Re: [PATCH 12/16] cifs-use-mutex.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Roland Dreier
Thanks for resurrecting this.  My original email to the CIFS
maintainer got dropped somewhere, but I think this patch is probably
still a good idea.
-- 
Roland Dreier  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  GPG Key: 1024D/E0EEFAC0
Fingerprint: A89F B5E9 C185 F34D BD50  4009 37E2 25CC E0EE FAC0

 Sending >500KB attachments is forbidden by the Geneva Convention.
Your country may be at risk if you fail to comply.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 12/16] cifs-use-mutex.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt

Verbatim copy of original mail:

*>>>
>From http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/2/86

The recent change to "allow Windows blocking locks to be cancelled
via a CANCEL_LOCK call" introduced a new semaphore in struct
cifsFileInfo, lock_sem.  However, semaphores used as mutexes are
deprecated these days, and there's no reason to add a new one to the
kernel. Therefore, convert lock_sem to a struct mutex (and also fix
one indentation glitch on one of the lines changed anyway).

Compile tested only, since I don't use CIFS.

Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*<<<


My 2ยข:
Compile tested. Runtime tested. Did not break.

From: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 cifsglob.h |2 +-
 dir.c  |2 +-
 file.c |   14 +++---
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
===
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
/* lock scope id (0 if none) */
struct file * pfile; /* needed for writepage */
struct inode * pInode; /* needed for oplock break */
-   struct semaphore lock_sem;
+   struct mutex lock_mutex;
struct list_head llist; /* list of byte range locks we have. */
unsigned closePend:1;   /* file is marked to close */
unsigned invalidHandle:1;  /* file closed via session abend */
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/fs/cifs/dir.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/fs/cifs/dir.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/fs/cifs/dir.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ cifs_create(struct inode *inode, struct 
pCifsFile->invalidHandle = FALSE;
pCifsFile->closePend = FALSE;
init_MUTEX(&pCifsFile->fh_sem);
-   init_MUTEX(&pCifsFile->lock_sem);
+   mutex_init(&pCifsFile->lock_mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pCifsFile->llist);
atomic_set(&pCifsFile->wrtPending,0);
 
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/fs/cifs/file.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static inline struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_
private_data->netfid = netfid;
private_data->pid = current->tgid;  
init_MUTEX(&private_data->fh_sem);
-   init_MUTEX(&private_data->lock_sem);
+   mutex_init(&private_data->lock_mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&private_data->llist);
private_data->pfile = file; /* needed for writepage */
private_data->pInode = inode;
@@ -508,12 +508,12 @@ int cifs_close(struct inode *inode, stru
 
/* Delete any outstanding lock records.
   We'll lose them when the file is closed anyway. */
-   down(&pSMBFile->lock_sem);
+   mutex_lock(&pSMBFile->lock_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &pSMBFile->llist, llist) {
list_del(&li->llist);
kfree(li);
}
-   up(&pSMBFile->lock_sem);
+   mutex_unlock(&pSMBFile->lock_mutex);
 
write_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
list_del(&pSMBFile->flist);
@@ -598,9 +598,9 @@ static int store_file_lock(struct cifsFi
li->offset = offset;
li->length = len;
li->type = lockType;
-   down(&fid->lock_sem);
+   mutex_lock(&fid->lock_mutex);
list_add(&li->llist, &fid->llist);
-   up(&fid->lock_sem);
+   mutex_unlock(&fid->lock_mutex);
return 0;
 }
 
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd
struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
 
rc = 0;
-   down(&fid->lock_sem);
+   mutex_lock(&fid->lock_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &fid->llist, llist) {
if (pfLock->fl_start <= li->offset &&
length >= li->length) {
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd
kfree(li);
}
}
-   up(&fid->lock_sem);
+   mutex_unlock(&fid->lock_mutex);
}
}
 
#
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/