Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Michael Ellermanwrote: > Rob Herring writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every >>> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed >>> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of >>> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe >>> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to >>> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct >>> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. >>> >>> Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my >>> target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. >>> >>> PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with >>> all the dependencies is here[1]. >> >> PPC folks, any chance to test this? > > I got stuck on your %pOF conversion, which broke the vio.c code, because of: > > - if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, > "/ibm,platform-facilities")) > + if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, > "ibm,platform-facilities")) > > But full_name hasn't been changed yet. Ah, those lines need to be dropped from the %pOF conversion. I'll send a new version. What I was originally considering here was just: strcmp(kbasename(parent_node->full_name), "ibm,platform-facilities") That would work for "/foo/ibm,platform-facilities" too, but IMO validation of the DT is not the kernel's job (if it is, we're doing a horrible job). But in the end here, I decided to keep the existing full path matching as patch 1 does. > But patch 1 here should fix that, so I'll pull it all together and try > and get it tested. Thanks. Rob
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Rob Herring writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every >>> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed >>> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of >>> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe >>> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to >>> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct >>> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. >>> >>> Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my >>> target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. >>> >>> PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with >>> all the dependencies is here[1]. >> >> PPC folks, any chance to test this? > > I got stuck on your %pOF conversion, which broke the vio.c code, because of: > > - if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, > "/ibm,platform-facilities")) > + if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, > "ibm,platform-facilities")) > > But full_name hasn't been changed yet. Ah, those lines need to be dropped from the %pOF conversion. I'll send a new version. What I was originally considering here was just: strcmp(kbasename(parent_node->full_name), "ibm,platform-facilities") That would work for "/foo/ibm,platform-facilities" too, but IMO validation of the DT is not the kernel's job (if it is, we're doing a horrible job). But in the end here, I decided to keep the existing full path matching as patch 1 does. > But patch 1 here should fix that, so I'll pull it all together and try > and get it tested. Thanks. Rob
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
Rob Herringwrites: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every >> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed >> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of >> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe >> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to >> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct >> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. >> >> Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my >> target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. >> >> PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with >> all the dependencies is here[1]. > > PPC folks, any chance to test this? I got stuck on your %pOF conversion, which broke the vio.c code, because of: - if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, "/ibm,platform-facilities")) + if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, "ibm,platform-facilities")) But full_name hasn't been changed yet. But patch 1 here should fix that, so I'll pull it all together and try and get it tested. cheers
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
Rob Herring writes: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every >> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed >> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of >> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe >> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to >> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct >> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. >> >> Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my >> target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. >> >> PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with >> all the dependencies is here[1]. > > PPC folks, any chance to test this? I got stuck on your %pOF conversion, which broke the vio.c code, because of: - if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, "/ibm,platform-facilities")) + if (!strcmp(parent_node->full_name, "ibm,platform-facilities")) But full_name hasn't been changed yet. But patch 1 here should fix that, so I'll pull it all together and try and get it tested. cheers
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herringwrote: > This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every > DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed > with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of > remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe > there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to > only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct > resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. > > Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my > target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. > > PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with > all the dependencies is here[1]. PPC folks, any chance to test this? Rob
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every > DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed > with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of > remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe > there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to > only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct > resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. > > Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my > target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. > > PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with > all the dependencies is here[1]. PPC folks, any chance to test this? Rob
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Frank Rowandwrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 07/25/17 14:44, Rob Herring wrote: >> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every >> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed >> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of >> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe >> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to >> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct >> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. > > I added a new dependency on full_name in: > > [PATCH v4 3/3] of: overlay: add overlay symbols to live device tree > > You don't need to fix that -- I knew the removal of full_name was coming > and expected to adapt to that change when it came, so I'll take care of > it. It will probably take me two or three weeks to get to it, but that > shouldn't be a big deal since the affected code is a new feature that > is not yet used. Indeed, I had fixed up the print statements, but missed that. Thanks for the heads up. Rob
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 07/25/17 14:44, Rob Herring wrote: >> This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every >> DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed >> with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of >> remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe >> there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to >> only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct >> resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. > > I added a new dependency on full_name in: > > [PATCH v4 3/3] of: overlay: add overlay symbols to live device tree > > You don't need to fix that -- I knew the removal of full_name was coming > and expected to adapt to that change when it came, so I'll take care of > it. It will probably take me two or three weeks to get to it, but that > shouldn't be a big deal since the affected code is a new feature that > is not yet used. Indeed, I had fixed up the print statements, but missed that. Thanks for the heads up. Rob
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
Hi Rob, On 07/25/17 14:44, Rob Herring wrote: > This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every > DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed > with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of > remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe > there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to > only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct > resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. I added a new dependency on full_name in: [PATCH v4 3/3] of: overlay: add overlay symbols to live device tree You don't need to fix that -- I knew the removal of full_name was coming and expected to adapt to that change when it came, so I'll take care of it. It will probably take me two or three weeks to get to it, but that shouldn't be a big deal since the affected code is a new feature that is not yet used. -Frank > > Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my > target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. > > PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with > all the dependencies is here[1]. > > Rob > > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git dt-printf > > Rob Herring (4): > powerpc: pseries: vio: match parent nodes with of_find_node_by_path > powerpc: pseries: remove dlpar_attach_node dependency on full path > powerpc: pseries: only store the device node basename in full_name > of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c | 26 +++ > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c| 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c| 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 4 +- > drivers/of/fdt.c | 69 > +--- > 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) >
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
Hi Rob, On 07/25/17 14:44, Rob Herring wrote: > This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every > DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed > with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of > remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe > there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to > only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct > resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. I added a new dependency on full_name in: [PATCH v4 3/3] of: overlay: add overlay symbols to live device tree You don't need to fix that -- I knew the removal of full_name was coming and expected to adapt to that change when it came, so I'll take care of it. It will probably take me two or three weeks to get to it, but that shouldn't be a big deal since the affected code is a new feature that is not yet used. -Frank > > Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my > target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. > > PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with > all the dependencies is here[1]. > > Rob > > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git dt-printf > > Rob Herring (4): > powerpc: pseries: vio: match parent nodes with of_find_node_by_path > powerpc: pseries: remove dlpar_attach_node dependency on full path > powerpc: pseries: only store the device node basename in full_name > of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c | 26 +++ > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c| 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c| 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 4 +- > drivers/of/fdt.c | 69 > +--- > 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) >
[PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with all the dependencies is here[1]. Rob [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git dt-printf Rob Herring (4): powerpc: pseries: vio: match parent nodes with of_find_node_by_path powerpc: pseries: remove dlpar_attach_node dependency on full path powerpc: pseries: only store the device node basename in full_name of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c | 26 +++ arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c| 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c| 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 4 +- drivers/of/fdt.c | 69 +--- 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) -- 2.11.0
[PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name
This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with all the dependencies is here[1]. Rob [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git dt-printf Rob Herring (4): powerpc: pseries: vio: match parent nodes with of_find_node_by_path powerpc: pseries: remove dlpar_attach_node dependency on full path powerpc: pseries: only store the device node basename in full_name of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c | 26 +++ arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c| 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c| 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 4 +- drivers/of/fdt.c | 69 +--- 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) -- 2.11.0