Re: (subset)[PATCH 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: mx25l51245g, mx66l51235l and mx66l51235f

2021-04-11 Thread Tudor Ambarus 
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:20:29 +0300, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> mx25l51245g and mx66l51235l have the same flash ID. The flash
> detection returns the first entry in the flash_info array that
> matches the flash ID that was read, thus for the 0xc2201a ID,
> mx25l51245g was always hit, introducing a regression for
> mx66l51235l. Revert mx25l51245g addition. A solution for these
> flashes to coexist was proposed.
> 
> [...]

Applied to spi-nor/next, thanks!

[1/2] Revert "mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add support for mx25l51245g"
  https://git.kernel.org/mtd/c/46094049a49b

Best regards,
-- 
Tudor Ambarus

[PATCH 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: mx25l51245g, mx66l51235l and mx66l51235f

2021-04-02 Thread Tudor Ambarus 
mx25l51245g and mx66l51235l have the same flash ID. The flash
detection returns the first entry in the flash_info array that
matches the flash ID that was read, thus for the 0xc2201a ID,
mx25l51245g was always hit, introducing a regression for
mx66l51235l. Revert mx25l51245g addition. A solution for these
flashes to coexist was proposed.

According to macronix website, there is no mx66l51235l part number.
Rename the part to mx66l51235f.

The difference betwenn mx25l51245g and mx66l51235f flash_info entries
was that mx25l51245g also set SECT_4K. Both flashes support 4K erases,
but the 4K erase should be discovered when parsing BFPT, so there's
no need to set the explicit SECT_4K flag.

Tudor Ambarus (2):
  Revert "mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add support for mx25l51245g"
  mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Fix name for mx66l51235f

 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c | 5 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1