Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:57:59 +0100
> Richard Weinberger  wrote:
> 
> > Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> > >>
> > >> Hi Yao,
> > >> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > >> achieve from this change.
> > >> Could you explain more?
> > > 
> > > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > > suitable and matchable.
> > > 
> > > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> > 
> > On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> > I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> > but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> > The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> > less efficient.
> 
> Indeed, you raised a good point. Having useless changes pollute git
> blame output may be problematic. Not sure I want to apply those patches
> anymore :-/.
> 
> Anyway, Yao, I'm sure you can find other usefull things to contribute.

OK, thanks for reviewing.

> 
> -- 
> Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:57:59 +0100
> Richard Weinberger  wrote:
> 
> > Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> > >>
> > >> Hi Yao,
> > >> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > >> achieve from this change.
> > >> Could you explain more?
> > > 
> > > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > > suitable and matchable.
> > > 
> > > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> > 
> > On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> > I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> > but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> > The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> > less efficient.
> 
> Indeed, you raised a good point. Having useless changes pollute git
> blame output may be problematic. Not sure I want to apply those patches
> anymore :-/.
> 
> Anyway, Yao, I'm sure you can find other usefull things to contribute.

OK, thanks for reviewing.

> 
> -- 
> Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Boris Brezillon 
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:57:59 +0100
Richard Weinberger  wrote:

> Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> >>
> >> Hi Yao,
> >> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> >> achieve from this change.
> >> Could you explain more?
> > 
> > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > suitable and matchable.
> > 
> > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> 
> On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> less efficient.

Indeed, you raised a good point. Having useless changes pollute git
blame output may be problematic. Not sure I want to apply those patches
anymore :-/.

Anyway, Yao, I'm sure you can find other usefull things to contribute.

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Boris Brezillon 
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:57:59 +0100
Richard Weinberger  wrote:

> Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> >>
> >> Hi Yao,
> >> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> >> achieve from this change.
> >> Could you explain more?
> > 
> > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > suitable and matchable.
> > 
> > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> 
> On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> less efficient.

Indeed, you raised a good point. Having useless changes pollute git
blame output may be problematic. Not sure I want to apply those patches
anymore :-/.

Anyway, Yao, I'm sure you can find other usefull things to contribute.

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:51:55AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Yao,
> 
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:31:53 +0800
> Yaowei Bai  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > ccing: Brian and Richard
> > > 
> > > Hi Yao,
> > > Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > > achieve from this change.
> > > Could you explain more?
> > 
> > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > suitable and matchable.
> > 
> > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> 
> At least be honest, and say this is for your patchcount statistics :P.
> I'm fine taking the NAND related ones, but please, next time find
> something more useful to submit.

That's very nice of you, thanks.

> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Boris
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Yang
> > > 
> > > On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > > >This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
> > > >readability, no other funcitonal changes.
> > > >
> > > >Yaowei Bai (5):
> > > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
> > > >  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:51:55AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Yao,
> 
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:31:53 +0800
> Yaowei Bai  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > ccing: Brian and Richard
> > > 
> > > Hi Yao,
> > > Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > > achieve from this change.
> > > Could you explain more?
> > 
> > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > suitable and matchable.
> > 
> > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> 
> At least be honest, and say this is for your patchcount statistics :P.
> I'm fine taking the NAND related ones, but please, next time find
> something more useful to submit.

That's very nice of you, thanks.

> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Boris
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Yang
> > > 
> > > On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > > >This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
> > > >readability, no other funcitonal changes.
> > > >
> > > >Yaowei Bai (5):
> > > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
> > > >   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
> > > >  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:57:59AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> >>
> >> Hi Yao,
> >> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> >> achieve from this change.
> >> Could you explain more?
> > 
> > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > suitable and matchable.
> > 
> > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> 
> On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> less efficient.

Working code doesn't mean perfect code. :-)

I still think this's a helpful change even though it's small, but
you make the decision to merge or drop it.

> 
> Thanks,
> //richard
>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:57:59AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> >>
> >> Hi Yao,
> >> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> >> achieve from this change.
> >> Could you explain more?
> > 
> > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > suitable and matchable.
> > 
> > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> 
> On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> less efficient.

Working code doesn't mean perfect code. :-)

I still think this's a helpful change even though it's small, but
you make the decision to merge or drop it.

> 
> Thanks,
> //richard
>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Richard Weinberger 
Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> ccing: Brian and Richard
>>
>> Hi Yao,
>> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
>> achieve from this change.
>> Could you explain more?
> 
> Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> suitable and matchable.
> 
> Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.

On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
less efficient.

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Richard Weinberger 
Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> ccing: Brian and Richard
>>
>> Hi Yao,
>> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
>> achieve from this change.
>> Could you explain more?
> 
> Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> suitable and matchable.
> 
> Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.

On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
less efficient.

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Boris Brezillon 
Hi Yao,

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:31:53 +0800
Yaowei Bai  wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > ccing: Brian and Richard
> > 
> > Hi Yao,
> > Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > achieve from this change.
> > Could you explain more?
> 
> Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> suitable and matchable.
> 
> Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.

At least be honest, and say this is for your patchcount statistics :P.
I'm fine taking the NAND related ones, but please, next time find
something more useful to submit.

Best Regards,

Boris

> 
> > 
> > Yang
> > 
> > On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > >This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
> > >readability, no other funcitonal changes.
> > >
> > >Yaowei Bai (5):
> > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean
> > >
> > >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
> > >  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
> > >  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > 
> 
> 



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Boris Brezillon 
Hi Yao,

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:31:53 +0800
Yaowei Bai  wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > ccing: Brian and Richard
> > 
> > Hi Yao,
> > Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > achieve from this change.
> > Could you explain more?
> 
> Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> suitable and matchable.
> 
> Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.

At least be honest, and say this is for your patchcount statistics :P.
I'm fine taking the NAND related ones, but please, next time find
something more useful to submit.

Best Regards,

Boris

> 
> > 
> > Yang
> > 
> > On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > >This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
> > >readability, no other funcitonal changes.
> > >
> > >Yaowei Bai (5):
> > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
> > >   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean
> > >
> > >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
> > >  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
> > >  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > 
> 
> 



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> ccing: Brian and Richard
> 
> Hi Yao,
> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> achieve from this change.
> Could you explain more?

Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
suitable and matchable.

Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.

> 
> Yang
> 
> On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> >This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
> >readability, no other funcitonal changes.
> >
> >Yaowei Bai (5):
> >   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean
> >
> >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
> >  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
> >  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-25 Thread Yaowei Bai 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> ccing: Brian and Richard
> 
> Hi Yao,
> Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> achieve from this change.
> Could you explain more?

Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
suitable and matchable.

Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.

> 
> Yang
> 
> On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> >This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
> >readability, no other funcitonal changes.
> >
> >Yaowei Bai (5):
> >   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
> >   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean
> >
> >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
> >  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
> >  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-24 Thread Dongsheng Yang 

ccing: Brian and Richard

Hi Yao,
Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can 
achieve from this change.

Could you explain more?

Yang

On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:

This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
readability, no other funcitonal changes.

Yaowei Bai (5):
   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean

  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-24 Thread Dongsheng Yang 

ccing: Brian and Richard

Hi Yao,
Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can 
achieve from this change.

Could you explain more?

Yang

On 03/25/2016 10:41 AM, Yaowei Bai wrote:

This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
readability, no other funcitonal changes.

Yaowei Bai (5):
   drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
   drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
   drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
   drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
   drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean

  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
  include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
  include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

[PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-24 Thread Yaowei Bai 
This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
readability, no other funcitonal changes.

Yaowei Bai (5):
  drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
  drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
  drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
  drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
  drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean

 drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
 include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

2016-03-24 Thread Yaowei Bai 
This series only make several funcitons return bool to improve
readability, no other funcitonal changes.

Yaowei Bai (5):
  drivers/mtd: mtd_is_partition can be boolean
  drivers/mtd: cfi_interleave_supported can be boolean
  drivers/mtd: map_bankwidth_supported can be boolean
  drivers/mtd: mtd_nand_has_bch can be boolean
  drivers/mtd/nand: nand_opcode_8bits can be boolean

 drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c  | 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/cfi.h| 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/map.h| 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/nand.h   | 6 +++---
 include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h   | 4 ++--
 include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1