[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue
Error: trailing statements should be on next line
Signed-off-by: Balavasu
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
@@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void)
char *s;
s = getenv("LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT");
- if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
/* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */
check_routers_before_use = 1;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue Error: trailing statements should be on next line Signed-off-by: Balavasu kp.balav...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c @@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void) char *s; s = getenv(LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT); - if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); /* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */ check_routers_before_use = 1; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue
Error: trailing statements should be on next line
Signed-off-by: Balavasu kuppusammyprathaban
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
@@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void)
char *s;
s = getenv("LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT");
- if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
/* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */
check_routers_before_use = 1;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue
Error: trailing statements should be on next line
Signed-off-by: Balavasu
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
@@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void)
char *s;
s = getenv("LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT");
- if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
/* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */
check_routers_before_use = 1;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue Error: trailing statements should be on next line Signed-off-by: Balavasu kp.balav...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c @@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void) char *s; s = getenv(LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT); - if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); /* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */ check_routers_before_use = 1; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue Error: trailing statements should be on next line Signed-off-by: Balavasu kuppusammyprathabankp.balav...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c @@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void) char *s; s = getenv(LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT); - if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); /* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */ check_routers_before_use = 1; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:50:40PM +0530, Balavasu wrote: > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue > Error: trailing statements should be on next line > > Signed-off-by: Balavasu > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Same comments as 1/2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue
Error: trailing statements should be on next line
Signed-off-by: Balavasu
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
@@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void)
char *s;
s = getenv("LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT");
- if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ router_ping_timeout = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ live_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
s = getenv("LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL");
- if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
+ if (s != NULL)
+ dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s);
/* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */
check_routers_before_use = 1;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue Error: trailing statements should be on next line Signed-off-by: Balavasu kp.balav...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c index cdeb246..0f569a0 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c @@ -1670,13 +1670,16 @@ lnet_get_tunables (void) char *s; s = getenv(LNET_ROUTER_PING_TIMEOUT); - if (s != NULL) router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + router_ping_timeout = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_LIVE_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + live_router_check_interval = atoi(s); s = getenv(LNET_DEAD_ROUTER_CHECK_INTERVAL); - if (s != NULL) dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); + if (s != NULL) + dead_router_check_interval = atoi(s); /* This replaces old lnd_notify mechanism */ check_routers_before_use = 1; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: trailing statements should be on next line
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:50:40PM +0530, Balavasu wrote: This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue Error: trailing statements should be on next line Signed-off-by: Balavasu kp.balav...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Same comments as 1/2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
