[PATCH 0/6] Expose RPi4'd bootloader configuration

2020-12-15 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Soon to be released versions of RPi4's firmware will take of care
passing their bootloader's configuration to the OS by copying it into
memory and creating a reserved memory node in the board's DT. In order
to make use of this information, this series introduces a new generic
nvmem driver that maps reserved-memory nodes into nvmem devices.

An alternative approach, less nice IMO, would be to create a
platform-specific 'soc' driver.

Regards,
Nicolas

---

Nicolas Saenz Julienne (6):
  dt-bindings: nvmem: Add bindings for rmem driver
  nvmem: Add driver to expose reserved memory as nvmem
  ARM: dts: bcm2711: Add reserved memory template to hold firmware
configuration
  ARM: dts: bcm2711: Expose boot-loader configuration
  arm64: defconfig: Enable nvmem's rmem driver
  ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable nvmem's rmem driver

 .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/rmem.yaml   | 35 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dts | 25 +
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig   |  1 +
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig  |  1 +
 drivers/nvmem/Kconfig |  8 ++
 drivers/nvmem/Makefile|  2 +
 drivers/nvmem/rmem.c  | 92 +++
 7 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/rmem.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/nvmem/rmem.c

-- 
2.29.2



Re: [PATCH 0/6] Expose RPi4'd bootloader configuration

2020-12-15 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 16:56 +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Soon to be released versions of RPi4's firmware will take of care
> passing their bootloader's configuration to the OS by copying it into
> memory and creating a reserved memory node in the board's DT. In order
> to make use of this information, this series introduces a new generic
> nvmem driver that maps reserved-memory nodes into nvmem devices.
> 
> An alternative approach, less nice IMO, would be to create a
> platform-specific 'soc' driver.
> 
> Regards,
> Nicolas

There's a typo in the Subject, it should look like this:

'Expose RPi4's bootloader configuration'

Regards,
Nicolas



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [PATCH 0/6] Expose RPi4'd bootloader configuration

2020-12-15 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Soon to be released versions of RPi4's firmware will take of care
> passing their bootloader's configuration to the OS by copying it into
> memory and creating a reserved memory node in the board's DT. In order
> to make use of this information, this series introduces a new generic
> nvmem driver that maps reserved-memory nodes into nvmem devices.
> 
> An alternative approach, less nice IMO, would be to create a
> platform-specific 'soc' driver.

What kind of information is this and how would the kernel use it?

-- 
Catalin


Re: [PATCH 0/6] Expose RPi4'd bootloader configuration

2020-12-15 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Hi Catalin,

On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 18:44 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Soon to be released versions of RPi4's firmware will take of care
> > passing their bootloader's configuration to the OS by copying it into
> > memory and creating a reserved memory node in the board's DT. In order
> > to make use of this information, this series introduces a new generic
> > nvmem driver that maps reserved-memory nodes into nvmem devices.
> > 
> > An alternative approach, less nice IMO, would be to create a
> > platform-specific 'soc' driver.
> 
> What kind of information is this and how would the kernel use it?

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, the ultimate goal is to use this information from
user-space, through nvmem's sysfs interface. The kernel itself has no use for
it.

Regards,
Nicolas



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [PATCH 0/6] Expose RPi4'd bootloader configuration

2020-12-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:01 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
 wrote:
>
> Hi Catalin,
>
> On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 18:44 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > Soon to be released versions of RPi4's firmware will take of care
> > > passing their bootloader's configuration to the OS by copying it into
> > > memory and creating a reserved memory node in the board's DT. In order
> > > to make use of this information, this series introduces a new generic
> > > nvmem driver that maps reserved-memory nodes into nvmem devices.
> > >
> > > An alternative approach, less nice IMO, would be to create a
> > > platform-specific 'soc' driver.
> >
> > What kind of information is this and how would the kernel use it?
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, the ultimate goal is to use this information 
> from
> user-space, through nvmem's sysfs interface. The kernel itself has no use for
> it.

That still leaves the first question.

Rob


Re: [PATCH 0/6] Expose RPi4'd bootloader configuration

2020-12-15 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Hi Rob, thanks for having a look at this.

On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 13:54 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:01 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
>  wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Catalin,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 18:44 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > > Soon to be released versions of RPi4's firmware will take of care
> > > > passing their bootloader's configuration to the OS by copying it into
> > > > memory and creating a reserved memory node in the board's DT. In order
> > > > to make use of this information, this series introduces a new generic
> > > > nvmem driver that maps reserved-memory nodes into nvmem devices.
> > > > 
> > > > An alternative approach, less nice IMO, would be to create a
> > > > platform-specific 'soc' driver.
> > > 
> > > What kind of information is this and how would the kernel use it?
> > 
> > Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, the ultimate goal is to use this information 
> > from
> > user-space, through nvmem's sysfs interface. The kernel itself has no use 
> > for
> > it.
> 
> That still leaves the first question.

It's the bootloader configuration, stuff like boot order, TFTP IP, etc... See
more here:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/bcm2711_bootloader_config.md

I'll add a new paragraph explaining all this on next version's cover letter.

Regards,
Nicolas



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part