Re: [PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-21 Thread Guenter Roeck

On 09/18/2013 09:23 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare 
Cc: Guenter Roeck 
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 


Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-21 Thread Guenter Roeck

On 09/18/2013 09:23 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com


Acked-by: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-18 Thread Eduardo Valentin
This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare 
Cc: Guenter Roeck 
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
---
 drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 19 +++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
---
Hi Guenter,

Very minor change, removing comment, as requested.

Eduardo

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
index d7b47ab..6748b45 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
+#include 
 
 #defineDRIVER_NAME "tmp102"
 
@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@
 
 struct tmp102 {
struct device *hwmon_dev;
+   struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct mutex lock;
u16 config_orig;
unsigned long last_update;
@@ -93,6 +96,15 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct i2c_client 
*client)
return tmp102;
 }
 
+static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
+{
+   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
+
+   *temp = tmp102->temp[0];
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
 static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -204,6 +216,12 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto fail_remove_sysfs;
}
 
+   tmp102->tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(>dev, 0,
+>dev,
+tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
+   if (IS_ERR(tmp102->tz))
+   tmp102->tz = NULL;
+
dev_info(>dev, "initialized\n");
 
return 0;
@@ -220,6 +238,7 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
+   thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(>dev, tmp102->tz);
hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102->hwmon_dev);
sysfs_remove_group(>dev.kobj, _attr_group);
 
-- 
1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-18 Thread Eduardo Valentin
This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com
---
 drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 19 +++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
---
Hi Guenter,

Very minor change, removing comment, as requested.

Eduardo

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
index d7b47ab..6748b45 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
 #include linux/mutex.h
 #include linux/device.h
 #include linux/jiffies.h
+#include linux/thermal.h
+#include linux/of.h
 
 #defineDRIVER_NAME tmp102
 
@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@
 
 struct tmp102 {
struct device *hwmon_dev;
+   struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct mutex lock;
u16 config_orig;
unsigned long last_update;
@@ -93,6 +96,15 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct i2c_client 
*client)
return tmp102;
 }
 
+static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
+{
+   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
+
+   *temp = tmp102-temp[0];
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
 static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -204,6 +216,12 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto fail_remove_sysfs;
}
 
+   tmp102-tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(client-dev, 0,
+client-dev,
+tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
+   if (IS_ERR(tmp102-tz))
+   tmp102-tz = NULL;
+
dev_info(client-dev, initialized\n);
 
return 0;
@@ -220,6 +238,7 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
+   thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(client-dev, tmp102-tz);
hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102-hwmon_dev);
sysfs_remove_group(client-dev.kobj, tmp102_attr_group);
 
-- 
1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-17 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 15-09-2013 19:33, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/15/2013 03:02 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
>> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
>> thermal framework.
>>
>> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
>> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
>> inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
>> will be the same.
>>
>> Cc: Jean Delvare 
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck 
>> Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 28 
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
>> index d7b47ab..e432444 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>>   #include 
>>   #include 
>>   #include 
>> +#include 
>> +#include 
>>
>>   #defineDRIVER_NAME "tmp102"
>>
>> @@ -50,6 +52,7 @@
>>
>>   struct tmp102 {
>>   struct device *hwmon_dev;
>> +struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>>   struct mutex lock;
>>   u16 config_orig;
>>   unsigned long last_update;
>> @@ -93,6 +96,19 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct
>> i2c_client *client)
>>   return tmp102;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
>> +{
>> +struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
>> +
>> +if (tmp102->temp[0] < 0)
>> +dev_warn(tmp102->hwmon_dev,
>> + "operating in negative temp: %d\n", tmp102->temp[0]);
>> +
> 
> Please drop this warning.
> 

Done for both drivers.

> Guenter
> 
>> +*temp = tmp102->temp[0];
>> +
>> +return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
>>   struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   char *buf)
>> @@ -204,6 +220,16 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>   goto fail_remove_sysfs;
>>   }
>>
>> +tmp102->tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(>dev, 0,
>> + >dev,
>> + tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
>> +if (IS_ERR(tmp102->tz)) {
>> +dev_warn(>dev,
>> + "Could not parse thermal data in device tree: %ld\n",
>> + PTR_ERR(tmp102->tz));
> 
> Please drop this warning. You already create error messages in
> thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(). That should be sufficient.
> The same applies to the lm75 patch.

OK. Done for both.

> 
> As a side note, I would suggest to provide devm_ functions for
> registration.
> We are introducing those for hwmon registration, which enables us to remove
> most _remove functions. It would be great if we can keep it that way.
> 

Right. This side note is taken. Actually this is on my todo list for
quite a while. But I believe this should not block this series, should
it? I will be probably cleaning the thermal framework code after this
current work is accepted at least.

> On a higher level, I don't think it is a good idea to make thermal zones
> and thermal zone data mandatory. Many systems may neither need nor want it.
> 

Well, I agree with you. Did you see something hard required in the patch
I sent. I made it so that it could continue the driver probe without
thermal zones, as you requested.


I will repost both patches in reply to our thread.

Eduardo

> Guenter
> 
>> +tmp102->tz = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>>   dev_info(>dev, "initialized\n");
>>
>>   return 0;
>> @@ -220,6 +246,8 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>   {
>>   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>
>> +/* thermal zone life cycle is not our responsibility */
>> +thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(>dev, tmp102->tz);
>>   hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102->hwmon_dev);
>>   sysfs_remove_group(>dev.kobj, _attr_group);
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-17 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 15-09-2013 19:33, Guenter Roeck wrote:
 On 09/15/2013 03:02 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
 This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
 to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
 thermal framework.

 The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
 describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
 inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
 will be the same.

 Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
 Cc: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
 Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com
 ---
   drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 28 
   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

 diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
 index d7b47ab..e432444 100644
 --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
 +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
 @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
   #include linux/mutex.h
   #include linux/device.h
   #include linux/jiffies.h
 +#include linux/thermal.h
 +#include linux/of.h

   #defineDRIVER_NAME tmp102

 @@ -50,6 +52,7 @@

   struct tmp102 {
   struct device *hwmon_dev;
 +struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
   struct mutex lock;
   u16 config_orig;
   unsigned long last_update;
 @@ -93,6 +96,19 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct
 i2c_client *client)
   return tmp102;
   }

 +static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
 +{
 +struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
 +
 +if (tmp102-temp[0]  0)
 +dev_warn(tmp102-hwmon_dev,
 + operating in negative temp: %d\n, tmp102-temp[0]);
 +
 
 Please drop this warning.
 

Done for both drivers.

 Guenter
 
 +*temp = tmp102-temp[0];
 +
 +return 0;
 +}
 +
   static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
   struct device_attribute *attr,
   char *buf)
 @@ -204,6 +220,16 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
   goto fail_remove_sysfs;
   }

 +tmp102-tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(client-dev, 0,
 + client-dev,
 + tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
 +if (IS_ERR(tmp102-tz)) {
 +dev_warn(client-dev,
 + Could not parse thermal data in device tree: %ld\n,
 + PTR_ERR(tmp102-tz));
 
 Please drop this warning. You already create error messages in
 thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(). That should be sufficient.
 The same applies to the lm75 patch.

OK. Done for both.

 
 As a side note, I would suggest to provide devm_ functions for
 registration.
 We are introducing those for hwmon registration, which enables us to remove
 most _remove functions. It would be great if we can keep it that way.
 

Right. This side note is taken. Actually this is on my todo list for
quite a while. But I believe this should not block this series, should
it? I will be probably cleaning the thermal framework code after this
current work is accepted at least.

 On a higher level, I don't think it is a good idea to make thermal zones
 and thermal zone data mandatory. Many systems may neither need nor want it.
 

Well, I agree with you. Did you see something hard required in the patch
I sent. I made it so that it could continue the driver probe without
thermal zones, as you requested.


I will repost both patches in reply to our thread.

Eduardo

 Guenter
 
 +tmp102-tz = NULL;
 +}
 +
   dev_info(client-dev, initialized\n);

   return 0;
 @@ -220,6 +246,8 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
   {
   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);

 +/* thermal zone life cycle is not our responsibility */
 +thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(client-dev, tmp102-tz);
   hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102-hwmon_dev);
   sysfs_remove_group(client-dev.kobj, tmp102_attr_group);


 
 
 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-15 Thread Guenter Roeck

On 09/15/2013 03:02 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare 
Cc: Guenter Roeck 
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
---
  drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 28 
  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
index d7b47ab..e432444 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
+#include 
+#include 

  #define   DRIVER_NAME "tmp102"

@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@

  struct tmp102 {
struct device *hwmon_dev;
+   struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct mutex lock;
u16 config_orig;
unsigned long last_update;
@@ -93,6 +96,19 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct i2c_client 
*client)
return tmp102;
  }

+static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
+{
+   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
+
+   if (tmp102->temp[0] < 0)
+   dev_warn(tmp102->hwmon_dev,
+"operating in negative temp: %d\n", tmp102->temp[0]);
+


Please drop this warning.

Guenter


+   *temp = tmp102->temp[0];
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
  static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -204,6 +220,16 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto fail_remove_sysfs;
}

+   tmp102->tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(>dev, 0,
+>dev,
+tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
+   if (IS_ERR(tmp102->tz)) {
+   dev_warn(>dev,
+"Could not parse thermal data in device tree: %ld\n",
+PTR_ERR(tmp102->tz));


Please drop this warning. You already create error messages in
thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(). That should be sufficient.
The same applies to the lm75 patch.

As a side note, I would suggest to provide devm_ functions for registration.
We are introducing those for hwmon registration, which enables us to remove
most _remove functions. It would be great if we can keep it that way.

On a higher level, I don't think it is a good idea to make thermal zones
and thermal zone data mandatory. Many systems may neither need nor want it.

Guenter


+   tmp102->tz = NULL;
+   }
+
dev_info(>dev, "initialized\n");

return 0;
@@ -220,6 +246,8 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
  {
struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);

+   /* thermal zone life cycle is not our responsibility */
+   thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(>dev, tmp102->tz);
hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102->hwmon_dev);
sysfs_remove_group(>dev.kobj, _attr_group);




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-15 Thread Eduardo Valentin
This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare 
Cc: Guenter Roeck 
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
---
 drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 28 
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
index d7b47ab..e432444 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
+#include 
 
 #defineDRIVER_NAME "tmp102"
 
@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@
 
 struct tmp102 {
struct device *hwmon_dev;
+   struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct mutex lock;
u16 config_orig;
unsigned long last_update;
@@ -93,6 +96,19 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct i2c_client 
*client)
return tmp102;
 }
 
+static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
+{
+   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
+
+   if (tmp102->temp[0] < 0)
+   dev_warn(tmp102->hwmon_dev,
+"operating in negative temp: %d\n", tmp102->temp[0]);
+
+   *temp = tmp102->temp[0];
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
 static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -204,6 +220,16 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto fail_remove_sysfs;
}
 
+   tmp102->tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(>dev, 0,
+>dev,
+tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
+   if (IS_ERR(tmp102->tz)) {
+   dev_warn(>dev,
+"Could not parse thermal data in device tree: %ld\n",
+PTR_ERR(tmp102->tz));
+   tmp102->tz = NULL;
+   }
+
dev_info(>dev, "initialized\n");
 
return 0;
@@ -220,6 +246,8 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
+   /* thermal zone life cycle is not our responsibility */
+   thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(>dev, tmp102->tz);
hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102->hwmon_dev);
sysfs_remove_group(>dev.kobj, _attr_group);
 
-- 
1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-15 Thread Eduardo Valentin
This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com
---
 drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 28 
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
index d7b47ab..e432444 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
 #include linux/mutex.h
 #include linux/device.h
 #include linux/jiffies.h
+#include linux/thermal.h
+#include linux/of.h
 
 #defineDRIVER_NAME tmp102
 
@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@
 
 struct tmp102 {
struct device *hwmon_dev;
+   struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct mutex lock;
u16 config_orig;
unsigned long last_update;
@@ -93,6 +96,19 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct i2c_client 
*client)
return tmp102;
 }
 
+static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
+{
+   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
+
+   if (tmp102-temp[0]  0)
+   dev_warn(tmp102-hwmon_dev,
+operating in negative temp: %d\n, tmp102-temp[0]);
+
+   *temp = tmp102-temp[0];
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
 static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -204,6 +220,16 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto fail_remove_sysfs;
}
 
+   tmp102-tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(client-dev, 0,
+client-dev,
+tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
+   if (IS_ERR(tmp102-tz)) {
+   dev_warn(client-dev,
+Could not parse thermal data in device tree: %ld\n,
+PTR_ERR(tmp102-tz));
+   tmp102-tz = NULL;
+   }
+
dev_info(client-dev, initialized\n);
 
return 0;
@@ -220,6 +246,8 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
+   /* thermal zone life cycle is not our responsibility */
+   thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(client-dev, tmp102-tz);
hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102-hwmon_dev);
sysfs_remove_group(client-dev.kobj, tmp102_attr_group);
 
-- 
1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 06/16] hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

2013-09-15 Thread Guenter Roeck

On 09/15/2013 03:02 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

This patch adds to tmp102 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the tmp102 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
Cc: lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com
---
  drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 28 
  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
index d7b47ab..e432444 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
  #include linux/mutex.h
  #include linux/device.h
  #include linux/jiffies.h
+#include linux/thermal.h
+#include linux/of.h

  #define   DRIVER_NAME tmp102

@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@

  struct tmp102 {
struct device *hwmon_dev;
+   struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct mutex lock;
u16 config_orig;
unsigned long last_update;
@@ -93,6 +96,19 @@ static struct tmp102 *tmp102_update_device(struct i2c_client 
*client)
return tmp102;
  }

+static int tmp102_read_temp(void *dev, long *temp)
+{
+   struct tmp102 *tmp102 = tmp102_update_device(to_i2c_client(dev));
+
+   if (tmp102-temp[0]  0)
+   dev_warn(tmp102-hwmon_dev,
+operating in negative temp: %d\n, tmp102-temp[0]);
+


Please drop this warning.

Guenter


+   *temp = tmp102-temp[0];
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
  static ssize_t tmp102_show_temp(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -204,6 +220,16 @@ static int tmp102_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto fail_remove_sysfs;
}

+   tmp102-tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(client-dev, 0,
+client-dev,
+tmp102_read_temp, NULL);
+   if (IS_ERR(tmp102-tz)) {
+   dev_warn(client-dev,
+Could not parse thermal data in device tree: %ld\n,
+PTR_ERR(tmp102-tz));


Please drop this warning. You already create error messages in
thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(). That should be sufficient.
The same applies to the lm75 patch.

As a side note, I would suggest to provide devm_ functions for registration.
We are introducing those for hwmon registration, which enables us to remove
most _remove functions. It would be great if we can keep it that way.

On a higher level, I don't think it is a good idea to make thermal zones
and thermal zone data mandatory. Many systems may neither need nor want it.

Guenter


+   tmp102-tz = NULL;
+   }
+
dev_info(client-dev, initialized\n);

return 0;
@@ -220,6 +246,8 @@ static int tmp102_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
  {
struct tmp102 *tmp102 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);

+   /* thermal zone life cycle is not our responsibility */
+   thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(client-dev, tmp102-tz);
hwmon_device_unregister(tmp102-hwmon_dev);
sysfs_remove_group(client-dev.kobj, tmp102_attr_group);




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/