Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 24/09/16 17:18, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
>> as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
> 
> Thanks for your positive response.
> 
> 
> Do you see any need to improve the software situation around
> the macro "BITS_TO_LONGS" further?
> 
> Do you fiddle with a programming interface like "bitmap_alloc" occasionally?
It might be clearer than having an array allocation as we do after this
patch. Obviously the representation is an array, but it is a little ugly
as it stands!
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 



Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 24/09/16 17:18, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
>> as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
> 
> Thanks for your positive response.
> 
> 
> Do you see any need to improve the software situation around
> the macro "BITS_TO_LONGS" further?
> 
> Do you fiddle with a programming interface like "bitmap_alloc" occasionally?
It might be clearer than having an array allocation as we do after this
patch. Obviously the representation is an array, but it is a little ugly
as it stands!
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 



Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
> as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks for your positive response.


Do you see any need to improve the software situation around
the macro "BITS_TO_LONGS" further?

Do you fiddle with a programming interface like "bitmap_alloc" occasionally?

Regards,
Markus


Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
> as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks for your positive response.


Do you see any need to improve the software situation around
the macro "BITS_TO_LONGS" further?

Do you fiddle with a programming interface like "bitmap_alloc" occasionally?

Regards,
Markus


Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 24/09/16 07:24, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring 
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:30:32 +0200
> 
> A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring 
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 7 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c 
> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 49bf9c5..7a4d9499 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -307,10 +307,9 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>   const unsigned long *mask;
>   unsigned long *trialmask;
>  
> - trialmask = kmalloc(sizeof(*trialmask)*
> - BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> + trialmask = kmalloc_array(BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
> +   sizeof(*trialmask),
> +   GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (trialmask == NULL)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>   if (!indio_dev->masklength) {
> 



Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 24/09/16 07:24, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring 
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:30:32 +0200
> 
> A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring 
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 7 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c 
> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 49bf9c5..7a4d9499 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -307,10 +307,9 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>   const unsigned long *mask;
>   unsigned long *trialmask;
>  
> - trialmask = kmalloc(sizeof(*trialmask)*
> - BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> + trialmask = kmalloc_array(BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
> +   sizeof(*trialmask),
> +   GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (trialmask == NULL)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>   if (!indio_dev->masklength) {
> 



[PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring 
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:30:32 +0200

A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring 
---
 drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 7 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c 
b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
index 49bf9c5..7a4d9499 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
@@ -307,10 +307,9 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
const unsigned long *mask;
unsigned long *trialmask;
 
-   trialmask = kmalloc(sizeof(*trialmask)*
-   BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
-   GFP_KERNEL);
-
+   trialmask = kmalloc_array(BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
+ sizeof(*trialmask),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (trialmask == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (!indio_dev->masklength) {
-- 
2.10.0



[PATCH 1/7] iio: Use kmalloc_array() in iio_scan_mask_set()

2016-09-24 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring 
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:30:32 +0200

A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring 
---
 drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 7 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c 
b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
index 49bf9c5..7a4d9499 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
@@ -307,10 +307,9 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
const unsigned long *mask;
unsigned long *trialmask;
 
-   trialmask = kmalloc(sizeof(*trialmask)*
-   BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
-   GFP_KERNEL);
-
+   trialmask = kmalloc_array(BITS_TO_LONGS(indio_dev->masklength),
+ sizeof(*trialmask),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (trialmask == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (!indio_dev->masklength) {
-- 
2.10.0