 __mutex_lock+0x6e/0x990
 mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
 pstore_unlink+0x3f/0xa0
 vfs_unlink+0xb5/0x190
 do_unlinkat+0x24c/0x2a0
 SyS_unlinkat+0x16/0x30
 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0CPU1

   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14);
lock(&psinfo->read_mutex);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14);
   lock(&psinfo->read_mutex);

Reported-by: Marta Lofstedt 
Reported-by: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
---
 fs/pstore/inode.c| 37 +++--
 fs/pstore/internal.h |  5 -
 fs/pstore/platform.c | 10 +-
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pstore/inode.c b/fs/pstore/inode.c
index 06504b69575b..792a4e5f9226 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/inode.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/inode.c
@@ -311,9 +311,8 @@ bool pstore_is_mounted(void)
  * Load it up with "size" bytes of data from "buf".
  * Set the mtime & ctime to the date that this record was originally stored.
  */
-int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
+int pstore_mkfile(struct dentry *root, struct pstore_record *record)
 {
-   struct dentry   *root = pstore_sb->s_root;
struct dentry   *dentry;
struct inode*inode;
int rc = 0;
@@ -322,6 +321,8 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
unsigned long   flags;
size_t  size = record->size + record->ecc_notice_size;
 
+   WARN_ON(!inode_is_locked(d_inode(root)));
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&allpstore_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(pos, &allpstore, list) {
if (pos->record->type == record->type &&
@@ -336,7 +337,7 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
return rc;
 
rc = -ENOMEM;
-   inode = pstore_get_inode(pstore_sb);
+   inode = pstore_get_inode(root->d_sb);
if (!inode)
goto fail;
inode->i_mode = S_IFREG | 0444;
@@ -394,11 +395,9 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
break;
}
 
-   inode_lock(d_inode(root));
-
dentry = d_alloc_name(root, name);
if (!dentry)
-   goto fail_lockedalloc;
+   goto fail_private;
 
inode->i_size = private->total_size = size;
 
@@ -413,12 +412,9 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
list_add(&private->list, &allpstore);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&allpstore_lock, flags);
 
-   inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
-
return 0;
 
-fail_lockedalloc:
-   inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
+fail_private:
free_pstore_private(private);
 fail_alloc:
iput(inode);
@@ -427,6 +423,27 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record)
return rc;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Read all the records from the persistent store. Create
+ * files in our filesystem.  Don't warn about -EEXIST errors
+ * when we are re-scanning the backing store looking to add new
+ * error records.
+ */
+void pstore_get_records(int quiet)
+{
+   struct pstore_info *psi = psinfo;
+   struct dentry *root;
+
+   if (!psi || !pstore_sb)
+   return;
+
+   root = pstore_sb->s_root;
+
+   inode_lock(d_inode(root));
+   pstore_get_backend_records(psi, root, quiet);
+   inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
+}
+
 static int pstore_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 {
struct inode *inode;
diff --git a/fs/pstore/internal.h b/fs/pstore/internal.h
index af1df5a36d86..c416e653dc4f 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/internal.h
+++ b/fs/pstore/internal.h
@@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ extern struct pstore_info *psinfo;
 
 extern voidpstore_set_kmsg_bytes(int);
 extern voidpstore_get_records(int);
-extern int pstore_mkfile(struct pstore_record *record);
+extern voidpstore_get_backend_records(struct pstore_info *psi,
+  struct dentry *root, int quiet);
+extern int