Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:40:46 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote: > >> I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, > >> mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still > >> needed? > > > > Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since > > Mel's "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy > > linkages" patch. > > The series still isn't queued anywhere. Are you planning on resending > it again, or should it get picked up in a particular tree? The patches need a refresh and a retest please, including incorporation of Christoph's changelog modifications. And for gawd's sake, please stop using my google address! It messes me all up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, wrote: >>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There >>> are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland >>> ABIs. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. >>> >>> --- >>> KOSAKI Motohiro (6): >>> Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle >>> vma->vm_policy linkages" >>> mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing >>> mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() >>> mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() >>> mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in >>> alloc_pages_vma() >>> MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry >>> >>> MAINTAINERS|7 +++ >>> mm/mempolicy.c | 151 >>> >>> mm/shmem.c |9 ++-- >>> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, >> mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still >> needed? > > Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since > Mel's "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy > linkages" patch. The series still isn't queued anywhere. Are you planning on resending it again, or should it get picked up in a particular tree? josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote: On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote: From: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com Hi This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland ABIs. Thanks. changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. --- KOSAKI Motohiro (6): Revert mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma-vm_policy linkages mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma() MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry MAINTAINERS|7 +++ mm/mempolicy.c | 151 mm/shmem.c |9 ++-- 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still needed? Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since Mel's mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma-vm_policy linkages patch. The series still isn't queued anywhere. Are you planning on resending it again, or should it get picked up in a particular tree? josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:40:46 -0400 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still needed? Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since Mel's mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma-vm_policy linkages patch. The series still isn't queued anywhere. Are you planning on resending it again, or should it get picked up in a particular tree? The patches need a refresh and a retest please, including incorporation of Christoph's changelog modifications. And for gawd's sake, please stop using my google address! It messes me all up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, wrote: >> From: KOSAKI Motohiro >> >> Hi >> >> This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There >> are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland >> ABIs. >> >> Thanks. >> >> changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. >> >> --- >> KOSAKI Motohiro (6): >> Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle >> vma->vm_policy linkages" >> mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing >> mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() >> mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() >> mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in >> alloc_pages_vma() >> MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry >> >> MAINTAINERS|7 +++ >> mm/mempolicy.c | 151 >> >> mm/shmem.c |9 ++-- >> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, > mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still > needed? Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since Mel's "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages" patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote: From: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com Hi This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland ABIs. Thanks. changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. --- KOSAKI Motohiro (6): Revert mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma-vm_policy linkages mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma() MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry MAINTAINERS|7 +++ mm/mempolicy.c | 151 mm/shmem.c |9 ++-- 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still needed? Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since Mel's mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma-vm_policy linkages patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro > > Hi > > This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There > are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland > ABIs. > > Thanks. > > changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs. > > --- > KOSAKI Motohiro (6): > Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle > vma->vm_policy linkages" > mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing > mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() > mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() > mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in > alloc_pages_vma() > MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry > > MAINTAINERS|7 +++ > mm/mempolicy.c | 151 > > mm/shmem.c |9 ++-- > 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still needed? josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote: From: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com Hi This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland ABIs. Thanks. changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs. --- KOSAKI Motohiro (6): Revert mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma-vm_policy linkages mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma() MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry MAINTAINERS|7 +++ mm/mempolicy.c | 151 mm/shmem.c |9 ++-- 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still needed? josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
