Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Rename MFD and regulator names differently

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

2015-10-30 20:01 GMT+09:00 Alim Akhtar :
> Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
> and this MFD also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
> has the same name, which is a bit confusing.
>
> We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
> cells need to be named here [1].
> Based in the discussion this patch rename MFD regulator name as
> *-regulator instead of current *-pmic.
>
> [1]-> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/28/417
>
> Suggested-by: Lee Jones 
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar 
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/sec-core.c |8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Two comments from my side:
1. Lee already pointed issue with bisectability. This is a requirement.
2. What is missing in commit is the reason. Answer to question: Why?
The answer is in LKML discussion but it should be provided here - in
commit: because current naming is confusing and we want to sort it
out.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Rename MFD and regulator names differently

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:

> Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
> and this MFD also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
> has the same name, which is a bit confusing.
> 
> We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
> cells need to be named here [1].
> Based in the discussion this patch rename MFD regulator name as
> *-regulator instead of current *-pmic.
> 
> [1]-> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/28/417
> 
> Suggested-by: Lee Jones 
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar 
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/sec-core.c |8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

You need to squash these patches together, or you will hurt
bisectability for your platform.
  
But the code looks good:
  Acked-by: Lee Jones 

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> index 7c4e7be17f1e..c9802ba9be72 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s5m8767_devs[] = {
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = {
>   {
> - .name = "s2mps11-pmic",
> + .name = "s2mps11-regulator",
>   }, {
>   .name = "s2mps14-rtc",
>   }, {
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = {
> - { .name = "s2mps13-pmic", },
> + { .name = "s2mps13-regulator", },
>   { .name = "s2mps13-rtc", },
>   {
>   .name = "s2mps13-clk",
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = {
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mps14_devs[] = {
>   {
> - .name = "s2mps14-pmic",
> + .name = "s2mps14-regulator",
>   }, {
>   .name = "s2mps14-rtc",
>   }, {
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
>   {
> - .name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
> + .name = "s2mpu02-regulator",
>   },
>  };
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Rename MFD and regulator names differently

[Alim Akhtar]

Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
and this MFD also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
has the same name, which is a bit confusing.

We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
cells need to be named here [1].
Based in the discussion this patch rename MFD regulator name as
*-regulator instead of current *-pmic.

[1]-> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/28/417

Suggested-by: Lee Jones 
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar 
---
 drivers/mfd/sec-core.c |8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
index 7c4e7be17f1e..c9802ba9be72 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s5m8767_devs[] = {
 
 static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = {
{
-   .name = "s2mps11-pmic",
+   .name = "s2mps11-regulator",
}, {
.name = "s2mps14-rtc",
}, {
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = {
-   { .name = "s2mps13-pmic", },
+   { .name = "s2mps13-regulator", },
{ .name = "s2mps13-rtc", },
{
.name = "s2mps13-clk",
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = {
 
 static const struct mfd_cell s2mps14_devs[] = {
{
-   .name = "s2mps14-pmic",
+   .name = "s2mps14-regulator",
}, {
.name = "s2mps14-rtc",
}, {
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
 
 static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
{
-   .name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
+   .name = "s2mpu02-regulator",
},
 };
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/