Re: [PATCH] security/selinux/ss: fix misspellings using codespell tool
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:03 AM wrote: > > From: Xiong Zhenwu > > A typo is found out by codespell tool in 16th line of hashtab.c > > $ codespell ./security/selinux/ss/ > ./hashtab.c:16: rouding ==> rounding > > Fix a typo found by codespell. > > Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhenwu > --- > security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Merged, thanks. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
[PATCH] security/selinux/ss: fix misspellings using codespell tool
From: Xiong Zhenwu A typo is found out by codespell tool in 16th line of hashtab.c $ codespell ./security/selinux/ss/ ./hashtab.c:16: rouding ==> rounding Fix a typo found by codespell. Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhenwu --- security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c b/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c index 3881787ce492..b8f6b3e0a921 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *hashtab_node_cachep __ro_after_init; /* * Here we simply round the number of elements up to the nearest power of two. - * I tried also other options like rouding down or rounding to the closest + * I tried also other options like rounding down or rounding to the closest * power of two (up or down based on which is closer), but I was unable to * find any significant difference in lookup/insert performance that would * justify switching to a different (less intuitive) formula. It could be that -- 2.25.1
