On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:43:38 -0800
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> invalidate_inode_pages2() should not try to fix races between direct_IO and
> mmap(). It should only be trying to clear out pages that were dirty before
> the direct_IO write (see generic_file_direct_IO()).
> Skipping dirty pages should therefore not result in an error.
>
This change worries me. It's a very bad situation if we leave dirty
pagecache sitting over a piece of the file which is about to be either read
or written via direct-IO. As far as the application is concerned, it
pretty much guarantees impending data corruption and I do think we need to
tell the application the bad news and not just pretend that things are all
OK.
What problem are we trying to fix here?
> ---
>
> mm/truncate.c |8 +---
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
> index 0f4b6d1..c3ff820 100644
> --- a/mm/truncate.c
> +++ b/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -318,6 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_mapping_pages);
> * invalidation guarantees, and cannot afford to leave pages behind because
> * shrink_list() has a temp ref on them, or because they're transiently
> sitting
> * in the lru_cache_add() pagevecs.
> + * Note: this function just skips pages that are dirty without flagging
> + * an error.
> */
> static int
> invalidate_complete_page2(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
> @@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ invalidate_complete_page2(struct address
>
> write_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> if (PageDirty(page))
> - goto failed;
> + goto dirty;
>
> BUG_ON(PagePrivate(page));
> __remove_from_page_cache(page);
> @@ -338,9 +340,9 @@ invalidate_complete_page2(struct address
> ClearPageUptodate(page);
> page_cache_release(page); /* pagecache ref */
> return 1;
> -failed:
> +dirty:
> write_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> - return 0;
> + return 1;
> }
>
> static int do_launder_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
